Abstract
In this study, we performed a virtual mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) on the contact pressure in the tibial insert and articular cartilage by using finite element (FE) analysis to understand clinical observations and elaborate on the potential risks associated with a joint line preservation such as wear on tibial insert and osteoarthritis on other compartment. Neutral position of the knee joint was defined in 0 mm joint line, and contact pressure between tibial insert and articular cartilage varies with respect to changes of joint line. Therefore, evaluation of contact pressure may provide the degree of joint line preservation. The FE model for the joint line was developed using a perpendicular projection line from the medial tibial plateau to the anatomical axis. Seven FE models for joint lines in cases corresponding to ± 6, ± 4, ± 2, and 0 mm were modeled and analyzed in normal level walking conditions. The maximum contact pressure on the superior and inferior surfaces of the polyethylene insert increased when the joint line became positive while the maximum contact pressure on the articular cartilage increased when the joint line became negative. The increase in the maximum contact pressure in the positive joint line exceeded that in the negative joint line, and this lead to an unsymmetrical maximum contact pressure distribution with respect to the joint line from a 0 reference. The joint line elevation was sensitive to increases or decreases in maximum contact pressures in the mobile-bearing UKA. The findings of the study determined that postoperative joint line preservation is important in mobile-type bearing UKA.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Iorio R, Healy WL (2003) Unicompartmental arthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(7):1351–1364
Vardi G, Strover AE (2004) Early complications of unicompartmental knee replacement: the Droitwich experience. Knee 11(5):389–394
Psychoyios V, Crawford RW, O’Connor JJ, Murray DW (1998) Wear of congruent meniscal bearings in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrieval study of 16 specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(6):976–982
Scott RD, Santore RF (1981) Unicondylar unicompartmental replacement for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63(4):536–544
Lindstrand A, Stenstrom A, Lewold S (1992) Multicenter study of unicompartmental knee revision. PCA, Marmor, and St Georg compared in 3777 cases of arthrosis. Acta Orthop Scand 63(3):256–259
Palmer SH, Morrison PJ, Ross AC (1998) Early catastrophic tibial component wear after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 350:143–148
Hamilton WG, Ammeen D, Engh CA Jr, Engh GA (2010) Learning curve with minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25(5):735–740
Weber P, Schroder C, Laubender RP, Baur-Melnyk A, von Schulze Pellengahr C, Jansson V, Muller PE (2013) Joint line reconstruction in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: development and validation of a measurement method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(11):2468–2473
Konig C, Matziolis G, Sharenkov A, Taylor WR, Perka C, Duda GN, Heller MO (2011) Collateral ligament length change patterns after joint line elevation may not explain midflexion instability following TKA. Med Eng Phys 33(10):1303–1308
Fornalski S, McGarry MH, Bui CN, Kim WC, Lee TQ (2012) Biomechanical effects of joint line elevation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 27(8):824–829
Hopgood P, Martin CP, Rae PJ (2004) The effect of tibial implant size on post-operative alignment following medial unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 11(5):385–388
Robinson BJ, Rees JL, Price AJ, Beard DJ, Murray DW, McLardy Smith P, Dodd CA (2002) Dislocation of the bearing of the Oxford lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty. A radiological assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(5):653–657
Kuwashima U, Okazaki K, Tashiro Y, Mizu-Uchi H, Hamai S, Okamoto S, Murakami K, Iwamoto Y (2015) Correction of coronal alignment correlates with reconstruction of joint height in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint Res 4(8):128–133
Kwon OR, Kang KT, Son J, Kwon SK, Jo SB, Suh DS, Choi YJ, Kim HJ, Koh YG (2014) Biomechanical comparison of fixed- and mobile-bearing for unicomparmental knee arthroplasty using finite element analysis. J Orthop Res 32(2):338–345
Kim YS, Kang KT, Son J, Kwon OR, Choi YJ, Jo SB, Choi YW, Koh YG (2015) Graft extrusion related to the position of allograft in lateral meniscal allograft transplantation: biomechanical comparison between parapatellar and transpatellar approaches using finite element analysis. Arthroscopy 31(12):2380–2391
Kang KT, Kim SH, Son J, Lee YH, Chun HJ (2016) Computational model-based probabilistic analysis of in vivo material properties for ligament stiffness using the laxity test and computed tomography. J Mater Sci Mater Med 27(12):183
Koh YG, Son J, Kwon SK, Kim HJ, Kwon OR, Kang KT (2017) Preservation of kinematics with posterior cruciate-, bicruciate- and patient-specific bicruciate-retaining prostheses in total knee arthroplasty by using computational simulation with normal knee model. Bone Joint Res 6(9):557–565
