Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Visualization of blurring process due to analog components in a digital radiography system using a simple method

  • Scientific Note
  • Published:
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To obtain useful medical X-ray images for diagnosis, it is necessary to accurately evaluate the characteristics and fully understand the features of the system to determine the imaging target and conditions. This study describes the performance of a digital radiography (DR) system in detail and proposes a method for characterizing the blurring process due to the presence of analog components in an imaging system. Our method does not involve any specialized technique, such as a simulation that requires long computing time on a high-performance computer. The method is based on the concept of the modulation transfer function (MTF). The functions that corresponded to the MTF of the analog components of the system when the Fourier transform was performed were examined. Indirect conversion type flat-panel detectors (FPD) in the general radiography energy range and direct conversion type FPD in the mammography were used for verification. A Gaussian function and Lorentz function were synthesized for modelling the blurring process of the indirect type FPDs. The spreads and shapes of the modeled functions depended on the systems. For the direct conversion type FPD, a combination of a Lorentz function with a narrow width and an impulse function characterized the results. Furthermore, based on the structure of each detector and the signal transfer process, the visualized results were considered reliable. The results of these experiments will aid in the detailed understanding of the image quality characteristics of the DR system by the feasible approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Dobbins JT III, Ergun DL, Rutz L, Hinshaw DA et al (1995) DQE(f) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices. Med Phys 22(10):1581–1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Samei E, Mj F (2003) An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. Med Phys 30(4):608–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lazzi B, Belli G, Gori C, Turco MRD (2007) Physical characteristics of five clinical systems for digital mammography. Med Phys 34(7):2730–2743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rivetti S, Lanconelli N, Campanini R, Bertolini M et al (2006) Comparison of different commercial FFDM units by means of physical characterization and contrast-detail analysis. Med Phys 33(11):4198–4209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Åslund M, Cederström B, Lundqvist M, Danielsson M (2007) Physical characterization of a scanning photon counting digital mammography system based on Si-strip detectors. Med Phys 34(6):1918–1925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yaffe MJ, Rowlands JA (1997) X-ray detectors for digital radiography. Phys Med Biol 42:1–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Åslund M, Fredenberg E, Telman M, Danielsson M (2010) Detectors for the future of X-ray imaging. Radiat Prot Dosim 139:327–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA (2000) Optimization of x-ray imaging geometry (with specific application to flat-panel cone beam computed tomography). Med Phys 27(8):1903–1914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tanaka N, Yano Y, Yabuuchi H, Akasaka T et al (2013) Basic imaging properties of an indirect flat-panel detector system employing irradiation side sampling (ISS) technology for chest radiography: comparison with a computed radiographic system. Radiol Phys Technol 6:162–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Richard S, Husarik DB, Yadava G, Murphy SN et al (2012) Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms. Med Phys 39(7):4115–4122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoheisel M, Bätz L, Mertelmeier T, Giersch J et al (2006) Modulation transfer function of a selenium-based digital mammography system. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 53(3):1118–1122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lim CH, Yun S, Han JC, Kim HK (2011) Characterization of imaging performance of a large-area CMOS active-pixel detector for low-energy X-ray imaging. Nucl Inst Methods Phys Res A 652:500–503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liaparinos P, Kalyvas N, Kandarakis I, Cavouras D (2013) Analysis of the imaging performance in indirect digital mammography detectors by linear systems and signal detection models. Nucl Inst Methods Phys Res A 697:87–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kalyvas N, Valais I, Michail C, Fountos G (2015) A theoretical study of CsI:Tl columnar scintillator image quality parameters by analytical modeling. Nucl Inst Methods Phys Res A 779:18–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Giger ML, Doi K (1984) Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. I Modulation transfer function. Med Phys 11(3):287–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fujita H, Tsai DY, Itoh T, Doi K et al (1992) A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 11(1):34–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Samei E, Flynn MJ, Reimann DA (1998) A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. Med Phys 25(1):102–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Irisawa K, Arai T, Nakata H, Sendai T et al (2009) Development high-sensitivity and high-resolution digital mammography system ‘AMULET’. FUJIFILM Res Dev 54:11–17

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sato K, Nariyuki F, Kuwabara T, Fukui S et al (2010) Development of “CALNEO”, an indirect-conversion digital radiography system with high-conversion efficiency. FUJIFILM Res Dev 55:10–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tokuhiro O, Gidou T, Kashino T (2011) Development of a wireless cassette digital radiography detector: the AeroDR. Konica Minolta Technology Report 8:96–100

    Google Scholar 

  21. Beutel J, Kundel HL, Metter RL (2000) Handbook of medical imaging, volume 1. Physics and psychophysics. SPIE Press, Bellingham

    Google Scholar 

  22. IEC62220-1-1 (2015) Medical electrical equipment – characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices – part1-1: determination of the detective quantum efficiency – detector used in radiographic imaging

  23. IEC62220-1-2 (2007) Medical electrical equipment – characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices – part1-2: determination of the detective quantum efficiency – detector used in mammography

  24. IEC61267 (2005) Medical diagnostic X-ray equipment – radiation conditions for use in the determination of characteristics

  25. Higashide R, Ichikawa K, Kunitomo H, Ohashi K (2015) Application of a variable filter for presampled modulation transfer function analysis with the edge method. Radiol Phys Technol 8:320–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Radiological Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, Gunma Paz University, 3-3-4 Tonyamachi, Takasaki, Gunma, 370-0006, Japan

    Sho Maruyama

Authors
  1. Sho Maruyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sho Maruyama.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this article.

Ethical approval

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maruyama, S. Visualization of blurring process due to analog components in a digital radiography system using a simple method. Phys Eng Sci Med 43, 1461–1468 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-020-00939-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-020-00939-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation