Skip to main content
Log in

The Impact of the Composition and Location of Thermal Insulation in the Building Envelope on Energy Consumption in Low-Rise Residential Buildings in Hot Climate Regions

  • Research Article-Civil Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As global temperatures rise as a result of climate change, there is an urgent need to find ways to keep buildings cool without increasing energy demand, especially in the residential sector. This is especially true in hot climate regions, where demand for air-conditioning drives high household electricity consumption rates, and, in some cases, overburdens the energy supply. This study evaluates the impact of thermal insulation type, thickness, and location on reducing the annual energy consumption in a representative low-rise residential building in Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia, using the DesignBuilder energy simulation tool. The most effective materials and locations are identified, and the life cycle cost model is used to establish the optimum thickness in each location. Reductions in energy demand, CO2 emissions, and cost savings are also calculated, and these are shown to exceed those made by applying current Saudi building standards. The findings reveal that applying the optimal thickness of thermal insulation to the walls and roof of a two-storey villa significantly enhances its thermal performance and reduces total costs, cutting overall energy consumption, and carbon emissions by up to 42.5% compared with the base case model, with a cost savings of 33% over 30 years, life cycle savings of 86.1 USD/m2, and a payback period of 7.98 years. This study demonstrates the positive impacts of thermal insulation from both an environmental and an economic perspective, with the aim of increasing its application. Its findings are immediately applicable in other hot-arid regions, notably other Gulf states, and its focus on the importance of ensuring that building regulations that mandate thermal insulation are properly enforced gives it wider relevance in other climate regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DWS:

Double wall system

EIFS:

External insulation and finish system

IIFS:

Internal insulation and finish system

HVAC:

Heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning

WWR:

Window-to-wall ratio

SEEC:

Saudi Energy Efficiency Centre

SBC:

Saudi Building Code

SEC:

Saudi Electricity Company

SBC602:

Saudi Energy Conservation Code

DB:

DesignBuilder

BPS:

Building performance simulation

BEMs:

Building energy models

FEMP:

Federal Energy Management Program

ASHRAE:

The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers

IPVMP:

International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol

NMBE:

Normalised mean bias error

CV(RMSE):

Coefficient of variation of the root-mean-square error

R 2 :

Coefficient of determination

XPS:

Polystyrene

PUR:

Polyurethane

SASO:

Saudi Standards, Metrology, and Quality Organization

EUI:

Energy use intensity

LCC:

Life cycle cost

References

  1. Almazroui, M.; Islam, M.N.; Saeed, S.; Saeed, F.; Ismail, M.: Future changes in climate over the Arabian Peninsula based on CMIP6 multimodel simulations. Earth Syst. Environ. 4, 611–630 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Esmaeil, K.K.; Alshitawi, M.S.; Almasri, R.A.: Analysis of energy consumption pattern in Saudi Arabia’s residential buildings with specific reference to Qassim region. Energy Effiic. 12, 2123–2145 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-019-09806-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alardhi, A.; Alaboodi, A.; Almasri, R.: Impact of the new Saudi energy conservation code on Saudi Arabia residential buildings. Aust. J. Mech. Eng. 20, 1–15 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. EIA: Energy Information Administration, International Energy Outlook 2016 with Projection to 2040, DOE/EIA- 0484, (2016). Available Online www.eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/pdf/0484(2016).pdf. [Accessed 10 Apr 2023]

  5. Felimban, A.; Prieto, A.; Knaack, U.; Klein, T.; Qaffas, Y.: Assessment of current energy consumption in residential buildings in Jeddah Saudi Arabia. Buildings 9, 163 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9070163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abd-ur-Rehman, H.M.; Al-Sulaiman, F.A.; Mehmood, A.; Shakir, S.; Umer, M.: The potential of energy savings and the prospects of cleaner energy production by solar energy integration in the residential buildings of Saudi Arabia. J. Clean. Prod. 183, 1122–1130 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. SEEC: Saudi Energy Efficiency Centre. Annual Report, (2018). On-line available at: https://www.seec.gov.sa/en/media-center/annual-report/ [Accessed on 10 April 2023]

  8. Hijazi, J.; Howieson, S.: Displacing air conditioning in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: an evaluation of ‘fabric first’ design integrated with hybrid night radiant and ground pipe cooling systems. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 39, 377–390 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. KAPSARC: Saudi Arabia Energy Report- King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Centre, (2020). (Available online at) https://www.kapsarc.org/research/publications/saudi-arabia-energy-report/ [Accessed 10 Apr 2023]

  10. Ozel, M.: Effect of wall orientation on the optimum insulation thickness by using a dynamic method. Appl. Energy 88(7), 2429–2435 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alyami, M.: An approach to enhancing energy performance in residential buildings in hot climate regions (The case of Saudi Arabia). PhD thesis, University of Nottingham, (2022)

  12. AlFaraidy, F.; Azzam, S.: Residential buildings thermal performance to comply with the energy conservation code of Saudi Arabia. Eng., Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 9(2), 3949–3954 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. SASO, ASTM E2110 Standard Terminology for Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems (EIFS), in Saudi Standards, Metrology and Quality Organization (SASO), (2011)

  14. ASTM, Standard Specification for Flat Fiber-Cement Sheets, C1186–08, ASTM International, (2016)

  15. BS British Standards, 476–7:1997- Fire Tests on Building Materials and Structures. Method of Test to Determine the Classification of the Surface Spread of Flame of Products, (1997)

  16. Alalouch, C.; Saleh, M.; Al-Saadi, S.: Energy-efficient house in the GCC region. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 216, 736–743 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Homoud, M.S.: The effectiveness of thermal insulation in different types of buildings in hot climates. J. Therm. Envel. Build. Sci. 27(3), 235–247 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Braulio-Gonzalo, M.; Bovea, M.D.: Environmental and cost performance of building’s envelope insulation materials to reduce energy demand: thickness optimisation. Energy Build. 150, 527–545 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Boermans, T.; Petersdorff, C.: U-Values. For better energy performance of buildings. ECOFYS for EURIMA (European Insulation Manufacturers Association). Ecofys Germany, (2007)

  20. Al Tamimi, N.: An optimum thermal insulation type and thickness for residential buildings in three different climatic regions of Saudi Arabia. Civil Eng. Archit. 9, 317–327 (2021). https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2021.090205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Alaidroos, A.; Krarti, M.: Optimal design of residential building envelope systems in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Energy Build. 86, 104–117 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Al-Sanea, S.A.; Zedan, M.F.: Improving thermal performance of building walls by optimizing insulation layer distribution and thickness for same thermal mass. Appl. Energy 88, 3113–3124 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Radhi, H.: Can envelope codes reduce electricity and CO2 emissions in different types of buildings in the hot climate of Bahrain? Energy 34, 205–215 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cheung, C.K.; Fuller, R.J.; Luther, M.B.: Energy-efficient envelope design for high-rise apartments. Energy Build. 37(1), 37–48 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Utama, A.; Gheewala, S.H.: Indonesian residential high-rise buildings: a life cycle energy assessment. Energy Build. 41, 1263–1268 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, J.W.; Jung, H.J.; Park, J.Y.; Lee, J.B.; Yoon, Y.: Optimization of building window system in Asian regions by analysing solar heat gain and daylighting elements. Renew. Energy 50, 522–531 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.07.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Alrashed, F.; Asif, M.: Climatic classifications of Saudi Arabia for building energy Modelling. Energy Procedia 75, 1425–1430 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ghabra, N.; Rodrigues, L.; Oldfield, P.: The impact of the building envelope on the energy efficiency of residential tall buildings in Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol. 12, 411–419 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li, Y.F.; Chow, W.K.: Optimum insulation-thickness for thermal and freezing protection. Appl. Energy 80, 23–33 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bojic, M.; Yik, F.; Leung, W.: Thermal insulation of cooled spaces in high rise residential buildings in Hong Kong. Energy Convers. Manage. 43, 165–183 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bolattürk, A.: Determination of optimum insulation thickness for building walls with respect to various fuels and climate zones in Turkey. Appl. Therm. Eng. 26, 1301–1309 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sisman, N.; Kahya, E.; Aras, N.; Aras, H.: Determination of optimum insulation thicknesses of the external walls and roof (ceiling) for Turkey’s different degree-day regions. Energy Policy 35, 5151–5155 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Feist, W.: Passive Houses in South West Europe. Passivhaus Institute, Rheinstraße 44/46, 336, (2009)

  34. Najim, K.B.: External load-bearing walls configuration of residential buildings in Iraq and their thermal performance and dynamic thermal behaviour. Energy Build. 84, 169–181 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Iranfar, M.; Muhy Al-din, S.: The cognition of the architectural styles role on thermal performance in houses of semi-arid climates: analysis of building envelope materials. Civil Eng. Archit. 8, 929–941 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Al-Sallal, K.A.: Comparison between polystyrene and fiberglass roof insulation in warm and cold climates. Renew. Energy 28(4), 603–611 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Çomaklı, K.; Yüksel, B.: Optimum insulation thickness of external walls for energy saving. Appl. Therm. Eng. 23(4), 473–479 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Al Surf, M.; Susilawati, C.; and Trigunarsayah, B.: The role of the Saudi government and The Saudi building code in implementing sustainable housing construction in Saudi Arabia, In: 20th Annual PRRES Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand, 19–22 January, (2014)

  39. SEEC, Saudi Energy Efficiency Center: Building Sector, (2021). Available online: https://www.seec.gov.sa/en/energy-sectors/buildings-sector/ [Accessed 30 Mar 2023]

  40. Aldossary, N.A.; Rezgui, Y.; Kwan, A.: Domestic energy consumption patterns in a hot and arid climate: a multiple-case study analysis. Renew. Energy 62, 369–378 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Asif, M.: Growth and sustainability trends in the buildings sector in the GCC region with particular reference to the KSA and UAE. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 55, 1267–1273 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Al-Homoud, M.S.; Krarti, M.: Energy efficiency of residential buildings in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia: review of status and future roadmap. J. Build. Eng. 36, 102143 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Alyami, M.; Omer, S.: Building energy performance simulation: a case study of modelling an existing residential building in Saudi Arabia. Environ. Res.: Infrastruct. Sustain. 1(3), 035001 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lahn, G.; Stevens, P.; Preston, F.: Saving Oil and Gas in the Gulf. Chatham House (The Royal Institute of International Affairs), London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  45. SBC602: Saudi Energy Conservation Code for Low-Rise (Residential) Buildings, Saudi Building Code National Committee, (2018), Available Online https://sbc.gov.sa/En/BC/Pages/buildingcode/BCHome.aspx [Accessed 25 Mar 2023]

  46. Meir, I.; Peeters, A.; Pearlmutter, D.; Halasah, S.; Garb, Y.; Davis, J.: Green buildings standards in MENA: an assessment of regional constraints, needs and trends. Adv. Build. Energy Res. 6, 173–211 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ghabra, N.: Energy efficient strategies for the building envelope of residential tall buildings in Saudi Arabia, PhD Thesis, (2017). Available online on: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/51738/1/Noura%20Ghabra_4198436_Final%20Thesis.pdf [Accessed 12 Feb 2023]

  48. Riyadh Development Authority, (2018). Online available at: https://riyadh.sa/en/city/l/AboutRiyadh/item/li/city/13522 [Accessed 06 Apr 2023]

  49. GAS: General Authority for Statistics, Housing Statistics Bulletin—Saudi Arabia (2019). Available Online at: https://www.stats.gov.sa/sites/default/files/nshr_hst_lmskn_lmntsf_m_2019.pdf [Accessed 15 Mar 2023]

  50. MoMRA: Ministry of Municipal and Rural Affairs in Saudi Arabia, (2017). [Online] Available from: https://www.momra.gov.sa/MediaCenter/Circulars/CircularsDisplay.aspx?CircularsID=262 [Accessed: 23 Jan 2023]

  51. MoMRA: Future Saudi Cities Programme City Profiles Series: Riyadh, Ministry of Municipal and Rural Affairs-United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). (2019), Available online at https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/03/riyadh.pdf [Accessed 19 Mar 2023]

  52. Krarti, M.; Aldubyan, M.; and Williams, E.: Residential building stock model for evaluating energy retrofit programs in Saudi Arabia, Energy, Volume 195, 116980, ISSN 0360–5442, (2020).

  53. Dabaieh, M.; Wanas, O.; Hegazy, M.A.; Johansson, E.: Reducing cooling demands in a hot dry climate: a simulation study for non-insulated passive cool roof thermal performance in residential buildings. Energy Build. 89, 142–152 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Coakley, D.; Raftery, P.; Molloy, P.: Calibration of whole building energy simulation models: detailed case study of a naturally ventilated building using hourly measured data, First Building Simulation and Optimization Conference. pp. 57–64, (2012)

  55. Macdonald, I.; Clarke, J.; and Strachan, P.: Assessing uncertainties in building simulation, Proceedings of building simulation, Kyoto, Japan. 2. (1999).

  56. Attia, S.: Building performance simulation tools: selection criteria and user survey, research based Report, 31 January (2010)

  57. Olaniyan, S.A.; Ayinla, A.K.; Odetoye, A.S.: Building envelope vis-à-vis indoor thermal discomfort in tropical design: how vulnerable are the constituent elements? Int. J. Sci., Environ. Technol. 2(5), 1370–1379 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Andarini, R.: The role of building thermal simulation for energy efficient building design. Energy Procedia 47, 217–226 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wahhaj, A.; Asif, M.; Alrashed, F.: Application of building performance simulation to design energy-efficient homes: case study from Saudi Arabia. Sustainability 11(21), 6048 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Beizaee, A.; Firth, S. K.A.: Comparison of calculated and subjective thermal comfort sensation in home and office environment. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4573.6327, (2011)

  61. Van den Brom, P.; Meijer, A.; Visscher, H.: Performance gaps in energy consumption: household groups and building characteristics. Build. Res. Inf. 46(1), 54–70 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kumar, R.: Research Methodology, 4th edn. SAGE Publications Ltd, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ruiz, G.R.; Bandera, C.F.: Validation of calibrated energy models: common errors. Energies 10, 1587 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/en10101587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Judkoff, R.; Wortman, D.; O’doherty, B.; and Burch, J.: Methodology for validating building energy analysis simulations; Technical Report; National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL): Golden, CO, USA, (2008)

  65. Salvalai, G.; Pfafferott, J.; Jacob, D.: Validation of a low-energy whole building simulation model. IBPSA-USA J. 4, 32–39 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Schiller, S. R.; Jump D.A.; Franconi, E.M.; StetzMand Geanacopoulos, A.: Guidelines: measurement and verification for federal energy projects Version 2.2 Technical Report, Washington, DC: US Department of Energy Federal Energy Management Program, (2000)

  67. Webster, L.; and Bradford, J.” Guidelines: measurement and verification for federal energy projects Version 3.0 Technical Report, Washington, DC: US Department of Energy Federal Energy Management Program, (2008)

  68. DOE, MV.: Guidelines: measurement and verification for performance-based contracts version 4.0. Federal Energy Management Program, (2015)

  69. IPMVP Committee, International performance measurement and verification protocol: concepts and options for determining energy and water savings Volume I Technical Report, Washington, DC: Efficiency Valuation Organization, (2002)

  70. Efficiency Valuation Organization, International performance measurement and verification protocol: concepts and options for determining energy and water savings Volume I Technical Report, Washington, DC: Efficiency Valuation Organization, (2012)

  71. Reddy, T.A.; Maor, I.; Jian, S.; Panjaporn, C.: Procedures for Reconciling Computer-Calculated Results with Measured Energy Data Technical Report. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning, Atlanta, GA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Robertson, J.; Polly, B.; and Collis, J.: Evaluation of automated model calibration techniques for residential building energy simulation; Technical Report, NREL Technical Report 5500-60127; National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL): Golden, CO, USA, (2013)

  73. Efficiency Valuation Organization, International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol: Concepts and Options for Determining Energy and Water Savings, Volume I; Technical Report; Efficiency Valuation Organization: Washington, DC, USA, (2010).

  74. SASO, Technical Regulation for Building Materials—Part 2: Insulation and Building Cladding Materials, Saudi Standards, Metrology and Quality Organization. Saudi Arabia, (2019)

  75. Al-Sanea, S.A.; Zedan, M.F.; Al-Hussain, S.N.: Effect of masonry material and surface absorptivity on critical thermal mass in insulated building walls. Appl. Energy 102, 1063–1070 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Ramin, H. and Karimi, H.: Optimum envelope design toward zero energy buildings in Iran. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 172, p. 16004). EDP Sciences, (2020).

  77. Terry, N.'; and Palmer, J.: Defining ‘Cost Effectiveness’ for Energy Efficiency Improvements in Buildings. Cambridge Energy. (2019) .Available at: https://www.climatexchange.org.uk/media/3611/defining-cost-effectiveness-for-energy-efficiency-improvements-in-buildings.pdf (Accessed 11 Feb 2023)

  78. Imam, A.A.; Al-Turki, Y.A.: Techno-economic feasibility assessment of grid-connected PV systems for residential buildings in Saudi Arabia—a case study. Sustainability 12(1), 262 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is thankful to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Najran University for funding this work under the Research Priorities and Najran Research funding programme (NU/NRP/SERC/12/6).

