Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Earthquake Characteristics on Seismic Performance of RC Elevated Water Tanks Considering Fluid Level within the Vessels

  • Research Article - Civil Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dynamic behavior of a liquid storage tank as a special structure differs from that of general structures. Important structures of cylindrical shape are used to store vital products, such as water and petroleum products, for cities and industrial facilities. Damage to these structures during a strong ground motion may lead to fire or other hazardous events. Liquid storage tanks are lifeline structures and strategically very important, since they have vital use in industries and nuclear power plants. In this research, an example reinforced concrete (RC) elevated water tank, with 900 cubic meters capacity, is studied under three pairs of earthquake records and analyzed in time history by using mechanical and finite element modeling techniques. The liquid mass of the tank is modeled as lumped masses known as sloshing mass, impulsive mass and rigid mass. The corresponding stiffness constants associated with these lumped masses are worked out depending upon the properties of the tank wall and liquid mass. Tank responses including base shear, overturning moment, tank displacement, and sloshing displacement under these three pairs of earthquake records are calculated, and then the results are compared and contrasted. Results show that the system responses are highly influenced by the structural parameters and the earthquake characteristics, such as frequency content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Steinbrugge KV, Rodrigo FA (1963) The Chilean earthquakes of May 1960: a structural engineering viewpoint. Bull Seismol Am 53: 225–307

    Google Scholar 

  2. Minowa C (1980) Dynamic analysis for rectangular water tanks, Recent Adv. Lifeline Earthquake Engineering Japan, 135–42

  3. Knoy CE (1995) Performance of elevated tanks during recent California seismic events. AWWA Annual Conference & Exhibition

  4. Attari NKA, Rofooei FR (2008) On lateral response of structures containing a cylindrical liquid tank under the effect of fluid/structure resonances. J Sound Vib 318: 1154–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. El Damatty AA, Saafan MS, Sweedan AMI (2005) Experimental study conducted on a liquid-filled combined conical tank model. Thin Walled Struct 43: 1398–1417

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sezen H, Livaoglu R, Dogangun A (2008) Dynamic analysis and seismic performance evaluation of above-ground liquid-containing tanks. Eng Struct 20: 749–803

    Google Scholar 

  7. Livaoglu R, Dogangun A (2006) Simplified seismic analysis procedures for elevated tanks considering fluid-structure-soil interaction. J Fluids Struct 22: 421–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Livaoglu R (2005) Investigation of the earthquake behavior of elevated tanks considering fluid–structure–soil interactions, Ph.D. Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, (in Turkish)

  9. Livaoglu R, Dogangun A (2007) Effect of foundation embedment on seismic behavior of elevated tanks considering fluid–structure-soil interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27: 855–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koh HM, Kim JK, Park JH (1998) Fluid–structure interaction analysis of 3-D rectangular tanks by a variationally coupled BEM-FEM and comparison with test results. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 27: 109–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Anghileri M, Castelletti LML, Tireli M (2005) Fluid–structure interaction of water filled tanks during the impact with the ground. Int J Impact Eng 31: 235–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Livaoglu R, Dogangun A (2005) Seismic evaluation of fluid-elevated tank-foundation-soil systems in frequency domain. Struct Eng Mech 21: 101–119

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dutta S, Mandal A, Dutta SC (2004) Soil–structure interaction in dynamic behavior of elevated tanks with alternate frame staging configurations. J Sound Vib 227(4–5): 825–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Housner GF (1963) Dynamic behavior of water tanks. Bull Seismol Soc Am 53: 381–387

    Google Scholar 

  15. Housner GW (1957) Dynamic pressures on accelerated fluid containers. Bull Seismol Soc Am 47: 15–35

    Google Scholar 

  16. Westergaard HM (1931) Water pressures on dams during earthquakes, Proceedings of the ASCE 57:1303

  17. Barton DC, Parker JV (1987) Finite element analysis of the seismic response of anchored and unanchored liquid storage tanks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 15: 299–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dogangun A, Durmus A, Ayvaz Y (1996) Finite element analysis of seismic response of rectangular tanks using added mass and Lagrangian approach, In: Proceedings of the second international conference on civil engineering computer applications research and practice, Bahrain, April 6–8, I, pp 371–379

  19. Haroun MA, Ellaithy MH (1985) Seismically induced fluid forces on elevated tanks. J Tech Top Civil Eng 111: 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marashi ES, Shakib H (1997) Evaluations of dynamic characteristics of elevated water tanks by ambient vibration tests, In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on civil engineering, Tehran, Iran, I, pp 367–373

  21. Reshidat RM, Sunna H (1986) Behavior of elevated storage tanks during earthquake, In: Proceeding of the 3rd US national conference on earthquake engineering, pp 2143–2154

  22. Haroun MA, Termaz MK (1992) Effects of soil–structure interaction effects on seismic response of elevated tanks. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 11: 37–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shrimali MK, Jangid RS (2003) Earthquake response of isolated elevated liquid storage steel tanks. J Construct Steel Res 59: 1267–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dutta SC, Jain SK, Murty CVR (2001) Inelastic seismic torsional behavior of elevated tanks. J Sound Vib 242: 151–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shekari MR, Khaji N, Ahmadi MT (2008) A coupled BE-FE study for evaluation of seismically isolated cylindrically liquid storage tanks considering fluid–structure interaction, J Fluids Struct. doi:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2008.07.005

  26. Panchal VR, Jangid RS (2008) Variable friction pendulum system for seismic isolation of liquid storage tanks. Nucl Eng Des 238: 1304–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dutta C, Jain SK, Murty CVR (2000) Alternate tank staging configurations with reduced torsional vulnerability. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 19: 199–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dutta SC, Jain SK, Murty CVR (2000) Assessing the seismic torsional vulnerability of elevated tanks with RC frame-type Staging. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 19: 183–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Omidinasab F, Shakib H (2008) Seismic vulnerability of elevated water tanks using performance based-design, In: The 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China

  30. Zienkiewicz OC, Bettes P (1978) Fluid-structure dynamic interaction and wave forces; an introduction to numerical treatment. Int J Numer Methods Eng 13: 1–16

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilson EL, Khalvati M (1983) Finite elements for the dynamic analysis of fluid-solid systems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 19: 1657–1668

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Olson LG, Bathe KJ (1983) A study of displacement-based fluid finite elements for calculating frequencies of fluid and fluid–structure systems. Nucl Eng Des 76: 137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dogangun A, Durmus A, Ayvaz Y (1996) Static and dynamic analysis of rectangular tanks by using the Lagrangian fluid finite element. Comput Struct 59: 547–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dogangun A, Livaoglu R (2004) Hydrodynamic pressures acting on the walls of rectangular fluid containers. Struct Eng Mech 17: 203–214

    Google Scholar 

  35. Donea J, Gıuliani S, Halleux JP (1982) An arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian finite element method for transient dynamic fluid-structure interaction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 33: 689–723

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Bauer HF (1964) Fluid oscillations in the containers of a space vehicle and their influence upon stability, NASA TR R 187

  37. European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode-8, and Part 4: silos, tanks and pipelines, Final PT, 2001

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamzeh Shakib.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shakib, H., Omidinasab, F. Effect of Earthquake Characteristics on Seismic Performance of RC Elevated Water Tanks Considering Fluid Level within the Vessels. Arab J Sci Eng 36, 227–243 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-010-0029-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-010-0029-1

Keywords

Navigation