Boyd JC, Bruns DE. Quality specifications for glucose meters: assessment by simulation modeling of errors in insulin dose. Clin Chem. 2001;47:209–14.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Raine CH III, Schrock LE, Edelman SV, et al. Significant insulin dose errors may occur if blood glucose results are obtained from miscoded meters. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007;1:205–10.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Virdi NS, Mahoney JJ. Importance of blood glucose meter and carbohydrate estimation accuracy. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6:921–6.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Breton MD, Kovatchev BP. Impact of blood glucose self-monitoring errors on glucose variability, risk for hypoglycemia, and average glucose control in type 1 diabetes: an in silico study. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4:562–70.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
ADA. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2017. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:1–135.
Article
Google Scholar
Elgart JF, Gonzalez L, Prestes M, Rucci E, Gagliardino JJ. Frequency of self-monitoring blood glucose and attainment of HbA1c target values. Acta Diabetol. 2016;53:57–62.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Klaff LJ, Brazg R, Hughes K, et al. Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17:8–15.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Brazg RL, Klaff LJ, Sussman AM. New generation blood glucose monitoring system exceeds international accuracy standards. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016;10:1414–5.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Freckmann G, Link M, Schmid C, et al. System accuracy evaluation of different blood glucose monitoring systems following ISO 15197:2013 by using two different comparison methods. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17:635–48.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hasslacher C, Kulozik F, Platten I. Analytical performance of glucose monitoring systems at different blood glucose ranges and analysis of outliers in a clinical setting. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014;8:466–72.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kristensen GB, Monsen G, Skeie S, Sandberg S. Standardized evaluation of nine instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008;10:467–77.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Littmann K, Petersen ER, Pussinen C, et al. Evaluation of OneTouch Verio(®), a new blood glucose self-monitoring system for patients with diabetes. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2013;73:286–92.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bailey TS, Wallace JF, Parkes JL, et al. Performance of a new blood glucose monitoring system in the hands of intended users. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14:783–9.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Solvik UO, Risa M, Jacobsen CE, Monsen G, Sandberg S. Performance of 10 systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose by trained healthcare professionals and in the hands of the users. Clin Chem. 2015;61:772–4.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization. In vitro diagnostic test systems—requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. ISO 15197:2013.
International Organization for Standardization. In vitro diagnostic test systems—requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus (ISO 15197:2013). EN ISO 15197:2015.
Baumstark A, Jendrike N, Pleus S, Haug C, Freckmann G. Evaluation of accuracy of six blood glucose monitoring systems and modeling of possibly related insulin dosing errors. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017;19:580–8.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization. In vitro diagnostic medical devices—measurement of quantities in biological samples—metrological traceability of values assigned to calibrators and control materials. EN ISO 17511:2003.
Bundesärztekammer. Richtlinie der Bundesärztekammer zur Qualitätssicherung laboratoriumsmedizinischer Untersuchungen. Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 2014;111:1583-618.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Simmons DA. How should blood glucose meter system analytical performance be assessed? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;10:178–84.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Pardo S, Dunne N, Simmons DA. Using radar plots to demonstrate the accuracy and precision of 6 blood glucose monitoring systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11:966–9.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Klonoff D, Lias C, Vigersky R, et al. The surveillance error grid. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014;8:658–72.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Diabetes Education Online. http://dtc.ucsf.edu/types-of-diabetes/type2/treatment-of-type-2-diabetes/medications-and-therapies/type-2-insulin-rx/calculating-insulin-dose/#mealtime. Diabetes Teaching Center at the University of California, San Francisco. 2018. Accessed Feb 2018.
Bailey TS, Wallace JF, Pardo S, et al. Accuracy and user performance evaluation of a new, wireless-enabled blood glucose monitoring system that links to a smart mobile device. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11:736–43.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Jendrike N, et al. Accuracy evaluation of four blood glucose monitoring systems in the hands of intended users and trained personnel based on ISO 15197 requirements. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017;19:246–54.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Skeie S, Thue G, Nerhus K, Sandberg S. Instruments for self-monitoring of blood glucose: comparisons of testing quality achieved by patients and a technician. Clin Chem. 2002;48:994–1003.
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Christiansen M, Greene C, Pardo S, et al. A new, wireless-enabled blood glucose monitoring system that links to a smart mobile device: accuracy and user performance evaluation. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11:567–73.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bailey T, Wallace JF, Greene C, et al. Accuracy and user performance evaluation of the Contour(®) Next Link 2.4 blood glucose monitoring system. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;448:139–45.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Caswell M, Frank J, Viggiani MT, et al. Accuracy and user performance evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17:152–8.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Parkes JL, Slatin SL, Pardo S, Ginsberg BH. A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1143–8.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Link M, Schmid C, Pleus S, et al. System accuracy evaluation of four systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose following ISO 15197 using a glucose oxidase and a hexokinase-based comparison method. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;9:1041–50.
CAS
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bailey TS, Klaff LJ, Wallace JF, et al. Fundamental importance of reference glucose analyzer accuracy for evaluating the performance of blood glucose monitoring systems (BGMSs). J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016;10:872–5.
CAS
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Baumstark A, Pleus S, Schmid C, et al. Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6:1076–86.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kristensen GB, Christensen NG, Thue G, Sandberg S. Between-lot variation in external quality assessment of glucose: clinical importance and effect on participant performance evaluation. Clin Chem. 2005;51:1632–6.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Müller UA, Hämmerlein A, Casper A, Schultz M. Community pharmacy-based intervention to improve self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetic patients. Pharmacy Pract (Granada). 2006;4:195–203.
Google Scholar
Bamberg R, Schulman K, MacKenzie M, Moore J, Olchesky S. Effect of adverse storage conditions on performance of glucometer test strips. Clin Lab Sci. 2005;18:203–9.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bergenstal R, Pearson J, Cembrowski GS, et al. Identifying variables associated with inaccurate self-monitoring of blood glucose: proposed guidelines to improve accuracy. Diabetes Educ. 2000;26:981–9.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bedini JL, Wallace JF, Pardo S, Petruschke T. Performance evaluation of three blood glucose monitoring systems using ISO 15197: 2013 accuracy criteria, consensus and surveillance error grid analyses, and insulin dosing error modeling in a hospital setting. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;10:85–92.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Pardo S, Dunne N, Simmons DA. Bolus insulin dose error distributions based on results from two clinical trials comparing blood glucose monitoring systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11:970–4.
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar