Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Voting-based 1D CNN model for human lower limb activity recognition using sEMG signal

  • Scientific Paper
  • Published:
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surface electromyography (sEMG) signal classification has many applications such as human-machine interaction, diagnosis of kinesiological studies, and neuromuscular diseases. However, these signals are complicated because of different artifacts added to the sEMG signal during recording. In this study, a multi-stage classification technique is proposed for the identification of distinct movements of the lower limbs using sEMG signals acquired from leg muscles of healthy knee and abnormal knee subjects. This investigation involves 11 subjects with a knee abnormality and 11 without knee abnormality for three distinct activities viz. walking, leg extension from sitting position (sitting), and flexion of the leg (standing). Discrete wavelet denoising to fourth level decomposition has been implemented for the artifact reduction and the signal has been segmented using overlapping windowing technique. A study of four different architectures of 1D convolutional neural network models is undertaken for the prediction of lower limb activities and the final prediction is achieved via a voting mechanism of all four model results. The performance parameters of CNN models have been calculated for three different cases: (1) healthy subjects (2) subjects with knee abnormality (3) Pooled data (combination of abnormal knee and healthy knee subjects) using nested threefold cross-validation. It has been found that the voting mechanism yields an average classification accuracy as 99.35%, 97.63%, and 97.14% for healthy subjects, knee abnormal subjects, and pooled data, respectively. The result validates that the proposed voting-based 1D CNN model is efficient and useful in lower limb activity recognition using the sEMG signal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ranasinghe S, Al Machot F, Mayr HC (2016) A review on applications of activity recognition systems with regard to performance and evaluation. Int J Distrib Sensor Netw 12(8):1550147716665520

  2. Liu X, Liu L, Simske SJ, Liu J (2016) Human daily activity recognition for healthcare using wearable and visual sensing data. 24–31

  3. Lara OD, Labrador MA (2012) A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 15(3):1192–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang B-S, Liao S-T (2012) Fall detecting using inertial and electromyographic sensors. In: Proceedings of the 36th annual meeting of the American Society of Biomechanics, Gainsville, FL, USA, pp 15–18

  5. Cheng J, Chen X, Shen M (2012) A framework for daily activity monitoring and fall detection based on surface electromyography and accelerometer signals. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 17(1):38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Farina D, Negro F (2012) Accessing the neural drive to muscle and translation to neurorehabilitation technologies. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 5:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nazmi N, Rahman A, Azizi M, Yamamoto S-I, Ahmad SA, Zamzuri H, Mazlan SA (2016) A review of classification techniques of EMG signals during isotonic and isometric contractions. Sensors 16(8):1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Au SK, Bonato P, Herr H (2005) An EMG-position controlled system for an active ankle-foot prosthesis: an initial experimental study. In: 9th international conference on rehabilitation robotics, 2005 (ICORR 2005), pp 375–379. IEEE

  9. Vijayvargiya A, Singh PL, Verma SM, Kumar R, Bansal S (2019) Performance comparison analysis of different classifier for early detection of knee osteoarthritis. Sensors Health Monitor. Elsevier, pp 243–257

  10. Burkow-Heikkinen L (2011) Non-invasive physiological monitoring of exercise and fitness. Neurol Res 33(1):3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiguchi K, Tanaka T, Fukuda T (2004) Neuro-fuzzy control of a robotic exoskeleton with EMG signals. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 12(4):481–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Krasin V, Gandhi V, Yang Z, Karamanoglu M (2015) EMG based elbow joint powered exoskeleton for biceps Brachii strength augmentation. pp 1–6

  13. Sharmila K, Sarath TV, Ramachandran KI (2016) EMG controlled low cost prosthetic arm. pp 169–172

  14. Cai S, Chen Y, Huang S, Yan W, Zheng H, Li X, Xie L (2019) SVM-based classification of sEMG signals for upper-limb self-rehabilitation training. Front Neurorobot 13:31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pancholi S, Joshi AM (2019) Electromyography-based hand gesture recognition system for upper limb amputees. IEEE Sensors Lett. 3(3):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eisenberg GD, Fyvie KGHM, Mohamed A-K (2017) Real-time segmentation and feature extraction of electromyography: towards control of a prosthetic hand. IFAC-PapersOnLine 50(2):151–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mukhopadhyay AK, Samui S (2020) An experimental study on upper limb position invariant EMG signal classification based on deep neural network. Biomed Signal Process Control 55:101669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Karabulut D, Faruk O, Yunus ZA, Mehmet AA (2017) Comparative evaluation of EMG signal features for myoelectric controlled human arm prosthetics. Biocybern Biomed Eng 37(2):326–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Souit C, Coelho DS, Szylit M, Camargo-Junior F, Junior Milton PC, Forner-Cordero A (2016) Design of a lower limb exoskeleton for experimental research on gait control. In: 2016 6th IEEE international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics (BioRob), pp 1098–1103. IEEE

  20. Xie H, Li Z, Li F (2020) Bionics design of artificial leg and experimental modeling research of pneumatic artificial muscles. J Robot

  21. Erkaymaz O, Şenyer İ, Uzun R (2017) Detection of knee abnormality from surface EMG signals by artificial neural networks. pp 1–4

  22. Miller JD, Beazer MS, Hahn ME (2013) Myoelectric walking mode classification for transtibial amputees. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 60(10):2745–2750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Naik GR, Easter Selvan S, Arjunan SP, Acharyya A, Kumar DK, Ramanujam A, Nguyen HT (2018) An ICA-EBM-based sEMG classifier for recognizing lower limb movements in individuals with and without knee pathology. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 26(3):675–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 1097–1105

  25. LeCun Y, Bengio Y et al (1995) Convolutional networks for images, speech, and time series. Handbook Brain Theory Neural Netw 3361(10):1995

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ullah I, Hussain M, Aboalsamh H et al (2018) An automated system for epilepsy detection using EEG brain signals based on deep learning approach. Expert Syst Appl 107:61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gautam A, Panwar M, Biswas D, Acharyya A (2020) Myonet: a transfer-learning-based lRCN for lower limb movement recognition and knee joint angle prediction for remote monitoring of rehabilitation progress from sEMG. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med 8:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sanchez OFA, Sotelo JLR, Gonzales MH, Hernandez GAM (2014) EMG dataset in lower limb data set. UCI Mach Learn Repos pp 2014–02

  29. Vijayvargiya A, Kumar R, Dey N, Tavares JMR. (2020) Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for the classification of knee abnormality. pp 1–6

  30. Chowdhury R, Reaz M, Ali M, Bakar A, Chellappan K, Chang T (2013) Surface electromyography signal processing and classification techniques. Sensors 13(9):12431–12466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Phinyomark A, Phukpattaranont P, Limsakul C (2011) Wavelet-based denoising algorithm for robust EMG pattern recognition. Fluct Noise Lett 10(02):157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Graps A (1995) An introduction to wavelets. IEEE Comput Sci Eng 2(2):50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jing-Yi L, Hong L, Dong Y, Yan-Sheng Z (2016) A new wavelet threshold function and denoising application. Math Prob Eng

  34. Phinyomark A, Limsakul C, Phukpattaranont P (2011) Application of wavelet analysis in EMG feature extraction for pattern classification. Meas Sci Rev 11(2):45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Oskoei MA, Hu H (2008) Support vector machine-based classification scheme for myoelectric control applied to upper limb. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55(8):1956–1965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kiranyaz S, Ince T, Gabbouj M (2015) Real-time patient-specific ECG classification by 1-d convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 63(3):664–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ullah I, Petrosino A (2016) About pyramid structure in convolutional neural networks. pp 1318–1324

  38. Kingma DP, Adam JB (2014) A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980

  39. Mehta S, Paunwala C, Vaidya B (2019) CNN based traffic sign classification using Adam optimizer. pp 1293–1298

  40. Vijayvargiya A, Gupta V, Kumar R, Dey N, Tavares JMR (2021) A hybrid WD-EEMD sEMG feature extraction technique for lower limb activity recognition. IEEE Sensors J 21:20431–20439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Herrera-González M, Martínez-Hernández GA, Rodríguez-Sotelo JL, Avilés-Sánchez OF (2015) Knee functional state classification using surface electromyographic and goniometric signals by means of artificial neural networks. Ing Univ 19(1):51–66

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang Y, Peng X, Li P, Duan K, Wen Y, Yang Q, Zhang T, Yao D (2017) Noise-assisted multivariate empirical mode decomposition for multichannel EMG signals. Biomed Eng Online 16(1):107

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication is supported by Visvesvaraya PhD Scheme, Meity, Govt. of India, MEITY-PHD-2942.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ankit Vijayvargiya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any study with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vijayvargiya, A., Khimraj, Kumar, R. et al. Voting-based 1D CNN model for human lower limb activity recognition using sEMG signal. Phys Eng Sci Med 44, 1297–1309 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-021-01071-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-021-01071-6

Keywords

Navigation