Abstract
Media can play a key role in shaping public opinion and setting a policy agenda by conveying and influencing public discourse. This article evaluates how the Spanish media has covered the topic of the forest bioeconomy and what kind of discourse it has produced and reproduced around it. For this purpose, we analysed the content of 204 national and regional newspaper articles. The results reveal the scarce penetration of the forest bioeconomy in media and some weaknesses in the narrative production and communicative dimension. The discourse is mainly constructed by governments with a limited presence of multiple stakeholders and an absence of conflict and divergent or alternative views. In addition, the discourse only addresses regional or local problems within the framework of an extended and dominant paradigm of economic growth considering the forest bioeconomy as an opportunity to combat fire, rural abandonment, smallholdings, and poor forest management. We conclude that media is not using its strategic potential and capacity as a public space. To become agents of change, the media should reflect a forest bioeconomy based on successful experiences of innovation and valorization, and adopt a transformative social vision that gives relevance to the interconnection between multiple stakeholders, forest multifunctionality and rural development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdullah, F.S. 2014. Mass media discourse: A critical analysis research agenda. Social Science and Humanities 22: 1–16.
Aquilani, B., C. Silvestri, G. Ioppolo, and A. Ruggieri. 2018. The challenging transition to bio-economies: Towards a new framework integrating corporate sustainability and value co-creation. Journal of Cleaner Production 172: 4001–4009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.153.
Bauer, F. 2018. Narratives of biorefinery innovation for the bioeconomy—Conflict, consensus, or confusion? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 28: 96–107.
Baum, M.A., and P.B.K. Potter. 2008. The relationships between mass media, public opinion, and foreign policy: Toward a theoretical synthesis. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060406.214132.
Bengston, D.N., and D.P. Fan. 1999. Conflict over natural resource management: A social indicator based on analysis of online news media text. Society & Natural Resources 12: 493–500.
Bernand, H.R., A. Wutich, and G.W. Ryan. 2016. Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. London: Sage Publications.
Birch, K., L. Levidow, and T. Papaioannou. 2010. Sustainable capital? The neoliberalization of nature and knowledge in the European “knowledge-based bio-economy”. Sustainability 2: 2898–2918.
Birner, R. 2018. Bioeconomy concepts. In Bioeconomy: Shaping the transition to a sustainable, biobased economy, ed. I. Lewandowski, 17–38. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8_3.
Bugge, M., T. Hansen, and A. Klitkou. 2016. What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability 8: 691. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070691.
Bushell, S., G. Satre Buissonb, M. Workmanb, and T. Colley. 2017. Strategic narratives in climate change: Towards a unifying narrative toaddress the action gap on climate change. Energy Research and Social Sciences 28: 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.04.001.
Conde, F. 2010. Sociological analysis of the discourses system. Madrid: CIS (In Spanish).
Cox, R. 2012. Environmental communication and the public sphere, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
D’Amato, D., N. Droste, B. Allen, M. Kettunen, K. Lähtinen, J. Korhonen, P. Leskinen, B.D. Matthies, et al. 2017. Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production 168: 716–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053.
Dryzek, J.S. 2013. The politics of the earth-environmental discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dusyk, N., J. Axsen, and K. Dullemond. 2018. Who cares about climate change? The mass media and socio-political acceptance of Canada’s oil sands and Northern Gateway Pipeline. Energy Research & Social Science 37: 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.07.005.
European Commission. 1998. Council Resolution of 15 December 1998 on a forestry strategy for the European Union (1999/C 56/01). https://ec.europa.eu/environment/forests/index_en.htm. Accessed 2 Dec 2019.
European Commission. 2006. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament of 15 June 2006 on an EU Forest Action Plan {SEC(2006) 748} /* COM/2006/0302 final [not published in the Official Journal]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52006DC0302&from=EN.
European Commission. 2012. Innovating for sustainable growth: A bioeconomy for Europe, SWD (2012). 11 nal. Brussels, 13.2.2012. COM(2012) 60 nal.
European Commission. 2018. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment (COM(2018) 673 final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0673.
European Commission. 2019. Survey. Citizen support for climate action. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/citizens/support_en#tab-0-0. Accessed 2 Dec 2019.
Fabra-Crespo, M., and E. Rojas-Briales. 2015. Analysis of mass media news on forest issues: A case study of Spain. Forest Systems. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2015242-06381.
Ferry, J.M., D. Wolton, A. Touraine, R. Boudon, P. Livet, E. Katz, D. Dayan, G. Achache, et al. 1992. The new public space. Barcelona: Gedisa Editorial (In Spanish).
Freeman, R.E. 1984/2010. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología, FECYT. 2017. Spanish scientific production in the field of Bioeconomy. 2005–2014. (In Spanish).
Gamson, W.A., and A. Modigliani. 1989. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology 95: 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213.
Geels, F.W., B.K. Sovacool, T. Schwanen, and S. Sorrell. 2017. The socio-technical dynamics of low carbon transitions. Joule 1: 463–475.
Gerbner, G. 1985. Mass media discourse: Message system analysis as a component of cultural indicators. In Discourse and communication: New approaches to the analyses of mass media discourse and communication, vol. 14, ed. T.A. van Dijk, 13–25. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110852141.
Giurca, A., and P. Späth. 2017. A forest-based bioeconomy for Germany? Strengths, weaknesses and policy options for lignocellulosic biorefineries. Journal of Cleaner Production 153: 51–62.
Habermas, J. 1984. The theory of communicative action, vol. 1. Boston: Bacon Press.
Hajer, M., and W. Versteeg. 2005. A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7: 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908050033964.
Happer, C., and G. Philo. 2013. The role of the media in the construction of public belief and social change. Journal of Social and Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v1i1.96.
Hermwille, L. 2016. The role of narratives in socio-technical transitions—Fukushima and the energy regimes of Japan, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science 11: 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.001.
Hjarvard, S. 2008. The mediatization of society. A theory of media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review 29: 105–134.
Holt, D., and R. Barkemeyer. 2012. Media coverage of sustainable development issues—Attention cycles or punctuated equilibrium? Sustainable Development 20: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.460.
Ingrao, C., J. Bacenetti, A. Bezama, V. Block, P. Goglio, E.G. Koukios, M. Lindner, T. Nemecek, et al. 2018. The potential roles of bio-economy in the transition to equitable, sustainable, post fossil-carbon societies: Findings from this virtual special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production 203: 417–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.068.
Irwansyah, 2016. What do scientists say on climate change? A study on Indonesian newspapers. Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences 2: 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psrb.2016.09.008.
Jasanoff, S. 2015. Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power, ed. S. Jasanoff and S.H. Kim, 1–33. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Kensicki, L.J. 2004. No cure for what ails us: The media-constructed disconnect between societal problems and possible solutions. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 81: 53–73.
Koukios, E.G. 2015. Knowledge-based greening as a new bioeconomy strategy for development: Agroecological utopia or revolution? In Law and agroecology, ed. M. Monteduro, P. Buongiorno, S. Di Benedetto, and A. Isoni, 439–450. Berlin: Springer.
Kröger, M., and K. Raitio. 2017. Finnish forest policy in the era of bioeconomy: A pathway to sustainability? Forest policy and Economics 77: 6–15.
Lainez, M., J.M. González, A. Aguilar, and C. Vela. 2018. Spanish strategy on bioeconomy: Towards a knowledge based sustainable Innovation. New Biotechnology 40: 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.05.006.
Levidow, L. 2015. European transitions towards a corporate-environmental food regime: Agroecological incorporation or contestation? Journal of Rural Studies 40: 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.001.
Lewis, T.L. 2000. Media representations of ‘sustainable development’: Sustaining the status quo? Science Communication 21: 244–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547000021003003.
Lyytimäki, J.T. Assmuth, and M. Hildén. 2011. Unrecognized, concealed, or forgotten—The case of absent information in risk communication. Journal of Risk Research 14: 757–773.
Lyytimäki, J.T., N.A. Nygrén, A. Pulkka, and A. Rantala. 2018. Energy transition looming behind headlines? Newspaper coverage of biogás production in Finland. Energy, Sustainability and Society 8: 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-018-0158-z.
McCombs, M. 2013. Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Hoboken: Wiley.
McCormick, K., and N. Kautto. 2013. The bioeconomy in Europe: An overview. Sustainability 5: 2589–2608.
Meyer, R. 2017. Bioeconomy strategies: Contexts, visions, guiding implementation principles and resulting debates. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061031.
Ministerio de Agricultura Pesca y Alimentación de España (MAPA). 2019. Statistical yearbook 2018. Part two. Chapter 6: Forest statistics. https://www.mapa.gob.es/estadistica/pags/anuario/2018/anuario/AE18.pdf. (In Spanish).
Mullally, G., and E. Byrne. 2016. A tale of three transitions: A year in the life of electricity system transformation narratives in the Irish media. Energy, Sustainability and Society 6: 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-015-0068-2.
Mustalahti, I. 2018. The responsive bioeconomy: The need for inclusion of citizens and environmental capability in the forest based bioeconomy. Journal of Cleaner Production 172: 3781–3790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.132.
Nogales, A., and R. Mancinas. 2014. Reference newspapers in the Spanish press market. Property, media groups and structural connections. Correspondencias y Análisis 4: 307–333 (In Spanish, English summary).
Peltomaa, J. 2018. Drumming the barrels of hope? Bioeconomy Narratives in the Media. Sustainability 10: 4278. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114278.
Pfau, S.F., J.A. Hagens, B. Dankbaar, and A.J. Smits. 2014. Visions of sustainability in bioeconomy research. Sustainability 6: 1222–1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6031222.
Prior, L. 2008. Documents and action. In The SAGE handbook of social research methods, ed. P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman, and J. Brannen. London: SAGE Publications.
Pülzl, H., D. Kleinschmit, and B. Arts. 2014. Bio-economy—an emerging meta-discourse affecting forest discourses? Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29: 386–393.
Ranacher, L., A. Ludvig, and P. Schwarzbauer. 2019. Depicting the peril and not the potential of forests for a biobased economy? A qualitative content analysis on online news media coverage in German language articles. Forest Policy and Economics 106: 101970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101970.
Reed, M. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management. Biological Conservation 141: 2417–2431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.
Ricœur, P. 1991. In On Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and interpretation, ed. D. Wood, 20–33. Abingdon: Routledge.
Riedl, M., M. Hrib, V. Jarský, and M. Jarkovska. 2018. Media analysis in a case study of Šumava National Park: A permanent dispute among interest groups. Forest Policy and Economics 89: 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.07.009.
Roos, A., and M. Stendahl. 2016. The emerging bio-economy and the forest sector. In Forests, business and sustainability, ed. R. Panwar, R. Kozak, and E. Hansen, 179. New York: Earthscan.
Sadath, M.N., and S. Rahman. 2016. Forest in crisis: 2 decades of media discourse analysis of Bangladesh print media. Forest Policy and Economics 68: 16–21.
Sanz-Hernández, A. 2016. Discourses about depopulation in Teruel from newspaper sources. Ager. Revista de estudios sobre despoblación y desarrollo rural 20: 105–137. https://doi.org/10.4422/ager.2016.01.
Sanz-Hernández, A. 2019a. Social engagement and socio-genesis of energy poverty as a problem in Spain. Energy Policy 124: 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.001.
Sanz-Hernández, A. 2019b. Media and stakeholders: Contribution to the public debate on poverty and energy justice in Spain. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas 168: 73–92. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.168.73.
Sanz-Hernández, A., E. Esteban, and P. Garrido. 2019. Transition to a bioeconomy: Perspectives from social sciences. Journal of Cleaner Production 224: 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.168.
Schuck, A., J. Parviainen, and W. Bücking. 1994. A review of approaches to forestry research on structure, succession and biodiversity of undisturbed and semi-natural forests and woodlands in Europe. EFI Working paper. http://www.efi.int/files/attachments/publications/wp_03.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2019.
Sengers, F., R.P.J.M. Raven, and A. Van Venrooij. 2010. From riches to rags: Biofuels, media discourses, and resistance to sustainable energy technologies. Energy Policy 38: 5013–5027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.030.
Setyawati, D., and R. Shaw. 2015. The media as social watch in forest management: Indonesia experience. Journal of Mass Communication Journalism 5: 258. https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7912.1000258.
Shanahan, E.A., M.K. McBeth, P.L. Hathaway, and R.J. Arnell. 2008. Conduit or contributor? The role of media in policy change theory. Policy Sciences 41: 115–138.
Sovacool, B.K., J. Axsen, and S. Sorrell. 2018. Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design. Energy Research & Social Science 45: 12–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.007.
Spanish Government. 2016a. The Spanish bioeconomy strategy. 2030 Horizon. http://bioeconomia.agripa.org/download-doc/102159. Accessed 29 Mar 2019.
Spanish Government. 2016b. Ministry of economy, industry and competitiveness. Spanish national plan for scientific and technical research and innovation 2013–2016. http://www.idi.mineco.gob.es/stfls/MICINN/Investigacion/FICHEROS/Spanish_RDTI_Plan_2013-2016.pdf/. Accessed 5 Oct 2019.
Staffas, L., M. Gustavsson, and K. McCormick. 2013. Strategies and policies for the bioeconomy and bio-based economy: An analysis of official national approaches. Sustainability 5: 2751–2769. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062751.
Sténs, A., T. Bjärstig, E.M. Nordström, C. Sandström, C. Fries, and J. Johansson. 2016. In the eye of the stakeholders: The challenges of governing social forest values. Ambio 45: S87–S99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0745-6.
Wei, J., Y. Wei, A. Western, D. Skinner, and C. Lyle. 2015. Evolution of newspapers coverage of water issues in Australia during 1843–2011. Ambio 44: 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0571-2.
Wolfslehner, B., S. Linser, H. Pülzl, A. Bastrup-Birk, A. Camia, and M. Marchetti. 2016. Forest bioeconomy—a new scope for sustainability indicators. From Science to Policy 4. European Forest Institute.
Acknowledgements
This study was finished in the framework of the Catedra Tervalis of Bioeconomy and Society (University of Zaragoza). Authors gratefully acknowledge valuable feedback from the editor and anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sanz-Hernández, A., Esteban, E., Marco, P. et al. Forest bioeconomy in the media discourse in Spain. Ambio 49, 1897–1911 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01390-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01390-0