Skip to main content
Log in

A novel HIPEC technique using hybrid CO2 recirculation system: intra-abdominal diffusion test in a porcine model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of loco-regional treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis using intraperitoneal chemotherapy is still investigated. Actually, new technologies are suitable for these procedures, especially a new hybrid system using CO2 called Peritoneal Recirculation System (PRS-1.0 Combat). A HIPEC procedure in a porcine model using the PRS system was conducted. The objective of experimentation was to assess the distribution of liquid inside the abdomen, by using methylene blue instead of chemotherapy. Moreover, we positioned six different thermal probes in different abdominal regions inside the abdomen to measure the temperature during procedure. During the procedure, all thermal probes recorded an average temperature of 41.5°. At the end of infusion, the abdomen was emptied and then opened; the tracer distribution was recorded. No technical problems were recorded during the procedure. Good distribution of tracer was recorded. More studies are needed to investigate better this new technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cosentino F, Vizzielli G, Turco LC et al (2018) Near-infrared imaging with indocyanine green for detection of endometriosis lesions (Gre-Endo Trial): a pilot study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.02.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Caruso S, Panella MM, Cianci S et al (2011) TOT does not affect the urethral sphincter innervation: a pilot study. Int Urogynecol J 22:739–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1364-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vitale SG, Laganà AS, Noventa M et al (2018) Transvaginal bilateral sacrospinous fixation after second recurrence of vaginal vault prolapse: efficacy and impact on quality of life and sexuality. Biomed Res Int 2018:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5727165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vitale SG, Sapia F, Rapisarda AMC et al (2017) Hysteroscopic morcellation of submucous myomas: a systematic review. Biomed Res Int 2017:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6848250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vitale SG, Caruso S, Rapisarda AMC et al (2016) Biocompatible porcine dermis graft to treat severe cystocele: impact on quality of life and sexuality. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293:125–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3820-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Laganà AS, Vitale SG, Trovato MA et al (2016) Full-thickness excision versus shaving by laparoscopy for intestinal deep infiltrating endometriosis: Rationale and potential treatment options. Biomed Res Int 2016:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Matarazzo MG, Cianci S, Rampello L et al (2013) Urethral sphincter innervation and clitoral blood flow after the transobturator (TOT) approach. Int Urogynecol J 24:621–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1891-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tozzi R, Giannice R, Cianci S et al (2015) Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy does not increase the rate of complete resection and does not significantly reduce the morbidity of Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (VPD) in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 138:252–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.05.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiofalo B, Palmara V, Laganà AS et al (2017) Fertility sparing strategies in patients affected by placental site trophoblastic tumor. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 18:58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rossetti D, Vitale SG, Tropea A et al (2017) New procedures for the identification of sentinel lymph node: shaping the horizon of future management in early stage uterine cervical cancer. Updates Surg 69:383–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-017-0456-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vitale SG, Rossetti D, Tropea A et al (2017) Fertility sparing surgery for stage IA type I and G2 endometrial cancer in reproductive-aged patients: evidence-based approach and future perspectives. Updates Surg. 69:29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gueli Alletti S, Rossitto C, Cianci S et al (2016) Telelap ALF-X vs standard laparoscopy for the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer: a single-institution retrospective cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23:378–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.11.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gueli Alletti S, Perrone E, Cianci S et al (2018) 3 mm Senhance robotic hysterectomy: a step towards future perspectives. J Robot Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0778-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rossitto C, Gueli Alletti S, Rotolo S et al (2016) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy using a percutaneous surgical system: a pilot study towards scarless surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 203:132–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gueli Alletti S, Rossitto C, Perrone E et al (2017) Needleoscopic conservative staging of borderline ovarian tumor. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24:529–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gueli Alletti S, Rossitto C, Cianci S et al (2017) The Senhance™ surgical robotic system (“Senhance”) for total hysterectomy in obese patients: a pilot study. J Robot Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0718-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lagana AS, Vitale SG, De Dominici R et al (2016) Fertility outcome after laparoscopic salpingostomy or salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy A 12-years retrospective cohort study. Ann Ital Chir 87:461–465

