Albert, C., B. Schröter, D. Haase, M. Brillinger, J. Henze, S. Herrmann, S. Gottwald, P. Guerrero, et al. 2019. Addressing societal challenges through nature-based solutions: How can landscape planning and governance research contribute? Landscape and Urban Planning 182: 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.003.
Article
Google Scholar
Aldous, A., J. Fitzsimons, B. Richter, and L. Bach. 2011. Droughts, floods and freshwater ecosystems: Evaluating climate change impacts and developing adaptation strategies. Marine & Freshwater Research 62: 223. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF09285.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Ames, D.P., J.S. Horsburgh, Y. Cao, J. Kadlec, T. Whiteaker, and D. Valentine. 2012. HydroDesktop: Web services-based software for hydrologic data discovery, download, visualization, and analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software 37: 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.03.013.
Article
Google Scholar
Andersson, E., J. Langemeyer, S. Borgström, T. McPhearson, D. Haase, J. Kronenberg, D.N. Barton, M. Davis, et al. 2019. Enabling green and blue infrastructure to improve contributions to human well-being and equity in urban systems. BioScience 69: 566–574. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz058.
Article
Google Scholar
Anzaldua, G., N.V. Gerner, M. Lago, K. Abhold, M. Hinzmann, S. Beyer, C. Winking, N. Riegels, et al. 2018. Getting into the water with the Ecosystem Services Approach: The DESSIN ESS evaluation framework. Ecosystem Services 30: 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.004.
Article
Google Scholar
Arany, I., Á. Vári, Á. Kalóczkai, R. Aszalós, P. Blik, K. Kelemen, M. Kelemen, G. Bóné, et al. 2019. Diversity of flower rich habitats can provide persistent source of healthy diet for honey bees. European Journal of Geography 10: 89–106.
Google Scholar
Bateman, I.J., G.M. Mace, C. Fezzi, G. Atkinson, and K. Turner. 2011. Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environmental & Resource Economics 48: 177–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9418-x.
Article
Google Scholar
Bennett, E.M., G.D. Peterson, and L.J. Gordon. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters 12: 1394–1404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Biró, M. 2009. Floodplain hay meadows along the river Tisza in Hungary. Grasslands in Europe. KNNV Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004278103_027.
Blackstock, K.L., J. Martin-Ortega, and C.J. Spray. 2015. Implementation of the European Water Framework Directive: what does taking an ecosystem services-based approach add? In Water Ecosystem Services: A Global Perspective, 57–64. In: Julia Martin-Ortega, Robert C. Ferrier, Iain J. Gordon, Shahbaz Khan, (Eds.) United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), France; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316178904.008.
Blicharska, M., R.J. Smithers, M. Kuchler, G.K. Agrawal, J.M. Gutiérrez, A. Hassanali, S. Huq, S.H. Koller, et al. 2017. Steps to overcome the North-South divide in research relevant to climate change policy and practice. Nature Climate Change 7: 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3163.
Article
Google Scholar
Boerema, A., S. Van Passel, and P. Meire. 2018. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ecosystem management with ecosystem services: From theory to practice. Ecological Economics 152: 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.06.005.
Article
Google Scholar
Borgwardt, F., L. Robinson, D. Trauner, H. Teixeira, A.J.A. Nogueira, A.I. Lillebø, G. Piet, M. Kuemmerlen, et al. 2019. Exploring variability in environmental impact risk from human activities across aquatic ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment 652: 1396–1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.339.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Bouwma, I., C. Schleyer, E. Primmer, K.J. Winkler, P. Berry, J. Young, E. Carmen, J. Špulerová, et al. 2018. Adoption of the ecosystem services concept in EU policies. Ecosystem Services 29: 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.014.
Article
Google Scholar
Brauman, K.A., G.C. Daily, T.K. Duarte, and H.A. Mooney. 2007. The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32: 67–98. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.031306.102758.
Article
Google Scholar
Bullock, A., and M. Acreman. 2003. The role of wetlands in the hydrological cycle. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 7: 358–389.
Article
Google Scholar
Burkhard, B., F. Kroll, and F. Müller. 2009. Landscapes’ capacities to provide ecosystem services: A concept for land-cover based assessments. Landscape Online. https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.200915.
Article
Google Scholar
Campagne, C.S., P. Roche, F. Müller, and B. Burkhard. 2020. Ten years of ecosystem services matrix: Review of a (r)evolution. One Ecosystem 5: https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.5.e51103.
Article
Google Scholar
Colloff, M.J., T.M. Doody, I.C. Overton, J. Dalton, and R. Welling. 2019. Re-framing the decision context over trade-offs among ecosystem services and wellbeing in a major river basin where water resources are highly contested. Sustainability Science 14: 713–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0630-x.
Article
Google Scholar
Corral-Verdugo, V., M. Frías-Armenta, C. Tapia-Fonllem, and B. Fraijo-Sing. 2015. The psychological dimension of water ecosystem services. In Water Ecosystem Services: A Global Perspective. In: Julia Martin-Ortega, Robert C. Ferrier, Iain J. Gordon, Shahbaz Khan, (Eds.) United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316178904.011.
Costanza, R., R. d’Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, et al. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Costanza, R., R. de Groot, P. Sutton, S. van der Ploeg, S.J. Anderson, I. Kubiszewski, S. Farber, and R.K. Turner. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 26: 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002.
Article
Google Scholar
Council Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks.
Council Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC.
Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources.
Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora.
Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption.
Crossman, N.D., S. Nedkov, and L. Brander. 2019. Water flow regulation for mitigatingriver and coastalflooding. Paper submitted to the Expert Meeting on Advancing the Measurement of Ecosystem Services for Ecosystem Accounting, New York, 22-24 January 2019 and subsequently revised. Version of 1 April 2019.
Czúcz, B., Á. Kalóczkai, I. Arany, K. Kelemen, J. Papp, K. Havadtői, K. Campbell, M. Kelemen, et al. 2018. How to design a transdisciplinary regional ecosystem service assessment: A case study from Romania, Eastern Europe. One Ecosystem. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e26363.
Article
Google Scholar
Decsi, B., Á. Vári, and Z. Kozma. 2020. The effect of future land use changes on hydrologic ecosystem services: A case study from the Zala catchment. Hungary: Biologia Futura. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42977-020-00032-6.
Book
Google Scholar
Derts, Z., and L. Koncsos. 2012. Ecosystem services and land use zonation in the Hungarian Tisza deep floodplains. Pollack Periodica 7: 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1556/Pollack.7.2012.3.8.
Article
Google Scholar
Díaz, S., S. Demissew, J. Carabias, C. Joly, M. Lonsdale, N. Ash, A. Larigauderie, J.R. Adhikari, et al. 2015. The IPBES Conceptual Framework: Connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002.
Article
Google Scholar
EC. 2003. Directorate-General for the Environment, 2003. Common Implementation Strategy for theWater Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)—Overall approach to the classification of ecological status and ecological potential.
EC. 2020. EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030—Bringing nature back into our lives. COM/2020/380.
EC. 2013 An EU Strategy on adaptation to climate change. COM/2013/0216.
EC. 2013. Green Infrastructure (GI). Enhancing Europe’s natural capital. COM(2013) 249.
Engloner, A., M. Vargha, A. Báldi, and J. Józsa (eds.). 2019. Hungarian water research programme: Challenges and resesarch tasks. Tihany: Centre for Ecological Research.
Google Scholar
Erős, T., and E.H.C. Grant. 2015. Unifying research on the fragmentation of terrestrial and aquatic habitats: Patches, connectivity and the matrix in riverscapes. Freshwater Biology 60: 1487–1501. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12596.
Article
Google Scholar
Erős, T., and W.H. Lowe. 2019. The landscape ecology of rivers: From patch-based to spatial network analyses. Current Landscape Ecology Reports. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-019-00044-6.
Article
Google Scholar
Erős, T., J.R. O’Hanley, and I. Czeglédi. 2018. A unified model for optimizing riverscape conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology 55: 1871–1883. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13142.
Article
Google Scholar
Erős, T., L. Kuehne, A. Dolezsai, N. Sommerwerk, and C. Wolter. 2019. A systematic review of assessment and conservation management in large floodplain rivers: Actions postponed. Ecological Indicators 98: 453–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.026.
Article
Google Scholar
European Environment Agency (EEA). 2019. The European Environment State and Outlook 2020. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Google Scholar
Everard, M. 2015. Community-based groundwater and ecosystem restoration in semi-arid north Rajasthan (1): Socio-economic progress and lessons for groundwater-dependent areas. Ecosystem Services 16: 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.011.
Article
Google Scholar
Friberg, N., T. Buijse, C. Carter, D. Hering, B.M. Spears, P. Verdonschot, and T.F. Moe. 2017. Effective restoration of aquatic ecosystems: Scaling the barriers. WIREs Water 4: https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1190.
Article
Google Scholar
Funk, A., M. Tschikof, B. Grüner, K. Böck, T. Hein, and E. Bondar‐Kunze. 2020. Analysing the potential to restore the multi-functionality of floodplain systems by considering ecosystem service quality, quantity and trade-offs. River Research and Applications n/a: rra.3662. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3662.
Ghermandi, A., and M. Sinclair. 2019. Passive crowdsourcing of social media in environmental research: A systematic map. Global Environmental Change 55: 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.02.003.
Article
Google Scholar
Gómez-Baggethun, E., D. Barton, P. Berry, R. Dunford, and P. Harrison. 2016. Concepts and methods in ecosystem services valuation. Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services, 99–111. London: Routledge.
Book
Google Scholar
Gozlan, R.E., B.K. Karimov, E. Zadereev, D. Kuznetsova, and S. Brucet. 2019. Status, trends, and future dynamics of freshwater ecosystems in Europe and Central Asia. Inland Waters 9: 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2018.1510271.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Grêt-Regamey, A., B. Weibel, F. Kienast, S.-E. Rabe, and G. Zulian. 2015. A tiered approach for mapping ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 13: 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.008.
Article
Google Scholar
Griebler, C., and M. Avramov. 2015. Groundwater ecosystem services: A review. Freshwater Science 34: 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1086/679903.
Article
Google Scholar
Grizzetti, B., C. Liquete, A. Pistocchi, O. Vigiak, G. Zulian, F. Bouraoui, A. De Roo, and A.C. Cardoso. 2019. Relationship between ecological condition and ecosystem services in European rivers, lakes and coastal waters. Science of the Total Environment 671: 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.155.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Grizzetti, B., C. Liquete, P. Antunes, L. Carvalho, N. Geamănă, R. Giucă, M. Leone, S. McConnell, et al. 2016a. Ecosystem services for water policy: Insights across Europe. Environmental Science & Policy 66: 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.09.006.
Article
Google Scholar
Grizzetti, B., D. Lanzanova, C. Liquete, A. Reynaud, and A.C. Cardoso. 2016b. Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management. Environmental Science & Policy 61: 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.008.
Article
Google Scholar
Guida, R.J., T.L. Swanson, J.W.F. Remo, and T. Kiss. 2015. Strategic floodplain reconnection for the Lower Tisza River, Hungary: Opportunities for flood-height reduction and floodplain-wetland reconnection. Journal of Hydrology 521: 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.080.
Article
Google Scholar
Haines-Young, R., and M. Potschin. 2010. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In: D.G. Raffaelli and C.L.J. Frid, eds., Ecosystem ecology, pp. 110–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511750458.007.
Hallouin, T., M. Bruen, M. Christie, C. Bullock, and M. Kelly-Quinn. 2018. Challenges in using hydrology and water quality models for assessing freshwater ecosystem services: A review. Geosciences 8: 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8020045.
Article
Google Scholar
Hanna, D.E.L., S.A. Tomscha, C. Ouellet Dallaire, and E.M. Bennett. 2018. A review of riverine ecosystem service quantification: Research gaps and recommendations. Edited by Danny Hooftman. Journal of Applied Ecology 55: 1299–1311. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13045.
Article
Google Scholar
Hettiarachchi, M., T. Morrison, and C. McAlpine. 2015. Forty-three years of Ramsar and urban wetlands.. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2015.02.009.
Article
Google Scholar
Hornung, L.K., S.A. Podschun, and M. Pusch. 2019. Linking ecosystem services and measures in river and floodplain management. Ecosystems and People 15: 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1656287.
Article
Google Scholar
Hossu, C.A., I.-C. Iojă, D.A. Onose, M.R. Nită, A.-M. Popa, O. Talabă, and L. Inostroza. 2019. Ecosystem services appreciation of urban lakes in Romania Synergies and trade-offs between multiple users. Ecosystem Services 37: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100937.
Article
Google Scholar
IPBES. 2018a. IPBES Guide on the production of assessments. Bonn, Germany: Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.
Google Scholar
IPBES. 2018b. The regional assessment report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for Europe and Central Asia—Summary for Policymakers.
Jacobs, S., B. Burkhard, T. Van Daele, J. Staes, and A. Schneiders. 2015. ‘The Matrix Reloaded’: A review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling 295: 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.024.
Article
Google Scholar
Jeffery, R. 2014. Authorship in multi-disciplinary, multi-national North-South research projects: issues of equity, capacity and accountability. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 44: 208–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2013.829300.
Article
Google Scholar
Junk, W.J., P.B. Bayley, and R.E. Sparks. 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106: 110–127.
Google Scholar
Karlsson, S., T. Srebotnjak, and P. Gonzales. 2007. Understanding the North-South knowledge divide and its implications for policy: A quantitative analysis of the generation of scientific knowledge in the environmental sciences. Environmental Science & Policy 10: 668–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.04.001.
Article
Google Scholar
Kaval, P. 2019. Integrated catchment management and ecosystem services: A twenty-five year overview. Ecosystem Services 37: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100912.
Article
Google Scholar
Keeler, B.L., S. Polasky, K.A. Brauman, K.A. Johnson, J.C. Finlay, A. O’Neill, K. Kovacs, and B. Dalzell. 2012. Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 18619–18624. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215991109.
Article
Google Scholar
Keller, P.S., N. Catalán, D. von Schiller, H.-P. Grossart, M. Koschorreck, B. Obrador, M.A. Frassl, N. Karakaya, et al. 2020. Global CO2 emissions from dry inland waters share common drivers across ecosystems. Nature Communications 11: 2126. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15929-y.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Kienast, F., J. Bolliger, M. Potschin, R.S. de Groot, P.H. Verburg, I. Heller, D. Wascher, and R. Haines-Young. 2009. Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data: Insights gained from a prototype development for Europe. Environmental Management 44: 1099–1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9384-7.
Article
Google Scholar
Kistenkas, F.H., and I.M. Bouwma. 2018. Barriers for the ecosystem services concept in European water and nature conservation law. Ecosystem Services 29: 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.013.
Article
Google Scholar
Langhans, S.D., P. Reichert, and N. Schuwirth. 2014. The method matters: A guide for indicator aggregation in ecological assessments. Ecological Indicators 45: 494–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.014.
Article
Google Scholar
Langhans, S.D., S.C. Jähnig, M. Lago, A. Schmidt-Kloiber, and T. Hein. 2019. The potential of ecosystem-based management to integrate biodiversity conservation and ecosystem service provision in aquatic ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment 672: 1017–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.025.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Lindenmayer, D. 2020. Improving restoration programs through greater connection with ecological theory and better monitoring. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.00050.
Article
Google Scholar
Maes, J., A. Teller, M. Erhard, S. Condé, S. Vallecillo, J.I. Barredo, M.L. Paracchini, D. Abdul Malak, et al. 2020. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: An EU ecosystem assessment. Publications Office of the European Union EUR 30161 EN. ISBN 978-92-76-17833-0, https://doi.org/10.2760/757183, JRC120383. Ispra.
Martin, D.M., and M. Mazzotta. 2018. Non-monetary valuation using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Using a strength-of-evidence approach to inform choices among alternatives. Ecosystem Services 33: 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.06.001.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Martín-López, B., I. Iniesta-Arandia, M. García-Llorente, I. Palomo, I. Casado-Arzuaga, D.G.D. Amo, E. Gómez-Baggethun, E. Oteros-Rozas, et al. 2012. Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS ONE 7: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038970.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Martin-Ortega, J., R.C. Ferrier, I.J. Gordon, and S. Khan (eds.). 2015. Water ecosystem services, A global perspective. International hydrology series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Mastrángelo, M.E., N. Pérez-Harguindeguy, L. Enrico, E. Bennett, S. Lavorel, G.S. Cumming, D. Abeygunawardane, L.D. Amarilla, et al. 2019. Key knowledge gaps to achieve global sustainability goals. Nature Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0412-1.
Article
Google Scholar
Maynard, S., D. James, S. Hoverman, A. Davidson, and S. Mooney. 2015. An ecosystem services-based approach to integrated regional catchment management: the South East Queensland experience. In Water Ecosystem Services: A Global Perspective, 90–98. In: Julia Martin-Ortega, Robert C. Ferrier, Iain J. Gordon, Shahbaz Khan, (Eds.) United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), France. Cambrdge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316178904.012.
McDonough, K., S. Hutchinson, T. Moore, and J.M.S. Hutchinson. 2017. Analysis of publication trends in ecosystem services research. Ecosystem Services 25: 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.022.
Article
Google Scholar
Mihók, B., M. Biró, Z. Molnár, E. Kovács, J. Bölöni, T. Erős, T. Standovár, P. Török, et al. 2017. Biodiversity on the waves of history: Conservation in a changing social and institutional environment in Hungary, a post-soviet EU member state. Biological Conservation 211: 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.05.005.
