Abstract
The dose optimization algorithm based on anatomical points is developed to produce rapidly uniform doses over target distances generated on the target volume edges in high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy stepping source application for a treatment length of 6 cm. Monte Carlo modeling of the 60Co HDR brachytherapy source and the surrounding medium were performed using PHITS code. The source dwell times were optimized using Tikhonov regularization in order to obtain uniform dose distribution at the anatomical points located at predefined target distances. The computed dose rates at distances from 0.25 up to 20 cm away from the source were first verified with the literature data sets. Then, the simulation results of the optimization process were compared to the calculations of commercial treatment planning system (TPS) SagiPlan. As a result, the dose uniformity was observed in the isodose curves at the target distances of 10 and 15 mm of the treatment length and the prescribed dose achieved the anatomical points uniformly. The algorithm developed in the present study can be applied for achieving the dose uniformity around the brachytherapy stepping source as a quicker tool for different treatment lengths and different target distances while maintaining the high quality of the treatment plans, saving time by avoiding the manual isodose shaping and then better suitable treatment for patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sadeghi M, Enferadi M, Shirazi A (2010) External and internal radiation therapy: past and future directions. J Cancer Res Ther 6(3):239–248
Yoshimura R, Hayashi K, Ayukawa F, Toda K, Iwata M, Oota S, Hoshi A, Wakatsuki M, Kurosaki H, Okazaki A, Shibuya H (2008) Radiotherapy doses at special reference points correlate with the outcome of cervical cancer therapy. Brachytherapy 7:260–266
Sarabiasl A, Ayoobian N, Poorbaygi H et al (2016) Erratum to: Monte Carlo dosimetry of the IRAsource high dose rate 192Ir brachytherapy source. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 39:591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-016-0444-z
Hirose K, Aoki M, Sato M et al (2016) Jpn J Radiol 34(11):718–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-016-0578-7
Janulionis E, Samerdokiene V, Valuckas KP, Atkocius V, Rivard MJ (2018) Second primary malignancies after high-dose-rate 60Co photon or 252Cf neutron brachytherapy in conjunction with external-beam radiotherapy for endometrial cancer. Brachytherapy 17:768–774
Skowronek J (2017) Current status of brachytherapy in cancer treatment—short overview. J Contemp Brachyther 9:581–589
Choi CH, Ye SJ, Parsai EI, Shen S, Meredith R, Brezovich IA, Ove R (2009) Dose optimization of breast balloon brachytherapy using a stepping 192Ir HDR source. J Appl Clin Med Phys 10(1):90–102
Patel NP, Majumdar B, Hota PK et al (2005) Dose uniformity assessment of intraluminal brachytherapy using HDR 192Ir stepping source. J Can Res Ther 1(2):84–91
Morén B, Larsson T, Tedgren ÅC (2018) Mathematical optimization of high dose-rate brachytherapy—derivation of a linear penalty model from a dose-volume model. Phys Med Biol 63(5):065011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aaab83
Lahanas M, Baltas D, Zamboglou N (1999) Anatomy-based three-dimensional dose optimization in brachytherapy using multiobjective genetic algorithms. Med Phys 26:1904–1918
Giantsoudi D, Baltas D, Karabis A, Mavroidis P, Zamboglou N, Tselis N, Shi C, Papanikolaou N (2013) A gEUD-based inverse planning technique for HDR prostate brachytherapy: feasibility study. Med Phys 40:041704
Holm Å, Larsson T, Carlsson Tedgren Å (2013) A linear programming model for optimizing HDR brachytherapy dose distributions with respect to mean dose in the DVH-tail. Med Phys 40:081705
De Boeck L, Beliën J, Egyed W (1990) Dose optimization in high-dose-rate brachytherapy: a literature review of quantitative models from 1990 to 2010. Oper Res Health Care. 2014(3):80–90
Alber M, Birkner M, Laub W, Nüsslin F (2000) Hyperion—an integrated IMRT planning tool. In: Schlegel W, Bortfeld T (eds) The use of computers in radiation therapy. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59758-9_17
Chui C-S, Spirou SV (2001) Inverse planning algorithms for external beam radiation therapy. Med Dosim 26(2):189–197
Chvetsov A (2005) SU-FF-T-108: computing the regularization parameter for inverse treatment planning using the L-curve method. Med Phys 32:1974–1974. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1997779
Badry H, Oufni L, Ouabi H, Hirayama H (2018) A Monte Carlo investigation of the dose distribution for 60Co high dose rate brachytherapy source in water and in different media. Appl Radiat Isot 136:104–110
Sato Sato T et al (2018) Features of particle and heavy ion transport code system (PHITS) version 3.02. J Nucl Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1419890
Puchalska M, Sihver L, Sato T, Berger T, Reitz G (2012) Simulations of MATROSHKA experiment at ISS using PHITS. Adv Space Res 50:489–495
Sato T, Kase Y, Watanabe R, Niita K, Sihver L (2009) Biological dose estimation for heavy ion therapy using an improved PHITS code coupled with the microdosimetric kinetic model. Radiat Res 171:107–117
Ohta M, Nakao N, Kuribayashi S, Hayashizaki N (2018) Verification of evaluation accuracy of absorbed dose in the dose-evaluation system for iridium-192 brachytherapy for treatment of keloids. Biomed Phys. Eng Express 4:025022
Badry H, Oufni L, Ouabi H, Hirayama H (2018) Monte Carlo dose calculation for HDR brachytherapy source using EGS5 code. Radiat Phys Chem 150:76–81
Rivard MJ, Coursey BM, DeWerd LA, Hanson WF, Huq MS, Ibbott GS, Mitch MG, Nath R, Williamson JF (2004) Update of AAPM task group no. 43 report: a revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy dose calculations. Med Phys. 31:633–674
Bertaccini D, Chan RH, Morigi S, Sgallari F (2012) An adaptive norm algorithm for image restoration. In: Bruckstein AM, ter Haar Romeny BM, Bronstein AM, Bronstein MM (eds) Scale space and variational methods in computer vision. SSVM 2011. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin
Tikhonov AN (1963) Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method. Soviet Math Dokl. 4:1035–1038; English translation of Dokl Akad Nauk. SSSR, 151(1963) pp 501–504
Tikhonov AN, Arsenin VY (1977) Solutions of ill-posed problems. Halsted Press, Washington/New York
Gfrerer H (1987) An a posteriori parameter choice for ordinary and iterated Tikhonov regularization of ill-posed problems leading to optimal convergences rates. Math Comput 49:507–522
Liu Y, Zhang C, Li W et al (2018) An adaptive multiscale anisotropic diffusion regularized image reconstruction method for digital breast tomosynthesis. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 41:993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-018-0700-5
Golub GH, Heath MT, Wahba G (1979) Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics 21:215–223
Hansen PC, O’Leary DP (1993) The use of the L-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems. SIAM J Sci Comput 14:1487–1503
Hansen PC (2001) The L-curve and its use in the numerical treatment of inverse problems; invited chapter. In: Johnston P (ed) Computational inverse problems in electrocardiology. WIT Press, Southampton, pp 119–142
Gunawan FE, Homma H (2004) Efficient iterative solution for large elasto-dynamic. Inverse problems. JSME Int J 24:130–137
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
No specific funding was disclosed.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human and animal participants
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Badry, H., Oufni, L., Ouabi, H. et al. A new fast algorithm to achieve the dose uniformity around high dose rate brachytherapy stepping source using Tikhonov regularization. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 42, 757–769 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-019-00775-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-019-00775-0