Skip to main content
Log in

Mitigation of microtiter plate positioning effects using a block randomization scheme

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microtiter plate-based assays are a common tool in biochemical and analytical labs. Despite widespread use, results generated in microtiter plate-based assays are often impacted by positional bias, in which variability in raw signal measurements are not uniform in all regions of the plate. Since small positional effects can disproportionately affect assay results and the reliability of the data, an effective mitigation strategy is critical. Commonly used mitigation strategies include avoiding the use of outer regions of the plate, replicating treatments within and between plates, and randomizing placement of treatments within and between plates. These strategies often introduce complexity while only partially mitigating positional effects and significantly reducing assay throughput. To reduce positional bias more effectively, we developed a novel block-randomized plate layout. Unlike a completely randomized layout, the block randomization scheme coordinates placement of specific curve regions into pre-defined blocks on the plate based on key experimental findings and assumptions about the distribution of assay bias and variability. Using the block-randomized plate layout, we demonstrated a mean bias reduction of relative potency estimates from 6.3 to 1.1 % in a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) used for vaccine release. In addition, imprecision in relative potency estimates decreased from 10.2 to 4.5 % CV. Using simulations, we also demonstrated the impact of assay bias on measurement confidence and its relation to replication strategies. We outlined the underlying concepts of the block randomization scheme to potentially apply to other microtiter-based assays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ekins RP. J Chem Educ. 1999;76:769–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. <Chapter 1032>. USP Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc., Rockville, MD; 2012.

  3. Findlay JW, Smith WC, Lee JW, Nordblom GD, Das I, DeSilva BS, et al. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2000;21:1249–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Statistical analysis of results of biological assays and tests. In: European Pharmacopoeia 6.0. EDQM; 2008.

  5. Burt SM, Carter TJ, Kricka LJ. J Immunol Methods. 1979;31:231–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Harrison RO, Hammock BD. J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1988;71:981–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kricka LJ, Carter TJ, Burt SM, Kennedy JH, Holder RL, Halliday MI, et al. Clin Chem. 1980;26:741–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liang Y, Woodle SA, Shibeko AM, Lee TK, Ovanesov MV. Thromb J. 2013;11:12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Noble JE, Wang L, Cerasoli E, Knight AE, Porter RA, Gray E, et al. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46:1033–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Oliver DG, Sanders AH, Hogg RD, Hellman JW. J Immunol Methods. 1981;42:195–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pesce AJ, Michael JG. J Immunol Methods. 1992;150:111–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. US FDA. Guidance for industry: immunogenicity assessment for therapeutic protein products (Draft). Rockville, MD: US FDA; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robinson CJ, Sadick M, Deming SN, Estdale S, Bergelson S, and Little L (2014) Bioprocess International.

  14. Hentz NG, Knaide TR. J Lab Autom. 2014;19:153–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pandya K, Ray CA, Brunner L, Wang J, Lee JW, DeSilva B. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2010;53:623–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hooton JW, Paetkau V. J Immunol Methods. 1986;94:81–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thorsten Verch.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest apply to the scope of the manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 975 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roselle, C., Verch, T. & Shank-Retzlaff, M. Mitigation of microtiter plate positioning effects using a block randomization scheme. Anal Bioanal Chem 408, 3969–3979 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-9469-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-9469-0

Keywords

Navigation