Abstract
Background
The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT and Bard is disrupting a broad swathe of fields, including medicine. In pediatric medicine, AI is also increasingly being used across multiple subspecialties. However, the practical application of AI still faces a number of key challenges. Consequently, there is a requirement for a concise overview of the roles of AI across the multiple domains of pediatric medicine, which the current study seeks to address.
Aim
To systematically assess the challenges, opportunities, and explainability of AI in pediatric medicine.
Methodology
A systematic search was carried out on peer-reviewed databases, PubMed Central, Europe PubMed Central, and grey literature using search terms related to machine learning (ML) and AI for the years 2016 to 2022 in the English language. A total of 210 articles were retrieved that were screened with PRISMA for abstract, year, language, context, and proximal relevance to research aims. A thematic analysis was carried out to extract findings from the included studies.
Results
Twenty articles were selected for data abstraction and analysis, with three consistent themes emerging from these articles. In particular, eleven articles address the current state-of-the-art application of AI in diagnosing and predicting health conditions such as behavioral and mental health, cancer, syndromic and metabolic diseases. Five articles highlight the specific challenges of AI deployment in pediatric medicines: data security, handling, authentication, and validation. Four articles set out future opportunities for AI to be adapted: the incorporation of Big Data, cloud computing, precision medicine, and clinical decision support systems. These studies collectively critically evaluate the potential of AI in overcoming current barriers to adoption.
Conclusion
AI is proving disruptive within pediatric medicine and is presently associated with challenges, opportunities, and the need for explainability. AI should be viewed as a tool to enhance and support clinical decision-making rather than a substitute for human judgement and expertise. Future research should consequently focus on obtaining comprehensive data to ensure the generalizability of research findings.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Change history
12 February 2024
An Erratum to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-024-3091-6
19 January 2024
An Erratum to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-024-3091-6
References
Clarke SL, Parmesar K, Saleem MA, Ramanan AV. Future of machine learning in paediatrics. Arch Dis Child. 2022;107: 223–8.
Biswas SS. Role of Chat GPT in Public Health. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023;51:868–9.
Cascella M, Montomoli J, Bellini V, Bignami E. Evaluating the feasibility of ChatGPT in healthcare: an analysis of multiple clinical and research scenarios. J Med Syst. 2023;47:1–5.
Abdullah IS, Loganathan A, Lee RW. ChatGPT & doctors: the medical dream team. [Feb 15, 2023]. Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library, The George Washington University on University Health Sciences Research Commons. Accessed on May 10, 2023. Available from: https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/smhs_URGENT_Matters?utm_source=hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu%2Fsmhs_URGENT_Matters%2F1&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2: 230–43.
Knake LA. Artificial intelligence in pediatrics: the future is now. Pediatr Res. 2023;93:445–6.
Ferguson C, et al. Europe PMC in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D1507–14.
Selçuk AA. A guide for systematic reviews: PRISMA. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;57:57–8.
Ge F, Li Y, Yuan M, Zhang J, Zhang W. Identifying predictors of probable posttraumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents with earthquake exposure: A longitudinal study using a machine learning approach. J Affect Disord. 2020;264:483–93.
Saxe GN, Ma S, Ren J, Aliferis C. Machine learning methods to predict child posttraumatic stress: a proof of concept study. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17:1–13.
Fathi E, Rezaee MJ, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Alizadeh A, Montazer A. Design of an integrated model for diagnosis and classification of pediatric acute leukemia using machine learning. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2020;234:1051–69.
Zhu Z, Gu J, Genchev GZ, et al. Improving the diagnosis of phenylketonuria by using a machine learning-based screening model of neonatal MRM data. Front Mol Biosci. 2020;7:115.
Jia J, Wang R, An Z, Guo Y, Ni X, Shi T. RDAD: a machine learning system to support phenotype-based rare disease diagnosis. Front Genet. 2018;9:587.
Lin H, et al. Prediction of myopia development among Chinese school-aged children using refraction data from electronic medical records: A retrospective, multicentre machine learning study. PLoS Med. 2018;15:1–17.
Zhang M, Gazzard G, Fu Z, Li L, Chen B, Saw SM, Congdon N. Validating the accuracy of a model to predict the onset of myopia in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52: 5836–41.
Wu TE, Chen HA, Jhou MJ, Chen YN, Chang TJ, Lu CJ. Evaluating the effect of topical atropine use for myopia control on intraocular pressure by using machine learning. J Clin Med. 2020;10:111.
Ogundele MO. Behavioural and emotional disorders in childhood: A brief overview for paediatricians. World J Clin Pediatr. 2018;7:9–26.
Aylward BS, Abbas H, Taraman S, et al. An introduction to artificial intelligence in developmental and behavioral pediatrics. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2023;44:e126–34.
Anagnostopoulou P, Alexandropoulou V, Lorentzou G, Lykothanasi A, Ntaountaki P, Drigas A. Artificial intelligence in autism assessment. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 2020;15:95–107.
