Skip to main content
Log in

Development of wearable posture monitoring system for dynamic assessment of sitting posture

  • Scientific Paper
  • Published:
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There have been increasing cases of people seeking treatment for neck and back pain. The most common cause of neck and back pain is due to long-term poor sitting posture. The most common poor sitting posture cases are humpback, and head and neck being too far forward. It is easy to cause neck and back pain and other symptoms. Therefore, the development of wearable posture monitoring system for dynamic assessment of sitting posture becomes both helpful and necessary. In addition to recording the wearer’s posture when sitting with quantitative assessment, it is needed to execute real-time action feedback for correctness of posture, in order to reduce neck and back pain due to long-term poor sitting posture. This study completed an instant recording and dynamic assessment of position measurement and feedback system. The system consists of a number of dynamic measurement units that can describe the posture trajectory, which integrates three-axis gyro meter, three-axis accelerometer, and magnetometer in order to measure the dynamic tracking. In the reliability analysis experiment, angle measurement error is less than 2%. The correlation coefficient between correlation analysis and Motion Analysis (MA) is 0.97. It is shown that the motion trajectory of this system is highly correlated with MA. In the feasibility test of sitting position detection, it is possible to detect the sitting position from the basic action of the walking, standing, sitting and lying down, and the sensitivity reaches 95.84%. In the assessment of the sitting position, the information published by the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety was used, as well as the recommendations of professional physicians as a basis for evaluating the threshold of the sitting measurement parameters and immediately feedback to the subjects. The system developed in this study can be helpful to reduce neck and back pain due to long-term poor sitting posture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schneider E, Irastorza X (2010) Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the EU: facts and figures. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, Bilbao

  2. American Cancer Society (2010) Epidemiology research program. Am J Epidemiol 172(4):419–429

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pereira S, Power C et al (2013) Sedentary behaviours in mid-adulthood and subsequent body mass index. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065791

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Uffelen J, Wong J et al (2010) Occupational sitting and health risks—a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 39(4):379–388

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Katzmarzyk P, Lee IM et al (2012) Sedentary behaviour and life expectancy in the USA: a cause—deleted life table analysis. BMJ open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000828

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Aissaoui R, Lacoste M, Dansereau J et al (2001) Analysis of sliding and pressure distribution During a repositioning of persons in a simulator chair. IEEE Trans Neural Sys Rehabil Eng 9(2):215–224

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schneider R (1998) Pantograph for tilting trains. In: IEEE current collections for high speed trains seminar (Ref. No. 1998/509) 2/1-2/6

  8. Neville L (2005) The fundamental principles of seating and positioning in children and young people with physical disabilities. University of Ulster, Coleraine

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mandal AC (1976) Work chair with tilting seat. Ergonomics 19(2):157–164

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hobson D (1992) Comparative effects of posture on pressure and shear at the body-seat interface. J Rehabil Res Dev 29(4):21–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koo T, Mak A, Lee YL et al (1996) Posture effect on seating interface biomechanics: comparison between two seating cushions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77(1):40–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mandal AC (1991) Investigation of the lumbar flexion of the seated man. Int J Ind Ergon 8(1):75–87

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rosemeyer B (1972) Die aufrechte körperhaltung des menschen. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung 112:115–163

    Google Scholar 

  14. Redfern R (2014) The miracle enzyme is serrapeptase. serrapeptase the 2nd gift from silkworms giving the answer to pain chronic inflammation and clogged arteries. Naturally Healthy Publications, Davenham

  15. Martini F, Timmons M, Tallitsch R (2014) Human anatomy, 8th edn. Pearson Education, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gottlieb B (2002) Alternative cures: the most effective natural home remedies for 160 health problems. Rodale, Emmaus

    Google Scholar 

  17. Owen N, Healy G, Matthews C, Dunstan D (2010) Too much sitting: the population-health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 38(3):105–113

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Grøntved A, Hu F (2011) Television viewing and risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. JAMA 305(23):2448–2455

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Seperson S (2008) Elder care and service learning: a handbook. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mandal AC (1996) Balanced sitting posture on forward sloping seat. http://www.acmandal.com/. Accessed 22 June 2015

  21. Prevention Magazine Editors (ed) (1996) Symptoms: their causes & cures: how to understand and treat 265 health concerns. Bantam, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tremblay M, LeBlanc A, Kho M et al (2011) Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 8(1):98

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Bloch D (2012) The Coolest Startups in America. Building Bloch Books, New York, pp 215–217

    Google Scholar 

  24. Millikan GA (1942) The oximeter: an instrument for measuring continuously oxygen-saturation of arterial blood in man. Rev Sci Instrum 13(10):434–444

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Andersson BJG, Ortengren R et al (1974) Lumbar disc pressure and myoelectric back muscle activity during sitting. I. Studies on an experimental chair. Scandinavian. J Rehabil Med 6(3):104–114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Andersson BJG, Ortengren R (1974) Lumbar disc pressure and myoelectric back muscle activity during sitting. II. Studies on an office chair. Scandinavian. J Rehabil Med 6(3):115–121

