Agre, P. (1997). Toward a critical technical practice: lessons learned in trying to reform AI. In Bowker, G., Star, S., Gasser, L., & Turner, W. (Eds.) Social science, technical systems and cooperative work: beyond the great divide, psychology press. pp. 131–157.
Agüera y Arcas, B., Todorov, A., & Mitchell, M. (2018). Do algorithms reveal sexual orientation or just expose our stereotypes? Medium https://link.medium.com/GO7FJgFgM1.
Ali, S.M. (2016). A brief introduction to decolonial computing. XRDS: Crossroads The ACM Magazine for Students, 22(4), 16–21.
Google Scholar
AMA. (2018). Augmented intelligence in health care H-480.940. American Medical Association PolicyFinder.
Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. (2016). Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv:160606565.
Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016a). Machine bias. Propublica, May 23:2016.
Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016). Machine bias. There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. and it’s biased against blacks. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing.
Arora, P. (2019). Decolonizing privacy studies. Television & New Media, 20(4), 366–378.
Google Scholar
Ashcroft, B. (2006). The post-colonial studies reader. Taylor & Francis, Tiffin, H.
Asilomar Meeting. (2017). Asilomar AI principles. https://futureoflife.org/ai-principles/.
Awori, K., Bidwell, NJ., Hussan, TS., Gill, S., & Lindtner, S. (2016). Decolonising technology design. In Proceedings of the first African conference on human computer interaction, pp. 226–228.
Balaram, B., Greenham, T., & Leonard, J. (2018). Artificial intelligence: real public engagement. London: RSA. https://www.thersaorg/discover/publications-and-articles/reports/artificial-intelligence-realpublic-engagement.
Barocas, S., & Selbst, A.D. (2016). Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review, 104, 671.
Google Scholar
Belmont Commission. (1978). The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research, vol 1. United States National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar
Bhambra, G.K., Nisancioglu, K., & Gebrial, D. (2018). Decolonizing the university. London: Pluto Press.
Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, G., & et al. (2018). Rethinking racial capitalism: questions of reproduction and survival. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Google Scholar
Boden, M.A. (2018). Artificial intelligence: a very short introduction. London: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Bonneuil, C. (2000). Development as experiment: science and state building in late colonial and postcolonial Africa, 1930-1970. Osiris, 15, 258–281.
Google Scholar
Brandt, A.M. (1978). Racism and research: the case of the Tuskegee syphilis study, (pp. 21–29). New York: Hastings Center Report.
Google Scholar
Bruhn, M., & Gallego, F.A. (2012). Good, bad, and ugly colonial activities: do they matter for economic development?. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(2), 433–461.
Google Scholar
Bueter, A. (2015). The irreducibility of value-freedom to theory assessment. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 49, 18–26.
Google Scholar
Bullington, J., & Lane, E. (2018). How a tech firm brought data and worry to New Orleans crime fighting. The New Orleans Times-Picayune. https://www.nola.com/news/crime_police/article_33b8bf05-722f-5163-9a0c-774aa69b6645.html.
Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency, pp 77–91.
Butorac, S.K. (2018). Hannah Arendt, James Baldwin, and the politics of love. Political Research Quarterly, 71(3), 710–721.
Google Scholar
Canetti, R., Cohen, A., Dikkala, N., Ramnarayan, G., Scheffler, S., & Smith, A. (2019). From soft classifiers to hard decisions: how fair can we be?. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 309–318). New York: ACM.
Capurro, R. (2018). Intercultural information ethics. In Localizing the Internet (pp. 19–38). Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
Champion, T. (2005). Metropole and margin: the dependency theory and the political economy of the Solomon Islands, 1880–1980. In Centre and periphery (pp. 43–60). Evanston: Routledge.
Chen, I.Y., Szolovits, P., & Ghassemi, M. (2019). Can AI help reduce disparities in general medical and mental health care?. AMA journal of ethics, 21(2), 167–179.
