Abstract
When accounting for the social–ecological impact of an ecological restoration program, both objective environmental contexts and people’s subjective perceptions are required. While this kind of environmental impact assessment lacks a comprehensive perspective. We use the difference-in-differences model to evaluate the effect of the greenness of the landscape after ecological migration in the Qilian Mountains in China; and analysis of variance and fixed effects models are used to evaluate the effects of such ecological restoration programs on local people’s perceptions. The results show that the ecological migration program in the Qilian Mountains has been successful at not only significantly improving remotely sensed greenness at the landscape scale, but also at enhancing immigrants’ environmental perceptions. These findings demonstrate the environmental impacts of ecological migration from a social–ecological perspective, and can provide methodological implications for landscape planning to support a better understanding of ecological restoration programs in the drylands.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamo, S.B. 2010. Environmental migration and cities in the context of global environmental change. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2: 161–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.06.005.
Albert, C., B. Schröter, D. Haase, M. Brillinger, J. Henze, S. Herrmann, S. Gottwald, P. Guerrero, et al. 2019. Addressing societal challenges through nature-based solutions: How can landscape planning and governance research contribute? Landscape and Urban Planning 182: 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.003.
Alene, E.T. 2021. The effect of urban redevelopment induced displacement and resettlement on social capital in Ethiopia. Preprint. In Review. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1020191/v1
Badura, T., E. KrkoškaLorencová, S. Ferrini, and D. Vačkářová. 2021. Public support for urban climate adaptation policy through nature-based solutions in Prague. Landscape and Urban Planning 215: 104215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104215.
Bennett, N.J. 2016. Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management: Perceptions and conservation. Conservation Biology 30: 582–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12681.
Bennett, N.J., A. Di Franco, A. Calò, E. Nethery, F. Niccolini, M. Milazzo, and P. Guidetti. 2019. Local support for conservation is associated with perceptions of good governance, social impacts, and ecological effectiveness. Conservation Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12640.
Birdsey, R., and Y. Pan. 2015. Trends in management of the world’s forests and impacts on carbon stocks. Forest Ecology and Management 355: 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.031.
Blanco, J., A. Sourdril, M. Deconchat, C. Barnaud, M. San Cristobal, and E. Andrieu. 2020. How farmers feel about trees: Perceptions of ecosystem services and disservices associated with rural forests in southwestern France. Ecosystem Services 42: 101066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101066.
Cilliers, S.S., S.J. Siebert, M.J. Du Toit, S. Barthel, S. Mishra, S.F. Cornelius, and E. Davoren. 2018. Garden ecosystem services of Sub-Saharan Africa and the role of health clinic gardens as social–ecological systems. Landscape and Urban Planning 180: 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.011.
Ding, Z., Y. Liu, L. Wang, Y. Chen, P. Yu, M. Ma, and X. Tang. 2021. Effects and implications of ecological restoration projects on ecosystem water use efficiency in the karst region of Southwest China. Ecological Engineering 170: 106356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106356.
Ding, Q., Q. Lu, J. Wu, T. Zhou, J. Deng, L. Kong, and W. Yang. 2022. Integrated assessment of a payment for ecosystem services program in China from the effectiveness, efficiency and equity perspective. Ecosystem Services 56: 101462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101462.
Estrada-Carmona, N., A.K. Hart, F.A.J. DeClerck, C.A. Harvey, and J.C. Milder. 2014. Integrated landscape management for agriculture, rural livelihoods, and ecosystem conservation: An assessment of experience from Latin America and the Caribbean. Landscape and Urban Planning 129: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.05.001.
Falk, T., J.H. Spangenberg, M. Siegmund-Schultze, S. Kobbe, T. Feike, D. Kuebler, J. Settele, and T. Vorlaufer. 2018. Identifying governance challenges in ecosystem services management—Conceptual considerations and comparison of global forest cases. Ecosystem Services 32: 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.07.012.
Fan, M., Y. Li, and W. Li. 2015. Solving one problem by creating a bigger one: The consequences of ecological resettlement for grassland restoration and poverty alleviation in Northwestern China. Land Use Policy 42: 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.011.
Fischer, R., F. Taubert, M.S. Müller, J. Groeneveld, S. Lehmann, T. Wiegand, and A. Huth. 2021. Accelerated forest fragmentation leads to critical increase in tropical forest edge area. Science Advances 7: eabg7012. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abg7012.
Gao, X., X. Huang, K. Lo, Q. Dang, and R. Wen. 2021. Vegetation responses to climate change in the Qilian Mountain Nature Reserve Northwest China. Global Ecology and Conservation 28: e01698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01698.
Geng, L., T. Che, X. Wang, and H. Wang. 2019. Detecting spatiotemporal changes in vegetation with the BFAST model in the Qilian Mountain Region during 2000–2017. Remote Sensing 11: 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11020103.
Gong, Z., K. Kawamura, N. Ishikawa, M. Goto, T. Wulan, D. Alateng, T. Yin, and Y. Ito. 2015. MODIS normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and vegetation phenology dynamics in the Inner Mongolia grassland. Solid Earth 6: 1185–1194. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-6-1185-2015.
Hermans-Neumann, K., J. Priess, and M. Herold. 2017. Human migration, climate variability, and land degradation: Hotspots of socio-ecological pressure in Ethiopia. Regional Environmental Change 17: 1479–1492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1108-6.
Hou, L., F. Xia, Q. Chen, J. Huang, Y. He, N. Rose, and S. Rozelle. 2021. Grassland ecological compensation policy in China improves grassland quality and increases herders’ income. Nature Communications 12: 4683. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24942-8.
Hu, Y., W. Zhou, and T. Yuan. 2018. Environmental impact assessment of ecological migration in China: A survey of immigrant resettlement regions. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A 19: 240–254. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1600669.
Huang, C., Z. Zhou, C. Peng, M. Teng, and P. Wang. 2019. How is biodiversity changing in response to ecological restoration in terrestrial ecosystems? A meta-analysis in China. Science of the Total Environment 650: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.320.
Huete, A., K. Didan, T. Miura, E.P. Rodriguez, X. Gao, and L.G. Ferreira. 2002. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment 83: 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2.
Jepson, P.R. 2022. To capitalise on the decade of ecosystem restoration, we need institutional redesign to empower advances in restoration ecology and rewilding. People and Nature 4: 1404–1413. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10320.
Kearns, A., and P. Mason. 2013. Defining and measuring displacement: Is relocation from restructured neighbourhoods always unwelcome and disruptive? Housing Studies 28: 177–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2013.767885.
Kim, G., C.-H. Lim, S. Kim, J. Lee, Y. Son, and W.-K. Lee. 2017. Effect of national-scale afforestation on forest water supply and soil loss in South Korea, 1971–2010. Sustainability 9: 1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061017.
Kong, L., Z. Liu, X. Pan, Y. Wang, X. Guo, and J. Wu. 2022. How do different types and landscape attributes of urban parks affect visitors’ positive emotions? Landscape and Urban Planning 226: 104482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104482.
Li, F., W. Zhou, Z. Shao, and X. Zhou. 2022a. Effects of ecological projects on vegetation in the three Gorges Area of Chongqing, China. Journal of Mountain Science 19: 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-021-6768-5.
Li, S., S. Su, Y. Liu, X. Zhou, Q. Luo, and B. Paudel. 2022b. Effectiveness of the Qilian Mountain Nature Reserve of China in reducing human impacts. Land 11: 1071. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11071071.
Lin, H., Y. Zhao, and G.M. Kalhoro. 2022. Ecological response of the subsidy and incentive system for grassland conservation in China. Land 11: 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11030358.
Liu, C., C. Song, S. Ye, F. Cheng, L. Zhang, and C. Li. 2023a. Estimate provincial-level effectiveness of the arable land requisition-compensation balance policy in mainland China in the last 20 years. Land Use Policy 131: 106733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106733.
Liu, Y., B. Fu, S. Wang, J.R. Rhodes, Y. Li, W. Zhao, C. Li, S. Zhou, et al. 2023b. Global assessment of nature’s contributions to people. Science Bulletin 68: 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2023.01.027.
Liu, Y., C. Wang, J. Dong, J. Zhang, and B. Fu. 2023c. Grasp the prior ecosystem services in multi-objective ecological restoration. Transactions in Earth Environment and Sustainability 1: 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/2754124X221127719.
Liu, Y., B. Fu, X. Wu, S. Wang, Y. Yao, Y. Li, J. Zhang, and X. Wen. 2023d. The community perception of human-water connections is indirectly influenced by the landscape context: A case study in the lower reaches of the Yellow river. Journal of Environmental Management 326: 116644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116644.
Luo, W., and D.J. Timothy. 2017. An assessment of farmers’ satisfaction with land consolidation performance in China. Land Use Policy 61: 501–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.002.
McGinnis, M.D., and E. Ostrom. 2014. Social–ecological system framework: Initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and Society 19: art30. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06387-190230.
MoahmmadiSarrafi, A.M. 2018. Involuntary resettlement: From a landslide-affected slum to a new neighbourhood. Case study of Mina resettlement project, Ahvaz, Iran. Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning 9: 11–24. https://doi.org/10.24193/JSSP.2018.1.02.
Nikuze, A., R. Sliuzas, J. Flacke, and M. Van Maarseveen. 2019. Livelihood impacts of displacement and resettlement on informal households—A case study from Kigali, Rwanda. Habitat International 86: 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.02.006.
Ostrom, E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social–ecological systems. Science 325: 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133.
Piao, S., A. Mohammat, J. Fang, Q. Cai, and J. Feng. 2006. NDVI-based increase in growth of temperate grasslands and its responses to climate changes in China. Global Environmental Change 16: 340–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.002.
Piao, S., Q. Liu, A. Chen, I.A. Janssens, Y. Fu, J. Dai, L. Liu, X. Lian, et al. 2019. Plant phenology and global climate change: Current progresses and challenges. Global Change Biology 25: 1922–1940. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14619.
Qian, D., G. Cao, Y. Du, Q. Li, and X. Guo. 2019. Impacts of climate change and human factors on land cover change in inland mountain protected areas: A case study of the Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve in China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 191: 486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7619-5.
Ramakrishnan, K. 2014. Cosmopolitan imaginaries on the margins: Negotiating difference and belonging in a Delhi resettlement colony. Contemporary South Asia 22: 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2013.870976.
Sheng, W., L. Zhen, Y. Xiao, and Y. Hu. 2019. Ecological and socioeconomic effects of ecological restoration in China’s Three Rivers Source Region. Science of the Total Environment 650: 2307–2313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.265.
Tang, H., D. Yang, X. Zhang, and X. Xiang. 2012. Ecological migration effects on the Tianchi Scenic Area in Xinjiang: From the perspective of migrant farmer families: Ecological migration effects on the Tianchi Scenic Area in Xinjiang: From the perspective of migrant farmer families. Journal of Arid Land 4: 95–104. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1227.2012.00095.
Wang, Y., and L. Zhou. 2022. Performance and obstacle tracking to Qilian Mountains’ Ecological Resettlement project: A case study on the theory of public value. Land 11: 910. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060910.
Wang, C., C. Tang, B. Fu, Y. Lü, S. Xiao, and J. Zhang. 2022. Determining critical thresholds of ecological restoration based on ecosystem service index: A case study in the Pingjiang catchment in southern China. Journal of Environmental Management 303: 114220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114220.
Wang, C., X. Liu, J. Wu, W. Qiao, and Y. Liu. 2023a. Planning a water-constrained ecological restoration pattern to enhance sustainable landscape management in drylands. Journal of Environmental Management 335: 117514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117514.
Wang, C., Y. Liu, X. Liu, W. Qiao, and M. Zhao. 2023b. Valuing ecological restoration benefits cannot fully support landscape sustainability: A case study in Inner Mongolia, China. Landscape Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-023-01697-9.
Wang, Y., Y. Liu, X. Wu, X. Wang, Y. Yao, Z. Zhang, and B. Fu. 2023c. Ecological restoration in Tibet optimises the cognitive structures of stakeholders on social–ecological systems. People and Nature 5: 1664–1679. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10532.
Warner, K. 2010. Global environmental change and migration: Governance challenges. Global Environmental Change 20: 402–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.12.001.
Webb, E.L., R.J. Maliao, and S.V. Siar. 2004. Using local user perceptions to evaluate outcomes of protected area management in the Sagay Marine Reserve, Philippines. Environmental Conservation 31: 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892904001377.
Yurui, L., Z. Xuanchang, C. Zhi, L. Zhengjia, L. Zhi, and L. Yansui. 2021. Towards the progress of ecological restoration and economic development in China’s Loess Plateau and strategy for more sustainable development. Science of the Total Environment 756: 143676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143676.
Zhang, B., P. Li, Y. Xu, and X. Yue. 2019. What affects farmers’ ecocompensation expectations? An empirical study of returning farmland to forest in China. Tropical Conservation Science 12: 194008291985719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082919857190.
Zhang, W., L. Zhou, Y. Zhang, Z. Chen, and F. Hu. 2022. Impacts of ecological migration on land use and vegetation restoration in Arid Zones. Land 11: 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060891.
Zhang, G., Q. Zhang, X. Yang, R. Fang, H. Wu, and S. Li. 2023. Living environment shaped residents’ willingness to pay for ecosystem services in Yangtze River Middle Reaches Megalopolis, China. Geography and Sustainability 4: 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2023.03.007.
Zhao, Y., C. Gao, Z. Rong, and C. Zhao. 2021. Understory vegetation should not be ignored in the estimation of forest carbon stocks in Qilian Mountains National Nature Reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica 41: 318–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2020.06.009.
Zhao, L., K. Jia, X. Liu, J. Li, and M. Xia. 2023. Assessment of land degradation in Inner Mongolia between 2000 and 2020 based on remote sensing data. Geography and Sustainability 4: 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2023.01.003.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41991235, 42171088, and 42271297) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, T., Liu, Y., Qi, X. et al. The environmental impact assessment of China’s ecological migration from a social–ecological perspective. Ambio (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02011-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02011-w