Abstract
Introduction
Hyperglycemia is a frequent complication of parenteral nutrition (PN) in patients both with and without diabetes mellitis (DM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of glucose control achieved with basal plus-correction insulin in surgical patients with and without a history of DM receiving PN.
Methods
Retrospective evaluation of a protocol applied during the period of January 2013–December 2015. The insulin dose was started at 0.4 and 0.3 IU/kg/day in patients with previous DM and without a history of DM, respectively, and the target blood glucose (BG) was < 180 mg/dl. Mean BG levels, insulin total daily dose (TDD) and hypoglycemic (< 70 mg/dl) events on different days of PN were also evaluated.
Results
Forty-one patients with previous type 2 DM and 39 without DM were evaluated. Glycemic control in both groups was as follows: during the first 48 h (230.4 ± 67 vs. 189.4 ± 38 mg/dl, p = 0.002); at the midpoint (224.6 ± 58 vs. 181.3 ± 27 mg/dl, p = 0.003); 48 h before ending TPN (196.4 ± 43 vs. 169.8 ± 40 mg/dl, p = 0.004). Insulin TDD was 0.5 ± 0.3 U/kg/day in patients with DM and 0.37 ± 0.3 units/kg/day in those without DM (p < 0.05). A total of 18 patients experienced hypoglycemic events, without differences between the groups.
Conclusion
A basal-correction insulin regimen is an alternative method for managing hyperglycemia in non-critically ill surgical patients on PN.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Hyperglycemia is an important side effect in patients receiving parenteral nutrition [1] because of its high prevalence and has been associated with adverse outcomes [2].
The prevalence of hyperglycemia in patients receiving PN is high and reported in more than 40% of these patients [3,4,5]. Most studies refer to critically ill patients because their hypermetabolic state makes controlling glucose levels difficult, and there are few studies of non-critically ill patients, who are expected to have a better tolerance of the glucose load. PN-related hyperglycemia is associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with and without DM as well as those who are either critically or non-critically ill [6,7,8,9]. In surgical patients, hyperglycemia increases risks of perioperative complications, length of stay and mortality [10, 11].
Both the consensus statement by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) as well the clinical practice guideline of the Endocrine Society recommend a pre-meal BG level < 140 mg/dl and random BG values < 180 mg/dl [12, 13]. Furthermore, the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition recommends a blood glucose goal of 140–180 mg/dl for hospitalized patients receiving nutritional support [14].
Insulin is the treatment of choice to control hyperglycemia during PN. Subcutaneous insulin administration, intravenous insulin infusion and addition of insulin to the PN bag have been shown to be effective in managing hyperglycemia in these patients [5, 13, 15, 16]. However, there are few data from clinical trials comparing different strategies [17], particularly in non-critically ill patients [18, 19]. Furthermore, insulin protocols vary widely between institutions.
In our hospital, a program for hyperglycemia management based on a published protocol was established [20]. For non-critically ill patients under continuous PN, a basal plus correction insulin regimen was set up. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of glucose control achieved by this strategy in surgical patients with and without a history of DM receiving PN.
Methods
A retrospective study of surgical patients receiving PN during the period of January 2013–December 2015 was performed at the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau in Barcelona, Spain. Data were retrieved from the hospital’s electronic medical records. Patients with or without a previous history of DM treated with a basal plus correction insulin regimen were included. In the diabetic patient group, those with no record of DM but a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measurement ≥ 6.5% or fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl were also included. Patients were excluded if they were transfered to intensive care units (ICUs), the duration of the PN was < 5 days or > 60 days, or they had recieved pharmacologic doses of corticosteroids. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our institution, the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau.
Parenteral Nutrition Administration
The TPN formula was provided as a total nutrient admixture solution containing carbohydrates, proteins and lipids, with daily adjustments according to the individual caloric and nutritional requirements of the patients. PN administration provides approximately 50–60% of the calculated daily carbohydrate caloric requirements during the first 24 h and was increased to the desired goal during the next 24 h. The glucose range administered was between 150 and 250 g.
Blood Glucose Monitoring and Insulin Therapy Protocol
In all patients receiving PN, capillary BG was monitored every 6 h and was discontinued in patients without a prior history of DM if glucose values were < 140 mg/dl without insulin therapy for 48 h with the desired caloric intake.
Insulin therapy was indicated for all patients with previous DM under pharmacologic therapy. In DM patients treated exclusively with a diet and in those without a history of DM, insulin therapy was indicated if blood glucose levels were > 180 mg/dl. Patients with previous replacement insulin therapy with a basal-bolus regimen or ≥ two doses of intermediate-acting or premixed insulin were started at their previous total daily dose (TDD), and in the remaining patients the initial TDD was estimated as 0.4 U/kg/day.
The TDD was administered as basal insulin glargine once daily, and correction doses of insulin lispro were administered every 6 h if glycemia remained above 180 mg/dl. The glargine insulin dose was increased or decreased by 10–20% every day to achieve a glycemic goal of 140–180 mg/dl.
The glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was determined in all patients with previous diabetes and in non-diabetic patients who required insulin therapy.
Outcome Measures
The primary outcome of this study was to determine the quality of glycemic control as measured by mean daily BG levels 48 h after initiation of PN treatment, at the midpoint of the treatment period and 48 h before ending PN. The number of hypoglycemic (< 70 mg/dl) events and TDD of insulin were also determined, and information on the demographics, DM characteristics, type of surgery, BG on admission and hospital length of stay (LOS) were collected.
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed with the STATA 13 statistical program.
A p value < 0.05 was set as statistically significant.
Descriptive statistics using frequencies to summarize categorical variables (percentage) and expressing quantitative variables as mean ± standard deviation (SD) were performed. Normal distribution of quantitative data was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test.
The univariate tests used were chi-square for categorical variables and Student’s t-test for quantitative variables. Paired Student’s tests were performed to search for statistical differences in the variables between DM and non-DM patients.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Results
The baseline characteristics of the 80 patients who met the eligibility criteria are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, weight, mean LOS, type of surgery or mean duration of PN between DM and non-DM patients. The most common reason for indicating PN was a paralytic ileus. Patients with a prior history of DM had significantly higher admission BG and HbA1c values (Table 2).
Glycemic Control
Mean daily BG concentrations during the hospital stay are shown in Fig. 1.
In all patients the mean BG levels during the first 48 h of PN, at the midpoint period of PN and 48 h before ending PN were 209.9 ± 58, 201.1 ± 43 and 183.1 ± 44 mg/dl, respectively. Patients with previous DM had higher mean BG concentrations at the three study times (Fig. 1). There were no differences between DM patients with or without previous insulin therapy during the first 48 h of PN (230.5 ± 67 vs. 221.6 ± 70 mg/dl), at the midpoint of the period with PN (221.8 ± 58 vs. 233.0 ± 60 mg/dl) and 48 h before ending PN (196.4 ± 43 vs. 193.92 ± 43 mg/dl), p > 0.05. The proportion of patients who achieved BG < 180 mg/dl is shown in Fig. 2.
Eighteen (22.5%) patients experienced mild hypoglycemic events and six (7.5%) severe hypoglycemic events, with no differences between patients with or without previous DM. Most hypoglycemic episodes were due to unplanned discontinuation of PN.
Insulin Dose
Insulin requirements are shown in Table 2. The TDD of insulin during PN was 30.2 ± 20 units or 0.43 ± 0.3 U/kg/day. In patients with DM, the TDD was 0.5 ± 0.3 U/kg/day (35.1 ± 21 U/day) and, in those with no history of DM, 0.37 ± 0.3 U/kg/day (25.3 ± 19 U/day), p < 0.05. The insulin glargine dose increased while the correctional insulin lispro decreased from the start until 48 h before ending the PN.
Newly Diabetic Patients
We identified five newly diabetic patients, and the mean HbA1c was 7.2% ± 0.6%. At discharge, three patients received basal insulin and two oral agents.
Discussion
This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the quality of glucose control achieved by a basal plus correction insulin regimen in surgical patients with and without a history of DM receiving PN. Our study confirms that subcutaneous insulin with basal and correction components is an adequate method for achieving and maintaining glucose control in non-critically ill hospitalized patients with PN and extends our knowledge as it was performed during regular clinical practice.
People with DM have a higher probability of requiring surgery during their lifetime than those without DM [21]. In addition, hyperglycemia is a frequent complication of PN in patients both with and without DM. Development of hyperglycemia during PN increases the risk of complications and mortality [7, 22, 23], and several studies have demonstrated that hyperglycemia treatment reduces rates of infections and mortality in surgical patients with diabetes [10, 24, 25].
Studies that evaluate hyperglycemia treatment in patients receiving PN are scarce and include both critically ill and non-critically ill patients. Glycemic targets are heterogeneous, and intervention includes the incorporation of insulin with PN solution [16] and administration of long-acting insulin [19]. Only one study has compared these strategies in surgical patients receiving PN [18], and the results confirm that both glargine insulin and regular insulin in the PN are effective modalities for BG control. Moreover, a recent meta-analysis confirms that the most fitting insulin regimen to treat hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients on nutritional support has not been established [17]. Accordingly, there is a lack of standardized protocols for monitoring and therapy in this population, and strategies are those recommended for hospitalized non-critically ill patients [5, 12, 13, 20, 26].
Although there is no clear evidence for specific BG goals in non-critically ill patients, pre-meal BG targets < 140 mg/dl with random BG < 180 mg/dl are considered reasonable [12, 13, 20, 26]. Glucose management typically involves subcutaneous insulin administered as a basal/bolus/correction regimen with adequate adjustments as the patient’s condition changes [12, 13, 20]. In patients on PN, as the rate of glucose infusion is expected to be flat and remain in a postprandial state, a basal plus correction insulin regimen and a BG target < 180 mg/dl were established.
The target BG < 180 mg/dl was achieved in only 50% of patients, equaling overall glycemic control rates obtained in a recent study with glargine insulin (52.24%) and regular insulin in the PN bag (47.76%) [18]. As expected, a high percentage of patients with a previous history of DM did not reach the glycemic target. The average TDD of insulin measured 0.5 U/kg/day in patients with previous DM and 0.37 U/kg/day in those with no history of DM, in accordance with current recommendations for hospitalized patients as initial insulin doses [13, 27, 28]. Therefore, an initial insulin dose estimated at 0.4 U/kg/day seems to be adequate for most patients, and perhaps the main reason for not achieving reasonable glycemic control was the lack of dose adjustment.
The prevalence of hypoglycemia in patients receiving PN is not well known and has been related to an increase in complications and mortality [29]. The percentage ranges from a low of around 4% up to 40% [30]. In our report, 22.5% of patients experienced BG levels < 70 mg/dl and 7.5% < 40 mg/dl. Most episodes were due to unplanned discontinuation of PN and lack of communication with the endocrinology team, a common occurrence in hospital wards.
The limitations of the present study include a retrospective design that led to exclusion of subjects whose data were incomplete. As the study was performed during regular clinical practice, it provides information on the applicability of a basal-correction insulin regimen in this context. Since our study did not aim to compare different strategies, conclusions regarding the most appropriate method to manage hyperglycemia could not be reached based on this study. Larger studies are needed to determine the optimal glycemic control strategies in patients with PN.
Conclusions
The results of our study show that in regular clinical practice subcutaneous insulin with basal and correction components is an adequate method for management of hyperglycemia in non-critically ill hospitalized surgical patients with PN.
References
Maroulis J, Kalfarentzos F. Complications of parenteral nutrition at the end of the century. Clin Nutr. 2000;19:295–304.
Ziegler TR. Parenteral nutrition in the critically ill patient. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1088–97.
Pleva M, Mirtallo JM, Steinberg SM. Hyperglycemic events in non-intensive care unit patients receiving parenteral nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract Off Publ Am Soc Parenter Enter Nutr. 2009;24:626–34.
Rosmarin D, Wardlaw G, Mirtallo J. Hyperglycemia associated with high, continuous infusion rates of total parenteral nutrition dextrose. Nutr Clin Pract. 1996;11:151–6.
Gosmanov AR, Umpierrez GE. Management of hyperglycemia during enteral and parenteral nutrition therapy. Curr Diabetes Rep. 2013;13:155–62.
Sarkisian S, Fenton TR, Shaheen AA, Raman M. Parenteral nutrition-associated hyperglycemia in noncritically ill inpatients is associated with higher mortality. Can J Gastroenterol J Can Gastroenterol. 2010;24:453–7.
Pasquel FJ, Smiley D, Spiegelman R, et al. Hyperglycemia is associated with increased hospital complications and mortality during parenteral nutrition. Hosp Pract. 2011;39:81–8.
Cheung NW, Napier B, Zaccaria C, Fletcher JP. Hyperglycemia is associated with adverse outcomes in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2367–71.
Lin L-Y, Lin H-C, Lee P-C, et al. Hyperglycemia correlates with outcomes in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. Am J Med Sci. 2007;333:261–5.
Umpierrez GE, Smiley D, Jacobs S, et al. Randomized study of basal-bolus insulin therapy in the inpatient management of patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing general surgery (RABBIT 2 surgery). Diabetes Care. 2011;34:256–61.
Noordzij PG, Boersma E, Schreiner F, et al. Increased preoperative glucose levels are associated with perioperative mortality in patients undergoing noncardiac, nonvascular surgery. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;156:137–42.
Moghissi ES, Korytkowski MT, DiNardo M, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Diabetes Association consensus statement on inpatient glycemic control. Endocr Pract Off J Am Coll Endocrinol Am Assoc Clin Endocrinol. 2009;15:353–69.
Umpierrez GE, Hellman R, Korytkowski MT, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients in non-critical care setting: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:16–38.
McMahon MM, Nystrom E, Braunschweig C, et al. ASPEN clinical guidelines: nutrition support of adult patients with hyperglycemia. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2013;37:23–36.
Olveira G, García-Luna PP, Pereira JL, et al. Recomendaciones del grupo GARIN para el manejo de pacientes no críticos con diabetes o hiperglucemia de estrés y nutrición artificial. Nutr Hosp. 2012;27:1837–49.
Valero MA, Alegre E, Gomis P, et al. Clinical management of hyperglycaemic patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. Clin Nutr Edinb Scotl. 1996;15:11–5.
Viana MV, Viana LV, Tavares AL, de Azevedo MJ. Insulin regimens to treat hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients on nutritional support: systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Nutr Metab. 2017;71:183–94.
Hakeam HA, Mulia HA, Azzam A, Amin T. Glargine insulin use versus continuous regular insulin in diabetic surgical noncritically ill patients receiving parenteral nutrition: randomized controlled study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017;41:1110–8.
Oghazian MB, Javadi MR, Radfar M, et al. Effectiveness of regular versus glargine insulin in stable critical care patients receiving parenteral nutrition: a randomized controlled trial. Pharmacotherapy. 2015;35:148–57.
Pérez PA, Conthe GP, Aguilar DM, et al. Hospital management of hyperglycemia. Med Clin (Barc). 2009;132:465–75.
Clement S, Braithwaite SS, Magee MF, et al. Management of diabetes and hyperglycemia in hospitals. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:553–91.
Olveira G, Tapia MJ, Ocón J, et al. Parenteral nutrition-associated hyperglycemia in non-critically ill inpatients increases the risk of in-hospital mortality (multicenter study). Diabetes Care. 2013;36:1061–6.
Kumar PR, Crotty P, Raman M. Hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients receiving parental nutrition is associated with increased morbidity and mortality: a review. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2011;10:1155.
Grey NJ, Perdrizet GA. Reduction of nosocomial infections in the surgical intensive-care unit by strict glycemic control. Endocr Pract Off J Am Coll Endocrinol Am Assoc Clin Endocrinol. 2004;10(Suppl 2):46–52.
Duncan AE. Hyperglycemia and perioperative glucose management. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18:6195–203.
American Diabetes Association. 14. Diabetes care in the hospital. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:S120–7.
Umpierrez GE, Smiley D, Zisman A, et al. Randomized study of basal-bolus insulin therapy in the inpatient management of patients with type 2 diabetes (RABBIT 2 trial). Diabetes Care. 2007;30:2181–6.
Umpierrez GE, Smiley D, Hermayer K, et al. Randomized study comparing a basal-bolus with a basal plus correction insulin regimen for the hospital management of medical and surgical patients with type 2 diabetes: basal plus trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:2169–74.
Garg R, Hurwitz S, Turchin A, Trivedi A. Hypoglycemia, with or without insulin therapy, is associated with increased mortality among hospitalized patients. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:1107–10.
Olveira G, Tapia MJ, Ocón J, et al. Hypoglycemia in noncritically ill patients receiving total parenteral nutrition: a multicenter study. (Study group on the problem of hyperglycemia in parenteral nutrition; Nutrition area of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition). Nutrition. 2015;31:58–63.
Acknowledgements
We thank the study participants.
Funding
No funding or sponsorship was received for this study or publication of this article. The article processing charges were funded by the authors. All authors had full access to all of the data in this study and take complete responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis.
Authorship
All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship of this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole and have given final approval for the version to be published.
Disclosures
Antonio Pérez has served as a consultant for or received lecture fees or travel reimbursement from Sanofi-Aventis, Almirall, NovoNordisk, Eli Lilly, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Esteve, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis and Astra Zeneca. Analía Ramos, Fernanda Rabasa, Lilian Mendoza, Joana Cardenete, Pedro Gill, Alba Morilla and Daniel Cardona have nothing to disclose.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Data Availability
The data sets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Enhanced digital features
To view enhanced digital features for this article go to https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6139673.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ramos, A., Rabasa, F., Mendoza, L. et al. Differences in Glycemic Control in Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients with Parenteral Nutrition Using a Basal plus Correction Insulin Regimen: An Observational, Retrospective Study. Diabetes Ther 9, 1359–1367 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0433-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0433-1