Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm Based on Different Normalizations and Dimension Reduction Techniques

  • Research Article-Earth Sciences
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm is used to generate landslide susceptibility maps. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first time the ABC algorithm is applied as a classifier on landslide susceptibility mapping. Twelve features are considered as inputs for the ABC model in this research work. These features contain redundant and correlated information. Therefore, normalization and dimension reduction are applied in the pre-processing stage. Three different normalization methods are investigated, i.e. minimum and maximum (Min-Max), mean standard deviation (Mean-SD), and median and interquartile range (Med-IQR). Two dimensionality reduction techniques, i.e., principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical variate analysis (CVA), are utilized to deal with high-dimensional information and eliminate correlated information in the data. In total, six different schemes of input data based on the three normalization methods and two techniques of dimension reduction are applied to train the ABC model. There are a total of 382 landslide incidents occurred at various locations on Penang Island, out of which 255 are selected for training and remaining 127 are used for the validation purpose of the model. The model classification accuracies and receiver of characteristics (ROC) curve are applied to evaluate the model’s performance. The results show that the ABC model trained using Min-Max normalization and CVA scheme generates the best results among these six schemes. The landslide susceptibility maps generated in this research offer significant information for landslide risk management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cruden, D.M.: A simple definition of a landslide. Bullet. Int. Assoc. Eng. Geol. 43(1), 27–29 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02590167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Varnes, DJ.: Landslide hazard zonation : A review of principles and practice. Natural Hazards, \(3^{rd}\) edition, UNESCO Press, Paris, 64 pp. https://trid.trb.org/view/281932 (1984)

  3. Chen, W.; Xie, X.; Wang, J.; Pradhan, B.; Hong, H.; Bui, D.T.; Duan, Z.; Ma, J.: A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility. Catena 151, 147–160 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.11.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim Huat, B.; Ali, F.; Baker, DH.; Singh, H.; Omar, H.: Landslides in Malaysia : occurrences, assessment, analyses and remediation. Penerbitan Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor. http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/32542 (2008)

  5. Saro, L.; Woo, J.S.; Kwan-Young, O.; Moung-Jin, L.: The spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility applying artificial neural network and logistic regression models: A case study of Inje. Korea. Open Geosci. 8(1), 117–132 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2016-0010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsangaratos, P.; Benardos, A.: Estimating landslide susceptibility through a artificial neural network classifier. Natural Hazards 74(3), 1489–1516 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1245-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sassa, K.: 2006 Tokyo Action Plan–strengthening research and learning on landslides and related earth system disasters for global risk preparedness. Landslides 3, 361–369 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-006-0065-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Qasim, S.; Harahap, I.S.H.; Osman, S.B.S.: Causal factors of Malaysian landslides: a narrative study. Res. J. Appl. Sci., Eng. Technol. 5(7), 2303–2308 (2013). https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.5.4656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng, T.A.; Lateh, H.; Peng, KS.: Intelligence explanation system on landslide dissemination: a case study in Malaysia. In Proceedings of the first world landslide forum report: Implementing the 2006 Tokyo action plan on the international program on landslides (IPL), pp 581–584. http://www.iclhq.org/WLFweb/parallel_sessions.pdf (2006)

  10. Ting, W.H.: Stability of slopes in Malaysia. In Proceedings Symposium on Geotechnical Aspects of Mass and Material Transportation, Bangkok, pp 119–128. (1984)

  11. Gian Quoc, A.; Duc-Tan, T.; Nguyen Dinh, C.; Tien Bui, D.: Flexible configuration of wireless sensor network for monitoring of rainfall-induced landslide. Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 12(3), 1030–1036 (2018). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v12.i3.pp1030-1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yaácob, N.; Tajudin, N.; Azize, A.M.: Rainfall-landslide early warning system (RLEWS) using TRMM precipitation estimates. Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 13(3), 1259–1266 (2019). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v13.i3.pp1259-1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, S.; Talib, J.A.: Probabilistic landslide susceptibility and factor effect analysis. Environ. Geol. 47(7), 982–990 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-005-1228-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tay, L.T.; Alkhasawneh, M.S.; Lateh, H.; Hossain, K.; Kamil, A.A.: Landslide hazard mapping of Penang Island using poisson distribution with dominant factors. J. Civil Eng. Res. 4(3A), 72–77 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fell, R.; Corominas, J.; Bonnard, C.; Cascini, L.; Leroi, E.; Savage, W.Z.: Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. Eng. Geol. 102(3–4), 85–98 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Akgun, A.; Dag, S.; Bulut, F.: Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models. Environ. Geol. 54(6), 1127–1143 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0882-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dahal, R.K.; Hasegawa, S.; Nonomura, A.; Yamanaka, M.; Masuda, T.; Nishino, K.: GIS-based weights-of-evidence modelling of rainfall-induced landslides in small catchments for landslide susceptibility mapping. Environ. Geol. 54(2), 311–324 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0818-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Girma, F.; Raghuvanshi, T.K.; Ayenew, T.; Hailemariam, T.: Landslide hazard zonation in Ada Berga district, Central Ethiopia - a GIS based statistical approach. J. Geom. 9(1), 25–38 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, S.; Pradhan, B.: Probabilistic landslide hazards and risk mapping on Penang Island. Malaysia. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 115(6), 661–672 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-006-0004-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hamza, T.; Raghuvanshi, T.K.: GIS based landslide hazard evaluation and zonation - A case from Jeldu District, Central Ethiopia. J. King Saud Univ. - Sci. 29(2), 151–65 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2016.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lamelas, M.T.; Marinoni, O.; Hoppe, A.; De La Riva, J.: Doline probability map using logistic regression and GIS technology in the central Ebro Basin (Spain). Environ. Geol. 54(5), 963–977 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-007-0895-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee, S.: Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 26(7), 1477–1491 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160412331331012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Luigi, L.; Martin, P.: Presenting logistic regression-based landslide susceptibility results. Eng. Geol. 244, 14–24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.07.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun, X.; Chen, J.; Bao, Y.; Han, X.; Zhan, J.; Peng, W.: Landslide susceptibility mapping using logistic regression analysis along the Jinsha River and its tributaries close to Derong and Deqin County Southwestern China. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inform. (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7110438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen, W.; Fan, L.; Li, C.; Pham, B.T.: Spatial Prediction of Landslides Using Hybrid Integration of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms with Frequency ratio and index of entropy in Nanzheng County. China. Appl. Sci. 10(1), 29 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Regmi, A.D.; Devkota, K.C.; Yoshida, K.; Pradhan, B.; Hamid Reza, P.; Takashi, K.; Akgun, A.: Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and weights-of-evidence models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping in Central Nepal Himalaya. Arab. J. Geosci. 7, 725–742 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0807-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yx, Zhang; Hx, Lan; Lp, Li; Yu-ming, W.; Jun-hui, C.; Nai-man, T.: Optimizing the frequency ratio method for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study of the Caiyuan Basin in the southeast mountainous area of China. J. Mount. Sci. 17, 340–357 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-019-5702-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Alkhasawneh, M.S.; Ngah, U.K.; Tay, L.T.; Mat Isa, N.A.: Determination of importance for comprehensive topographic factors on landslide hazard mapping using artificial neural network. Environ. Earth Sci. 72(3), 787–799 (2014a). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-3003-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Alkhasawneh, M.S.; Ngah, U.K.; Tay, L.T.; Mat Isa, N.A.; Al-Batah, M.S.: Modeling and testing landslide hazard using decision tree. J. Appl. Math. (2014b). https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/929768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen, W.; Pourghasemi, H.R.; Naghibi, S.A.: Prioritization of landslide conditioning factors and its spatial modeling in shangnan county, china using gis-based data mining algorithms. Bullet. Eng. Geol. Environ. 77, 611–629 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1004-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, L.J.; Guo, M.; Sawada, K.; Lin, J.; Zhang, J.: A comparative study of landslide susceptibility maps using logistic regression, frequency ratio, decision tree, weights of evidence and artificial neural network. Geosci. J. 20, 117–136 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-015-0026-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen, W.; Chen, X.; Peng, J.; Panahi, M.; Lee, S.: Landslide susceptibility modeling based on ANFIS with teaching-learning-based optimization and Satin bowerbird optimizer. Geosci. Front. 12(1), 93–107 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xi, C.; Wei, C.: GIS-based landslide susceptibility assessment using optimized hybrid machine learning methods. CATENA 196, 104833 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bakhtiyari, K.; Husain, H.: Fuzzy model of dominance emotions in affective computing. Neural Comput. Appl. 25(6), 1467–1477 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1637-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rezaee Jordehi, A.; Jasni, J.: Heuristic methods for solution of FACTS optimization problem in power systems. In Proceedings of IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development, Cyberjaya, pp 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCOReD.2011.6148703 (2011)

  36. Taghavi, M.; Bakhtiyari, K.; Scavino, E.: Agent-Based Computational Investing Recommender System. In RecSys 2013 - Proceedings of the \(7^{th}\) ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Hong Kong, pp 455–458. https://doi.org/10.1145/2507157.2508072 (2013)

  37. Rezaee Jordehi, A.; Jasni, J.; Abdul Wahab, NI.; Abd Kadir, MZA.: Particle swarm optimisation applications in FACTS optimisation problem. In Proceedings of the IEEE \(7^{th}\) International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference (PEOCO), Langkawi, pp 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1109/PEOCO.2013.6564541 (2013)

  38. Jordehi, A.R.: Enhanced leader PSO (ELPSO): a new PSO variant for solving global optimisation problems. Appl. Soft Comput. 26, 401–417 (2015b). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.10.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rezaee Jordehi, A.: Particle swarm optimisation for dynamic optimisation problems: a review. Neural Comput. Appl. 25(7–8), 1507–1516 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1661-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Holland, JH.: Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. MIT Press, USA. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=6267401 (1992)

  41. Karaboga, D.: An idea based on Honey Bee Swarm for Numerical Optimization. Technical report-TR06, Erciyes university, engineering faculty, computer engineering department, 200:1–10. https://abc.erciyes.edu.tr/pub/tr06_2005.pdf (2005)

  42. Karaboga, D.; Akay, B.: A comparative study of Artificial Bee Colony algorithm. Appl. Math. Comput. 214(1), 108–132 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.090

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Karaboga, D.; Gorkemli, B.: A quick artificial bee colony (qABC) algorithm and its performance on optimization problems. Appl. Soft Comput. 23, 227–238 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.06.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Karaboga, D.; Basturk, B.: A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: Artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. J. Global Optim. 39(3), 459–471 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-007-9149-x

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhu, G.; Kwong, S.: Gbest-guided artificial bee colony algorithm for numerical function optimization. Appl. Math. Comput. 217(7), 3166–3173 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2010.08.049

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Blum, C.: Ant colony optimization: introduction and recent trends. Phys. Life Rev. 2(4), 353–373 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2005.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Dorigo, M.; Maniezzo, V.; Colorni, A.: Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., Part B (Cybern.), 26(1), 29–41 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.484436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Jordehi, A.R.: Chaotic bat swarm optimisation (CBSO). Appl. Soft Comput. 26, 523–530 (2015a). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yang, X.S.: A New Metaheuristic Bat-Inspired Algorithm. In: González, J.R., Pelta, D.A., Cruz, C., Terrazas, G., Krasnogor, N. (eds.) Nature Inspired Cooperative Strategies for Optimization (NICSO 2010). Studies in Computational Intelligence, Springer, Berlin (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12538-6_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Huqqani, I.A.; Tay, L.T.; Mohamad-Saleh, J.: Analysis of landslide hazard mapping of penang island Malaysia using bivariate statistical methods. Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 16(2), 781–786 (2019). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v16.i2.pp781-786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Huqqani, I.A.; Tay, L.T.; Mohamad-Saleh, J.: Landslide hazard analysis using a multilayered approach based on various input data configurations. Geosfera Indonesia 6(1), 20–39 (2021). https://doi.org/10.19184/geosi.v6i1.23347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tay, L.T.; Alkhasawneh, M.S.; Ngah, U.K.; Lateh, H.: Landslide hazard mapping with new topographic factors: a study case of Penang Island, Malaysia. Aus. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 8(4), 387–392 (2014b)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lim Khai - Wern, K.; Lea Tien, T.; Lateh, H.: Landslide Hazard Mapping of Penang Island Using Probabilistic Methods and Logistic Regression. In IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques,Penang, pp 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1109/IST.2011.5962174 (2011)

  54. Pradhan, B.; Lee, S.: Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Environ. Earth Sci. 60(5), 1037–1054 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0245-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Murakami, S.; Tay, L.T.; Omar, R.; Nishigaya, T.; Aziza, N.; Roslan, R.; Baharuddin, I.; Lateh, H.; Sakai, N.: Landslides hazard map in Malay Peninsula by using historical landslide database and related information. J. Civil Eng. Res. 4(3A), 54–58 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5923/c.jce.201402.08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Varnes, D.J.: Slope Movement Types and Processes. In: Schuster, R.L., Krizek, R.J. (eds.) Landslides:analysis and control, special report 176, TRB. National research Council, Washington DC (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chen, Y.; Song, L.; Liu, Y.; Yang, L.; Li, D.: A review of the artificial neural network models for water quality prediction. Appl. Sci. 10(17), 5776 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10175776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Dobbin, K.K.; Simon, R.M.: Optimally splitting cases for training and testing high dimensional classifiers. BMC Med. Genom. 4, 31 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-4-31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Guzzetti, F.; Carrara, A.; Cardinali, M.; Reichenbach, P.: Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study. Central Italy. Geomorphol. 31(1–4), 181–216 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00078-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Van Westen, C.J.; Rengers, N.; Soeters, R.: Use of geomorphological information in indirect landslide susceptibility assessment. Natural Hazards 30(3), 399–419 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000007097.42735.9e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Westen, CJ.: Application of Geographic Information Systems to Landslide Hazard Zonation. http://www.itc.nl/library/Papers_1993/phd/vanwesten.pdf (1993)

  62. Shalabi, L.; Zyad, S.; Al-Kasasbeh, B.: Data mining: a preprocessing engine. J. Comput. Sci. 2(9), 735–739 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2006.735.739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Patro, SG.; Sahoo, P.; Panda, I.; Sahu, KK.: Technical Analysis on Financial Forecasting. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1503.03011 (2015)

  64. Vlachos, M.: Dimensionality Reduction. In: Sammut C, Webb GI (eds) Encyclopedia of Machine Learning. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_216 (2011)

  65. Riba Ruiz, J.; Canals, T.; Cantero Gomez, R.: Comparative study of multivariate methods to identify paper finishes using infrared spectroscopy. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Measurement 61(4), 1029–1036 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2011.2173048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Jolliffe, I.T.; Cadima, J.: Principal component analysis: : a review and recent developments. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A 374, 20150202 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  67. Everitt, B.S.: Principles of multivariate analysis. J. Royal Stat. Soc.: Series A (Stat. Soc.) 152, 264–265 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/2982935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Nørgaard, L.; Bro, R.; Westad, F.; Engelsen, S.B.: A modification of canonical variates analysis to handle highly collinear multivariate data. J. Chemom. 20(8–10), 425–435 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Gittins, R.: Canonical analysis : a review with applications in ecology. Biomathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69878-1

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. Krzanowski, W.J.: Ranking principal components to reflect group structure. J. Chemom. 6(2), 97–102 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.1180060207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Yendle, P.W.; MacFie, H.J.H.: Discriminant principal components analysis. J. Chemom. 3(4), 589–600 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.1180030407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Hotelling, H.: The most predictable criterion. J. Edu. Psychol. 26(2), 139–142 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Bahamish, H.; Abdullah, R.; Abdul Salam, R.: Protein Tertiary Structure Prediction Using Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm. In: \(3^{rd}\) Asia International Conference on Modelling and Simulation, Bali, pp 258–263. https://doi.org/10.1109/AMS.2009.47 (2009)

  74. Karaboga, N.: A new design method based on artificial bee colony algorithm for digital IIR filters. J. Frankl. Inst. 346(4), 328–348 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2008.11.003

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  75. Karaboga, D.; Akay, B.; Ozturk, C.: Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) optimization algorithm for training feed-forward neural networks LNCS: modeling decisions for artificial intelligence, pp. 318–329. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73729-2_30

    Book  Google Scholar 

  76. Basturk, B.; Karaboga, D.: An artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm for numeric function optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE swarm intelligence symposium, Indianapolis, IN, USA 2006, 12–14 (2006)

  77. Javed, A.; Larijani, H.; Ahmadinia, A.; Emmanuel, R.: Random neural netwrok learning heuristics. Probab. Eng. Inform. Sci. 31(4), 436–456 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269964817000201

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. Sarkar, M.; Yegnanarayana, B.; Khemani, D.: A clustering algorithm using an evolutionary programming-based approach. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 18(10), 975–986 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8655(97)00122-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Kumar, Y.; Sahoo, G.: A two-step artificial bee colony algorithm for clustering. Neural Comput. Appl. 28(3), 537–551 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2095-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Karaboga, D.; Ozturk, C.: A novel clustering approach: Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput. 11(1), 652–657 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2009.12.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Pourtaghi, Z.S.; Pourghasemi, H.R.: GIS-based groundwater spring potential assessment and mapping in the Birjand Township, southern Khorasan Province. Iran. Hydrogeol. J. 22, 643–662 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-013-1089-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Chen, W.; Pradhan, B.; Li, S.; Shahabi, H.; Rizeei, H.M.; Hou, E.; Wang, S.: Novel hybrid integration approach of bagging-based Fisher’s linear discriminant function for groundwater potential analysis. Natural Resour. Res. 28, 1239–1258 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09465-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Chen, W.; Shahabi, H.; Shirzadi, A.; Hong, H.; Akgun, A.; Tian, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhu, A.X.; Li, S.: Novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach of bivariate statistical-methods-based kernel logistic regression classifier for landslide susceptibility modeling. Bullet. Eng. Geol. Environ. 78(6), 4397–4419 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1401-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Chung, C.J.; Fabbri, A.: Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 65(12), 1389–1399 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM) for providing technical and financial support (FRGS – Geran Penyelidikan Fundamental FRGS/1/2018/TK04/USM/02/6).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300, Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia

    Ilyas Ahmad Huqqani, Lea Tien Tay & Junita Mohamad-Saleh

Authors
  1. Ilyas Ahmad Huqqani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lea Tien Tay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Junita Mohamad-Saleh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lea Tien Tay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huqqani, I.A., Tay, L.T. & Mohamad-Saleh, J. Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm Based on Different Normalizations and Dimension Reduction Techniques. Arab J Sci Eng 47, 7243–7260 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06013-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06013-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation