Skip to main content
Log in

Design and Analysis of a Microplate Assay in the Presence of Multiple Restrictions on the Randomization

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experiments using multi-step protocols often involve several restrictions on the randomization. For a specific application to in vitro testing on microplates, a design was required with both a split-plot and a strip-plot structure. On top of two-level treatment factors and the factors that define the randomization restrictions, a multi-level fixed blocking factor not involving further restrictions on the randomization had to be added. We develop a step-by-step approach to construct a design for the microplate experiment and analyze a response. To consolidate the approach, we study various alternative scenarios for the experiment.Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bingham D, Sitter RR (1999) Minimum-aberration two-level fractional factorial split-plot designs. Technometrics 41(1):62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham DR, Sitter RR (2001) Design issues in fractional factorial split-plot experiments. J Qual Technol 33(1):2–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham DR, Schoen ED, Sitter RR (2004) Designing fractional factorial split-plot experiments with few whole-plot factors. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 53(2):325–339

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham D, Sitter R, Kelly E, Moore L, Olivas JD (2008) Factorial designs with multiple levels of randomization. Stat Sin 18(2):493–513

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Box GE, Hunter WH, Hunter S (1978) Statistics for experimenters, vol 664. Wiley, New York

  • Cheng C-S, Tsai P-W (2011) Multistratum fractional factorial designs. Stat Sin 21(3):1001–1021

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Eendebak P, Vazquez A (2019) OApackage: a Python package for generation and analysis of orthogonal arrays, optimal designs and conference designs. J Open Source Softw 4(34):1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goos P, Langhans I, Vandebroek M (2006) Practical inference from industrial split-plot designs. J Qual Technol 38(2):162–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang P, Chen D, Voelkel JO (1998) Minimum-aberration two-level split-plot designs. Technometrics 40(4):314–326

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jones B, Goos P (2009) D-optimal design of split-split-plot experiments. Biometrika 96(1):67–82

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Leung CM, de Haan P, Ronaldson-Bouchard K, Kim G-A, Ko J, Rho HS, Chen Z, Habibovic P, Jeon NL, Takayama S, Shuler ML, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Frey O, Verpoorte E, Toh Y-C (2022) A guide to the organ-on-a-chip. Nat Rev Methods Primers 2(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mee RW (2009) A comprehensive guide to factorial two-level experimentation. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mee RW, Bates RL (1998) Split-lot designs: experiments for multistage batch processes. Technometrics 40(2):127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller A (1997) Strip-plot configurations of fractional factorials. Technometrics 39(2):153–161

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DC (2019) Design and analysis of experiments, 9th edn

  • Mostaço-Guidolin LB, Ko AC-T, Wang F, Xiang B, Hewko M, Tian G, Major A, Shiomi M, Sowa MG (2013) Collagen morphology and texture analysis: from statistics to classification. Sci Rep 3:2190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeder BA, Kokini K, Sturgis JE, Robinson JP, Voytik-Harbin SL (2002) Tensile mechanical properties of three-dimensional type I collagen extracellular matrices with varied microstructure. J Biomech Eng 124(2):214–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartono B, Goos P, Schoen E (2015a) Blocking orthogonal designs with mixed integer linear programming. Technometrics 57(3):428–439

  • Sartono B, Goos P, Schoen E (2015b) Constructing general orthogonal fractional factorial split-plot designs. Technometrics 57(4):488–502

  • Schoen ED (1999) Designing fractional two-level experiments with nested error structures. J Appl Stat 26(4):495–508

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen ED, Kaul EAA (2000) Three robust scale estimators to judge unreplicated experiments. J Qual Technol 32(3):276–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung KE, Su G, Pehlke C, Trier SM, Eliceiri KW, Keely PJ, Friedl A, Beebe DJ (2009) Control of 3-dimensional collagen matrix polymerization for reproducible human mammary fibroblast cell culture in microfluidic devices. Biomaterials 30(27):4833–4841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theocharis AD, Skandalis SS, Gialeli C, Karamanos NK (2016) Extracellular matrix structure. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 97:4–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Duinen V, Trietsch SJ, Joore J, Vulto P, Hankemeier T (2015) Microfluidic 3D cell culture: from tools to tissue models. Curr Opin Biotechnol 35:118–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivacqua CA, Bisgaard S (2004) Strip-block experiments for process improvement and robustness. Qual Eng 16(3):495–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vo-Thanh N, Schoen ED, Goos P (2020) Row-column arrangements of regular and nonregular fractional factorial two-level designs. J Qual Technol 52(3):304–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu CFJ, Hamada M (2009) Experiments: planning, analysis, and optimization, 2nd edn. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley, Hoboken

  • Xu H, Lau S (2006) Minimum aberration blocking schemes for two- and three-level fractional factorial designs. J Stat Plan Inference 136(11):4088–4118

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by the Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO, Flanders, Belgium).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandre Bohyn.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (csv 10 KB)

Supplementary file 2 (xlsx 11 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bohyn, A., Schoen, E.D., Ng, C.P. et al. Design and Analysis of a Microplate Assay in the Presence of Multiple Restrictions on the Randomization. JABES (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-023-00570-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-023-00570-1

Keywords

Navigation