We have developed a multiplex assay covering 16 microsatellite loci, amplified in four polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays, and loaded on the ABI DNA Analyzer in two separate panels. The assay was tested on 603 individuals originating from wild populations and hatchery stocks of Atlantic sturgeon. The assay was also tested on 12 individuals of European sturgeon and appeared to be almost equally useful. The multiplex assay designed in this study can be successfully applied in studies requiring high genetic resolution, such as relatedness analysis, selective breeding programs, and stock identification of Atlantic sturgeon.
Atlantic (Acipenser oxyrinchus) and European (A. sturio) sturgeons belong to the Acipenseridae, considered one of the most endangered fish families (Pikitch et al. 2005; Ludwig 2006). Historically, Atlantic sturgeon inhabited the East Coast of North America, and Western and Central Europe, including the Baltic Sea, whereas the European sturgeon’s habitat was restricted to Western and Southern Europe (Ludwig et al. 2002 and 2009; Stankovic 2011; Chassaing et al. 2011a, 2013). During the last two centuries, the populations of Atlantic and European sturgeons have declined drastically due to river damming, habitat destruction, and overexploitation (Waldman and Wirgin 1998; Vecsei 2005; Ludwig 2006). At present, both species are endangered across the whole of their historical range; in the case of the European sturgeon, only a single population exists, in the Gironde–Garonne–Dordogne watershed (France) (Lassalle et al. 2011). The Atlantic sturgeon became extinct in the wild in Europe in 1996, when the last specimen was captured in the Baltic Sea (Paaver 1999). In Poland, a sturgeon restitution program was launched in 2004 (Kolman et al. 2011). Material from the St. John River has been used to build up broodstock in Poland and to repopulate local rivers (Kolman et al. 2011). These attempts at sturgeon restitution in the Baltic Sea have been followed by genetic monitoring using microsatellite loci to characterize and maintain genetic polymorphism within the established population.
Microsatellite loci are molecular markers commonly used in population genetics, especially in non-model organisms. The usefulness of these markers lies in their assumed neutrality and high level of polymorphism. In conservation genetics, microsatellite loci have been applied for the determination of management units (MUs), and for planning captive breeding programs and population management (DeSalle and Amato 2004). The number of loci needed to obtain reliable results depends upon the type of analysis required and the genetic variability of the species under study. For strain identification or relatedness analysis, the use of 15–20 markers to obtain sufficient statistical power is recommended (Blouin et al. 1996; Norris et al. 2000). Individual amplification and length analysis of so many loci is both time-consuming and expensive; therefore, the development and optimization of multiplex assays, enabling simultaneous amplification and analysis of several loci in a single polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, is becoming increasingly popular (Zhu et al. 2010; Olafsson et al. 2010; Ciofi et al. 2011). Carefully tested multiplexes allow for the direct comparison of populations studied in different laboratories and for building common databases of genotypes.
Various sets of microsatellite loci have already been employed to study wild and hatchery populations of Atlantic and European sturgeons (Ludwig et al. 2000, 2008; King et al. 2001; Wirgin et al. 2002; Henderson et al. 2004; Williot et al. 2007; Tiedemann et al. 2011; Saarinen et al. 2011; Moyer et al. 2012; Waldman et al. 2013; Wirgin et al. 2012). However, no standardized multiplex set is currently available, despite the utility of such an assay for the sturgeon conservation programs which have recently been started in several countries (Henderson et al. 2004; Gessner et al. 2011; Kirschbaum et al. 2011; Kolman et al. 2011). The aim of the present paper was to develop a microsatellite multiplex assay as a standard, cost-effective genotyping tool for the analysis of Atlantic sturgeon populations. The system was successfully tested on several wild and broodstock sturgeon populations, and we further show that the same approach could also be used for the analysis of the European sturgeon species.
Materials and methods
Sampling and DNA extraction
The material for this study consisted of 255 Atlantic sturgeon specimens from seven wild populations from the St. John, St. Lawrence, Kennebec, Hudson, Savannah, Shark, and Delaware Rivers, and 348 specimens from the broodstock kept in the Kuźniczki and Pieczarki Hatchery Stations in Poland and at the Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries in Germany (Supplementary Table 1). The broodstock population was composed of nine year classes, each being the progeny of artificially spawned wild individuals originating from the St. John River. As the number of spawners caught and used for reproduction was limited (usually around five to eight, annually), the year classes were mostly composed of siblings and half-siblings. Additionally, 12 wild specimens of European sturgeon from the Gironde population were analyzed (Supplementary Table 1). DNA was extracted from fin clips preserved in 70 % EtOH. DNA was isolated using proprietary kits [Sherlock AX Kit, Genomic Mini (A&A Biotechnology) or Wizard Kit (Promega)], according to manufacturers’ instructions. DNA was eluted with sterile water and stored at −20°C.
Microsatellite selection and multiplex PCR optimization
Up to 2009, 38 microsatellite loci had been described from Atlantic sturgeon (May et al. 1997; King et al. 2001; Henderson-Arzapalo and King 2002). Of these, we chose 17 loci which had simple, long repeat motifs and which showed the highest polymorphism. These were assigned to four multiplex reactions based on their allele lengths (Supplementary Fig. 1). Before including different loci in the multiplex assays, their potential for primer dimer or hairpin formation was tested in silico, using FastPCR v.3.8.41 with default parameters (Kalendar et al. 2009). To avoid non-specific amplification, the forward primers for AoxD170 and Ls-62 were modified (Supplementary Table 2). The primer concentration was adjusted experimentally to give similar amounts of PCR products which were evaluated on the chromatogram reads. The final amplification reaction volume of 10 μl contained 50–200 ng of DNA, 1× MasterMix (Qiagen Multiplex Kit), and an appropriate concentration of primers, of which the 5′ end of each forward primer was fluorescently labeled (Supplementary Table 2). The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation of 15 min at 95 °C, 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 63 °C (mixes 1 and 2) or 61 °C (mixes 3 and 4), 30 s at 72 °C, and a final elongation of 30 min at 60 °C. Mixes were loaded onto two autosequencer panels (1 + 2 and 3 + 4). The length reading of PCR products was performed commercially (Oligo.pl, IBB, Warsaw, Poland) on ABI PRISM 377 and 310 automated sequencers with ROX 500 size standard (Applied Biosystems).
Peak Scanner v.1.0 software (Applied Biosystems) was used to bin, score, and output the microsatellite data. Micro-Checker v.2.2.3 (Van Oosterhout et al. 2004) was applied to test for errors due to stuttering, null alleles (AN), and large allele dropouts. These analyses were performed for the whole dataset and each of the five most numerous wild populations, using 1,000 randomizations and 95 % confidence interval (CI). The Brookfield 1 (Brookfield 1996) equation was used for null allele frequency estimation. The number of alleles per locus (NA) and probability of identity (PI and PIsibs) were calculated using GenAlEx v.6.5 software (Paekal and Smouse 2001), while GENEPOP v.4.0.10 (Raymond and Rousset 1995) was used to calculate the mean null allele frequency (AN) using maximum likelihood based on the expectation–maximization (EM) algorithm. Observed heterozygosity (HO), expected heterozygosity (HE), and linkage disequilibrium between pairs of loci using 16,000 permutations were estimated with Arlequin v.184.108.40.206 (Excoffier and Lischer 2010). Linkage analysis was conducted for the five wild populations of sturgeons (excluding Savannah and Delaware, as their population sizes were considered too small). The average non-exclusion probabilities for parentage assignment (NE-1P, NE-2P, and NE-PP) and the polymorphic information Content (PIC) of the studied loci were calculated separately for the wild and hatchery populations using Cervus v.3.0 (Kalinowski et al. 2007).
Results and discussion
The multiplex assay for 17 microsatellite loci was tested on a sample of 603 Atlantic sturgeons from both wild and hatchery populations (Tables 1 and 2). Using FastPCR, only the primers for loci AoxD161 and AoxD297 (mix 1) forward primer for locus Ls-68 (mix 4) could form dimers. However, the amplified products were, nevertheless, clearly distinguishable and easy to score. The obtained allele ranges for each locus of the 603 individuals belonging to the main distribution area of Atlantic sturgeon were non-overlapping (Supplementary Fig. 1). The total successful amplification rate of particular loci varied from 96.5 to 100 %, with the exception of locus Ls-62 (85.7 %) (Table 1). We subsequently decided to exclude this locus from the multiplex assay, as the low amplification yields were most probably caused by the presence of null alleles and stuttering, as suggested by the results obtained with the Micro-Checker software.
Linkage disequilibrium and null allele frequency estimation
Independently performed linkage analysis has shown that the microsatellite loci included into the multiplex assay are not linked with each other, as neither of the pair of loci was repeatedly significantly linked across all five examined populations. No evidence of large allele dropouts or false alleles was obtained. However, four loci (AoxD54, AoxD297, Ls-68, AoxD186) could exhibit stuttering according to Micro-Checker and four loci (AoxD186, AoxD54, AoxD297, Ls-68) could be biased with null allele presence, with the frequency exceeding 0.05 for both tests (Table 1). Analyses of the five wild populations separately have shown (according to the Brookfield 1 method) that only some of the loci could exhibit null alleles (data not shown), but not across all of the studied populations (AoxD186 in none, AoxD54 in one, Ls-68 in two, and AoxD297 in three populations). The highest An values, reaching 0.10, were obtained for AoxD297. However, as the most polymorphic locus, we consider this to be a valuable member of the multiplex assay. The An values obtained for other loci were usually close or equal to zero. The occurrence of null alleles in a large sample of individuals representing populations from a very broad geographic range is not a surprise considering the high mutation rates of the microsatellite loci ranging, on average, 5 × 10−4 per generation (Schlötterer 2004).
Polymorphism and assignment power of the selected markers
The results presented in Table 1 indicate that all the loci included in the multiplex assay were polymorphic. The number of alleles varied from three (AoxC45) to 36 (AoxD297), and averaged 15.2 per locus, making this multiplex assay a valuable tool for population analysis. Observed heterozygosity also varied strongly between the loci, often departing from the mean value of 0.60. The PIC values, which depend on both allele frequency and heterozygosity, varied between 0.17 for AoxC45 and 0.89 for AoxD234 and AoxD241. As expected, all indices of genetic polymorphism were lower for the hatchery population than for wild fish, presumably as a result of using a limited number of spawners for reproduction (Table 2). Despite that, the PI values were still sufficiently high to distinguish even highly related individuals. The same was true also for the paternity analysis, where non-exclusion probabilities had very low values, minimizing the probability of errors of false parent identification. These results demonstrate that the designed multiplex assay could serve well for both stock identification and kinship analysis. Even when a single year class, containing the progeny of one female and two males, was analyzed (Table 2), the PI and non-exclusion probabilities were sufficiently low to assure proper individual and parental identification.
Cross-species amplification in A. sturio
The multiplex assay was also tested on 12 individuals of European sturgeon (A. sturio). For five loci, the optimal annealing temperature had to be lowered to 58 °C (AoxD188, AoxC27 56 °C (AoxC45), and 54 °C (AoxD242) for successful amplification, but even at these temperatures, the amplification of AoxC45 and AoxD242 remained problematic. Four loci seemed to be monomorphic (Table 1), although analysis of a larger sample may reveal more alleles for these loci, as shown previously for Ls-68 (Chassaing et al. 2011b). The low variability of European sturgeon is not surprising, because only a single, very small, and probably bottlenecked population of species remains (Williot et al. 2007). For five loci (AoxD161, AoxD188, AoxD297, AoxD242, and AoxC30), the allele range sizes of Atlantic and European sturgeons did not overlap. These loci together could serve as a powerful tool for species or hybrid identification. Chassaing et al. (2011b) has already suggested the use of AoxD161 as a diagnostic marker distinguishing Atlantic and European sturgeons. If the multiplex assay described here is used to analyze European sturgeon populations, we suggest the use of a fourth fluorescent dye to label microsatellite loci AoxD161, AoxD242, and Ls-68, as the allele size ranges of these loci overlap with those of some others.
The described multiplex assay, covering 16 microsatellite loci, amplified in four polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays and loaded on the ABI DNA analyzer in two separate panels, can be successfully applied in the genetic analysis of populations and relatedness assignment in captive breeding programs of Atlantic sturgeon. The optimized microsatellite set may also be used for European sturgeon; however, for optimal results in this case, we recommend the addition of loci designed specifically for this species (Tiedemann et al. 2011). Five loci were identified which can be used for the detection of introgression between the two sturgeon species. The designed multiplex assay has already been applied in practice and will be used for creating a pedigree book and optimal cross design for the broodstock of Atlantic sturgeon during its reintroduction in Poland (Stankovic 2011).
