Abstract
Re-evaluation of the eye lens radio-sensitivity by the ICRP in 2011 resulted in a significant reduction of the threshold for lens opacities from 8 Gy to 0.5 Gy. This has led to an increase in concern for eye lens doses from treatment sites further from the eye than previously considered. The aim of this study was to examine the out-of-field dose far from the field edge and develop an effective method to accurately characterise the constituent components of this dose at varying depths. Dose profile scans using a 0.6 cm3 cylindrical ionisation chamber in a motorised water tank were compared with previous studies and displayed good agreement. At points more than 20 cm from the field edge patient scatter becomes insignificant, and the dose is dominated by head leakage and collimator scatter. Point depth-dose measurements made with a Roos parallel plate chamber in solid water at distances of 52 cm and 76 cm from central axis showed that the highest dose is at the surface. Since the sensitive region of the eye can be as shallow as 3 mm, in vivo measurements carried out with a detector with buildup more than 3 mm water equivalent thickness may be underestimating the dose to the lens. It is therefore recommended that for in vivo measurements for the eye lens further than 20 cm from the field edge the detector should have only 3 mm build-up material over the effective point of measurement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (2011) Statement on tissue reactions. Tech Rep
Harrison R (2017) Out-of-field dose in radiotherapy: input to epidemiological studies and dose-risk models. Phys Med 42:239–246
Mulrooney DA, Yeazel MW, Kawashima T, Mertens AC, Mitby P, Stovall M, Donaldson SS, Green DM, Sklar CA, Robison LL, Leisenring WM (2009) Cardiac outcomes in a cohort of adult survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: retrospective analysis of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. Br Med J. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4606
Behrens R, Dietze G, Zankl M (2009) Dose conversion coefficients for electron exposure of the human eye lens. Phys Med Biol 54(13):4069–4087
Das IJ, Cheng C (2008) Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM. Med Phys 35(9):4186–4215
Howell RM, Scarboro SB, Kry SF, Yaldo DZ (2010) Accuracy of out-of-field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system. Phys Med Biol 55(23):6999–7008
Joosten F, Bochud S, Baechler F, Levi R-O, Mirimanoff R, Moeckli R (2011) Variability of a peripheral dose among various linac geometries for second cancer risk assessment. Phys Med Biol 56:5131–5151
Joosten O, Matzinger W, Jeanneret-Sozzi F, Bochud R, Moeckli R (2013) Evaluation of organ-specific peripheral doses after 2-dimensional, 3-dimensional and hybrid intensity modulated radiation therapy for breast cancer based on Monte Carlo and convolution/superposition algorithms: implications for secondary cancer risk asses. Radiother Oncol 106(1):33–41
Huang JY, Followill DS (2013) Accuracy and sources of error of out-of field dose calculations by a commercial treatment planning system for intensity modulated radiation therapy treatments. J Appl Clin Med Phys 14(2):186–197
Heuvel FVD, Defraene G, Crijns W, Bogaerts R (2012) Out-of-field contributions for IMRT and volumetric modulated arc therapy measured using gafchromic films and compared to calculations using a superposition/convolution-based treatment planning system. Radiother Oncol 105:127–132
Wang L, Ding GX (2014) The accuracy out-of-field dose calculations using a model based algorithm in a commercial treatment planning system. Phys Med Biol 59:N113–N128
Stovall M, Blackwell CR, Cundiff J, Novack DH, Palta JR, Wagner LK, Webster EW, Shalek RJ (1995) Fetal dose from radiotherapy with photon beams: report of AAPM radiation therapy committe task group. 36. Med Phys 22(1):63–82
Starkschall G, St George FJ, Zellmer DL (1983) Surface dose for megavoltage photon beams outside the treatment field. Med Phys 10(6):906–910
Kry SF, Titt U, Ponisch F, Followill D, Vassiliev ON, White RA, Mohan R, Salehpour M (2006) A Monte Carlo model for calculating out-of-field dose from a Varian 6 MV beam. Med Phys 33(11):4405–4413
Ruben JD, Lancaster CM, Jones P, Smith RL (2011) A comparison of out-of- field dose and its constituent components for intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus conformal radiation therapy: implications for carcinogenesis. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 81(5):1458–1464
Kry SF, Bednarz B, Howell RM, Dauer L, Followill D, Klein E, Paganetti H, Wang B, Wuu C-S, Xu X (2017) AAPM TG 158 measurement and calculation of doses outside the treated volume from external-beam radiation therapy. Med Phys 44(10):e391–e429
Kry SF, Smith SA, Weathers R, Stovall M (2012) Skin dose during radiotherapy: a summary and general estimation technique. J Appl Clin Med Phys 13(3):20–34
Peet SC, Wilks R, Kairn T, Crowe SB (2016) Measuring dose from radiotherapy treatments in the vicinity of a cardiac pacemaker. Phys Med 32(12):1529–1536
Constantin M, Hsu H, Mansfield S, Svatos M (2013) Mitigation strategies to reduce the relative extrafocal dose (RED). Med Phys 40(6):322
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We the authors confirm there is no conflict of interest and no human/animal testing involved in this research.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baradaran, T.C., Cutajar, D.L., Qi, Y. et al. Characterisation of out-of-field dose at shallow depths for external beam radiotherapy: implications for eye lens dose. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 42, 671–676 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-019-00764-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-019-00764-3