Abstract
Fig (Ficus carica) trees exhibited symptoms of little leaf, mottling and deformation in Sanliurfa province, Turkey. Poylmerase chain reaction (PCR) through direct and nested-PCR, phylogeny based on the sequence analysis revealed that the infecting agent was closely related to ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma aurantifolia’ (16SrII-B subgroup). This is the first report of Ca. P. aurantifolia in fig trees in Turkey.
With the suitability of ecological conditions, figs are produced in almost all regions of Turkey, which is one of the most important gene sources for figs in the Middle East as hosting quite a number of varieties (Tanriver 2019). Turkey has been in the front line with the 56% of the world fig production. Iran (19%), USA (6%), Greece (5%), Spain (4%) and Italy (3%) follow Turkey, respectively in terms of fig production (Ozden et al. 2021). Recently, symptoms such as little leaf, shortening of the internodes, mottling and deformation have been observed in fig leaves similar to those of symptoms characterized by phytoplasma diseases (Fig. 1). Although phytoplasma infections in apples, pears, plums, apricots, peaches, cherries and almonds have been reported previously in the world (Fiore et al. 2018), reports of phytoplasma infections in fig trees are very few. Alsaheli et al. (2020) made a first report with those of Ca. P. asteris and Ca. P. solani in fig leaves exhibiting yellowing, mottling and shortening of internodes.
Total nucleic acid (TNA) isolation from symptomatic fig leaves was performed to detect the presence of phytoplasma using etiolated method (Dikilitas et al. 2019). The obtained TNAs were then subjected to PCR studies using R16F1/R16R0 (5’- AAGACGAGGATAACAGTTGG-3’/ 5’- GGATACCTTGTTACGACTTAACCCC-3’) primer pairs in the first round PCR followed by R16F2n/R16R2 (5’- GAAACGACTGCTAAGACTGG -3’/ 5’- TGACGGGCGGTGTGTACAAACCCCG) primers in the second PCR to amplify the 16S rRNA gene (Duduk et al. 2013). The PCR product (R16F1/R16R0; 1,400 kb) was diluted 1:50 with the sterile distilled water serving as a template for the nested PCR (R16F2n/R16R2) which amplifies a 1,200 bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene. The PCR conditions followed those described by (Akkurak et al. 2021). As a result of the nested PCR, band at the expected length (~ 1,200 bp) was obtained from the symptomatic fig leaves (Fig. 2). The DNA fragments amplified with the use of primers R16F2n/R16R2 were purified using ExoSAP-IT™ 40 (ThermoFischer), and sequenced in both directions. Afterwards, the 16SrDNA partial sequences were aligned using MEGA 7 software programme and compared with BLASTn analysis through the NCBI (National Center of Biotechnology Information, USA) database. Two representative isolates (MG614 and MG615) used in this study showed 99.8% similarity with the lime witches’ broom 16SrII-B phytoplasma subgroup and the isolates were uploaded with ON009058 and ON009057 accession numbers to GenBank, respectively. Phylogenetic trees using the Maximum Likelihood method in MEGA 7 were constructed based on the available 16S rDNA sequences of “Candidatus Phytoplasmas” retrieved from the NCBI, and Acholeplasma laidlawii was used as the outgroup sequence (Fig. 3). Determination of subgroups of isolates was also performed with the online tool iPhyClassifier (Zhao et al. 2009). According to the analysis, the isolates shared 98.8% similarity with that of the ‘Ca. P. aurantifolia’ reference strain (GenBank accession: U15442, 16SrII-B group) (Fig. 4). Ortega-Acosta et al. (2022) reported the presence of Ca. P. asteris in fig leaves showing deformation and mosaic symptoms in Mexico. In Turkey, 'Candidatus Phytoplasma prunorum' was previously associated with the European stone fruit yellows (ESFY) disease in apricot, plum, peach and almond trees exhibiting chlorosis between the veins and off-season flowering (Caglayan et al. 2011). On the other hand, Ayvaci et al. (2021) reported the association of ‘Ca. P. aurantifolia' with cacti in Turkey. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of ‘Ca. P. aurantifolia'-related strain (16SrII-B subgroup) causing disease in fig trees. It is important to detect and verify the phytoplasma diseases to make phytoplasma-free fig production in mother and nursery plants as well as preventing the spread of diseases to other cultivations.
References
Akkurak H, Dikilitas M, Simsek E, Karakas S, Ayvaci H, Caglar BK, Guldur ME (2021) Changes in biochemical patterns in the leaves of pistachio infected with a molecular variant of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma solani’. Phytopathogenic Mollicutes 11(2):117–124. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-4677.2021.00019.0
Alsaheli Z, Contaldo N, Mehle N, Dermastia M, Elbeaino T, Bertaccini A (2020) First detection of “Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris”-and “Candidatus Phytoplasma solani”-related strains in fig trees. J Phytopathol 168(1):63–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12868
Ayvaci H, Simsek E, Akkurak H, Dikilitas M, Guldur ME (2021) First report of a ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma aurantifolia’-related strain associated with Cactus witches’ broom disease in Opuntia sp. Turkey New Dis Rep 44(1)
Caglayan K, Gazel M, Serce CU, Bozkurt IA, Elci E (2011) Phytoplasma diseases of stone fruit trees in Turkey and their containment. Phytopathogenic Mollicutes 1(2):95–97. https://doi.org/10.5958/j.2249-4669.1.2.017
Dikilitas M, Gumus H, Danis F, Simsek E, Guldur ME (2019) A New and Improved Method for Plant Genomic DNA Extraction by Pre-Removal of Phenolic and Polysaccharide Compounds. 1st International Gobeklitepe Agriculture Congress, November 25–27, 2019, Sanliurfa,/Turkey 661–664
Duduk B, Paltrinieri S, Lee IM, Bertaccini A (2013) Nested PCR and RFLP analysis based on the 16S rRNA Gene. In: Dickinson M, Hodgetts J, eds. Phytoplasma. Methods in Molecular Biology (Methods and Protocols), vol 938. Totowa, USA: Humana Press, 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-089-2_1
Fiore N, Bertaccini A, Bianco PA, Cieślińska M, Ferretti L, Hoat TX, Quaglino F (2018) Fruit crop phytoplasmas. In Phytoplasmas: Plant pathogenic bacteria-I (pp. 153–190). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0119-3_6
Ortega-Acosta C, Ochoa-Martínez DL, Muratalla-Lúa A (2022) Viruses and ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris’ detection in fig plants showing fig mosaic disease in Mexico. J Plant Pathol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42161-022-01064-8
Ozden A, Ozer OO, Armagan G, Cinar G (2021) Determining the effective factors on technical efficiency and quality efficiency in fig processing businesses. Turkish J Agriculture-Food Sci Technol 9(5):878–886. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v9i5.878-886.4137
Tanriver E (2019) Fig Production and Germplasm in Turkey. In: Kahramanoglu I , Kafkas NE, Kuden A, and Comlekcioglu S (Eds.), Modern Fruit Industry, IntechOpen, London. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86997
Zhao Y, Wei W, Lee IM, Shao J, Suo X, Davis RE (2009) Construction of an interactive online phytoplasma classification tool, iPhyClassifier, and its application in analysis of the peach X-disease phytoplasma group (16SrIII). Int J Systemic and Evolutionary Microbiol 59(10):2582–2593. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.010249-0
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All the authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akkurak, H., Guldur, M.E., Ayvaci, H. et al. First detection of little leaf disease caused by ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma aurantifolia’-related strain (16SrII-B subgroup) in Ficus carica. Australasian Plant Dis. Notes 17, 25 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13314-022-00470-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13314-022-00470-2