Article
Google Scholar
Molnár, Z.S., and F. Berkes. 2018. Role of traditional ecological knowledge in linking cultural and natural capital in cultural landscapes. In Reconnecting natural and cultural capital: Contributions from science and policy, ed. M.L. Paracchini and P. Zingari, 183–194. Brussels: Office of Publications of the European Union.
Google Scholar
Moomaw, W.R., G.L. Chmura, G.T. Davies, C.M. Finlayson, B.A. Middleton, S.M. Natali, J.E. Perry, N. Roulet, et al. 2018. Wetlands in a changing climate: Science, policy and management. Wetlands 38: 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-018-1023-8.
Article
Google Scholar
Naumann, S., G. Anzaldua, P. Berry, S. Burch, M. Davis, A. Frelih-Larsen, H. Gerdes, and M. Sanders. 2011. Assessment of the potential of ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation and mitigation. Final report to the European Commission, DG Environment. Ecologic institute and Environmental Change Institute, Oxford University Centre for the Environment.
Nedkov, S., and B. Burkhard. 2012. Flood regulating ecosystem services: Mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria. Ecological Indicators 21: 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.022.
Article
Google Scholar
Pascual, U., P. Balvanera, S. Díaz, G. Pataki, E. Roth, M. Stenseke, R.T. Watson, E. Başak Dessane, et al. 2017. Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26–27. Open Issue, Part II. 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006.
Article
Google Scholar
Paudyal, K., H. Baral, and R.J. Keenan. 2018. Assessing social values of ecosystem services in the Phewa Lake Watershed, Nepal. Forest Policy and Economics 90: 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.01.011.
Article
Google Scholar
Pinke, Z., B. Decsi, Z. Kozma, Á. Vári, and G.L. Lövei. 2020. A spatially explicit analysis of wheat and maize yield sensitivity to changing groundwater levels in Hungary, 1961–2010. Science of the Total Environment 715: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136555.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Podschun, S.A., C. Albert, G. Costea, C. Damm, A. Dehnhardt, C. Fischer, H. Fischer, F. Foeckler, et al. 2018. RESI—Anwendungshandbuch. Berlin: Leibniz-Institut für Gewässerökologie und Binnenfischerei.
Google Scholar
Poff, N.L., J.D. Olden, D.M. Merritt, and D.M. Pepin. 2007. Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America 104: 5732–5737. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609812104.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Poikane, S., N. Zampoukas, A. Borja, S.P. Davies, W. van de Bund, and S. Birk. 2014. Intercalibration of aquatic ecological assessment methods in the European Union: Lessons learned and way forward. Environmental Science & Policy 44: 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.08.006.
Article
Google Scholar
Qiu, J., and M.G. Turner. 2013. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America 110: 12149–12154. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1310539110.
Article
Google Scholar
Reynaud, A., and D. Lanzanova. 2017. A global meta-analysis of the value of ecosystem services provided by lakes. Ecological Economics 137: 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.001.
Article
Google Scholar
Saarela, S.-R., and J. Rinne. 2016. Knowledge brokering and boundary work for ecosystem service indicators. An urban case study in Finland. Ecological Indicators 61: 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.016.
Article
Google Scholar
Sanon, S., T. Hein, W. Douven, and P. Winkler. 2012. Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs: The case of an urban floodplain in Vienna, Austria. Journal of Environmental Management 111: 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.008.
Article
Google Scholar
Schaafsma, M., S. Ferrini, A.R. Harwood, and I.J. Bateman. 2015. The first United Kingdom’s National Ecosystem Assessment and beyond. In Water Ecosystem Services: A Global Perspective, 73–81. In: Julia Martin-Ortega, Robert C. Ferrier, Iain J. Gordon, Shahbaz Khan, (Eds.) United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316178904.010.
Scheffer, M. 1990. Multiplicity of stable states in freshwater systems. Hydrobiologia 200: 475–486.
Article
Google Scholar
Schindler, S., F.H. O’Neill, M. Biró, C. Damm, V. Gasso, R. Kanka, T. van der Sluis, A. Krug, et al. 2016. Multifunctional floodplain management and biodiversity effects: A knowledge synthesis for six European countries. Biodiversity and Conservation 25: 1349–1382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1129-3.
Article
Google Scholar
Schindler, S., Z. Sebesvari, C. Damm, K. Euller, V. Mauerhofer, A. Schneidergruber, M. Biró, F. Essl, et al. 2014. Multifunctionality of floodplain landscapes: Relating management options to ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology 29: 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-9989-y.
Article
Google Scholar
Schröter, M., E.H. van der Zanden, A.P.E. van Oudenhoven, R.P. Remme, H.M. Serna-Chavez, R.S. de Groot, and P. Opdam. 2014. Ecosystem services as a contested concept: A synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. Conservation Letters 7: 514–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12091.
Article
Google Scholar
Schulp, C.J.E., W. Thuiller, and P.H. Verburg. 2014. Wild food in Europe: A synthesis of knowledge and data of terrestrial wild food as an ecosystem service. Ecological Economics 105: 292–305.
Article
Google Scholar
Shackleton, R.T., R. Biggs, D.M. Richardson, and B.M.H. Larson. 2018. Social-ecological drivers and impacts of invasion-related regime shifts: Consequences for ecosystem services and human wellbeing. Environmental Science & Policy 89: 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.08.005.
Article
Google Scholar
Stammel, B., C. Fischer, B. Cyffka, C. Albert, C. Damm, A. Dehnhardt, H. Fischer, F. Foeckler, et al. 2020. Assessing land use and flood management impacts on ecosystem services in a river landscape (Upper Danube, Germany). River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3669.
Article
Google Scholar
Syrbe, R.-U., and U. Walz. 2012. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators 21: 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013.
Article
Google Scholar
Thiele, J., C. Albert, J. Hermes, and C. von Haaren. 2020. Assessing and quantifying offered cultural ecosystem services of German river landscapes. Ecosystem Services 42: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101080.
Article
Google Scholar
Thorp, J.H., J.E. Flotemersch, M.D. Delong, A.F. Casper, M.C. Thoms, F. Ballantyne, B.S. Williams, B.J. O’Neill, et al. 2010. Linking Ecosystem services, rehabilitation, and river hydrogeomorphology. BioScience 60: 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.1.11.
Article
Google Scholar
Thorp, J.H., M.C. Thoms, and M.D. Delong. 2006. The riverine ecosystem synthesis: Biocomplexity in river networks across space and time. River Research and Applications 22: 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.901.
Article
Google Scholar
Thorp, K.R., A.N. French, and A. Rango. 2013. Effect of image spatial and spectral characteristics on mapping semi-arid rangeland vegetation using multiple endmember spectral mixture analysis (MESMA). Remote Sensing of Environment 132: 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.01.008.
Article
Google Scholar
Tomscha, S.A., S.E. Gergel, and M.J. Tomlinson. 2017. The spatial organization of ecosystem services in river-floodplains. Ecosphere 8: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1728.
Article
Google Scholar
Vallecillo, S., A. La Notte, S. Ferrini, and J. Maes. 2019. How ecosystem services are changing: An accounting application at the EU level. Ecosystem Services 40: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101044.
Article
Google Scholar
Vallet, A., B. Locatelli, H. Levrel, S. Wunder, R. Seppelt, R.J. Scholes, and J. Oszwald. 2018. Relationships between ecosystem services: Comparing methods for assessing tradeoffs and synergies. Ecological Economics 150: 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.002.
Article
Google Scholar
Vannote, R.L., G.W. Minshall, K.W. Cummins, J.R. Sedell, and C.E. Cushing. 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37: 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1139/f80-017.
Article
Google Scholar
Vermaat, J.E., B. Immerzeel, E. Pouta, and A. Juutinen. 2020. Applying ecosystem services as a framework to analyze the effects of alternative bio-economy scenarios in Nordic catchments. Ambio 49: 1784–1796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01348-2.
Article
Google Scholar
Wantzen, K.M., A. Ballouche, I. Longuet, I. Bao, H. Bocoum, L. Cissé, M. Chauhan, P. Girard, et al. 2016. River culture: An eco-social approach to mitigate the biological and cultural diversity crisis in riverscapes. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 16: 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2015.12.003.
Article
Google Scholar
Werners, S.E., Z. Flachner, P. Matczak, M. Falaleeva, and R. Leemans. 2009. Exploring earth system governance: A case study of floodplain management along the Tisza river in Hungary. Global Environmental Change 19: 503–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.07.003.
Article
Google Scholar
Wu, J., J. Huang, X. Han, Z. Xie, and X. Gao. 2003. Three-Gorges Dam: Experiment in habitat fragmentation? Science 300: 1239–1240.
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Xu, X., B. Jiang, Y. Tan, R. Costanza, and G. Yang. 2018. Lake-wetland ecosystem services modeling and valuation: Progress, gaps and future directions. Ecosystem Services 33: 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.08.001.
Article
Google Scholar