Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic versus robotic right colectomy: technique and outcomes

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery has gained worldwide acceptance in the treatment of colonic cancer in the last decades, thanks to its well-known advantages in short-term outcomes. Nevertheless, the penetrance of minimally invasive colorectal surgery still remains low. Few studies and metanalysis, to date, have analyzed the results of robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery, often with conflicting conclusions. The robotic platform, thanks to its technological features, may potentially overcome the limitation of standard laparoscopy, especially when performing a complete mesocolic excision resection and an intracorporeal anastomosis. Robotic surgery could also shorten the learning curve of young novice surgeons, provided that strict protocols of structured training are applied. This paper is an update on the current available outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic surgery in right colectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG, Brown JM (2013) Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100(1):75–82. doi:10.1002/bjs.8945

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10(1):44–52. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70310-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa032651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kwon S, Billingham R, Farrokhi E, Florence M, Herzig D, Horvath K, Rogers T, Steele S, Symons R, Thirlby R, Whiteford M, Flum DR (2012) Adoption of laparoscopy for elective colorectal resection: a report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. J Am Coll Surg 214(6):909–918. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.03.010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M (2008) Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 247(5):819–824. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816d950e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Simorov A, Shaligram A, Shostrom V, Boilesen E, Thompson J, Oleynikov D (2012) Laparoscopic colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure: a national database review of academic medical centers. Ann Surg 256(3):462–468. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182657ec5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Klugsberger B, Haas D, Oppelt P, Neuner L, Shamiyeh A (2015) Current state of laparoscopic colonic surgery in Austria: a national survey. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 25(12):976–981. doi:10.1089/lap.2015.0373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rondelli F, Trastulli S, Avenia N, Schillaci G, Cirocchi R, Gulla N, Mariani E, Bistoni G, Noya G (2012) Is laparoscopic right colectomy more effective than open resection? A meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studies. Colorectal Dis 14(8):e447–e469. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03054.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation–technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11(4):354–364. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01735.x (discussion 364–355)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Trastulli S, Coratti A, Guarino S, Piagnerelli R, Annecchiarico M, Coratti F, Di Marino M, Ricci F, Desiderio J, Cirocchi R, Parisi A (2015) Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared with laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicentre study. Surg Endosc 29(6):1512–1521. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3835-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carnuccio P, Jimeno J, Pares D (2014) Laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing two types of anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 18(1):5–12. doi:10.1007/s10151-013-1029-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H, Bailey C, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143(8):762–767. doi:10.1001/archsurg.143.8.762 (discussion 768)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stein SA, Bergamaschi R (2013) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 17(Suppl 1):S35–S39. doi:10.1007/s10151-012-0937-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E, Guarino S, Desiderio J, Boselli C, Parisi A, Noya G, Slim K (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy––systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 22(1):1–13. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2012.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee KH, Ho J, Akmal Y, Nelson R, Pigazzi A (2013) Short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 27(6):1986–1990. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2698-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Feroci F, Lenzi E, Garzi A, Vannucchi A, Cantafio S, Scatizzi M (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 28(9):1177–1186. doi:10.1007/s00384-013-1651-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Milone M, Elmore U, Di Salvo E, Delrio P, Bucci L, Ferulano GP, Napolitano C, Angiolini MR, Bracale U, Clemente M, D’Ambra M, Luglio G, Musella M, Pace U, Rosati R, Milone F (2015) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers. Surg Endosc 29(8):2314–2320. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3950-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grams J, Tong W, Greenstein AJ, Salky B (2010) Comparison of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic-assisted hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc 24(8):1886–1891. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0865-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. DeSouza A, Domajnko B, Park J, Marecik S, Prasad L, Abcarian H (2011) Incisional hernia, midline versus low transverse incision: what is the ideal incision for specimen extraction and hand-assisted laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 25(4):1031–1036. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1309-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP (2012) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg 99(9):1219–1226. doi:10.1002/bjs.8841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morpurgo E, Contardo T, Molaro R, Zerbinati A, Orsini C, D’Annibale A (2013) Robotic-assisted intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a case control study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 23(5):414–417. doi:10.1089/lap.2012.0404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Barrie J, Jayne DG, Wright J, Murray CJ, Collinson FJ, Pavitt SH (2014) Attaining surgical competency and its implications in surgical clinical trial design: a systematic review of the learning curve in laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 21(3):829–840. doi:10.1245/s10434-013-3348-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen W, Sailhamer E, Berger DL, Rattner DW (2007) Operative time is a poor surrogate for the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 21(2):238–243. doi:10.1007/s00464-006-0120-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY (2014) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons from a single surgeon’s experience. Dis Colon Rectum 57(9):1066–1074. doi:10.1097/dcr.0000000000000174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Melich G, Hong YK, Kim J, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK, Sender Liberman A, Min BS (2015) Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves. Surg Endosc 29(3):558–568. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3698-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Park EJ, Kim CW, Cho MS, Kim DW, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2014) Is the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection shorter than laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer?: a comparative analysis of clinicopathologic outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries. Medicine 93(25):e109. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000000109

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamaguchi T, Kinugasa Y, Shiomi A, Sato S, Yamakawa Y, Kagawa H, Tomioka H, Mori K (2015) Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: use of the cumulative sum method. Surg Endosc 29(7):1679–1685. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3855-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Buchs NC (2015) Robotic technology: optimizing the outcomes in rectal cancer? World J Clin Oncol 6(3):22–24. doi:10.5306/wjco.v6.i3.22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Byrn JC, Hrabe JE, Charlton ME (2014) An initial experience with 85 consecutive robotic-assisted rectal dissections: improved operating times and lower costs with experience. Surg Endosc 28(11):3101–3107. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3591-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Foo CC, Law WL (2015) The learning curve of robotic-assisted low rectal resection of a novice rectal surgeon. World J Surg. doi:10.1007/s00268-015-3251-x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Formisano G, Marano A, Bianchi PP, Spinoglio G (2015) Challenges with robotic low anterior resection. Miner Chir 70:341–354

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cho MS, Baek SJ, Hur H, Soh Min B, Baik SH, Kyu Kim N (2015) Modified complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for the treatment of right-sided colon cancer: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors. Ann Surg 261(4):708–715. doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000000831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE, Wilhelmsen M, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Tenma JR, Bols B, Ingeholm P, Rasmussen LA, Jepsen LV, Iversen ER, Kristensen B, Gogenur I (2015) Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study. Lancet Oncol 16(2):161–168. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)71168-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chow CF, Kim SH (2014) Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision: West meets East. World J Gastroenterol 20(39):14301–14307. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14301

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Bae SU, Saklani AP, Lim DR, Kim DW, Hur H, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Kim NK (2014) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21(7):2288–2294. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-3614-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Huang JL, Wei HB, Fang JF, Zheng ZH, Chen TF, Wei B, Huang Y, Liu JP (2015) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer. Int J Surg 23:12–17. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.08.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kang J, Kim IK, Kang SI, Sohn SK, Lee KY (2014) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision. Surg Endosc 28(9):2747–2751. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3521-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Melich G, Jeong DH, Hur H, Baik SH, Faria J, Kim NK, Min BS (2014) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision provides acceptable perioperative outcomes but is lengthy–analysis of learning curves for a novice minimally invasive surgeon. Can J Surg 57(5):331–336

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Mori S, Baba K, Yanagi M, Kita Y, Yanagita S, Uchikado Y, Arigami T, Uenosono Y, Okumura H, Nakajo A, Maemuras K, Ishigami S, Natsugoe S (2015) Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with radical lymph node dissection along the surgical trunk for right colon cancer. Surg Endosc 29(1):34–40. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3650-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Shin JW, Amar AH, Kim SH, Kwak JM, Baek SJ, Cho JS, Kim J (2014) Complete mesocolic excision with D3 lymph node dissection in laparoscopic colectomy for stages II and III colon cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes in 168 patients. Tech Coloproctol 18(9):795–803. doi:10.1007/s10151-014-1134-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gouvas N, Pechlivanides G, Zervakis N, Kafousi M, Xynos E (2012) Complete mesocolic excision in colon cancer surgery: a comparison between open and laparoscopic approach. Colorectal Dis 14(11):1357–1364. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03019.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General and Minimally-invasive Surgery, International School of Robotic Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy

    Giampaolo Formisano, Pasquale Misitano, Giuseppe Giuliani, Giulia Calamati, Lucia Salvischiani & Paolo Pietro Bianchi

Authors
  1. Giampaolo Formisano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pasquale Misitano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giuseppe Giuliani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giulia Calamati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lucia Salvischiani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Paolo Pietro Bianchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giampaolo Formisano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Giampaolo Formisano, Pasquale Misitano, Giuseppe Giuliani, Giulia Calamati, Lucia Salvischiani, Sofia Esposito and Paolo Pietro Bianchi have no conflict of interests or financial ties to disclose.

Ethical approval

Our study was conducted in accordance with the Italian government ethical guidelines for the treatment of humans and with Institutional Review Board approval.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Formisano, G., Misitano, P., Giuliani, G. et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic right colectomy: technique and outcomes. Updates Surg 68, 63–69 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0353-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0353-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation