Skip to main content
Log in

Verifying Reification With Application to a Rainfall–Runoff Computer Simulator

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Deterministic computer models or simulators are used regularly to assist researchers in understanding the behavior of complex physical systems when real-world observations are limited. However, simulators are often imperfect representations of physical systems and may introduce layers of uncertainty into model-based inferences that are hard to quantify. To formalize the use of expert judgment in assessing simulator uncertainty, Goldstein and Rougier in J. Stat. Plan. Inference 139:1221–1239 (2009) propose a method, called reification, that decomposes the discrepancy between simulator predictions and reality by an improved, hypothetical computer model known as a “reified simulator”. One criticism of reification is that validation is, at best, challenging; only expert critiques can validate the subjective judgments used to specify a reified simulator. For this paper, we develop a procedure to quantify the advantages of reification for fast, modular simulators. The procedure is explained and implemented within the context of a rainfall-runoff that was developed by Iorgulescu, Beven, and Musy in Hydrol. Process. 19:2557–2573 (2005). We show that reification leads to informed judgments of simulator uncertainty

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bastos, L., and O’Hagan, A. (2009), “Diagnostics for Gaussian Process Emulators,” Technometrics, 51, 425–438.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, K., Haran, M., Tonkonojenkov, R., and Keller, K. (2009), “Inferring Likelihoods and Climate System Characteristics From Climate Models and Multiple Tracers,” Technical report, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Statistics.

  • Bratley, P., and Fox, B. (1988), “Algorithm 659: Implementing Sobol’s Quasirandom Sequence Generator,” ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 14 (1), 88–100.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Challenor, P. G. (2009), “Comment on ‘Reified Bayesian Modelling and Inference for Physical Systems’ (Pkg: P1221-1256),” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 139 (3), 1248.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, P., Goldstein, M., Rougier, J., and Seheult, A. (2001), “Bayesian Forecasting for Complex Systems Using Computer Simulators,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96 (454), 717–729.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, M., and Rougier, J. (2004a), “Probabilistic Formulations for Transferring Inferences From Mathematical Models to Physical Systems,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 26 (2), 467–487.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (2004b), “Probabilistic Formulations for Transferring Inferences From Mathematical Models to Physical Systems,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 26 (3), 467–487.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (2009), “Reified Bayesian Modelling and Inference for Physical Systems (Pkg: P1221-1256),” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 139 (3), 1221–1239.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, M., and Woof, D. (2007), Bayes Linear Statistics, Chichester: Wiley.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Higdon, D., Gattiker, J., Williams, B., and Rightley, M. (2008), “Computer Model Calibration Using High Dimensional Output,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103 (482), 570–583.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Iorgulescu, I., Beven, K., and Musy, A. (2005), “Data-Based Modelling of Runoff and Chemical Tracer Concentrations in the Haute–Mentue Research Catchment (Switzerland),” Hydrological Processes, 19 (13), 2557–2573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2007), “Flow, Mixing, and Displacement in Using a Data-Based Hydrochemical Model to Predict Conservative Tracer Data,” Water Resources Research, 43, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, H. (1946), “An Invariant Form for the Prior Probability in Estimation Problem,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 186 (1007), 453–461.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M., and O’Hagan, A. (2001), “Bayesian Calibration of Computer Models,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical Methodology, 63 (3), 425–464.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (2000), “Predicting the Output From a Complex Computer Code When Fast Approximations Are Available,” Biometrika, 87 (1), 1–13.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lavine, M., Hegerl, G., and Lozier, S. (2009), “Comment on ‘Reified Bayesian Modelling and Inference for Physical Systems’ (Pkg: P1221-1256),” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 139 (3), 1243–1245.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, F., Bayarri, M., and Berger, J. (2009), “Modularization in Bayesian Analysis, With Emphasis on Analysis of Computer Models,” Bayesian Analysis, 4 (1), 119–150.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Loeppky, J., Bingham, D., and Welch, W. (2006), “Computer Model Calibration or Tuning in Practice,” Technical Report 221, Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia,Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2.

  • Madsen, H. (2000), “Automatic Calibration of a Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Model Using Multiple Objectives,” Journal of Hydrology, 235, 276–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morita, S., Thall, P., and Mueller, P. (2007), “Determining the Effective Sample Size of a Parametric Prior,” Technical Report 36, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Department of Biostatistics Working Paper Series.

  • Morris, M., and Higdon, D. (2009), “Comment on ‘Reified Bayesian Modelling and Inference for Physical Systems’ (Pkg: P1221-1256),” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 139 (3), 1249–1250.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hagan, A. (1978), “Curve Fitting and Optimal Design for Prediction,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological, 40, 1–24.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (2006), “Reliability Engineering and System Safety,” The Fourth International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output (SAMO 2004), 91 (10–11), 1290–1300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pina, J., Beven, K., and Freer, J. (1997), “Modelling the Hydrological Response of Mediterranean Catchments, Prades, Catalonia. The Use of Distributed Models as Aids to Hypothesis Formulation,” Hydrological Processes, 11, 1287–1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rougier, J. (2008a), “Comment on Article by Sanso et al. Bayesian Analysis,” Bayesian Analysis, 3 (1), 45–56.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (2008b), “Efficient Emulators for Multivariate Deterministic Functions,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 17 (4), 827–843.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, J., Welch, W., Mitchell, T., and Wynn, H. (1989), “Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments (C/R: P423-435),” Statistical Science, 4, 409–423.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sansó, B., Forest, C., and Zantedeschi, D. (2008), “Inferring Climate System Properties Using a Computer Model (Pkg: P1-62),” Bayesian Analysis, 3 (1), 1–38.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Santner, T., Williams, B., and Notz, W. (2003), The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments, New York: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. Q. (2009), “Comment on ‘Reified Bayesian Modelling and Inference for Physical Systems’ (Pkg: P1221-1256),” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 139 (3), 1246–1247.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sobol, L. (1967), “On the Distribution of Points in a Cube and the Approximate Evaluation of on the Distribution of Points in a Cube and the Approximate Evaluation of Integrals”, U.S.S.R. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 7, 86–112.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leanna House.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

House, L. Verifying Reification With Application to a Rainfall–Runoff Computer Simulator. JABES 16, 513–530 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-011-0075-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-011-0075-5

Key Words

Navigation