Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating the Fracturing Fluid Recovery in Shale Gas Reservoirs: Experiments and Field Data Analysis

  • Research Article-Petroleum Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In shale gas reservoirs, the fluid flowback rates have become one of the key parameters to evaluate the fracturing operation and manage fracturing fluid after well stimulation. Based on experimental tests and a field data analysis, this paper proposed a method to estimate the fracturing fluid recovery. First, fracturing fluid imbibition and flowback experiments were conducted with fractured and matrix downhole shale plugs, and the average flowback rates for matrix and fractured samples were tested. Then, using a material balance model, the percentages of fluid retained in matrix and fractures are determined with the early-stage well production data. Combining the experimental and field results, a linear superposed model was adopted to compute the final fracturing fluid recovery. The values for the selected two wells were 23.3% and 26.2%, respectively, slightly smaller than the field-recorded values, which may be attributed to the underestimation of the flowback rate in fracture networks. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the recovery was more sensitive to the fluid flowback rate in fractures as more than a half of the fracturing fluid stayed there. The outcomes of this paper may explain the reasons why the fracturing fluid recovery of shale gas wells fluctuates in a wide range and wells with low flowback rates usually have a high productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taleghani, A.D.; Olson, J.E.: How natural fractures could affect hydraulic-fracture geometry. SPE J. 19(1), 161–171 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Makhanov, K.; Habibi, A.; Dehghanpour, H.; Kuru, E.: Liquid uptake of gas shales: a workflow to estimate water loss during shut-in periods after fracturing operations. J. Unconv. Oil Gas Resour. 7, 22–32 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, Y.: Impact of water dynamics in fractures on the performance of hydraulically fractured wells in gas-shale reservoirs. J. Can. Pet. Technol. 51(2), 143–151 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vidic, R.D.; Brantley, S.L.; Vandenbossche, J.M.; Yoxtheimer, D.; Abad, J.D.: Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality. Science 340, 1235009 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang, B.; Kang, Y.; You, L.; Li, X.; Chen, Q.: Measurement of the surface diffusion coefficient for adsorbed gas in the fine mesopores and micropores of shale organic matter. Fuel 181, 793–804 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lai, F.; Li, Z.; Li, Z.; Yang, Z.; Fu, Y.: Shale gas pseudo two-dimensional unsteady seepage pressure simulation analysis in capillary model. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. Rev. IFP 69(7), 1191–1199 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, F.; Zhu, H.; Zhou, H.; Guo, J.; Huang, B.: Discrete-element-method/computational-fluid-dynamics coupling simulation of proppant embedment and fracture conductivity after hydraulic fracturing. SPE J. 22(02), 632–644 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clarkson, C.R.; Wood, J.; Burgis, S.; Aquino, S.; Freeman, M.; Birss, V.: Nanopore structure analysis and permeability predictions for a tight gas/shale reservoir using low-pressure adsorption and mercury intrusion techniques. Presented at SPE Americas Unconventional Resources Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, June 5–7 (2012)

  9. Wu, K.; Chen, Z.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Xu, J.; Dong, X.: Wettability effect on nanoconfined water flow. PNAS 2017, 201612608 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, N.; Liu, M.; Zhang, S.: Flowback patterns of fractured shale gas wells. Nat. Gas Ind. 35(3), 50–54 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ghanbari, E.; Dehghanpour, H.: Impact of rock fabric on water imbibition and salt diffusion in gas shales. Int. J. Coal Geol. 138, 55–67 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roychaudhuri, B.; Tsotsis, T.; Jessen, K.: An experimental and numerical investigation of spontaneous imbibition in gas shales. Presented at SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA, October 30–November 2 (2011)

  13. Wang, M.; Leung, J.: Numerical investigation of fluid-loss mechanisms during hydraulic fracturing flow-back operations in tight reservoirs. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 133, 85–102 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cai, J.; Yu, B.: Advances in studies of spontaneous imbibition in porous media. Adv Mech. 42(6), 735–775 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schembre, J.M.; Akin, S.; Kovscek, A.R.: Spontaneous water imbibition into diatomite. Presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, CA (1998)