Elankeerthana R, Hanshiya D, Pranavajothi A, Shanmugapriya N, Sujitha S. Child abuse mental symptom prediction model using machine learning techniques. In: The 6th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI). Tirunelveli, India, 2022:1459-65. Accessed on May 10, 2023. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9777138
Kissos L, Goldner L, Butman M, Eliyahu N, Lev-Wiesel R. Can artificial intelligence achieve human-level performance? A pilot study of childhood sexual abuse detection in self-figure drawings. Child Abuse Negl. 2020;109:104755.
Amrit C, Paauw T, Aly R, Lavric M. Identifying child abuse through text mining and machine learning. Expert Systems With Applications. 2017;88:402–18.
Gupta P, Gossett J, Rao Rettiganti M. Trends in mortality rates in pediatric intensive care units in the United States from 2004 to 2015. Critical Care Medicine. 2018;46:30.
Kelly CJ, Karthikesalingam A, Suleyman M, Corrado G, King D. Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Med. 2019;17:195.
Tirunagari S, Bull SC, Poh N. Automatic classification of irregularly sampled time series with unequal lengths: A case study on estimated glomerular filtration rate. In: The 26th IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP). Vietri sul Mare, Italy, 2016. Accessed on May 10, 2023. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7738901
Xiao C, Choi E, Sun J. Opportunities and challenges in developing deep learning models using electronic health records data: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25:1419–28.
Vogl TM. Artificial intelligence and organizational memory in government: the experience of record duplication in the child welfare sector in Canada. In: The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, June 2020. Accessed on May 10, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/3396956.3396971
McCartney M. Margaret McCartney: AI in medicine must be rigorously tested. BMJ. 2018;361:k1752.
Davendralingam N, Sebire NJ, Arthurs OJ, Shelmerdine SC. Artificial intelligence in paediatric radiology: Future opportunities. Br J Radiol. 2021;94:20200975.
Chen KC, Yu HR, Chen WS, et al. Diagnosis of common pulmonary diseases in children by X-ray images and deep learning. Sci Rep. 2020;10:17374.
Reid JE, Eaton E. Artificial intelligence for pediatric ophthalmology. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2019;30:337–46.
Deliu M, Fontanella S, Haider S, et al. Longitudinal trajectories of severe wheeze exacerbations from infancy to school age and their association with early-life risk factors and late asthma outcomes. Clin Exp Allergy. 2020;50:315–24.
Bravo À, Piñero J, Queralt-Rosinach N, Rautschka M, Furlong LI. Extraction of relations between genes and diseases from text and large-scale data analysis: implications for translational research. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:55.
Ziegler A, Wilichowski E, Schara U, et al. Handlungsempfehlungen zur Gentherapie der spinalen Muskelatrophie mit Onasemnogene Abeparvovec - AVXS-101: Konsensuspapier der deutschen Vertretung der Gesellschaft für Neuropädiatrie (GNP) und der deutschen Behandlungszentren unter Mitwirkung des Medizinisch-Wissenschaftlichen Beirates der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Muskelkranke (DGM) e./V [Recommendations for gene therapy of spinal muscular atrophy with onasemnogene abeparvovec-AVXS-101: Consensus paper of the German representatives of the Society for Pediatric Neurology (GNP) and the German treatment centers with collaboration of the medical scientific advisory board of the German Society for Muscular Diseases (DGM)]. Nervenarzt. 2020;91:518–29. German.
Hunt X, Tomlinson M, Sikander S, et al. Artificial intelligence, big data, and mhealth: the frontiers of the prevention of violence against children. Front Artif Intell. 2020;3:543305.
Tornese G, Pellegrin MC, Barbi E, Ventura A. Pediatric endocrinology through syndromes. Eur J Med Genet. 2020;63: 103614.
Filipow N, Main E, Sebire NJ, et al. Implementation of prognostic machine learning algorithms in paediatric chronic respiratory conditions: a scoping review. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2022;9:e001165.
Shu LQ, Sun YK, Tan LH, Shu Q, Chang AC. Application of artificial intelligence in pediatrics: past, present and future. World J Pediatr. 2019;15:105–8.
Adadi A, Berrada M. Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access. 2018;6:52138–60.
van der Velden BHM, Kuijf HJ, Gilhuijs KGA, Viergever MA. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis. Med Image Anal. 2022;79:102470.
Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019;366:447–53.
Vokinger KN, Feuerriegel S, Kesselheim AS. Mitigating bias in machine learning for medicine. Commun Med (Lond). 2021;1:25.
Funding
None
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YB: conceptualizing the review, providing clinical expertise, and contributing to the selection of review articles and discussion of findings. ST: important contribution to data analysis, structuring the themes, and ensuring a cohesive presentation of the findings. DW: contributed expertise in explainable AI (XAI) and data bias. All authors have contributed, designed and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
None stated.
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Balla, Y., Tirunagari, S. & Windridge, D. Pediatrics in Artificial Intelligence Era: A Systematic Review on Challenges, Opportunities, and Explainability. Indian Pediatr 60, 561–569 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-023-2936-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-023-2936-8