Skip to main content
Log in

Determination and Comparison of Wind and Earthquake Responses of Reinforced Concrete Minarets

  • Technical Note - Civil Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During severe wind storms or strong ground motions, so many constructed reinforced concrete (RC) minarets are severely damaged or collapse causing the loss of lives and economy. Damages or collapses of RC minarets after these miserable acts of nature compel us to revise our knowledge about the structural wind and earthquake analyses of these structures. The main objectives of this study are to make structural wind and earthquake analyses of representative RC minaret, to compare and discuss the results of the analyses and to clarify the weaknesses of these structures. The findings of this study showed that the analyses results found from earthquake time history analysis should be used in the structural design of RC minarets and that extra care should be taken in those places where there is a decrease in cross section and door opening occurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hacıefendioǧlu K.: Seasonally frozen soil’s effect on stochastic response of masonry minaret–soil interaction systems to random seismic excitation. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 60, 66–74 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sezen H., Acar R., Doǧangün A., Livaoǧlu R.: Dynamic analysis and seismic performance of RC minarets. Eng. Struct. 30, 2253–2264 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Temüz, T.H.: Structural Behavior and Analysis of Minarets Subjected to Wind Loads, MS Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University (2007)

  4. Doǧangün, A.; Tuluk,  I.; Livaoǧlu, R.; Acar, R.: Performance of masonry minarets against earthquakes and winds in turkey. In: 1st International Conference on Restoration of Heritage Masonry Structures, Cairo, Egypt, April 24–27 (2006)

  5. Erdik, M.; Kamer, Y.; Demircioǧlu, M.B.; Sesetyan, K.: Report on 2012 Van (Turkey) Earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 1938–1949 (2012)

  6. Doǧangün A., Acar R., Sezen H., Livaoǧlu R.: Investigation of dynamic response of masonry minaret structures. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 6, 505–517 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Doǧangün, A.; Tuluk,  I.; Livaoǧlu, R.; Acar, R.: Traditional Turkish minarets on the basis of architectural and engineering concepts. In: 1st International Conference on Restoration of Heritage Masonry Structures, Cairo, Egypt, April 24–27 (2006)

  8. Acar, R.; Livaoǧlu, R.; Doǧangün, A.; Sezen, H.: The effect of subsoils on the seismic response of RC cylindrical minarets. In: The International Conference on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Tahran,  Iran (2007)

  9. Oliveira C.S., Çaktı E., Stengel D., Branco M.: Minaret behavior under earthquake loading: the case of historical Istanbul. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41, 19–39 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Altunışık A.C.: Dynamic response of masonry minarets strengthened with Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) composites. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 11, 2011–2019 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hacıefendioǧlu K., Birinci F.: Stochastic dynamic response of masonry minarets subjected to random blast and earthquake-induced ground motions. Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 20, 669–678 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bayraktar A., Sevim B., Altunışık A.C., Türker T.: Earthquake analysis of RC minarets using ambient vibration test results. Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 19, 257–273 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Acar, R.: Investigation of Behaviors of Monumental Tower Structures and Development of Alternative Systems, MS Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University (2009)

  14. Turkish Standard, T.S. 498: The Calculation Values of Loads used in Designing Structural Elements. Turkish Standard Institute, Ankara (1997)

  15. CICIND 2001: Model Code for Concrete Chimneys, Part A: Shell, CICIND 2001 with Commentary, 2nd edn. Comité International des Cheminées Industrielles (International Committee on Industrial Chimneys), UK (2001)

  16. Turkish Earthquake Code: Specification for Buildings to be Built in Disaster Areas. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara (2007)

  17. Holmes J.D.: Wind Loading of Structures, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. ACI 307/98 with Commentary, Design and Construction of RC Chimneys, American Concrete Institute Committee 307, USA, 1998.

  19. ANSI/ASCE 7–95: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York (1996)

  20. http://peer.berkeley.edu/. Accessed 04.12.2012

  21. Ahuja A.K., Dalui S.K., Ahuja R., Gupta V.K.: Effect Of interference on the wind environment around high-rise buildings. J. Wind Eng. Sci. 2(1), 1–8 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wilson, E.L.: Sap 2000: Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures. Computers & Structures, Berkeley (2000)

  23. Karaca Z., Türkeli E.: Determination and comparison of wind loads for industrial reinforced concrete chimneys. Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 2, 133–154 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ilki A., Celep Z.: Earthquakes, existing buildings and seismic design codes in Turkey. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 37(2), 365–380 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ulutaş, E.; Özer, M.F.: Empirical attenuation relationship of peak ground acceleration for eastern marmara region in Turkey. The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Vol. 35, 1A, pp. 187–203 (2010)

  26. Karabulut S., Özcep F., Korkmaz B., Zarif H.: Urban seismic microzonation studied at small scales: Sisli/ Istanbul(Turkey). Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 36(1), 75–87 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. El-Kholy S.A., El-Assaly M.S., Maher M.: Seismic vulnerability assessment of existing multi-story reinforced concrete buildings in Egypt. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 37(2), 341–355 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mahmood M.: An experimental investigation of pressures developed on buildings of different height. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 35(1B), 353–366 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Brencich A., Gnecco M.: Failure case studies in structural engineering courses and professional practice. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 37(8), 2113–2126 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Özcan Z., Arman H.: Ground condition effects on dynamic response of the 1995 Dinar Earthquake in Western Turkey. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 33(2A), 213–227 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mahmood M., Srinivas K., Budair M.O.: Experimental study of flow past a low-rise building. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 33(2B), 551–568 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shakib H., Omidinasab F.: Effect of earthquake characteristics on seismic performance of RC elevated water tanks considering fluid level within the vessels. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 36(2), 227–243 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ghasemi A., Shakib H.: The improvement of structural adequacy against large demands of near-fault ground motions. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 36(2), 185–202 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Akıncı T.Ç., Nogay H.S.: Wind speed correlation between neighboring measuring stations. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 37(4), 1007–1019 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erdem Türkeli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Türkeli, E. Determination and Comparison of Wind and Earthquake Responses of Reinforced Concrete Minarets. Arab J Sci Eng 39, 3665–3680 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-0999-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-0999-5

Keywords

Navigation