Abstract
Based on the available literature, women living with HIV (WLWH) seem to show greater cognitive and emotional disadvantages than men living with HIV (MLWH). Our aim was to compare the cognitive performance of MLWH and WLWH in an Italian cohort of People Living With HIV (PLWH) and to analyse factors potentially contributing to sex differences in cognitive function. We ran a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of a monocentric dataset of PLWH who were administered a standardized neuropsychological test battery (SNB) during routine clinical care. We enrolled 161 Italian PLWH who are on combined antiretroviral therapy (cART): 114 (70.8%) MLWH and 47 (29.2%) WLWH.
Global cognitive performance (composite z score) (GCP) was significantly higher in MLWH than WLWH [mean 0.19 (SD 0.85) vs − 0.13 (SD 0.96); p = 0.039]. Moreover, WLWH obtained significantly higher scores on the Zung Depression Scale than MLWH [mean 41.8 (SD 10.9) vs 36.7 (SD 9.2); p = 0.003]. However, there was no statistically significant direct effect between male sex and better GCP (p = 0.692) in the context of a mediation model. On the contrary, the associations between male sex and better GCP were mediated by higher level of education (a*b = + 0.15, Bootstrap CI95 = 0.05 and 0.27) and a lower Zung depression score (a*b = + 0.10, Bootstrap CI95 = 0.02 and 0.21).
In conclusion, the global cognitive performance of WLWH is lower than that of MLWH. However, other demographic and clinical factors besides sex might help explain differences in their neurocognitive functions and make it possible for us to monitor them and identify those patients most in need.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
There are several issues relating to the HIV care that make it important to differentiate women living with HIV (WLWH) from men living with HIV (MLWH) (Geretti et al. 2017). Indeed, sex-specific factors may impact on behaviours and conditions of PLWH, affecting access to diagnosis and treatment, clinical management, treatment response, and the overall wellbeing (Rosin et al. 2015; Lundgren et al. 2015; Soon et al. 2012; Burch et al. 2016; Ribaudo et al. 2016). For instance, WLWH demonstrated lower adherence to antiretroviral therapy (Puskas et al. 2011) and, despite a lower viral load, they did not show appreciable benefits in terms of disease progression compared to MLWH (Perez-Elias et al. 2014; Law et al. 2015; Napravnik et al. 2002). Regarding studies on HIV and cognition, neurocognitive studies focusing on WLWH are increased since the introduction of effective combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) (Maki et al. 2018; Sundermann et al. 2018; Rubin et al. 2020).
Available data suggest that WLWH have some cognitive and emotional disadvantages compared to MLWH. A recent systematic American review assessed whether WLWH are more cognitively vulnerable than MLWH (Rubin et al. 2019) and concluded that few HIV studies are adequately powered to address sex differences in prevalence and pattern of HAND. However, several studies indicate that WLWH have a higher prevalence of HAND (Sundermann et al. 2018; Royal et al. 2016) and a lower performance or higher impairment of memory and learning (Kabuba et al. 2016; Royal et al. 2016), speed of information processing (Maki et al. 2018; Do et al. 2018) and motor abilities (Maki et al. 2018; Burlacu et al. 2018) than MLWH. Only one study reported lower performance of WLWH in executive functions (Maki et al. 2018), and no difference was observed for fluency or attention/working memory (Do et al. 2018; Sundermann et al. 2018; Kabuba et al. 2016; Burlacu et al. 2018; Royal et al. 2016; Behrman-Lay et al. 2016).
Several factors seem to contribute to documented sex differences. Among biological factors (e.g., inflammation, hormones, genetics) (Rubin et al. 2019), there is evidence of an association between testosterone insufficiency and cognitive complaints (Laan et al. 2019) and of sex differences in inflammatory biomarkers (Ticona et al. 2015; Fitch et al. 2013; Martin et al. 2013; Looby et al. 2016). The higher prevalence of HAND in WLWH compared to MLWH could also be linked to differences in other variables, such as socio-economic conditions and education (Basso and Bornstein 2000; Farinpour et al. 2003). These factors could be some of the cognitive reserve determinants prior to HIV infection and might contribute to greater cognitive vulnerability after infection (Tsai and Burns 2015; Singer 1994).
In fact, in a recent study, Rubin et al. (2020) suggested that despite different cognitive profiles according to sex, the most discriminative factors were similar between men and women and included reading level (cognitive reserve), current and nadir CD4 count, plasma HIV viral load, duration of HIV disease, age, depressive symptoms, and race/ethnicity.
Furthermore, mental health disorders might actually contribute to higher rates of HAND in WLWH versus MLWH. Indeed, in a recent review, Geretti et al. (2017) suggested that WLWH experience a disproportionate burden of mental health issues (Orza et al. 2015) and face very different emotional challenges upon diagnosis (Loutfy et al. 2013). Specifically, the higher frequency of cognitive impairment in WLWH compared to MLWH might be related to the higher prevalence of depression (Bayón et al. 2012; Morrison et al. 2002; Rabkin et al. 1991; Semple et al. 1996; Aljassem et al. 2016). In fact, depression is negatively associated with cognitive functioning in PLWH and both a history of depression and current depression are associated with HAND in PLWH (Yousuf et al. 2019). Several international studies suggest that depression is almost twice as common in women as in men (Yousuf et al. 2019; Fantahun et al. 2018; Antelman et al. 2007) and that WLWH may be more cognitively susceptible than MLWH to the effects of mental health factors (Rubin et al. 2019, 2020). In particular, Rubin et al. (2020) indicated that HIV comorbid with depression affects specific cognitive domains, including cognitive control, and that these effects are largest in women. Other studies reported that depression is associated with deficits in learning, memory, and attention in WLWH (Maki et al. 2018; Rubin et al. 2016, 2014, 2015) and that women with elevated depressive symptoms seem to have a three times greater risk of impairment in executive control/inhibition than MLWH with elevated depressive symptoms (Rubin et al. 2019).
However, to date, few studies have been published on this topic, especially in Italy where literature recounts inconsistent results in PLWH. For example, Focà et al. (2016) reported, in contrast with other previous studies, that MLWH might be most at risk for neurocognitive disorders than WLWH.
Thus, as significant knowledge gaps remain, additional studies are needed to deepen this subject and improve management of PLWH.
Our aim was to compare the cognitive performance of MLWH and WLWH in an Italian Cohort of People Living With HIV and to analyse factors potentially contributing to sex differences in cognitive function.
Methods
Participants
We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of a monocentric dataset that included PLWH who are being followed at the Infectious Diseases Institute of “Policlinico Gemelli Foundation” of Rome, and who were submitted to a standardized neuropsychological test battery (SNB) during routine clinical care between January 2011 and March 2019.
Data concerning the following demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables were collected for each participant at the time of the neuropsychological testing: age, education, ethnicity, risk factors for HIV infection, time from HIV diagnosis, current and past antiretroviral regimen, current and nadir CD4 cell count, HIV-1 viral load, co-infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV), comorbidities, use of antidepressant and concomitant medications.
Procedure
Neuropsychological examination
By means of SNB we investigated the following cognitive areas:
-
learning memory: The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test – RAVLT;
-
attention: WAIS Digit Span, WAIS Digit Symbol;
-
verbal fluency: FAS Test (subtest of the Neurosensory Center Comprehensive Examination for Aphasia-NCCEA);
-
executive functioning: Multiple features target cancellation- MFTC;
-
fine motor skills: Grooved Pegboard Test.
We measured global cognitive performance (GCP) by transforming raw scores obtained on each task into standardized Z scores using means and standard deviations of Italian normative data (Capitani and Laiacona 1997; Carlesimo et al. 1996) and averaging them to calculate a composite total score and a score for each domain score. Domain-specific impairment was defined as a Z score less than −1. According to the Frascati Criteria (Antinori et al. 2007), patients were considered affected by HIV-associated neurocognitive diseases (HAND) if they showed impairment in at least two domains.
Each patient was also administered the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (Zung 1965, 1986), a short self-report questionnaire that investigates four common characteristics of depression: the pervasive effect, the physiological equivalents, other disturbances, and psychomotor activities. A score ≥ 50 is considered to indicate probable depression and abnormal/elevated depression symptoms.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative variables [median, interquartile range (IQR), means, standard deviations (SD)] and qualitative variables (percent frequencies).
When appropriate, T tests or the Chi-square test were performed to determine differences in cognitive performance and Zung scores among groups based on sex: WLWH = group 1 and MLWH = group 2.
We also computed Cohen’s d in order to identify effect sizes and show the clinical significance of comparisons between groups 1 and 2.
We performed a mediation analysis through a bootstrapping method using SPSS Process Macro to examine the effect of mediating variables on the relationship between sex and cognitive performance (Abu-Bader and Jones 2021).
We selected the most discriminating factors based on the literature (Basso and Bornstein 2000; Farinpour et al. 2003; Rubin et al. 2020). Thus, we examined as mediators the following collected variables: age, education, injecting drug use, time from HIV diagnosis, time from cART, current and nadir CD4 cell count, HIV-1 viral load, past AIDS-defining events and co-infection with HCV.
According to Baron and Kenny (1986), we chose demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables as mediators when regression analyses revealed three statistically significant relationships: (1) sex was a statistically significant predictor of global or domain-specific cognitive performance. (2) Sex was a statistically significant predictor of the mediator. (3) The mediator was a statistically significant predictor of the global or domain-specific cognitive performance (dependent variable) while controlling for the effect of sex.
All analyses were performed using the SPSS version 21.0 software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
Results
Demographic and clinical characteristics
A total of 161 Italian PLWH on cART were enrolled: 114 (70.8%) MLWH and 47 (29.2%) WLWH. Their demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
The subjects in the two groups (MLWH vs WLWH) significantly differed in mean education [mean 13 (SD 3.6) vs 11 (SD 3.1); p = 0.006], with a medium effect size (d = 0.59), time from HIV diagnosis [mean 12.7 (SD 9.3) vs 16.6 (SD 8.7); p = 0.020], with a small effect size (d = 0.43), and from first cART [mean 9.9 (SD 7.4) vs 12.8 (SD 7.5); p = 0.009], with a small effect size (d = 0.38).
Neuropsychological performance in MLWH and WLWH
GCP was significantly higher in MLWH than WLWH [mean 0.19 (SD 0.85) vs −0.13 (SD 0.96); p = 0.039] with a small effect size (d = 0.35). Considering each cognitive domain separately, MLWH performed better than WLWH on attention [mean 0.16 (SD 0.73) vs −0.26 (SD 0.69); p < 0.001], with a medium effect size (d = 0.59), and executive functions [mean 0.02 (SD 0.80) vs −0.26 (SD 0.78); p = 0.002], with a small effect size (d = 0.35). Nevertheless, the percentage of patients affected by HAND did not significantly differ between MLWH and WLWH [20/114 (17.5%) vs 13/47 (27.7%), p = 0.148].
Moreover, WLWH obtained significantly higher scores on the Zung Depression Scale than MLWH [mean 41.8 (SD 10.9) vs 36.7 (SD 9.2); p = 0.003], with a medium effect size (d = 0.50), indicating more symptoms of depression in the former group and a significantly higher percentage of subjects with probable depression according to the Zung Depression normative cut-off [23.4% (n = 11/47) vs 8.8% (n = 10/114); p = 0.012]. Results of the neuropsychological performances in each cognitive domain are shown in Table 2.
Factors contributing to sex differences in cognitive function
We used linear regression analysis to select demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables as mediators intervened between sex and cognitive performance. First, the results of the regression analysis show that male sex was a significant predictor of higher level of education (mean change + 1.76; 95% CI 0.56/2.96; p = 0.004) and of a lower Zung depression score (mean change − 0.51; 95% CI −8.44/ −1.78; p = 0.003).
Next, while controlling for sex, the results of the second regression analysis show that higher level of education was a significant predictor of better GCP (mean change + 0.09 per 1 year increase; 95% CI 0.05/0.13; p < 0.001) and attention skills (mean change + 0.07 per 1 year increase; 95% CI 0.05/0.10; p < 0.001). Furthermore, after controlling for sex, a lower Zung depression score was a significant predictor of better GCP (mean change −0.02 per 1 score; 95% CI − 0.03/ −0.01; p = 0.001), attention skills (mean change −0.02 per 1 score; 95% CI −0.03/ −0.01; p < 0.001) and executive skills (mean change −0.01 per 1 score; 95% CI −0.02/ −0.03; p = 0.019).
We performed a bootstrapping method to examine if education and Zung depression score mediated the relationship between sex and GCP (Table 3), attention and executive skills.
The results of the indirect effect based on 5000 bootstrap samples showed the following associations. It emerged a significant indirect relationship (a*b) between male sex and better GCP and attention skills mediated by higher level of education (a*b = + 0.15, Bootstrap CI95 = 0.05 and 0.27; a*b = + 0.12, Bootstrap CI95 = 0.04 and 0.22, respectively) and a lower Zung depression score (a*b = + 0.10, Bootstrap CI95 = 0.02 and 0.21; a*b = + 0.10, Bootstrap CI95 = 0.02 and 0.20, respectively). Furthermore, it emerged a significant indirect relationship (a*b) between male sex and better executive skills mediated by a lower Zung depression score (a*b = + 0.07, Bootstrap CI95 = 0.00 and 0.16).
The mediator, education, accounted for approximately 46% of the total effect on GCP [PM = (0.15) / (0.32)] and for approximately 27% of the total effect on attention skills [PM = (0.12) / (0.43)]. Moreover, the mediator, Zung depression score, accounted for approximately 32% of the total effect on GCP [PM = (0.10) / (0.32)], for approximately 23% of the total effect on attention skills [PM = (0.10) / (0.43)] and for approximately 24% of the total effect on executive skills [PM = (0.07) / (0.29)].
On the other hand, there was no statistically significant direct effect (c) between sex and GCP (b = + 0.57, t = 0.39, p = 0.692), attention skills (b = + 0.20, t = 1.72, p = 0.087), and executive skills (b = + 0.21, t = 1.72, p = 0.125) in the context of the mediation model.
Discussion
The aim of this study was to analyse the cognitive profile of MLWH and WLWH in an Italian cohort of PLWH and to examine the effect of mediating variables on the relationship between sex and cognitive function. Indeed, based on the available literature, WLWH seem to have cognitive and emotional disadvantages (Rubin et al. 2019; Bayón et al. 2012; Morrison et al. 2002). However, a significant knowledge gap remains on this topic especially in Italy where few studies have been published with inconsistent results (Focà et al. 2016).
Overall, the WLWH in our cohort of patients had a lower level of education and longer time from HIV diagnosis and from first cART compared to MWLH. In line with previous evidence (Sundermann et al. 2018; Royal et al. 2016), our findings show that WLWH demonstrate lower global cognitive performance than MLWH and a higher proportion of subjects with probable depression. However, our WLWH did not manifest a significantly higher frequency of HAND compared to MLWH, in agreement with the Frascati criteria (Antinori et al. 2007). This discrepancy could be explained by the fact that WLWH demonstrate mild impairment than MLWH across domains that does not typically meet the threshold of impairment contributing to a HAND diagnosis.
In this regard, discrepant data emerged from previous observations. For example, Sundermann et al. (2018) found a higher prevalence of HAND in WLWH compared to MLWH; however, this difference was not confirmed by adjusting for reading level and ethnicity. On the other hand, from Rubin et al.’s review (2019), it emerged that only 43% of the studies examined demonstrated that the prevalence of HAND was higher in WLWH. Considering cognitive domains individually, we found additional differences. First, WLWH performed worse than MLWH in the executive skills domain, confirming previous observations (Maki et al. 2018). Furthermore, our WLWH sample also performed worse than MLWH on the attention tasks; note, however, that in this domain, there are inconsistent results across studies (Do et al. 2018; Sundermann et al. 2018; Kabuba et al. 2016; Burlacu et al. 2018; Royal et al. 2016; Behrman-Lay et al. 2016) probably due to methodological differences.
However, we identified other demographic and clinical factors besides sex that could help explain the aforementioned difference between WLWH and MLWH. Indeed, our results showed that there was no statistically significant direct effect between sex and GCP, attention and executive skills. On the contrary, the associations between male sex and better GCP and attention skills were mediated by higher level of education and fewer depressive symptoms. Moreover, a lower Zung depression score mediated the association between male sex and better executive skills.
Thus, as suggested in previous studies, we confirm that depressive symptoms seem to be more prevalent in WLWH than in MLWH (Aljassem et al. 2016) and might contribute to higher cognitive impairment (Bayón et al. 2012). Furthermore, we confirm several data reported in the literature regarding predictive factors for cognitive performance in PLWH such as educational background (Tedaldi et al. 2015; Milanini et al. 2016).
Indeed, we corroborate the finding that adjusting for critical factors such as education, clinical variables, and mental health reduces the dimension of the sex difference and elucidates factors contributing to NCI in women (Rubin et al. 2019). Moreover, our findings support those of Sundermann et al. (2018), suggesting that discrepancies in biopsychosocial factors (e.g., reading level that reflect education quality) may explain the sex difference in NCI regarding PLWH.
We acknowledge that our study has some limitations. First, our conclusions are limited by the small sample size of the study. Indeed, due to the small number of patients who were submitted to a completed SNB in the dataset used for the retrospective analysis, our study reached a low statistical power. Thus, in future studies, it will be important to extend the sample to confirm the generalizability of the results achieved.
Second, this is a cross-sectional study and uncontrolled biases can occur in routine clinical practice. Thus, future longitudinal studies are needed to confirm our findings also given the fact that only one longitudinal study to date has examined the risk of neurocognitive decline in WLWH and MLWH (Heaton et al. 2015).
Lastly, in future investigations, it would be useful to include a healthy control group to compare differences in cognitive functions between women and men and between PLWH and the general population. In addition, our WLWH and MLWH subgroups were not matched for education, years from HIV diagnosis and years from first ARV; future investigations that include matched groups are needed to check the probable influences of these disparities on cognitive performance.
In conclusion, taken together, our findings suggest that in our sample, WLWH demonstrate lower global cognitive performance, attention, and executive skills compared to MLWH. However, other demographic and clinical factors might be able to explain these disadvantages in WLWH besides sex, in particular the lower level of education and more depressive symptoms. On these bases, in planning cognitive interventions, it seems appropriate to pay particular attention to WLWH, but it would also be helpful to monitor demographic, clinical, and mental health factors to identify the patients who are most in need and to detect cognitive impairments as soon as possible and intervene to improve the psychological wellbeing of PLWH.
Change history
24 August 2022
Missing Open Access funding information has been added in the Funding Note.
References
Abu-Bader S, Jones TV (2021) Statistical mediation analysis using the sobel test and hayes SPSS process macro. Int J Quant Qual Res Methods. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3799204
Aljassem K, Raboud JM, Hart TA, Benoit A, Su D, Margolese SL, Rourke SB, Rueda S, Burchell A, Cairney J, Shuper P, Loutfy MR, OHTN Cohort Study Research Team (2016) Gender differences in severity and correlates of depression symptoms in people living with HIV in Ontario, Canada. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care 15(1):23–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325957414536228
Antelman G, Kaaya S, Wei R, Mbwambo J, Msamanga GI, Fawzi WW, Fawzi MC (2007) Depressive symptoms increase risk of HIV disease progression and mortality among women in Tanzania. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 44(4):470–477. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e31802f1318
Antinori A, Arendt G, Becker JT, Brew BJ, Byrd DA, Cherner M, Clifford DB, Cinque P, Epstein LG, Goodkin K, Gisslen M, Grant I, Heaton RK, Joseph J, Marder K, Marra CM, McArthur JC, Nunn M, Price RW, Pulliam L, Robertson KR, Sacktor N, Valcour V, Wojna VE (2007) Updates Research nosology for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. Neurol 69:1789–1799. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000287431.88658.8b
Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182
Basso MR, Bornstein RA (2000) Estimated premorbid intelligence mediates neurobehavioral change in individuals infected with HIV across 12 months. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 22:208–218
Bayón C, Ribera E, Cabrero E, Griffa L, Burgos Á (2012) Prevalence of depressive and other central nervous system symptoms in HIV-infected patients treated with HAART in Spain. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (chic) 321–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545109712448217
Behrman-Lay AM, Paul RH, Heaps-Woodruff J, Baker LM, Usher C, Ances BM (2016) Human immunodeficiency virus has similar effects on brain volumetrics and cognition in males and females. J Neuro-Oncol 22(1):93–103
Burch LS, Smith CJ, Anderson J, Sherr L, Rodger AJ, O’Connell R, Geretti AM, Gilson R, Fisher M, Elford J, Jones M, Collins S, Azad Y, Phillips AN, Speakman A, Johnson MA, Lampe FC (2016) Socioeconomic status and treatment outcomes for individuals with HIV on antiretroviral tretament in the UK: cross sectional and longitudinal analyses. Lancet Public Health 1:e26–e36
Burlacu R, Umlauf A, Luca A, Gianella S, Radoi R, Ruta SM, Marcotte TD, Ene L, Achim CL (2018) Sex-based differences in neurocognitive functioning in HIV infected young adults. AIDS 32(2):217–225
Capitani E, Laiacona M (1997) Composite neuropsychological batteries and demographic correction: standardization based on equivalent scores, with a review of published data. The Italian Group for the Neuropsychological Study of Ageing. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 19(6):795–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639708403761
Carlesimo GA, Caltagirone C, Gainotti G (1996) The mental deterioration battery: normative data, diagnostic reliability and qualitative analyses of cognitive impairment. The Group for the Standardization of the Mental Deterioration Battery. Eur Neurol 36(6):378–84. https://doi.org/10.1159/000117297
Do TC, Kerr SJ, Avihingsanon A, Suksawek S, Klungkang S, Channgam T, Odermatt CC, Maek-A-Nantawat W, Ruxtungtham K, Ananworanich J, Valcour V, Reiss P, Wit FW (2018) HIV-associated cognitive performance and psychomotor impairment in a Thai cohort on long-term cART. J Virus Erad 4(1):41–47
Fantahun A, Cherie A, Deribe L (2018) Prevalence and factors associated with postpartum depression among mothers attending public health centers of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2016. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health 31(14):196–206. https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901814010196
Farinpour R, Miller EN, Satz P, Selnes OA, Cohen BA, Becker JT, Skolasky RL Jr, Visscher BR (2003) Psychosocial risk factors of HIV morbidity and mortality: findings from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS). J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 25:654–670
Fitch KV, Srinivasa S, Abbara S, Burdo TH, Williams KC, Eneh P, Lo J, Grinspoon SK (2013) Non calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque and immune activation in HIV-infected women. J Infect Dis 208(11): 1737–46. 66
Focà E, Magro P, Motta D, Compostella S, Casari S, Bonito A, Brianese N, Ferraresi A, Rodari P, Pezzoli MC, Quiros-Roldan E, Castelli F (2016) Screening for neurocognitive impairment in HIV-infected individuals at first contact after HIV diagnosis: the experience of a large clinical center in Northern Italy. Int J Mol Sci 17(4):434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17040434.PMID:27023519;PMCID:PMC4848890
Geretti AM, Loutfy M, D’Arminio Monforte A, Latysheva I, Pérez Elías MJ, Rymer J, Boffito M (2017) Out of focus: tailoring the cascade of care to the needs of women living with HIV. HIV Med 18(Suppl 2):3–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12533. (PMID: 28880486)
Heaton RK, Franklin DR Jr, Deutsch R, Letendre S, Ellis RJ, Casaletto K, Marquine MJ, Woods SP, Vaida F, Atkinson JH, Marcotte TD, McCutchan JA, Collier AC, Marra CM, Clifford DB, Gelman BB, Sacktor N, Morgello S, Simpson DM, Abramson I, Gamst AC, Fennema-Notestine C, Smith DM (2015) Neurocognitive change in the era of HIV combination antiretroviral therapy: the longitudinal CHARTER study. Clin Infect Dis 60(3):473–480. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu862
Kabuba N, Menon JA, Franklin DR Jr, Heaton RK, Hestad KA (2016) HIV- and AIDS-associated neurocognitive functioning in Zambia—a perspective based on differences between the genders. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 12(2021–8):21
Laan ETM, Prins JM, van Lunsen RHW, Nieuwkerk PT, Nievaard Boon MAF (2019) Testosterone insufficiency in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women: a cross-sectional study. Sex Med 7(1):72–79
Law MG, Achhra A, Deeks SG, Gazzard B, Migueles SA, Novak RM, Ristola M (2015) International Network for Strategic Initiatives in Global HIV Trials (INSIGHT) START Study Group (2015) Clinical and demographic factors associated with low viral load in early untreated HIV infection in the INSIGHT Strategic Timing of AntiRetroviral Treatment (START) trial. HIV Med 16(Suppl. 1):37–45
Looby SE, Fitch KV, Srinivasa S, Lo J, Rafferty D, Martin A, Currier JC, Grinspoon S, Zanni MV (2016) Reduced ovarian reserve relates to monocyte activation and subclinical coronary atherosclerotic plaque in women with HIV. AIDS 30(3):383–393
Loutfy MR, Sherr L, Sonnenberg-Schwan U, Walmsley SL, Johnson M, d’Arminio Monforte A (2013) Caring for women living with HIV: gaps in the evidence. J Int AIDS Soc 16:18509. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.16.1.18509
Lundgren JD, Babiker AG, Gordin F, Emery S, Grund B, Sharma S, Avihingsanon A, Cooper DA, Fätkenheuer G, Llibre JM, Molina JM, Munderi P, Schechter M, Wood R, Klingman KL, Collins S, Lane HC, Phillips AN, Neaton JD (2015) Initiation of antiretroviral therapy in early asymptomatic HIV infection. N Engl J Med 373:795–807
Maki PM, Rubin LH, Springer G, Seaberg EC, Sacktor N, Miller EN, Valcour V, Young MA, Becker JT, Martin EM (2018) Neuropsychology working groups of the womenʼs interagency HIV study and the multicenter AIDS cohort study differences in cognitive function between women and men with HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 79:101–107
Martin GE, Gouillou M, Hearps AC, Angelovich TA, Cheng AC, Lynch F, Cheng WJ, Paukovics G, Palmer CS, Novak RM, Jaworowski A, Landay AL, Crowe SM (2013) Age-associated changes in monocyte and innate immune activation markers occur more rapidly in HIV infected women. PLoS One 8(1):e55279.67
Milanini B, Ciccarelli N, Fabbiani M, Limiti S, Grima P, Rossetti B, Visconti E, Tamburrini E, Cauda R, Di Giambenedetto S (2016) Cognitive reserve and neuropsychological functioning in older HIV-infected people. J Neurovirol 22(5):575–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13365-016-0426-7
Morrison MF, Petitto J, Ten Have T, Gettes DR, Chiappini MS, Weber AL, Brinker-Spence P, Bauer RM, Douglas SD, Evans DL (2002) Depressive and anxiety disorders in women with HIV infection. Am J Psychiatry 159(5):789–796
Napravnik S, Poole C, Thomas JC, Eron JJ Jr (2002) Gender difference in HIV RNA levels: a meta-analysis of published studies. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 31:11–19
Orza L, Bewley S, Logie CH, Crone ET, Moroz S, Strachan S, Vazquez M, Welbourn A (2015) How does living with HIV impact on women’s mental health? Voices from a global survey. J Int AIDS Soc 18:20289. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.18.6.20289
Pérez-Elías MJ, Muriel A, Moreno A, Martinez-Colubi M, Iribarren JA, Masiá M, Blanco JR, Palacios R, Del Romero J, Pérez DG, Hernando V (2014) CoRIS study group relevant gender differences in epidemiological profile, exposure to first antiretroviral regimen and survival in the Spanish AIDS Research Network Cohort. Antivir Ther 19:375–385
Puskas CM, Forrest JI, Parashar S, Salters KA, Cescon AM, Kaida A, Miller CL, Bangsberg DR, Hogg RS (2011) Women and vulnerability to HAART non-adherence: a literature review of treatment adherence by gender from 2000 to 2011. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 8:277–287
Rabkin JG, Johnson J, Lin SH, Lipsitz JD, Remien RH, Williams JB, Gorman JM (1997) Psychopathology in male and female HIV-positive and negative injecting drug users: longitudinal course over 3 years. AIDS 11(4):507–515
Ribaudo H, Landovitz RJ, Na LH (2016) Gender and racial disparities in initial antiretorviral treatment outcome: ACT A5257. CROI 22–25 Feb 2016. Abstract 476
Rosin C, Elzi L, Thurnheer C, Fehr J, Cavassini M, Calmy A, Schmid P, Bernasconi E, Battegay M (2015) Swiss HIV cohort study gender inequalities in the response to combination antiretroviral therapy over time: the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. HIV Med 16:319–325
Royal W III, Cherner M, Burdo TH, Umlauf A, Letendre SL, Jumare J, Abimiku A, Alabi P, Alkali N, Bwala S, Okwuasaba K, Eyzaguirre LM, Akolo C, Guo M, Williams KC, Blattner WA (2016) Associations between cognition, gender and monocyte activation among HIV infected individuals in Nigeria. PLoS One 11:e0147182
Rubin LH, Sundermann EE, Cook JA, Martin EM, Golub ET, Weber KM, Cohen MH, Crystal H, Cederbaum JA, Anastos K, Young M, Greenblatt RM, Maki PM (2014) Investigation of menopausal stage and symptoms on cognition in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women. Menopause 21:997–1006
Rubin LH, Cook JA, Weber KM, Cohen MH, Martin E, Valcour V, Milam J, Anastos K, Young MA, Alden C, Gustafson DR, Maki PM (2015) The association of perceived stress and verbal memory is greater in HIV-infected versus HIV-uninfected women. J Neurovirol 21:422–432
Rubin LH, Pyra M, Cook JA, Weber KM, Cohen MH, Martin E, Valcour V, Milam J, Anastos K, Young MA, Alden C, Gustafson DR, Maki PM (2016) Post-traumatic stress is associated with verbal learning, memory, and psychomotor speed in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women. J Neurovirol 22:159–169
Rubin LH, Springer G, Martin EM, Seaberg EC, Sacktor NC, Levine A, Valcour VG, Young MA, Becker JT, Maki PM (2019) Elevated depressive symptoms are a stronger predictor of executive dysfunction in HIV-infected women than men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 81(3):274–283
Rubin LH, Neigh GN, Sundermann EE, Xu Y, Scully EP, Maki PM (2019) Sex differences in neurocognitive function in adults with HIV: patterns, predictors, and mechanisms. Curr Psychiatry Rep 21(10):94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1089-x.PMID:31522330;PMCID:PMC7673651
Rubin LH, Sundermann EE, Dastgheyb R, Buchholz AS, Pasipanodya E, Heaton RK, Grant I, Ellis R, Moore DJ (2020) Sex differences in the patterns and predictors of cognitive function in HIV. Front Neurol 11:551921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.551921.PMID:33329301;PMCID:PMC7732436
Semple SJ, Patterson TL, Straits-Troster K, Atkinson JH, McCutchan JA, Grant I (1996) Social and psychological characteristicsof HIV-infected women andgay men. Women Health 24:17–41
Singer M (1994) AIDS and the health crisis of the U.S. urban poor; the perspective of critical medical anthropology. Soc Sci Med 39(7):931–48
Soon GG, Min M, Struble KA, Chan-Tack KM, Hammerstrom T, Qi K, Zhou S, Bhore R, Murray JS, Birnkrant DB (2012) Meta-analysis of gender differences in efficacy outcomes for HIV-positive subjects in randomized controlled clinical trials of antiretroviral therapy (2000–2008). AIDS Patient Care STDS 26:444–453
Sundermann EE, Heaton RK, Pasipanodya E, Moore RC, Paolillo EW, Rubin LH, Ellis R, Moore DJ, HNRP Group (2018) Sex differences in HIV-associated cognitive impairment. AIDS 32(18):2719–2726
Tedaldi EM, Minniti NL, Fischer T (2015) HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: the relationship of HIV infection with physical and social comorbidities. Biomed Res Int 641913. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/641913
Ticona E, Bull ME, Soria J, Tapia K, Legard J, Styrchak SM, Williams C, Mitchell C, La Rosa A, Rosa AL, Coombs RW, Frenkel LM (2015) Biomarkers of inflammation in HIV-infected Peruvian men and women before and during suppressive antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 29(13):1617–22
Tsai AC, Burns BF (2015) Syndemics of psychosocial problems and HIV risk: a systematic review of empirical tests of the disease interaction concept. Soc Sci Med 139:26–35
Yousuf A, Arifin SRM, Musa R, Md Isa ML (2019) Depression and HIV disease progression: a mini-review. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health 15:153–159. https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901915010153
Zung WW (1965) A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 12:63–70
Zung WW (1986) Zung self-rating depression scale and depression status inventory. In: Sartorius N, Ban TA (eds) Assessment of depression. Springer, Berlin
Acknowledgements
The authors want to thank all the study’s participants.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The study was approved by the institutional ethic committee and all participants provided written informed consent prior to enrollment.
Conflict of interest
AB received fee for advisory board by ViiV Healthcare, personal fee by Janssen Cilag, AC received a travel grant by ViiV Healthcare, SDG received speakers’ honoraria and support for travel to meetings from Gilead, Janssen-Cilag (JC), Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), and ViiV Healthcare. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Donne, V.D., Massaroni, V., Ciccarelli, N. et al. Difference in the neurocognitive functions of WLWH and MLWH in an Italian cohort of people living with HIV. J. Neurovirol. 28, 422–429 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13365-022-01078-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13365-022-01078-z