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jaaback K, Johnson N, Lawrie TA (2011) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the initial management of primary epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD005340. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd005340.pub3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Golse N, Bakrin N, Passot G et al (2012) Iterative procedures combining cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal recurrence: postoperative and long-term results. J Surg Oncol 106:197–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Petrillo M, De Iaco P, Cianci S et al (2016) Long-term survival for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients treated with secondary cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Ann Surg Oncol 23:1660–1665. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5050-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vitale SG, Marilli I, Lodato M et al (2013) The role of cytoreductive surgery in advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a systematic review. Updates Surg. 65:265–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gallotta V, Conte C, Giudice MT et al (2017) Secondary laparoscopic cytoreduction in recurrent ovarian cancer: a large, single-institution experience. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25(4):644–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rossetti D, Vitale SG, Gulino FA et al (2016) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for the assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis resectability in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 37:671–673. https://doi.org/10.12892/ejgo3234.2016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vassos N, Förtsch T, Aladashvili A et al (2016) Repeated cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis. World J Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0804-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Chiva LM, Gonzalez-Martin A (2015) A critical appraisal of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 136:130–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van Driel WJ, Koole SN, Sikorska K et al (2018) Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 378:230–240. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1708618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alyami M, Gagniere J, Sgarbura O et al (2017) Multicentric initial experience with the use of the pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the management of unresectable peritoneal carcinomatosis. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:2178–2183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2017.09.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Khosrawipour T, Khosrawipour V, Giger-Pabst U (2017) Pressurized intra peritoneal aerosol chemotherapy in patients suffering from peritoneal carcinomatosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186709

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Sánchez-García S, Villarejo-Campos P, Padilla-Valverde D et al (2016) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy hyperthermia (HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis of ovarian cancer origin by fluid and CO2 recirculation using the closed abdomen technique (PRS-1.0 Combat): a clinical pilot study. Int J Hyperth 32:488–495. https://doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2016.1152515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Issels RD (2008) Hyperthermia adds to chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 44:2546–2554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.07.038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ferron G, Gesson-Paute A, Classe JM, Querleu D (2005) Feasibility of laparoscopic peritonectomy followed by intra-peritoneal chemohyperthermia: an experimental study. Gynecol Oncol 99:358–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.06.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fagotti A, Costantini B, Gallotta V et al (2015) Minimally Invasive Secondary Cytoreduction Plus HIPEC Versus Open Surgery Plus HIPEC in Isolated Relapse From Ovarian Cancer: a retrospective cohort study on perioperative outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22:428–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.11.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Alletti SG, Vizzielli G, Lafuenti L et al (2018) Single-institution propensity-matched study to evaluate the psychological effect of minimally invasive interval debulking surgery versus standard laparotomic treatment: from body to mind and back. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.12.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rossitto C, Cianci S, Gueli Alletti S et al (2017) Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, single-port and percutaneous hysterectomy: comparison of perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive approaches in gynecologic surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 216:125–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bellia A, Vitale SG, Laganà AS et al (2016) Feasibility and surgical outcomes of conventional and robot-assisted laparoscopy for early-stage ovarian cancer: a retrospective, multicenter analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294:615–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4087-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Padilla-Valverde D, Sanchez-Garcia S, García-Santos E et al (2017) Usefulness of thermographic analysis to control temperature homogeneity in the development and implementation of a closed recirculating CO2 chemohyperthermia model. Int J Hyperth 33:220–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2016.1237679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sánchez-García S, Padilla-Valverde D, Villarejo-Campos P et al (2017) Hyperthermic chemotherapy intra-abdominal laparoscopic approach: development of a laparoscopic model using CO2 recirculation system and clinical translation in peritoneal carcinomatosis. Int J Hyperth 33:684–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2017.1302100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vetvicka V, Laganà AS, Salmeri FM et al (2016) Regulation of apoptotic pathways during endometriosis: from the molecular basis to the future perspectives. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294:897–904

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Laganà AS, Vitale SG, Salmeri FM et al (2017) Unus pro omnibus, omnes pro uno: a novel, evidence-based, unifying theory for the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Med Hypotheses 103:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2017.03.032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Caruso S, Agnello C, Romano M et al (2011) Preliminary study on the effect of four-phasic estradiol valerate and dienogest (e2v/dng) oral contraceptive on the quality of sexual life. J Sex Med 8:2841–2850. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02409.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Caruso S, Cianci S, Malandrino C et al (2013) Hyperandrogenic women treated with a continuous-regimen oral contraceptive. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 171:307–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.09.039

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Caruso S, Cianci S, Cariola M et al (2017) Improvement of low sexual desire due to antiandrogenic combined oral contraceptives after switching to an oral contraceptive containing 17 β-estradiol. J Women’s Health 26:728–734. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.5801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Caruso S, Cianci S, Vitale SG et al (2017) Effects of ultralow topical estriol dose on vaginal health and quality of life in postmenopausal women who underwent surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. Menopause 24:900–907. https://doi.org/10.1097/gme.0000000000000851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Caruso S, Cianci S, Vitale SG et al (2018) Sexual function and quality of life of women adopting the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS 13.5 mg) after abortion for unintended pregnancy. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 23:24–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2018.1433824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was not supported by any fund/grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Cianci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Not applicable for this type of study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cianci, S., Vizzielli, G., Fagotti, A. et al. A novel HIPEC technique using hybrid CO2 recirculation system: intra-abdominal diffusion test in a porcine model. Updates Surg 70, 529–533 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0557-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0557-x

Keywords

Navigation