Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of weather, season, and daylight on female wild boar movement

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Theriologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Animals often modify their behavior to reduce the effects of adverse weather conditions. By studying wild boar equipped with the Global Positioning System (GPS) collars, we explored the effects of weather conditions on movement and activity patterns across seasons. We found that the most prevailing strategy for wild boar exposed to stressful weather conditions is to reduce movement. Wild boar thus decreased movement at low temperatures and in precipitation during winter. We also found that wild boar increased movement in late summer, and with precipitation during late summer, despite higher food availability and facilitated foraging by the rain. We also confirm previous results that snow depth reduces movement of wild boar, likely by making movements more energetically costly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahti T, Hämet-Ahti L, Jalas J (1968) Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Ann Bot Fenn 5:169–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. Ieee Trans Automat Cont AC 19(6):716–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoń K (2013) MuMIn: Multi-model inference, 1911th edn

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2013) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes, 0999999–2nd edn

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieber C, Ruf T (2005) Population dynamics in wild boar Sus scrofa: ecology, elasticity of growth rate and implications for the management of pulsed resource consumers. J Appl Ecol 42(6):1203–1213. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01094.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börger L, Franconi N, Ferretti F, Meschi F, De Michele G, Gantz A, Coulson T (2006) An integrated approach to identify spatiotemporal and individual-level determinants of animal home range size. Am Nat 168(4):471–485. doi:10.1086/507883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill AE, Aiello-Lammens ME, Fisher-Reid MC, Hua X, Karanewsky CJ, Ryu HY, Sbeglia GC, Spagnolo F, Waldron JB, Warsi O, Wiens JJ (2013) How does climate change cause extinction? Proc Royal Soc Lond [Biol] 280 (1750)

  • Cellina S (2008) Effects of supplemental feeding on the body condition and reproductive state of wild boar Sus scrofa in Luxembourg. University of Sussex

  • Fielitz U (2003) Remote GPS-data transmission via mobile phone. http://www.environmental-studies.de/products/02/gps-gsm_collars.html. 2007

  • Forcada J, Trathan PN, Reid K, Murphy EJ (2005) The effects of global climate variability in pup production of Antarctic fur seals. Ecology 86(9):2408–2417. doi:10.1890/04-1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford RG (1983) Home range in a patchy environment—optimal foraging predictions. Am Zool 23(2):315–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisser H, Reyer HU (2005) The influence of food and temperature on population density of wild boar Sus scrofa in the Thurgau (Switzerland). J Zool 267:89–96. doi:10.1017/S095283690500734x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gethoffer F, Sodeikat G, Pohlmeyer K (2007) Reproductive parameters of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in three different parts of Germany. Eur J Wildl Res 53(4):287–297. doi:10.1007/s10344-007-0097-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson A (2006) Yrkesjägare. Högestad Viltförvaltning AB, Ystad

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuling O, Stier N, Roth M (2008) How does hunting influence activity and spatial usage in wild boar Sus scrofa L.? Eur J Wildl Res 54(4):729–737. doi:10.1007/s10344-008-0204-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kie JG, Bowyer RT, Nicholson MC, Boroski BB, Loft ER (2002) Landscape heterogeneity at differing scales: effects on spatial distribution of mule deer. Ecology 83(2):530–544. doi:10.2307/2680033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreeger TJ, Arnemo JM (2007) Handbook of wildlife chemical immobilization, 3rd edn. Wildlife Pharmaceuticals, Fort Collins, CO, USA

  • Lemel J (1999) Populationstillväxt, dynamik och spridning hos vildsvinet, Sus scrofa, i mellersta Sverige

  • Lemel J, Truve J, Soderberg B (2003) Variation in ranging and activity behaviour of European wild boar Sus scrofa in Sweden. Wildl Biol 9:29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Macarthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100(916):603. doi:10.1086/282454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massei G, Genov PV, Staines BW, Gorman ML (1997) Factors influencing home range and activity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a Mediterranean coastal area. J Zool 242:411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melis C, Szafranska PA, Jedrzejewska B, Bartoń K (2006) Biogeographical variation in the population density of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in western Eurasia. J Biogeogr 33(5):803–811. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01434.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen AN (1976) Energy-conservation by white-tailed deer in winter. Ecology 57(1):192–198. doi:10.2307/1936411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen R, Pastor J, Cohen Y, Schwartz CC (1996) Effects of moose movement and habitat use on GPS collar performance. J Wildl Manag 60(3):659–668. doi:10.2307/3802085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker KL (1988) Effects of heat, cold, and rain on coastal black-tailed deer. Can J Zool-Rev Can Zool 66(11):2475–2483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penuelas J, Sardans J, Estiarte M, Ogaya R, Carnicer J, Coll M, Barbeta A, Rivas-Ubach A, Llusia J, Garbulsky M, Filella I, Jump AS (2013) Evidence of current impact of climate change on life: a walk from genes to the biosphere. Glob Chang Biol 19(8):2303–2338. doi:10.1111/gcb.12143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podgórski T, Bas G, Jedrzejewska B, Sonnichsen L, Sniezko S, Jędrzejewski W, Okarma H (2013) Spatiotemporal behavioral plasticity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) under contrasting conditions of human pressure: primeval forest and metropolitan area. J Mammal 94(1):109–119. doi:10.1644/12-Mamm-a-038.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quillfeldt P, Masello JF (2013) Impacts of climate variation and potential effects of climate change on South American seabirds—a review. Mar Biol Res 9(4):337–357. doi:10.1080/17451000.2012.756982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, 2.10.0 edn. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

  • Rivrud IM, Loe LE, Mysterud A (2010) How does local weather predict red deer home range size at different temporal scales? J Anim Ecol 79(6):1280–1295. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01731.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson BG, Merrill EH (2012) The influence of snow on the functional response of grazing ungulates. Oikos 121(1):28–34. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19408.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo L, Massei G, Genov PV (1997) Daily home range and activity of wild boar in a Mediterranean area free from hunting. Ethol Ecol Evol 9(3):287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selva N, Jedrzejewska B, Jędrzejewski W, Wajrak A (2003) Scavenging on European bison carcasses in Bialowieza Primeval Forest (eastern Poland). Ecoscience 10(3):303–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurfjell H, Spong G, Ericsson G (2013) Effects of hunting on wild boar Sus scrofa behaviour. Wildl Biol 19(1):87–93. doi:10.2981/12-027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufto J, Andersen R, Linnell JDC (1996) Habitat use and ecological correlates of home range size in a small cervid: the roe deer. J Anim Ecol 65(6):715–724. doi:10.2307/5670

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the Swedish Association for Hunting and Wildlife Management and the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies for the financial support and the thematic program for wildlife and forestry. To Earl Carl Piper for letting us conduct the study on his estates. To all fieldworkers and veterinarians involved in the project and Christina Prokopenko for her useful comments regarding the English grammar.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrik Thurfjell.

Additional information

Communicated by: Jan M. Wójcik

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Appendix 1

(TXT 10.6 KB)

Appendix 2

(TXT 33.3 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thurfjell, H., Spong, G. & Ericsson, G. Effects of weather, season, and daylight on female wild boar movement. Acta Theriol 59, 467–472 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-014-0185-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-014-0185-x

Keywords

Navigation