Peña E, Calvo B, Martinez MA, Palanca D, Doblaré M (2006) Why lateral meniscectomy is more dangerous than medial meniscectomy. A finite element study. J Orthop Res 24(5):1001–1010
Haut Donahue TL, Hull M, Rashid MM, Jacobs CR (2003) How the stiffness of meniscal attachments and meniscal material properties affect tibio-femoral contact pressure computed using a validated finite element model of the human knee joint. J Biomech 36(1):19–34
Shepherd D, Seedhom B (1999) The ‘instantaneous’ compressive modulus of human articular cartilage in joints of the lower limb. Rheumatology 38(2):124–132
Mesfar W, Shirazi-Adl A (2005) Biomechanics of the knee joint in flexion under various quadriceps forces. Knee 12(6):424–434
Takeda Y, Xerogeanes JW, Livesay GA, Fu FH, Woo SL (1994) Biomechanical function of the human anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 10(2):140–147
Peña E, Calvo B, Martinez M, Doblare M (2006) A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the combined behavior of ligaments and menisci in the healthy human knee joint. J Biomech 39(9):1686–1701
Limbert G, Taylor M, Middleton J (2004) Three-dimensional finite element modelling of the human ACL: simulation of passive knee flexion with a stressed and stress-free ACL. J Biomech 37(11):1723–1731
Reese SP, Maas SA, Weiss JA (2010) Micromechanical models of helical superstructures in ligament and tendon fibers predict large Poisson’s ratios. J Biomech 43(7):1394–1400
Blankevoort L, Huiskes R (1996) Validation of a three-dimensional model of the knee. J Biomech 29(7):955–961
Pegg EC, Walter J, Mellon SJ, Pandit HG, Murray DW, D’Lima DD, Fregly BJ, Gill HS (2013) Evaluation of factors affecting tibial bone strain after unicompartmental knee replacement. J Orthop Res 31(5):821–828
Chang TW, Yang CT, Liu YL, Chen WC, Lin KJ, Lai YS, Huang CH, Lu YC, Cheng CK (2011) Biomechanical evaluation of proximal tibial behavior following unicondylar knee arthroplasty: modified resected surface with corresponding surgical technique. Med Eng Phys 33(10):1175–1182
Godest AC, Beaugonin M, Haug E, Taylor M, Gregson PJ (2002) Simulation of a knee joint replacement during a gait cycle using explicit finite element analysis. J Biomech 35(2):267–275
Kang KT, Koh YG, Jung M, Nam JH, Son J, Lee YH, Kim SJ, Kim SH (2017) The effects of posterior cruciate ligament deficiency on posterolateral corner structures under gait- and squat-loading conditions: a computational knee model. Bone Joint Res 6(1):31–42
ISO 14243-1 (2002) Implants for surgery. Wear of total knee joint prostheses. Loading and displacement parameters for wear-testing machines with load control and corresponding environmental conditions for test
Kutzner I, Heinlein B, Graichen F, Bender A, Rohlmann A, Halder A, Beier A, Bergmann G (2010) Loading of the knee joint during activities of daily living measured in vivo in five subjects. J Biomech 43(11):2164–2173
Halloran JP, Clary CW, Maletsky LP, Taylor M, Petrella AJ, Rullkoetter PJ (2010) Verification of predicted knee replacement kinematics during simulated gait in the Kansas knee simulator. J Biomech Eng 132(8):081010
Porteous AJ, Hassaballa MA, Newman JH (2008) Does the joint line matter in revision total knee replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(7):879–884
Laskin RS (2002) Joint line position restoration during revision total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:169–171
Konig C, Sharenkov A, Matziolis G, Taylor WR, Perka C, Duda GN, Heller MO (2010) Joint line elevation in revision TKA leads to increased patellofemoral contact forces. J Orthop Res 28(1):1–5
Partington PF, Sawhney J, Rorabeck CH, Barrack RL, Moore J (1999) Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res (367):165–171
Figgie HE 3rd, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS 3rd, Gordon NH (1986) The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68(7):1035–1040
Bellemans J (2004) Restoring the joint line in revision TKA: does it matter? Knee 11(1):3–5
Blackburne JS, Peel TE (1977) A new method of measuring patellar height. J Bone Joint Surg Br 59(2):241–242
Floren M, Davis J, Peterson MG, Laskin RS (2007) A mini-midvastus capsular approach with patellar displacement decreases the prevalence of patella baja. J Arthroplasty 22(6 Suppl 2):51–57
Anagnostakos K, Lorbach O, Kohn D (2012) Patella baja after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(8):1456–1462
Morlock M, Schneider E, Bluhm A, Vollmer M, Bergmann G, Muller V, Honl M (2001) Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients. J Biomech 34(7):873–881
Kwon OR, Kang KT, Son J, Suh DS, Baek C, Koh YG (2017) Importance of joint line preservation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: finite element analysis. J Orthop Res 35(2):347–352
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not involve the performance of studies with human participants or animals by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kang, KT., Kwon, OR., Son, J. et al. Effect of joint line preservation on mobile-type bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: finite element analysis. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 41, 201–208 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-018-0630-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-018-0630-2