Funding

Najran University, NU/NRP/SERC/12/6, Mana Alyami.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mana Alyami.

Appendices

Appendix 1: External wall constructions for simulation

External wall

No. of layers

Description

System of installation

U-value (W/m2K)

Base case

3

25-mm stucco + 200-mm concrete hollow block + 20-mm cement plaster

2.146

EW 1-A

4

25-mm stucco + 50-mm XPS (Extruded) + 200-mm concrete hollow block + 20-mm cement plaster

EIFS

0.516

EW 1-B

4

25-mm stucco + 100-mm XPS (Extruded) + 200-mm concrete hollow block + 20-mm cement plaster

EIFS

0.246

EW 1-C

4

25-mm stucco + 100-mm EPS (Standard) + 200-mm concrete hollow block + 20-mm cement plaster

EIFS

0.337

EW 2-A

5

25-mm stucco + 150-mm concrete hollow block + 50-mm EPS (standard) + 100-mm concrete hollow block + 20-mm cement plaster

DWS

0.507

EW 2-B

5

25-mm stucco + 150-mm concrete hollow block + 100-mm EPS (standard) + 100-mm concrete hollow block + 20-mm cement plaster

DWS

0.310

EW 2-C

5

25-mm stucco + 150-mm concrete hollow block + 50-mm EPS (Standard) + 150-mm concrete hollow block + 20-mm cement plaster

DWS

0.481

EW 2-D

5

25-mm stucco + 150-mm concrete hollow block + 100-mm EPS (standard) + 150-mm concrete hollow block + 20-mm cement plaster

DWS

0.301

EW 3-A

5

25-mm stucco + 150-mm concrete hollow block + 50-mm XPS (Extruded) + 100-mm concrete hollow block + 20-mm cement plaster

DWS

0.418

EW 3-B

5

25-mm stucco + 150-mm concrete hollow block + 100-mm XPS (Extruded) + 100-mm concrete hollow block + 20-mm cement plaster

DWS

0.294

EW 3-C

5

25-mm stucco + 150-mm concrete hollow block + 50-mm XPS (Extruded) + 150-mm concrete hollow block + 20-mm cement plaster

DWS

0.401

EW 3-D

5

25-mm stucco + 150-mm concrete hollow block + 100-mm XPS (Extruded) + 150-mm concrete hollow block + 20-mm cement plaster

DWS

0.240

EW 4-A

5

25-mm stucco + 150-mm concrete hollow block + 50-mm rock wool + 150-mm concrete hollow block + 20-mm cement plaster

DWS

0.427

EW 4-B

5

25-mm stucco + 150-mm concrete hollow block + 100-mm rock wool + 100-mm concrete hollow block + 20-mm cement plaster

DWS

0.266

EW 4-C

5

25-mm stucco + 150-mm concrete hollow block + 100-mm PUR polyurethane rigid board + 100-mm concrete hollow block + 20-mm cement plaster

DWS

0.219

EW 5-A

4

25-mm stucco + 200-mm concrete hollow block + 100-mm XPS (Extruded) + 20-mm plaster

IIFS

0.252

EW 5-B

4

25-mm stucco + 200-mm concrete hollow block + 100-mm rock wool + 20-mm plaster

IIFS

0.273

EW 5-C

4

25-mm stucco + 200-mm concrete hollow block + 100-mm PUR polyurethane rigid board + 20-mm plaster

IIFS

0.232

EW 6

3

25-mm stucco + 250-mm AAC block + 20-mm plaster

Self-insulated

0.397

Appendix 2: Entire Envelope Insulation Thicknesses Analysis (Both Roof and Walls)

See Tables 13 and 14.

Table 13 Optimum insulation thickness identification for the entire building envelope using the XPS material for both roof and walls structures
Table 14 Optimum insulation thickness identification for the entire building envelope using the PUR material for the roof and XPS for walls structures

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alyami, M. The Impact of the Composition and Location of Thermal Insulation in the Building Envelope on Energy Consumption in Low-Rise Residential Buildings in Hot Climate Regions. Arab J Sci Eng 49, 5305–5351 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08366-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08366-8

Keywords

Navigation