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Watson DH, Trott PH (1993) Cervical headache: an investigation of natural head posture and upper cervical flexor muscle performance. Cephalagia 13(4):272–284

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Azrin N, Rubin H, O’Brien F, Ayllon T, Roll D (1968) Behavioral engineering: postural control by a portable operant apparatus. J Appl Behav Anal 1(2):99–108

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wong MS, Mak AF, Luk KD, Evans JH, Brown B (2001) Effectiveness of audio-biofeedback in postural training for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Prosthet Orthot Int 25(1):60–70

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Okada S, Sakaki T, Hirata R, Okajima Y, Uchida S, Tomita Y (2001) TEM: a therapeutic exercise machine for the lower extremities of spastic patients. Adv Robot 14(7):597–606

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hirata R, Sakaki T, Okada S, Nakamoto Z, Hiraki N, Okajima Y et al (2002) BRMS bio responsive motion system. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems pp 1344–1348

  32. Bernhardt M, Frey M, Colombo G, Riener R (2005) Hybrid force-position control yields cooperative behaviour of the rehabilitation robot LOKOMAT. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th international conference on rehabilitation robotics pp 536–539

  33. Lunenburger L, Colombo G, Riener R, Dietz V (2005) Clinical assessments performed during robotic rehabilitation by the gait training robot Lokomat. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th international conference on rehabilitation robotics pp 345–348

  34. Mayagoitia R, Nene A, Veltink P (2002) Accelerometer and rate gyroscope measurement of kinematics: an inexpensive alternative to optical motion analysis systems. J Biomech 35(4):537–542

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Roetenberg D, Slycke P, Veltink P (2007) Ambulatory position and orientation tracking fusing magnetic and inertial sensing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54(5):883–890

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang S, Li Q (2012) Inertial sensor-based methods in walking speed estimation: a systematic review. Sensors 12(5):6102–6116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rueterbories J, Spaich E, Larsen B, Andersen O (2010) Methods for gait event detection and analysis in ambulatory systems. Med Eng Phys 32(6):545–552

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Watanabe T, Saito H, Koike E, Nitta K (2011) A preliminary test of measurement of joint angles and stride length with wireless inertial sensors for wearable gait evaluation system. Comput Intel Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/975193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Aminian K, Robert P, Buchser EE, Rutschmann B, Hayoz D, Depairon M (1999) Physical activity monitoring based on accelerometry: validation and comparison with video observation. Med Biol Eng CompuT 37(3):304–308

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mathie M, Coster A, Lovell N, Celler B (2004) Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement. Physiol Meas 25(2):R1–R20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Grant P, Ryan C, Tigbe W, Granat M (2006) The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. Br J Sports Med 40(12):992–997

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Mansfield A, Lyons G (2003) The use of accelerometry to detect heel contact events for use as a sensor in FES based assisted walking. Med Eng Phys 25(10):879–885

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu K, Liu T, Shibata K, Inoue Y, Zheng T (2009) Novel approach to ambulatory assessment of human segmental orientation a wearable sensor system. J Biomech 42(16):2747–2752

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Willemsen A, van Alsté JA, Boom HBK (1990) Real-time gait assessment utilizing a new way of accelerometry. J Biomech 23(8):859–863

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Duric M, Dosen S, Popovic M, Popovic D (2008) Sensors for assistive system for restoring of the walking. In: Proceedings 52nd ETRAN conference, society for electronics, telecommunications, computers, automatic control and nuclear engineering

  46. Shimada Y, Ando S, Matsunaga T, Misawa A, Aizawa T, Shirahata T, Itoi E (2005) Clinical application of acceleration sensor to detect the swing phase of stroke gait in functional electrical stimulation. Tohoku J Exp Med 207(3):197–202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Willemsen A, Friego C, Boom HBK (1991) Lower extremity angle measurement with accelerometers-errors and sensitivity analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 38(12):1186–1193

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sabatini A, Martelloni C, Scapellato S, Cavallo F (2005) Assessment of walking features from foot inertial sensing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52(3):486–494

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wu G, Ladin Z (1996) The study of kinematic transients in locomotion using the integrated kinematic sensor. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 4(3):193–200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Williamson R, Andrews B (2000) Gait event detection for FES using acceleromenters and supervised machine learning. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 8(3):312–319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lee SW, Mase K, Kogure K (2005) Detection of spatio-temporal gait parameters by using wearable motion sensors. In: IEEE engineering in medicine and biology 27th annual conference vol 7, pp 6836–6839

  52. M. Duric (2008) Automatic recognition of gait phases from accelerations of leg segments. In: Neural network applications in electrical engineering

  53. Williamson R, Andrews B (2000) Sensor system for lower limb functional electrical stimulation (FES) control. Med Eng Phys 22(5):313–325

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Morris J (1973) Accelerometry-a technique for the measurement of human body movements. J Biomech 6(6):729–736

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. O’Donovan K, Kamnik R, O’Keeffe D, Lyons G (2007) An inertial and magnetic sensor based technique for joint angle measurement. J Biomech 40(12):2604–2611

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Coley B, Najafi B, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Aminian K (2005) Stair climbing detection during daily physical activity using a miniature gyroscope. Gait Posture 22(4):287–294

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Aminian K, Najafi B, Bla C, Lezvraz P, Robert P (2002) Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured by an ambulatory system using miniature gyroscopes. J Biomech 35(5):689–699

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Jasiewicz J, Allum J, Middleton J, Barriskill A, Condie P, Purcell B, Li RC (2006) Gait event detection using linear accelerometers or angular velocity transducers in able-bodied and spinal-cord injured individuals. Gait Posture 24(4):502–509

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Tong K, Granat M (1999) A practical gait analysis system using gyroscopes. Med Eng Phys 21(2):87–94

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Pappas IP, Popovic MR, Keller T, Dietz V, Morari M (2001) A reliable gait phase detection system. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 9(2):113–125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Veltink P, Slycke P, Hemssems J, Buschman R, Bultstra G, Hermens H (2003) Three dimensional inertial sensing of foot movements for automatic tuning of a two-channel implantable drop-foot stimulator. Med Eng Phys 25(1):21–28

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Dai R, Stein R, Andrews B, James K, Wieler M (1996) Application of tilt sensors in functional electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 4(2):63–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Weber D, Stein B, Chan K, Loeb G, Richmond F, Rolf R, James K, Chong S (2005) BIONic WalkAide for correcting foot drop. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 13(2):242–246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Skelly M, Chizeck H (2001) Real-time gait event detection for paraplegic FES walking. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 9(1):59–68

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Nilsson J, Stokes V, Thorstensson A (1985) A new method to measure foot contact. J Biomech 18(8):625–627

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Pappas IP, Keller T, Mangold S, Popovic M, Dietz V, Morari M (2004) A reliable gyroscope-based gait-phase detection sensor embedded in a shoe insole. IEEE J Sensors 4(2):268–274

    Google Scholar 

  67. Claus A, Hides J, Moseley G, Hodges P (2016) Thoracic and lumbar posture behaviour in sitting tasks and standing: progressing the biomechanics from observations to measurements. Appl Ergon 53:161–168

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Zemp R, Taylor W, Lorenzetti S (2016) Seat pan and backrest pressure distribution while sitting in office chairs. Appl Ergon 53:1–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Claeys K, Brumagne S, Deklerck J, Vanderhaeghen J, Dankaerts W (2016) Sagittal evaluation of usual standing and sitting spinal posture. J Bodyw Mov Ther 20(2):326–333

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Wong WY, Wong MS (2008) Detecting spinal posture change in sitting positions with tri-axial accelerometers. Gait Posture 27(1):168–171

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Araújo F, Lucas R, Alegrete N, Azevedo A, Barros H (2014) Individual and contextual characteristics as determinants of sagittal standing posture: a population-based study of adults. Spine J 14(10):2373–2383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. O’Sullivan K, O’Keeffe M, O’Sullivan L, O’Sullivan P, Dankaerts W (2013) Perceptions of sitting posture among members of the community, both with and without non-specific chronic low back pain. Manual Ther 18(6):551–556

    Google Scholar 

  73. Nguyen H, Lebel K, Boissy P, Bogard S, Goubault E, Duval C (2017) Auto detection and segmentation of daily living activities during a Timed Up and Go task in people with Parkinson’s disease using multiple inertial sensors. J NeuroEng Rehabil 14(1):26

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Lee CH, Lee S, Shin G (2017) Reliability of forward head posture evaluation while sitting, standing, walking and running. Hum Mov Sci 55:81–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Hernandez JE, Cretu E (2017) Respiratory effort monitoring system for sleep apnea screening for both supine and lateral recumbent positions. In: 8th IEEE annual information technology, electronics and mobile communication conference (IEMCON)

  76. Eyobu OS, Kim YW, Cha D, Han DS (2018) A real-time sleeping position recognition system using IMU sensor motion data. In: IEEE international conference on consumer electronics (ICCE)

  77. Hellmers S, Izadpanah B, Dasenbrock L, Diekmann R, Bauer JM, Hein A, Fudickar S (2018) Towards an automated unsupervised mobility assessment for older people based on inertial TUG measurements. Sensors 18(10):3310

    Google Scholar 

  78. Martinez-Hernandez U, Dehghani-Sanij AA (2019) Probabilistic identification of sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit with a wearable sensor. Pattern Recogn Lett 118:32–41

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC, for supporting this research under Contracts MOST 105-2221-E-035-064-.

Funding

This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC (Grant Number: MOST 105-2221-E-035-064-).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi-Chih Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, CC., Chiu, CC. & Yeh, CY. Development of wearable posture monitoring system for dynamic assessment of sitting posture. Phys Eng Sci Med 43, 187–203 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-019-00836-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-019-00836-4

Keywords

Navigation