Skip to main content
Log in

Report of the ACPSEM radiation oncology medical physics workforce modelling project task group

  • ACPSEM Report
  • Published:
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ACPSEM radiation oncology medical physics workforce modelling project task group was formed to acquire a snapshot of practices in Australia and New Zealand and to develop an activity-based workforce model. To achieve this, two surveys were carried out, capturing the work practices of 98 radiation oncology departments and 182 college members. The member survey provided a snapshot of the current workforce: their demographics, work conditions, professional recognition, and future plans. The facility survey provided an Australian and New Zealand contextualisation of the volume-based activities defined in the International Atomic Energy Agency activity-based radiation oncology staffing model at a granular level. An ACPSEM ROMP workforce model was developed to be a modelling tool applicable at both the facility and sector levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

2D, 3D, 4D:

Two-, three- and four- dimensional

ACPSEM:

Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine

ARW:

ACPSEM ROMP Workforce

CPD:

Continuing professional development

CT:

Computed tomography

EBRT:

External beam radiotherapy

FTE:

Full time equivalent

IAEA:

International Atomic Energy Agency

IVD:

In vivo dosimetry

IMRT:

Intensity modulated radiotherapy

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

PET:

Positron emission tomography

QA:

Quality Assurance

ROMP:

Radiation Oncology Medical Physicist

SABR:

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy

SRS:

Stereotactic radiosurgery

TEAP:

Training, Education and Assessment Program

VMAT:

Volumetric modulated arc therapy

References

  1. Round WH (2007) A survey of the Australasian clinical medical physics and biomedical engineering workforce. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 30:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03178405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Round WH (2010) A 2009 survey of the Australasian clinical medical physics and biomedical engineering workforce. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 33:153–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-010-0023-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Round WH (2013) A 2012 survey of the Australasian clinical medical physics and biomedical engineering workforce. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 36:147–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-013-0195-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kron T, Cheung KY, Dai J, Ravindran P, Soejoko D, Inamura K, Song JY, Bold L, Srivastava R, Rodriguez L, Wong TG, Kumara A, Lee CC, Krisanachinda A, Nguyen XC, Ng KH (2008) Medical physics aspects of cancer care in the Asia Pacific region. Biomed Imaging Interv J 4:e33. https://doi.org/10.2349/biij.4.3.e33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kron T, Azhari HA, Voon EO, Cheung KY, Ravindran P, Soejoko D, Inamura K, Han Y, Ung NM, Bold L, Win UM, Srivastava R, Meyer J, Farrukh S, Rodriguez L, Kuo M, Lee JCL, Kumara A, Lee CC, Krisanachinda A, Nguyen XC, Ng KH (2012) Medical physics aspects of cancer care in the Asia Pacific region: 2011 survey results. Biomed Imaging Interv J 8:e10. https://doi.org/10.2349/biij.8.2.e10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kron T, Azhari HA, Voon EO, Cheung KY, Ravindran P, Soejoko D, Inamura K, Han Y, Ung NM, Tsedenlsh B, Win UM, Srivastava R, Marsh S, Farrukh S, Rodriguez L, Kuo M, Baggarley S, DilipKumura AH, Lee CC, Krisanachinda A, Nguyen XC, Ng KH (2015) Medical physics aspects of cancer care in the Asia Pacific region: 2014 survey results. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 38:493–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-015-0373-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kisling KD, Ger RB, Netherton TJ, Cardenas CE, Owens CA, Anderson BM, Lee J, Rhee DJ, Edward SS, Gay SS, He Y, David SD, Yang J, Nitsch PL, Balter PA, Urbauer DL, Peterson CB, Court LE (2018) A snapshot of medical physics practice patterns. J Appl Clin Med Phys 19:306–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12464