Google Scholar
Chiappa, S., & Isaac, W.S. (2019). A Causal Bayesian Networks Viewpoint on Fairness. In Kosta, E., Pierson, J, Slamanig, D., Fischer-Hübner, S., & Krenn, S. (Eds.) Privacy and identity management. Fairness, accountability, and transparency in the age of big data. Privacy and identity 2018. IFIP advances in information and communication technology, (Vol. 547 pp. 3–20). Cham.
Coates, J.F., & at al. (1985). Foresight in federal government policy making. Futures Research Quarterly, 1(2), 29–53.
Google Scholar
Costanza-Chock, S. (2018). Design justice, AI, and escape from the matrix of domination. Journal of Design and Science.
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U.A. (2019a). The costs of connection: how data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar
Couldry, N., & Mejias U.A. (2019b). Data colonialism: rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336–349.
Google Scholar
Dastin, J. (2018). Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. San Francisco, CA: Reuters Retrieved on October 9:2018.
Derrida, J. (1993). Politics of friendship. American Imago, 50 (3), 353–391.
Google Scholar
D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L.F. (2020). Data feminism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
DiSalvo, C. (2012). Adversarial design (design thinking, design theory). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Douglas, H. (2007). Rejecting the ideal of value-free science. In Kincaid, H., Dupré, J., & Wylie, A. (Eds.) Value-free science: ideals and illusions? chap 6 (pp. 120–141). Oxford: Oxford university press.
Dourish, P., & Mainwaring, S.D. (2012). Ubicomp’s colonial impulse. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM conference on ubiquitous computing (pp. 133–142). New York: ACM.
Dourish, P., Finlay, J., Sengers, P., & Wright, P. (2004). Reflective HCI: towards a critical technical practice. In Conference on human factors in computing systems: CHI’04 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, (Vol. 29 pp. 1727–1728).
Directorate of Science, Technology, and Innovation in the Office of the President, Sierra Leone. (2019). Sierra Leone National Innovation & Digital Strategy 2019 - 2029. Digitization for all: Identity, Economy, and Governance.
Dutton, T. (2018). An overview of national AI strategies. Medium. https://link.medium.com/jqPZBjs7j2.
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel R. (2012). Fairness through awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd innovations in theoretical computer science conference, pp 214–226.
Edgerton, D. (2007a). Creole technologies and global histories: rethinking how things travel in space and time. Journal of History of Science and Technology, 1(1), 75–112.
Google Scholar
Edgerton, D.E. (2007b). The contradictions of techno-nationalism and techno-globalism: a historical perspective. New Global Studies 1(1).
El Khayat, R., & Khatibi, A. (2010). Open correspondence: an epistolary dialogue. UNO press translated by Babana-Hampton S, Orlando VK, Vogl M.
Elliott, K.C., & McKaughan, D.J. (2014). Nonepistemic values and the multiple goals of science. Philosophy of Science, 81(1), 1–21.
Google Scholar
Escobar, A. (2011). Sustainability: design for the pluriverse. Development, 54(2), 137–140.
Google Scholar
Ess, C. (2006). Ethical pluralism and global information ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 8(4), 215–226.
Google Scholar
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: how high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Google Scholar
Fanon, F. (1961). The wretched of the earth. United States: Grove/Atlantic, Inc.
Google Scholar
Fanon, F. (1967). Black skin, white masks. New York: Grove press.
Google Scholar
Feenberg, A. (2017). Critical theory of technology and STS. Thesis Eleven, 138(1), 3–12.
Google Scholar
Floridi, L. (2019). Translating principles into practices of digital ethics: five risks of being unethical. Philosophy & Technology, 32(2), 185–193.
Google Scholar
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., & et al. (2018). AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707.
Google Scholar
Forsythe, D. (2001). Studying those who study us: an anthropologist in the world of artificial intelligence. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar
Forsythe, D.E. (1993). Engineering knowledge: the construction of knowledge in artificial intelligence. Social studies of science, 23(3), 445–477.
Google Scholar
Freudenthal, E. (2019). Ebola’s lost blood: row over samples flown out of africa as’ big pharma’set to cash in. The Telegraph.
Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., Borning, A., & Huldtgren, A. (2013). Value sensitive design and information systems. In Early engagement and new technologies: opening up the laboratory (pp. 55–95). Berlin: Springer.
Gabriel, I. (2020). Artificial intelligence, values and alignment. arXiv:200109768.
Gallopin, G. (1992). Science, technology and the ecological future of Latin America. World Development, 20(10), 1391–1400.
Google Scholar
Gandhi, L. (2006). Affective communities: anticolonial thought, fin-de-siècle radicalism, and the politics of friendship. Durham: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar
Garcia, E. (2019). The militarization of artificial intelligence: a wake-up call for the global south. Available at SSRN 3452323.
Gavighan, C., Knott, A., Maclaurin, J., Zerilli, J., & Liddicoat, J. (2019). Government use of artificial intelligence in New Zealand. New Zealand: Law Society.
Google Scholar
Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J.W., Wallach, H., Daumé III, H., & Crawford, K. (2018). Datasheets for datasets. arXiv:180309010.
Gerrish, S. (2018). How smart machines think. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Gershgorn, D. (2019). Africa is building an AI industry that doesn’t look like silicon valley. Medium OneZero. https://bit.ly/2SBnQFm.
Gomberg-Muñoz, R.M. (2018). Review essay: law and migrant labor in the 20th century: Ghost workers and global capitalism. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review.
Gopal, P. (2019). Insurgent empire: anticolonial resistance and british dissent. London: Verso Books.
Google Scholar
Goyanes, R. (2018). Data for black lives is an organization using analytics as a tool for social change. Garage Magazine. https://garage.vice.com/en_us/article/kzn4jn/data-for-black-lives-is-an-organization-using-analytics-as-a-tool-for-social-change.
Gray, M.L., & Suri, S. (2019). Ghost work: how to stop silicon valley from building a new global underclass. Eamon Dolan Books.
Green, B. (2019). “Good” isn’t good enough. In NeurIPS workshop on AI for social good.
Greene, D., Hoffmann, A.L., & Stark, L. (2019). Better, nicer, clearer, fairer: a critical assessment of the movement for ethical artificial intelligence and machine learning. In Proceedings of the 52nd hawaii international conference on system sciences.
Hacking, I. (2015). Biopower and the avalanche of printed numbers. Biopower: Foucault and beyond, 65–80.
Hanna, A., Denton, E., Smart, A., & Smith-Loud, J. (2019). Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency.
Hao, K. (2019). An AI startup has found a new source of cheap labor for training algorithms: prisoners. Cambridge: MIT Tech Review . https://www.technologyreview.com/f/613246/an-ai-startup-has-found-a-new-source-of-cheap-labor-for-training-algorithms/.
Google Scholar
Harding, S. (2011). The postcolonial science and technology studies reader. Durham: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2004). The ‘new’ imperialism: accumulation by dispossession. Socialist Register, 40, 63–87.
Google Scholar
Hogarth, I. (2018). AI nationalisms. https://www.ianhogarth.com/blog/2018/6/13/ai-nationalism.
IEEE Global Initiative. (2016). Ethically aligned design. IEEE Standards v1.
Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K., & Grinter, R.E. (2010). Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1311–1320). New York: ACM.
Isaac, W.S. (2017). Hope, hype, and fear: the promise and potential pitfalls of artificial intelligence in criminal justice. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 15, 543.
Google Scholar
ITU. (2019). United nations activities on artificial intelligence (AI). Geneva: International Telecommunication Union. https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/opb/gen/S-GEN-UNACT-2019-1-PDF-E.pdf.
Google Scholar
James, C.L.R. (1993). Beyond a boundary. Durham: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar
Jansen, J. (2019). Decolonisation in universities: the politics of knowledge. Wits University Press.
Jasanoff, S., & Hurlbut, J.B. (2018). A global observatory for gene editing. Nature, 555(7697), 435–437.
Google Scholar
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399.
Google Scholar
Johnston, K. (2019). A comparison of two smart cities: Singapore and Atlanta. Journal of Comparative Urban Law and Policy, 3, 191.
Google Scholar
Jung, C., Kearns, M., Neel, S., Roth, A., Stapleton, L., & Wu, Z.S. (2019). Eliciting and enforcing subjective individual fairness. arXiv:190510660.
Kanth, D.R. (2019). India boycotts ‘Osaka Track’ at G20 summit. Live Mint. https://www.livemint.com/news/world/india-boycotts-osaka-track-at-g20-summit-1561897592466.html.
Katell, M., Young, M., Dailey, D., Herman, B., Guetler, V., Tam, A., Binz, C., Raz, D., & Krafft, P. (2020). Toward situated interventions for algorithmic equity: lessons from the field. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, pp 45–55.
Keyes, O. (2018). The misgendering machines: trans/HCI implications of automatic gender recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 88.
Google Scholar
Kiros, T. (1992). Moral philosophy and development: the human condition in Africa, vol 61. Ohio Univ Ctr for International Studies.
Latonero, M. (2019). Stop surveillance humanitarianism. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/11/opinion/data-humanitarian-aid.html.
Laudan, L. (1968). Theories of scientific method from Plato to mach: a bibliographical review. History of science, 7(1), 1–63.
Google Scholar
Law, J., & et al. (1987). Technology and heterogeneous engineering: the case of Portuguese expansion. The social construction of technological systems:, New directions in the sociology and history of technology, 1, 1–134.
Google Scholar
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444.
Google Scholar
Lee, K.F. (2017). The real threat of artificial intelligence. The New York Times 24.
Lee, K.F. (2018). AI superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Lum, K., & Isaac, W. (2016). To predict and serve?. Significance, 13(5), 14–19.
Google Scholar
Madras, D., Creager, E., Pitassi, T., & Zemel, R. (2019). Fairness through causal awareness: learning causal latent-variable models for biased data. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 349–358). New York: ACM.
Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being: contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural studies, 21(2-3), 240–270.
Google Scholar
Marda, V., & Narayan, S. (2020). Data in New Delhi’s predictive policing system. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, pp. 317–324.
McClintock, A. (1992). The angel of progress: pitfalls of the term “post-colonialism”. Social text (31/32), 84–98.
McDowell, C., & Chinchilla, M.Y. (2016). 30 partnering with communities and institutions. Civic Media: Technology, Design, Practice , 461.
Mezzadra, S., & Neilson, B. (2017). On the multiple frontiers of extraction: excavating contemporary capitalism. Cultural Studies, 31(2-3), 185–204.
Google Scholar
Mignolo, W.D. (2007). Introduction: coloniality of power and de-colonial thinking. Cultural studies, 21(2-3), 155–167.
Google Scholar
Mignolo, W.D. (2012). Local histories/global designs: coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Mikesell, L., Bromley, E., & Khodyakov, D. (2013). Ethical community-engaged research: a literature review. American Journal of Public Health, 103 (12), e7–e14.
Google Scholar
Milan, S. (2013). Social movements and their technologies: wiring social change. Berlin: Springer.
Google Scholar
Milan, S., & Treré, E. (2019). Big data from the south (s): beyond data universalism. Television & New Media, 20(4), 319–335.
Google Scholar
Milan, S., & Van der Velden, L. (2016). The alternative epistemologies of data activism. Digital Culture & Society, 2(2), 57–74.
Google Scholar
Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I.D., & Gebru, T. (2019). Model cards for model reporting. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 220–229). New York: ACM.
Mitchell, S., Potash, E., Barocas, S., D’Amour, A., & Lum, K. (2018). Prediction-based decisions and fairness: a catalogue of choices, assumptions, and definitions. arXiv:181107867.
Mitchell, T.M. (2006). The discipline of machine learning. Tech. Rep CMU-ML-06-108, Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University.
Nabi, R., & Shpitser, I. (2018). Fair inference on outcomes. In Thirty-second AAAI conference on artificial intelligence.
Nandy, A. (1989). Intimate enemy: loss and recovery of self under colonialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press Oxford.
Google Scholar
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S.J. (2015). Decoloniality as the future of Africa. History Compass, 13(10), 485–496.
Google Scholar
Nelson, A. (2002). Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Journal of the National Medical Association, 94(8), 666.
Google Scholar
Nissenbaum, H. (2001). How computer systems embody values. Computer, 34(3), 120–119.
Google Scholar
Noble, S.U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: how search engines reinforce racism. New York: NYU Press.
Google Scholar
Nuremberg Military Tribunals. (1947). Permissible medical experiments. In Trials of war criminals before the nuremberg military tribunals under control council law No. 10, vol 2, U.S. government printing office, pp 181–182.
Nyabola, N. (2018). Digital democracy, analogue politics: how the Internet era is transforming politics in kenya. Zed Books Ltd.
Nyawa, J.M. (2019). The big brother is watching: Huduma Namba a threat to our rights and freedoms. Available at SSRN 3389268.
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453.
Google Scholar
OECD. (2019). OECD principles on artificial intelligence. https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/principles/.
O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Broadway Books.
Pappas, G.F. (2017). The limitations and dangers of decolonial philosophies: lessons from Zapatista Luis Villoro. Radical Philosophy Review.
Pathways for Prosperity. (2019). Digital diplomacy: technology governance for developing countries. Pathways for Prosperity Commission on Technology and Inclusive Development . https://pathwayscommission.bsg.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2019-10/Digital-Diplomacy.pdf.
Philip, K., Irani, L., & Dourish, P. (2012). Postcolonial computing: a tactical survey. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 37(1), 3–29.
Google Scholar
Van de Poel, I., & Kroes, P. (2014). Can technology embody values?. In The moral status of technical artefacts (pp. 103–124). Berlin: Springer.
Pollard, J., Mcewan, C., & Hughes, A. (2011). Postcolonial economies. London/New York: Zed Books.
Google Scholar
Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power and Eurocentrism in Latin Americas. International Sociology, 15(2), 215–232.
Google Scholar
Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural studies, 21(2-3), 168–178.
Google Scholar
Raji, I.D., & Dobbe, R. (2020). Concrete problems in AI safety, revisited. In ICLR workshop on ML in the real world.
Ramose, M.B. (1999). African philosophy through Ubuntu. Mond Books.
Ricaurte, P. (2019). Data epistemologies, the coloniality of power, and resistance. Television & New Media, 20(4), 350–365.
Google Scholar
Richardson, R., Schultz, J., & Crawford, K. (2019). Dirty data, bad predictions: how civil rights violations impact police data, predictive policing systems and justice. New York University Law Review Online, Forthcoming.
Rock, D., & Grant, H. (2016). Why diverse teams are smarter. Harvard Business Review, 4(4), 2–5.
Google Scholar
Ronconi, L. (2015). Enforcement and the effective regulation of labor. Tech. rep., IDB Working Paper Series.
Røpke, I. (2001). New technology in everyday life–social processes and environmental impact. Ecological economics, 38(3), 403–422.
Google Scholar
Russell S, & Norvig P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Said, E.W. (1993). Culture and imperialism. Vintage.
Sap, M., Card, D., Gabriel, S., Choi, Y., & Smith, N.A. (2019). The risk of racial bias in hate speech detection. In Proceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, pp 1668–1678.
Schroeder, D., Cook Lucas, J., Hirsch, F., Fenet, S., & Muthuswamy, V. (2018). Ethics dumping case studies from north-south research collaborations. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Google Scholar
Selbst, A.D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S.A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019). Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, (pp. 59–68). New York: ACM.
Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., & Kaye, J. (2005). In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on critical computing: between sense and sensibility, pp 49–58: Reflective design.
Sengers, P., McCarthy, J., & Dourish, P. (2006). Reflective HCI: Articulating an agenda for critical practice. In CHI’06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 1683–1686). New York: ACM.
Senior, E. (2018). The Caribbean and the medical imagination, 1764-1834: slavery, disease and colonial modernity Vol. 119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Shore, N. (2006). Re-conceptualizing the Belmont report: a community-based participatory research perspective. Journal of Community Practice, 14 (4), 5–26.
Google Scholar
Siddiqui, A.U., & Singh, H.K. (2015). “Aadhar” management system. IITM Journal of Management and IT, 6(1), 40–43.
Google Scholar
Sokoloff, N.J., & Pincus, F.L. (2008). Introduction: race, class, gender, and capitalism. Race, Gender & Class, 4–8.
Stark, L. (2019). Facial recognition is the plutonium of AI. XRDS: Crossroads. The ACM Magazine for Students, 25(3), 50–55.
Google Scholar
Steiner, C.B. (1994). Technologies of resistance: structural alteration of trade cloth in four societies. Zeitschrift fü,r Ethnologie, pp. 75–94.
Stoler, A.L. (2008). Epistemic politics: ontologies of colonial common sense. In The philosophical forum, (Vol. 39 pp. 349–361). New Jersey: Wiley Online Library.
Taylor, E. (2016). Groups and oppression. Hypatia, 31(3), 520–536.
Google Scholar
Thatcher, J., O’Sullivan, D., & Mahmoudi, D. (2016). Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: new metaphors for daily data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(6), 990–1006.
Google Scholar
Thrush, C. (2008). American curiosity: cultures of natural history in the colonial British Atlantic world. Environmental History, 13(3), 573.
Google Scholar
Tilley, H. (2014). Conclusion: experimentation in colonial East Africa and beyond. The International Journal of African Historical Studies, 47(3), 495–505.
Google Scholar
Tomašev, N, Cornebise, J, Hutter, F, Mohamed, S, Picciariello, A, Connelly, B, Belgrave, DCM, Ezer, D, van der Haert, FC, Mugisha, F, Abila, G, Arai, H, Almiraat, H, Proskurnia, J, Snyder, K, Otake-Matsuura, M, Othman, M, Glasmachers, T, de Wever, W, Teh, YW, Khan, ME, De Winne, R, Schaul, T, & Clopath, C. (2020). AI for social good: unlocking the opportunity for positive impact. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–6. Nature Publishing Group.
Google Scholar
Toyama, K. (2015). Geek heresy: rescuing social change from the cult of technology. New York: PublicAffairs.
Google Scholar
UK National Health Service. (2019). Code of conduct for data-driven health and care technology.
UNCTAD. (2013). Information economy report 2013: The cloud economy and developing countries. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
Google Scholar
Vaithianathan, R., Maloney, T., Putnam-Hornstein, E., & Jiang, N. (2013). Children in the public benefit system at risk of maltreatment: identification via predictive modeling. American journal of preventive medicine, 45(3), 354–359.
Google Scholar
Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., Felländer, A, Langhans, S.D., Tegmark, M., & Nerini, F.F. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the sustainable development goals. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–10.
Google Scholar
Vitak, J., Shilton, K., & Ashktorab, Z. (2016). Beyond the Belmont principles: ethical challenges, practices, and beliefs in the online data research community. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 941–953). New York: ACM.
Wa Thiong’o, N. (1992). Decolonising the mind: the politics of language in African literature. East African Publishers.
Wallerstein, I. (1987). World-systems analysis.
Washington, H.A. (2006). Medical apartheid: the dark history of medical experimentation on Black Americans from colonial times to the present. Doubleday Books.
Whittlestone, J., Nyrup, R., Alexandrova, A., Dihal, K., & Cave, S. (2019). Ethical and societal implications of algorithms, data, and artificial intelligence: a roadmap for research. London: Nuffield Foundation.
Google Scholar
Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 121–136.
WMA General Assembly. (1964). Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2566407/pdf/11357217.pdf.
Wong, P.H. (2012). Dao, harmony and personhood: towards a confucian ethics of technology. Philosophy & technology, 25(1), 67–86.
Google Scholar
Young, M., Magassa, L., & Friedman, B. (2019). Toward inclusive tech policy design: a method for underrepresented voices to strengthen tech policy documents. Ethics and Information Technology, 21(2), 89–103.
Google Scholar
Yuan, L. (2018). How cheap labor drives China’s A.I. ambitions. New York: New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/25/business/china-artificial-intelligence-labeling.html.
Google Scholar
Zembylas, M. (2017). Love as ethico-political practice: inventing reparative pedagogies of aimance in “disjointed” times. Journal of curriculum and pedagogy, 14(1), 23–38.
Google Scholar
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. London: Profile Books.
Google Scholar