Blouin MS, Parsons M, Lacaille V, Lotz S (1996) Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness. Mol Ecol 5:393–401
Brookfield JFY (1996) A simple new method for estimating null allele frequency from heterozygote deficiency. Mol Ecol 5:453–455
Chassaing O, Desse-Berset N, Duffraisse M, Piquès G, Hänni C, Berrebi P (2011a) Palaeogeographic patterns of A. sturio. In: Williot P, Rochard E, Desse-Berset N, Kirschbaum F, Gessner J (eds) Biology and conservation of the European sturgeon Acipenser sturio L. 1758. Springer, Berlin, pp 117–129. ISBN 978-3-642-20610-8
Chassaing O, Hänni C, Berrebi P (2011b) Distinguishing species of European sturgeons Acipenser spp. using microsatellite allele sequences. J Fish Biol 78:208–226
Chassaing O, Desse-Berset N, Duffraisse M, Hughes S, Hänni C, Berrebi P (2013) Palaeogenetics of western French sturgeons spotlights the relationships between Acipenser sturio and Acipenser oxyrinchus. J Biogeogr 40(2):382–393
Ciofi C, Tzika AC, Natali C, Watts PC, Sulandari S, Zein MSA, Milinkovitch MC (2011) Development of a multiplex PCR assay for fine-scale population genetic analysis of the Komodo monitor Varanus komodoensis based on 18 polymorphic microsatellite loci. Mol Ecol Resour 11:550–556
DeSalle R, Amato G (2004) The expansion of conservation genetics. Nat Rev Genet 5:702–712
Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567
Gessner J, Tautenhahn M, Spratte S, Arndt G-M, von Nordheim H (2011) Development of a German Action Plan for the restoration of the European sturgeon Acipenser sturio L.—implementing international commitments on a national scale. J Appl Icthyol 27:192–198
Henderson AP, Spidle AP, King TL (2004) Genetic diversity, kinship analysis, and broodstock management of captive Atlantic sturgeon for population restoration. In: Propagated Fish in Resource Management, American Fisheries Society Symposium, 44, pp 621–633
Henderson-Arzapalo A, King TL (2002) Novel microsatellite markers for Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus) population delineation and broodstock management. Mol Ecol Notes 2:437–439
Kalendar R, Lee D, Schulman AH (2009) FastPCR software for PCR primer and probe design and repeat search. Gene Genome Genom 3:1–14. http://primerdigital.com/fastpcr.html
Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03089.x
King TL, Lubinski BA, Spidle AP (2001) Microsatellite DNA variation in Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) and cross-species amplification in the Acipenseridae. Conserv Genet 2:103–119
Kirschbaum F, Williot P, Fredrich F, Tiedemann R, Gessner J (2011) Restoration of the European Sturgeon Acipenser sturio in Germany. In: Williot P, Rochard E, Desse-Berset N, Kirschbaum F, Gessner J (eds) Biology and conservation of the European sturgeon Acipenser sturio L. 1758. Springer, Berlin, pp 309–333
Kolman R, Kapusta A, Duda A, Wiszniewski G (2011) Review of the current status of the Atlantic sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus Mitchill 1815, in Poland: principles, previous experience, and results. J Appl Icthyol 27:186–191
Lassalle G, Béguer M, Rochard E (2011) An overview on geographical distribution from past descriptions. In: Williot P, Rochard E, Desse-Berset N, Kirschbaum F, Gessner J (eds) Biology and conservation of the European sturgeon Acipenser sturio L. 1758. Springer, New York, pp 81–90
Ludwig A (2006) A Sturgeon view on conservation genetics. Eur J Wildl Res 52:3–8
Ludwig AN, Jenneckens I, Debus L, Ludwig A, Becker J, Kirschbaum F (2000) Genetic analyses of archival specimens of the Atlantic sturgeon Acipenser sturio L., 1758. Bol Inst Esp Oceanogr 16:181–190
Ludwig A, Debus L, Lieckfeldt D, Wirgin I, Benecke N, Jenneckens I, Williot P, Waldman JR, Pitra C (2002) When the American sea sturgeon swam east. Nature 419:447–448
Ludwig A, Arndt U, Lippold S, Benecke N, Debus L, King TL, Matsumura S (2008) Tracing the first steps of American sturgeon pioneers in Europe. BMC Evol Biol 8:221
Ludwig A, Makowiecki D, Benecke N (2009) Further evidence of trans-Atlantic colonization of Western Europe by American Atlantic sturgeons. Archeofauna 18:185–192
May B, Krueger CC, Kincaid KL (1997) Genetic variation at microsatellite loci in sturgeon: primer sequence homology in Acipenser and Scaphirhynchus. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:1542–1547
Moyer GR, Sweka JA, Peterson DL (2012) Past and present processes influencing genetic diversity and effective population size in a natural population of Atlantic sturgeon. Trans Am Fish Soc 141:56–67
Norris AT, Bradley DG, Cunningham EP (2000) Parentage and relatedness determination in farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) using microsatellite markers. Aquaculture 182:73–83
Olafsson K, Hjorleifsdottir S, Pampoulie C, Hreggvidsson GO, Gudjonsson S (2010) Novel set of multiplex assays (SalPrint15) for efficient analysis of 15 microsatellite loci of contemporary samples of the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Mol Ecol Resour 10:533–537
Paaver T (1999) Historic and recent records of native and exotic sturgeon species in Estonia. J Appl Icthyol 15:129–132
Paekal R, Smouse PE (2001) GenAlEx V5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. http://biology.anu.edu.au/GenAlEx/
Pikitch EK, Doukakis P, Lauck L, Chakrabarty P, Erickson DL (2005) Status, trends and management of sturgeon and paddlefish fisheries. Fish Fish 6:233–265
Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) Genepop (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249
Saarinen EV, Flowers JH, Pine WE, Parauka F, Austin JD (2011) Molecular kin estimation from eggs in the threatened Gulf sturgeon. J Appl Ichthyol 27(2):492–495
Schlötterer C (2004) The evolution of molecular markers—just a matter of fashion? Nat Rev Genet 5:63–69
Stankovic A (2011) The past and future of sturgeons in Poland: the genetic approach. In: Williot P, Rochard E, Desse-Berset N, Kirschbaum F, Gessner J (eds) Biology and conservation of the European sturgeon Acipenser sturio L. 1758. Springer, Berlin, pp 561–572
Tiedemann R, Schneider A, Williot P, Kirschbaum F (2011) Genetic variability of cultured European sturgeon Acipenser sturio. In: Williot P, Rochard E, Desse-Berset N, Kirschbaum F, Gessner J (eds) Biology and Conservation of the European sturgeon Acipenser sturio L. 1758. Springer, Berlin, pp 455–464
Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538
Vecsei P (2005) Gastronome 101: how capitalism killed the sturgeons. Environ Biol Fish 73:111–116
Waldman JR, Wirgin II (1998) Status and restoration options for Atlantic sturgeon in North America. Conserv Biol 12:631–638
Waldman JR, King T, Savoy T, Maceda L, Grunwald C, Wirgin I (2013) Stock origins of subadult and adult Atlantic sturgeon, Acipenser oxyrinchus, in a non-natal estuary, Long Island Sound. Estuar Coasts 36:257–267. doi:10.1007/s12237-012-9573-0
Williot P, Rouault T, Pelard M, Mercier D, Lepage M, Davail-Cluisset B, Kirschbaum F, Ludwig A (2007) Building a broodstock of the critically endangered sturgeon Acipenser sturio: problems and observations associated with the adaptation of wild-caught fish to hatchery conditions. Cybium 31:3–11
Wirgin I, Waldman JR, Stabile J, Lubinski B, King T (2002) Comparison of mitochondrial DNA control region sequence and microsatellite DNA analyses in estimating population structure and gene flow rates in Atlantic sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus. J Appl Ichthyol 18:313–319
Wirgin I, Maceda L, Waldman JR, Wehrell S, Dadswell D, King T (2012) Stock origin of migratory Atlantic Sturgeon in Minas Basin, Inner Bay of Fundy, Canada, determined by microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA analyses. Trans Am Fish Soc 141:1389–1398
Zhu ZY, Wang CM, Lo LC, Lin G, Feng F, Tan J, Chou R, Lim HS, Orban L, Yue GH (2010) A standard panel of microsatellites for Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer). Anim Genet 41:208–212
We thank Patrick Berrebi, Ryszard Kolman, Jörn Gessner, Marek Raczkowski, Mirosław Szczepkowski, Arne Ludwig, Bernie May, Timothy King, Barb Lubinski, Eric Rochard, Isaac Wirgin, Jason Bartlett, and Gail Wipplehauser for providing fish samples. We are very grateful to Martyna Molak for the help with editing the manuscript and to Philip Harris for the English proofreading and corrections. We thank Mateusz Baca, Kinga Czarnogórska, Magdalena Gonciarz, and Katarzyna Pająk for their laboratory assistance. The study was carried out with the support of the project financing agreements POIG.02.02.00-14-024/08-00 through grants ZPB/62/72380/IT2/10 and NR12012910 (NCBiR) and with use of CePT infrastructure financed by the EU. The authors declare that all experiments presented in this study comply with the current laws of Poland.
H.P. and D.P. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. K.Z. performed the experiments. H.P., D.P., P.W., and A.S. wrote the manuscript. P.W. and A.S. designed and directed this project.
Electronic supplementary material
Below are the links to the electronic supplementary material.
(PDF 165 kb)
(PDF 242 kb)
Multiplex PCR loading panels showing allele size range and colors assigned to microsatellite primers labeled with 6-FAM, Hex, and TAMRA for the 603 analyzed specimens of Atlantic sturgeon. (PDF 214 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Panagiotopoulou, H., Popovic, D., Zalewska, K. et al. Microsatellite multiplex assay for the analysis of Atlantic sturgeon populations. J Appl Genetics 55, 505–510 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-014-0216-y