  16. Roshan, H.; Ehsani, S.; Marjo, C.E.; Andersen, M.S.; Acworth, R.I.: Mechanisms of water adsorption into partially saturated fractured shales: an experimental study. Fuel 159, 628–637 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou, Z.; Abass, H.; Li, X.; Teklu, T.: Experimental investigation of the effect of imbibition on shale permeability during hydraulic fracturing. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 29, 413–430 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ehlig-Economides, C.A.; Economides, M.J.: Water as proppant. Presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA, October 30–November 2 (2011)

  19. Fan, L.; Thompson, J.W.; Robinson, J.R.: Understanding gas production mechanism and effectiveness of well stimulation in the Haynesville Shale through reservoir simulation. Presented at Canadian unconventional resources and international petroleum conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, October 19–21 (2010)

  20. Parmar, J.; Dehghanpour, H.; Kuru, E.: Displacement of water by gas in propped fractures: combined effects of gravity, surface tension, and wettability. J. Uncon. Oil Gas Resour. 17, 10–21 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghanbari, E.; Dehghanpour, H.: The fate of fracturing water: a field and simulation study. Fuel 163, 282–294 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu, Y.; Adefidipe, O.; Dehghanpour, H.: A flowing material balance equation for two-phase flowback analysis. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 142, 170–185 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, L.; Kang, Q.J.; Yao, J.: The explanation of low recovery of fracturing fluid in shale hydraulic fracturing by pore-scale simulation. Chin. Sci. Bull. 59(32), 3197–3203 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kang, Y.; Zhang, X.; You, L.: The experimental research on spontaneous flowback relieve aqueous phase trapping damage in shale gas reservoirs. Nat. Gas Geosci. 28(7), 1054–1059 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li, C.; Lafollette, R.; Sookprasong, A.; Wang, S.: characterization of hydraulic fracture geometry in shale gas reservoirs using early production data. Presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Beijing, China, March 26–28 (2013)

  26. Alkouh, A.; McKetta, S.; Wattenbarger, R.A.: Estimation of effective-fracture volume using water-flowback and production data for shale-gas wells. J. Can. Pet. Technol. 53, 290–303 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Adefidipe, O.A.; Dehghanpour, H.; Virues, C.J.: Immediate gas production from shale gas wells: a two-phase flowback model. Present as SPE unconventional resources conferences, Woodlands, Texas, USA, April 1–3 (2014)

  28. Xu, Y.; Adefidipe, O.A.; Dehghanpour, H.: Estimating fracture volume using flowback data from the Horn River Basin: a material balance approach. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 25, 253–270 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang, B.; You, L.; Kang, Y.; He, Z.; Li, X.: Estimation of fracture volume and its surface area on stimulated shale gas wells by material balance method. Nat. Gas Geosci. 28(7), 1060–1065 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Singh, V.K.: Overview of material balance equation (MBE) in shale gas & nonconventional reservoir. Presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Manama, Bahrain, March 10–13 (2013)

  31. Benavente, D.; Lock, P.; Ángeles, M.; Salavador, O.: Predicting the capillary imbibition of porous rocks from microstructure. Transp. Porous Media 49, 59–76 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Iglauer, S.; Wülling, W.; Pentland, C.H.; Al-Mansoori, S.K.; Blunt, M.J.: Capillary-trapping capacity of sandstones and sandpacks. SPE J. 16(4), 778–783 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gao, S.; Hu, Z.; Guo, W.; Zuo, L.; Shen, R.: Water absorption characteristics of gas shale and the fracturing fluid flowback capacity. Nat. Gas. Ind. 33(12), 71–76 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support received from the Open Fund (PLC2020042) of State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation (Chengdu University of Technology), the Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation (U19A2097) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (NO.51874052) is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhang Hao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, B., Hao, Z., You, L. et al. Estimating the Fracturing Fluid Recovery in Shale Gas Reservoirs: Experiments and Field Data Analysis. Arab J Sci Eng 45, 7851–7861 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04882-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04882-z

Keywords

Navigation