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Healy BJ, Budanec M, Ourdane B, Peace T, Petrovic B, Sanz DE, Scanderbeg DJ, Tuntipumiamorn L (2020) An IAEA survey of radiotherapy practice including quality assurance extent and depth. Acta Oncol 59:503–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2020.1714721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. HealthConsult (2009) Radiation oncology workforce planning final report. Report to Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra, Australia

  10. Bezak E, Suchowerska R, Mackonis EC, Pillen H, Ralston A, Haworth A, Suchowerska N (2019) Women and men in the Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine: workforce survey. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 42:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-018-0706-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ebert MA, Halkett GKB, Berg M, Cutt D, Davis M, Hegney D, House M, Krawiec M, Kearvell R, Lester L, Maresse S, McLoone P, McKay J (2017) An assessment of radiation oncology medical physicists’ perspectives on undertaking research. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 40:173–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-016-0505-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Halkett GKB, McKay J, Hegney DG, Breen LJ, Berg M, Ebert MA, Davis M, Kearvell R (2017) Radiation therapists’ and radiation oncology medical physicists’ perceptions of work and the working environment in Australia: a qualitative study. Eur J Can Care 26:e12511. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ebert MA, Hardcastle N, Kron T (2018) Future forum, Hobart, October 29, 2017: examining the role of medical physics in cancer research. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 41:571–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-018-0659-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Crowe SB, Kairn T (2016) Women in Medical Physics: a preliminary analysis of workforce and research participation in Australia and New Zealand. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 39:525–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-016-0428-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Crowe S, Bezak E, Oliver L, Kron T (2020) Medical physics training, education and professional recognition in Australia and New Zealand. Med Phys Int 8:417–421

    Google Scholar 

  16. Health Workforce Australia (2012) Medical physicist workforce study. Health Workforce Australia, Canberra, Australia

  17. Oliver L, Fitchew R, Drew J (2001) Requirements for radiation oncology physics in Australia and New Zealand. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 24:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03178281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dempsey C (2018) Medical physics workforce modelling: do we need what we want? Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 41:565–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-018-0663-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. International Atomic Energy Agency (2015) Staffing in radiotherapy: an activity based approach. IAEA Human Health Report No. 13. IAEA, Vienna, Austria

  20. Malkoske KE, Sixel KE, Hunter R, Battista JJ (2021) COMP report: an updated algorithm to estimate medical physics staffing levels for radiation oncology. J Appl Clin Med Phys 22:6–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13364

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Allen Consulting Group (2012) Projecting the radiation oncology workforce. Input to the Tripartite National Strategic Plan for Radiation Oncology in Australia. Report to The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, Sydney, Australia

  22. Bortfeld T, Torresin A, Fiorino C, Andreo P, Gagliardi G, Jeraj R, Muren LP, Paiusco M, Thwaites D, Knöös T (2015) The research versus clinical service role of medical physics. Radiother Oncol 114:285–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.02.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The ACPSEM wishes to express its gratitude to the members and directors of radiotherapy departments that completed the member and facilities surveys. The authors would like to thank Dr. Kym Rykers and Sharon Flynn for reviewing the report on behalf of the ACPSEM.

Funding

The project was supported financially as part of the 2018–2020 Supporting Medical Physics grant program by the Australian Department of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DD and AS designed and distributed the survey instrument, validated results, and provided analysis of the data. HR supervised the project and provided guidance. Task group members SC, TA, LH, LG, LF, JL and DW provided clinical context. All authors collaborated on development of the survey instrument, writing the manuscript, and reviewed the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Crowe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

DD and AS are consultants contracted to complete the work described in this report (as Venndelta Pty Ltd). HR was contracted by the ACPSEM to direct the task group efforts. Task group members SC, TA, LH, LG, LF, JL and DW are employed as ROMPs in a clinical setting.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crowe, S., Aland, T., Fog, L. et al. Report of the ACPSEM radiation oncology medical physics workforce modelling project task group. Phys Eng Sci Med 44, 1013–1025 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-021-01078-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-021-01078-z

Keywords

Navigation