Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The aortic calcification is a risk factor for colorectal anastomotic leakage

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The current pooling up analysis aimed to evaluate whether aortic calcification (AC) was a potential risk factor for anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery.

Methods

In this study, we searched studies in three databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on April 20, 2022. In order to investigate the association between AC and AL, the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of AC were pooled up. Our study was performed with RevMan 5.3 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

Results

We finally enrolled eight studies involving 1955 patients for statistical analysis. As for all patients, we found that AC could significantly increase the risk of AL after surgery (HR = 2.31, I2 = 0%, 95%CI = 1.58 to 3.38, P < 0.01). In five studies including patients undergoing colorectal surgery (benign diseases and cancers), AC was also a risk factor for AL (HR = 3.30, I2 = 2%; 95%CI = 1.83 to 5.95, P < 0.01). In terms of the other three studies that only included CRC patients, there was still a correction between AC and AL (HR = 1.80, I2 = 0%, 95%CI = 1.10 to 2.96, P = 0.02).

Conclusion

Patients with AC were more likely to develop AL after colorectal surgery. Moreover, subgroup analysis suggested that AC was a predictor for AL after CRC surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data was accessed in the database.

References

  1. Rutkow IM (2000) Colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 135(1):97. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.135.1.97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Parker JM, Feldmann TF, Cologne KG (2017) Advances in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Clin North Am 97(3):547–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2017.01.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Labianca R, Nordlinger B, Beretta GD, Mosconi S, Mandalà M, Cervantes A, Arnold D, ESMO Guidelines Working Group (2013) Early colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of oncology: Off J Euro Soc Med Oncol 24:64–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rawla P, Sunkara T, Barsouk A (2019) Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Przeglad gastroenterologiczny 14(2):89–103. https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2018.81072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Peng D, Cheng YX, Cheng Y (2021) Improved overall survival of colorectal cancer under multidisciplinary team: a meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int 2021:5541613. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5541613

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ba L, Wang Q, Wang H, Zhu L, Zhang T, Ren J, Lin Z (2021) Survival analysis and prognostic factors of palliative radiotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a propensity score analysis. J Gastrointest Oncol 12(5):2211–2222. https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-21-540

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Janani B, Vijayakumar M, Priya K, Kim JH, Prabakaran DS, Shahid M, Al-Ghamdi S, Alsaidan M, Othman Bahakim N, Hassan Abdelzaher M, Ramesh T (2022) EGFR-based targeted therapy for colorectal cancer-promises and challenges. Vaccines 10(4):499. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10040499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu XY, Yuan C, Kang B, Cheng YX, Tao W, Zhang B, Wei ZQ, Peng D (2022) Predictors associated with planned and unplanned admission to intensive care units after colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective study. Supp Care Cancer 30(6):5099–5105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06939-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng YX, Tao W, Liu XY, Yuan C, Zhang B, Wei ZQ, Peng D (2022) Hypertension remission after colorectal cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective study. Nutr Cancer 74(8):2789–2795. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2021.2025256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Peng D, Liu XY, Cheng YX, Tao W, Cheng Y (2021) Improvement of diabetes mellitus after colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective study of predictive factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus remission and overall survival. Front Oncol 11:694997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.694997

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kawada K, Hasegawa S, Hida K, Hirai K, Okoshi K, Nomura A, Kawamura J, Nagayama S, Sakai Y (2014) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis. Surg Endosc 28(10):2988–2995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3564-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kingham TP, Pachter HL (2009) Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 208(2):269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC (2015) Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg 102(5):462–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng YX, Tao W, Liu XY, Zhang H, Yuan C, Zhang B, Zhang W, Peng D (2022) does chronic kidney disease affect the surgical outcome and prognosis of patients with gastric cancer? Meta-Anal Nutrit cancer 74(6):2059–2066. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2021.1993277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, Inada R, Moriya Y, Yamamoto S (2012) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer using a stapling technique. Surg Laparos endos Percut Techn 22(3):239–243. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e31824fbb56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Silva-Velazco J, Stocchi L, Costedio M, Gorgun E, Kessler H, Remzi FH (2016) Is there anything we can modify among factors associated with morbidity following elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis? Surg Endosc 30(8):3541–3551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4651-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu QL, Feng B, Lu AG, Wang ML, Hu WG, Li JW, Mao ZH, Zheng MH (2010) Laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: complications and management in 132 consecutive patients. World J Gastroenterol 16(36):4605–4610. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i36.4605

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kayano H, Okuda J, Tanaka K, Kondo K, Tanigawa N (2011) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 25(9):2972–2979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1655-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rifkin RD, Parisi AF, Folland E (1979) Coronary calcification in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 44(1):141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(79)90263-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tao W, Cheng YX, Zou YY, Peng D, Zhang W (2021) Aorta calcification increases the risk of anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients. Cancer Manag Res 13:3857–3865. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S306942

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee SL, Jeon CH, Park KB, Seo HS, Lee HH (2022) Association between vascular calcification and esophagojejunal anastomotic complications after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity-matched study. Cur Oncol. 29(5):3224–3231. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29050262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goense L, van Rossum PSN, Weijs TJ, van Det MJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Luyer MD, van Leeuwen MS, van Hillegersberg R, Ruurda JP, Kouwenhoven EA (2016) Aortic calcification increases the risk of anastomotic leakage after ivor-lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 102(1):247–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tzortzakakis A, Kalarakis G, Huang B, Terezaki E, Koltsakis E, Kechagias A, Tsekrekos A, Rouvelas I (2022) Role of radiology in the preoperative detection of arterial calcification and celiac trunk stenosis and its association with anastomotic leakage post esophagectomy, an up-to-date review of the literature. Cancers 14(4):1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041016

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Pochhammer J, Tröster F, Blumenstock G, Closset J, Lang S, Weller MP, Schäffer M (2018) Calcification of the iliac arteries: a marker for leakage risk in rectal anastomosis-a blinded clinical trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 33(2):163–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2949-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Deguelte S, Besson R, Job L, Hoeffel C, Jolly D, Kianmanesh R (2021) Assessing abdominal aortic calcifications before performing colocolic or colorectal anastomoses: a case-control study. J Res Med Sci 26:110. https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.JRMS_874_19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Boersema GS, Vakalopoulos KA, Kock MC, van Ooijen PM, Havenga K, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2016) Is aortoiliac calcification linked to colorectal anastomotic leakage? A case-control study. Int J Surg 25:123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.12.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Eveno C, Latrasse V, Gayat É, Lo Dico R, Dohan A, Pocard M (2016) Colorectal anastomotic leakage can be predicted by abdominal aortic calcification on preoperative CT scans: A pilot study. J Visc Surg 153(4):253–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.03.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Komen N, Klitsie P, Dijk JW, Slieker J, Hermans J, Havenga K, Oudkerk M, Weyler J, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF (2011) Calcium score: a new risk factor for colorectal anastomotic leakage. Am J Surg 201(6):759–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Knight KA, Fei CH, Boland KF, Dolan DR, Golder AM, McMillan DC, Horgan PG, Black DH, Park JH, Roxburgh CSD (2021) Aortic calcification is associated with non-infective rather than infective postoperative complications following colorectal cancer resection: an observational cohort study. Eur Radiol 31(6):4319–4329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07189-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee SY, Yeom SS, Kim CH, Kim YJ, Kim HR (2020) A new aortoiliac calcification scoring system to predict grade C anastomotic leak following rectal cancer surgery. Tech Coloproctol 24(8):843–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02246-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Morita S, Tsuruta M, Okabayashi K, Shigeta K, Seishima R, Monno M, Itano O, Kitagawa Y (2022) Evaluation of abdominal aortic calcification by plain CT predicts anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 52(2):122–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyab196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hoek VT, Edomskis PP, Menon AG, Kleinrensink GJ, Lagarde SM, Lange JF, Wijnhoven BPL (2020) Arterial calcification is a risk factor for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Euro J Surg Oncol 46(11):1975–1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.06.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tong L, Xie D, Song X, Wu X, Wen S, Liu A (2020) Is abdominal vascular calcification score valuable in predicting the occurrence of colorectal anastomotic leakage? A meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 35(4):641–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03513-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hoek VT, Edomskis PP, Menon AG, Dwarkasing RS, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2021) Calcification of the aorta-iliac trajectory as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: individual patient data meta-analysis and systematic review. Surg Technol Int 39:155–165. https://doi.org/10.52198/21.STI.39.CR1479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25(9):603–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Szulc P (2016) Abdominal aortic calcification: a reappraisal of epidemiological and pathophysiological data. Bone 84:25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2015.12.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bastos Gonçalves F, Voûte MT, Hoeks SE, Chonchol MB, Boersma EE, Stolker RJ, Verhagen HJ (2012) Calcification of the abdominal aorta as an independent predictor of cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis. Heart 98(13):988–994. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Harbaugh CM, Terjimanian MN, Lee JS, Alawieh AZ, Kowalsky DB, Tishberg LM, Krell RW, Holcombe SA, Wang SC, Campbell DA Jr, Englesbe MJ (2013) Abdominal aortic calcification and surgical outcomes in patients with no known cardiovascular risk factors. Ann Surg 257(4):774–781. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826ddd5f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ichii M, Ishimura E, Shima H, Ohno Y, Ochi A, Nakatani S, Tsuda A, Ehara S, Mori K, Fukumoto S, Naganuma T, Takemoto Y, Nakatani T, Inaba M (2013) Quantitative analysis of abdominal aortic calcification in CKD patients without dialysis therapy by use of the Agatston score. Kidney Blood Press Res 38(2–3):196–204. https://doi.org/10.1159/000355768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Beard JR, Officer A, de Carvalho IA, Sadana R, Pot AM, Michel JP, Lloyd-Sherlock P, Epping-Jordan JE, Peeters GMEEG, Mahanani WR, Thiyagarajan JA, Chatterji S (2016) The world report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet 387(10033):2145–2154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F (2017) Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut 66(4):683–691. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Vignali A, Gianotti L, Braga M, Radaelli G, Malvezzi L, Di Carlo V (2000) Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leak. Dis Colon Rectum 43(1):76–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Braunschmid T, Hartig N, Baumann L, Dauser B, Herbst F (2017) Influence of multiple stapler firings used for rectal division on colorectal anastomotic leak rate. Surg Endosc 31(12):5318–5326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5611-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Chung RS (1987) Blood flow in colonic anastomoses. Eff Stapl Sut Ann Surg. 206(3):335–339. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198709000-00011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Watanabe J, Ota M, Suwa Y, Suzuki S, Suwa H, Momiyama M, Ishibe A, Watanabe K, Masui H, Nagahori K, Ichikawa Y, Endo I (2015) Evaluation of the intestinal blood flow near the rectosigmoid junction using the indocyanine green fluorescence method in a colorectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 30(3):329–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2129-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledgment to all the authors in this article.

Funding

This study is supported by CQMU Program for Youth Innovation in Future Medicine (W0190).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Peng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, XR., Liu, F., Zhang, W. et al. The aortic calcification is a risk factor for colorectal anastomotic leakage. Updates Surg 75, 1857–1865 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01630-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01630-4

Keywords

Navigation