Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution and occupancy of Atlantic salt marsh mink (Neovison vison lutensis) in Northeastern Florida (USA)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mammal Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Salt marsh is a unique and biologically productive ecosystem characterized by relatively few endemic terrestrial vertebrates. Salt marsh continues to decline worldwide and the persistence of species restricted to salt marsh may depend on understanding characteristics associated with their use of these ecosystems. Atlantic salt marsh mink (Neovison vison lutensis) were historically found throughout Northeastern Florida (USA) but their numbers and distribution may have declined following coastal development beginning in the 1800s. Information on their current distribution and ecology in Florida is unknown but they are suspected of being restricted to salt marsh. Between 2013 and 2015, we conducted camera surveys for mink in 42.1 km2 units in salt marsh to determine their occupancy, extent of occurrence, and drivers of habitat use. We measured 20 site-specific environmental covariates to model occupancy and detectability. Mink were detected in a 226 km2 area within 14 km of the Atlantic coast between two of the region’s major rivers. We found positive associations in our top overall occupancy model between mink and blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) biomass and between detectability and low marsh dominated by cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora). Our detection data provides further support that mink may be endemic to coastal salt marsh in Florida and that they currently occupy approximately half the northern portion of their historical distribution. We suggest that the long-term persistence of Atlantic salt marsh mink in Florida may depend on the presence of healthy and functional low marsh where aquatic food resources, particularly blue crab, are locally abundant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Allen AW (1984) Habitat suitability index model: mink. US Fish Wildl Serv FWS/OBS-82/10:1–19

  • Baker OE (1999) The status of mink (Mustela vison) in South Carolina. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. Furbearer Project Publication No. 99–01

  • Bangs O (1899) Land mammals of peninsular Florida and the coast region of Georgia. In: Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History 28. Boston, Massachusetts, pp 157–235

  • Beck MW et al (2001) The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. BioScience 51:633–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David M, Boyer RT, Faro JB (1996) Niche separation by mink and river otters: coexistence in a marine environment. Oikos 75:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birks JD, Linn I (1982) Studies of home range of the feral mink Mustela vison. Symp Zool Soc London 49:231–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonesi L, Dunstone N, O’Connell M (2000) Winter selection of habitats within intertidal foraging areas by mink (Mustela vison). J Zool 250:419–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb00785.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgham SD, Megonigal JP, Keller JK, Bliss NB, Trettin C (2006) The carbon balance of North American wetlands. Wetlands 26:889–916. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[889:TCBONA]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, United States

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Soc Meth Res 33:261–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle B et al (2006) Rapid method for assessing estuarine (salt) marshes in New England version 1.4 – October 2006. Modified by: Hilary Neckles and Glenn Guntenspergen USGS, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, Maryland

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging theory, marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Bio 9:129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks S, Herr D, Tamelander J, Laffoley D, Vandever J (2011) Mitigating climate change through restoration and management of coastal wetlands and near-shore marine ecosystems: challenges and opportunities. Environment department papers no. 121. Marine ecosystem series. World Bank, Washington, DC

  • Deegan LA, Johnson DS, Warren RS, Peterson BJ, Fleeger JW, Fagherazzi S, Wollheim WM (2012) Coastal eutrophication as a driver of salt marsh loss. Nature 490:388–392. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delibes M, Clavero M, Prenda J, del Carmen BM, Ferreras P (2004) Potential impact of an exotic mammal on rocky intertidal communities of northwestern Spain. Biol Invasions 6:213–219. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BINV.0000022141.47102.5c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan T, Hines J (2007) Exercises in occupancy modeling and estimation. Electronic book. http://www.uvm.edu/envnr/vtcfwru/spreadsheets/occupancy.htm

  • Dunstone N (1993) The mink. T & AD Poyser, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Eleuterius LN (1976) Vegetative morphology and anatomy of the salt marsh rush, Juncusroemerianus. Gulf Res Reports 5:1–10. https://doi.org/10.18785/grr.0502.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eleuterius LN, Eleuterius CK (1979) Tide levels and salt -marsh zonation. Bull Mar Sci 29:394–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Errington PL (1961) Muskrats and marsh management. Stackpole Company, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA

  • Fitz HC, Wiegert RG (1991) Utilization of the intertidal zone of a salt marsh by the blue crab Callinectes sapidus: density, return frequency, and feeding habits. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 76:249–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaxman SM, Lou Y (2009) Tracking prey or tracking the prey’s resource? Mechanisms of movement and optimal habitat selection by predators. J Theor Biol 256:187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.09.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) (2019) Florida’s Wildlife Legacy Initiative: Florida’s State Wildlife Action Plan. Tallahassee, Florida

  • Fraser EJ, Harrington LA, MacDonald DW, Lambin X (2017) Control of an invasive species: the American mink in Great Britain. In: Macdonald DW, Newman C, Harrington LA (eds) Biology and conservation of musteloids. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 357–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganju NK et al (2017) Spatially integrative metrics reveal hidden vulnerability of microtidal salt marshes. Nat Commun 8:14156. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner B, Garner L, Cobb D, Moorman C (2016) Factors affecting occupancy and abundance of American alligators at the northern extent of their range. J Herpetol 50:541–547. https://doi.org/10.1670/15-147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1994) Rarity. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gedan KB, Altieri AH, Bertness MB (2009) Uncertain future of New England salt marshes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 434:229–237. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg R, Maldonado JE (2006) Diversity and endemism in tidal-marsh vertebrates. Studies in Avian Biol 32:32–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert FF, Nancekivell EG (1982) Food habits of mink (Mustela vison) and otter (Lutra canadensis) in northeastern Alberta. Can J Zool 60:1282–1288. https://doi.org/10.1139/z82-172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorga C (2012) Ecology of the American mink and the potential impact on species of concern in Cape Romain National Wildlife Refuge, South Carolina. MS thesis, Clemson University

  • Greenberg R, Maldonado JE, Droege S, McDonald MV (2006) Tidal marshes: a global perspective on the evolution and conservation of their terrestrial vertebrates. BioScience 56:675–685. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[675:TMAGPO]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatler DF (1976) The coastal mink on Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Dissertation, The University of British Columbia

  • Hoffman JD, Wilson S, Genoways HH (2009) Historical winter diets of mink (Mustela vison) in Nebraska. Trans Kansas Acad Sci 112:119–122. https://doi.org/10.1660/062.112.0216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey SR (1992) Southern Florida population of mink Mustela vison mink (in part). In: Humphrey SR (ed) Rare and endangered biota of Florida, vol I. Mammals. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, pp 319–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey S, Zinn T (1982) Seasonal habitat use by river otters and Everglades mink in Florida. J Wildl Manage 46:375–381. https://doi.org/10.2307/3808649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey SR, Setzer HW (1989) Geographic variation and taxonomic revision of Mink (Mustela vison) in Florida. J Mammal 70:241–252. https://doi.org/10.2307/1381505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Union for the Conservation of Nature (2012) Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, United Kingdom. pp 41

  • International Union for the Conservation of Nature (2017) Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List criteria and categories. pp 108

  • Joanen T, McNease L (1989) Ecology and physiology of nesting and early development of the American alligator. Am Zool 29:987–998. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/29.3.987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DH (1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecol 61:65–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston S (2001) The Historical Development of St. Johns County, Florida, with the Development Patterns and Periods of Building Construction. Environmental Services, Inc., Jacksonville.

  • Kautz RS, Gilbert DT, Mauldin GM (1993) Vegetative cover in Florida based on 1985–1989 Landsat thematic mapper imagery. Florida Scientist 56:135–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Keim JL, DeWitt PD, Subhash RL (2011) Predators choose prey over prey habitats: evidence from a lynx–hare system. Ecol Appl 21:1011–1016. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0949.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lariviere S (1999) Mustela vison. Mamm Species 608(1):9

    Google Scholar 

  • Linscombe G, Kinler N, Aulerich RJ (1982) Mink: Mustela vison. In: Chapman JA, Feldhamer GA (eds) Wild mammals of North America: biology, management, and economics. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 629–643

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur R, Pianka E (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609. https://doi.org/10.1086/282454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCleery R, Zweig C, Desa MA, Hunt R, Kitchens W, Percival HF (2014) A novel method for camera-trapping small mammals. Wildl Soc Bull 38:887–891. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCowen CJ, Weatherdon LV, Bochove JV, Sullivan E, Blyth S, Zockler C, Fletcher S (2017) A global map of saltmarshes. Biodivers Data J 5:e11764. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e11764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melquist WE, Whitman JS, and Homocker MG (1981) Resource partitioning and co-existence of sympatric mink and river otter populations. In: Chapman JA and Pursley P (eds) Proceedings of the worldwide furbearers conference. Frostburg, pp 187–221.

  • Mohr CO (1947) Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. Am Midl Nat 37:223–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin DJ, Yackulic CB, Diffendorfer JE, Lesmeister DB, Nielsen CK, Reid J, Schauber EM (2020) Is your ad hoc model selection strategy affecting your multimodel inference? Ecosphere 11:e02997. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2997

  • National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (2015) Tide tables - 2015: East coast of North America and South America including Greenland. pp 433

  • Nifong JC, Lowers RH (2017) Reciprocal intraguild predation between Alligator mississippiensis (American alligator) and Elasmobranchii in the southeastern United States. Southeastern Nat 16:383. https://doi.org/10.1656/058.016.0306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peeples JW (2001) The feasibility of re-establishing wild mink in the northern coastal marshes of South Carolina. MS thesis, Clemson University

  • Pennings SC (2012) Ecology: the big picture of marsh loss. Nature 490:352–353. https://doi.org/10.1038/490352a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Postal M, Joiner K, Lilly T (2010) Northeast Florida. In: Titus JG, Trescott DL, Hudgens DE (eds) The Likelihood of Shore Protection along the Atlantic Coast of the United States Volume 2: New England and the Southeast. Report to the US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

  • Rosenblatt AE, Nifong JC, Heithaus MR, Parry MW, Mazzotti FJ (2014) New record of Everglades mink in Everglades National Park from the stomach of an American alligator. Southeastern Nat 13:22–25. https://doi.org/10.1656/058.013.0303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozas LP, Minello TJ (1998) Nekton use of salt marsh, seagrass, and nonvegetated habitats in a south Texas (USA) estuary. Bull Mar Sci 63:481–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Saintilan N, Wilson N, Rogers K, Rajkaran A, Krauss KW (2014) Mangrove expansion and salt marsh decline at mangrove poleward limits. Global Change Biol 20:147–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikes RS, Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists (2016) Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education. J Mammal 97:663–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AT (1980) An environmental study of Everglades mink (Mustela vison). Everglades National Park, South Florida Research Center, Report T-555. pp 17

  • Waller DW (1962) Feeding behavior of minks at some Iowa marshes. MS thesis, Iowa State University

  • Waller M (2010) Evaluation of spotlight surveys for monitoring mink populations in coastal South Carolina. MS thesis, Clemson University

  • White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46:S120–S139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063659909477239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson TL, Schmidt JH (2015) Scale dependence in occupancy models: implications for estimating bear den distribution and abundance. Ecosphere 6:168. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES15-00250.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff PJ, Taylor CA, Heske EJ, Schooley RL (2015) Habitat selection by American mink during Summer is related to hotspots of crayfish prey. Wildl Biol 21:9–17. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00031

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We also thank the North Florida Land Trust for facilitating housing during year two of the study.

Funding

Funding and logistical support provided by Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and Central Connecticut State University Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Chris Winchester and Lisa Smith were primarily responsible for collection of detection data. Paul Hapeman and Agnes Kosciolek were primarily responsible for collection of covariate data. Paul Hapeman conducted the analysis and wrote the manuscript with other co-authors participating in the editing process.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Hapeman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All research was conducted following the ASM ethical and safety guidelines (Sikes et al., 2016).

Consent to participate

All authors consent to participate in this research and the publication of the findings.

Consent for publication

All authors consent to the publication of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Communicated by: Andrzej Zalewski

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 120 KB)

Supplementary file2 (PDF 88 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hapeman, P., Smith, L.M., Kosciolek, A. et al. Distribution and occupancy of Atlantic salt marsh mink (Neovison vison lutensis) in Northeastern Florida (USA). Mamm Res 66, 541–551 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-021-00584-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-021-00584-5

Keywords

Navigation