Abstract
Correct modelling of the interaction parameters of patient tissues is of vital importance in proton therapy treatment planning because of the large dose gradients associated with the Bragg peak. Different 3D imaging techniques yield different information regarding these interaction parameters. Given the rapidly expanding interest in proton therapy, this review is written to make readers aware of the current challenges in accounting for tissue heterogeneities and the imaging systems that are proposed to tackle these challenges. A summary of the interaction parameters of interest in proton therapy and the current and developmental 3D imaging techniques used in proton therapy treatment planning is given. The different methods to translate the imaging data to the interaction parameters of interest are reviewed and a summary of the implementations in several commercial treatment planning systems is presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papanikolaou N, Battista JJ, Boyer AL, Kappas C, Klein E, Mackie TR, Sharpe M, Van Dyk J (2004) Tissue inhomogeneity corrections for megavoltage photon beams. AAPM Task Gr 65:1–142
Robinson DM (2008) Inhomogeneity correction and the analytic anisotropic algorithm (AAA). J Appl Clin Med Phys 9(2):1–12
Verhaegen F, Devic S (2005) Sensitivity study for CT image use in Monte Carlo treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 50(5):937
Schaffner B, Pedroni E (1998) The precision of proton range calculations in proton radiotherapy treatment planning: experimental verification of the relation between CT-HU and proton stopping power. Phys Med Biol 43(6):1579
Paganetti H (2012) Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol 57(11):R99
Newhauser WD, Zhang R (2015) The physics of proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 60(8):R155
Tavernier S (2010) Experimental techniques in nuclear and particle physics. Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg
Chen GT, Singh RP, Castro JR, Lyman JT, Quivey JM (1979) Treatment planning for heavy ion radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 5(10):1809–1819
Schneider U, Pemler P, Besserer J, Pedroni E, Lomax A, Kaser-Hotz B (2005) Patient specific optimization of the relation between CT-Hounsfield units and proton stopping power with proton radiography. Med Phys 32(1):195–199
Kanematsu N, Inaniwa T, Koba Y (2012) Relationship between electron density and effective densities of body tissues for stopping, scattering, and nuclear interactions of proton and ion beams. Med Phys 39(2):1016–1020
Jiang H, Seco J, Paganetti H (2007) Effects of Hounsfield number conversion on CT based proton Monte Carlo dose calculations. Med Phys 34(4):1439–1449
Schneider U, Pedroni E, Lomax A (1996) The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 41(1):111
Yang M, Virshup G, Clayton J, Zhu X, Mohan R, Dong L (2010) Theoretical variance analysis of single-and dual-energy computed tomography methods for calculating proton stopping power ratios of biological tissues. Phys Med Biol 55(5):1343
DeMarco J, Solberg T, Smathers JB (1998) A CT-based Monte Carlo simulation tool for dosimetry planning and analysis. Med Phys 25(1):1–11
Du Plessis F, Willemse C, Lötter M, Goedhals L (1998) The indirect use of CT numbers to establish material properties needed for Monte Carlo calculation of dose distributions in patients. Med Phys 25(7):1195–1201
Bazalova M, Carrier J-F, Beaulieu L, Verhaegen F (2008) Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations. Phys Med Biol 53(9):2439
Landry G, Parodi K, Wildberger JE, Verhaegen F (2013) Deriving concentrations of oxygen and carbon in human tissues using single-and dual-energy CT for ion therapy applications. Phys Med Biol 58(15):5029
Johns HE, Cunningham JR (1974) The physics of radiology. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, p 457
Gottschalk B, Koehler A, Schneider R, Sisterson J, Wagner M (1993) Multiple Coulomb scattering of 160 MeV protons. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B 74(4):467–490
Fermi E (1940) The ionization loss of energy in gases and in condensed materials. Phys Rev 57(6):485
Eyges L (1948) Multiple scattering with energy loss. Phys Rev 74(10):1534
Kanematsu N (2009) Semi-empirical formulation of multiple scattering for the Gaussian beam model of heavy charged particles stopping in tissue-like matter. Phys Med Biol 54(5):N67
Gottschalk B (2010) On the scattering power of radiotherapy protons. Med Phys 37(1):352–367. doi:10.1118/13264177
Ibbott GS (1985) Radiation dosimetry: electron beams with energies between 1 and 50 MeV (ICRU report No. 35). Med Phys 12(6):813–813
Fippel M, Soukup M (2004) A Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for proton therapy. Med Phys 31(8):2263–2273
ICRU (2000) Nuclear data for neutron and proton radiotherapy and for radiation protection dose. International commission on radiation units and measurements report 63
ICRU (1989) Tissue substitutes in radiation dosimetry and measurement. International commission on radiation units and measurements report 44
Knopf A-C, Lomax A (2013) In vivo proton range verification: a review. Phys Med Biol 58(15):R131
Schneider W, Bortfeld T, Schlegel W (2000) Correlation between CT numbers and tissue parameters needed for Monte Carlo simulations of clinical dose distributions. Phys Med Biol 45(2):459
Rutherford R, Pullan B, Isherwood I (1976) Measurement of effective atomic number and electron density using an EMI scanner. Neuroradiology 11(1):15–21
Fornaro J, Leschka S, Hibbeln D, Butler A, Anderson N, Pache G, Scheffel H, Wildermuth S, Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P (2011) Dual-and multi-energy CT: approach to functional imaging. Insights Imaging 2(2):149–159
Torikoshi M, Tsunoo T, Sasaki M, Endo M, Noda Y, Ohno Y, Kohno T, Hyodo K, Uesugi K, Yagi N (2003) Electron density measurement with dual-energy X-ray CT using synchrotron radiation. Phys Med Biol 48(5):673
Johns H, Cunningham J (1983) The physics of radiology, 4th edn. Thomas, Springfield
Hünemohr N, Paganetti H, Greilich S, Jäkel O, Seco J (2014) Tissue decomposition from dual energy CT data for MC based dose calculation in particle therapy. Med Phys 41(6):061714
Landry G, Seco J, Gaudreault M, Verhaegen F (2013) Deriving effective atomic numbers from DECT based on a parameterization of the ratio of high and low linear attenuation coefficients. Phys Med Biol 58(19):6851
Cormack AM (1963) Representation of a function by its line integrals, with some radiological applications. J Appl Phys 34(9):2722–2727
Goitein M (1972) Three-dimensional density reconstruction from a series of two-dimensional projections. Nucl Instrum Methods 101(3):509–518
Schulte R, Bashkirov V, Li T, Liang Z, Mueller K, Heimann J, Johnson LR, Keeney B, Sadrozinski HF, Seiden A (2004) Conceptual design of a proton computed tomography system for applications in proton radiation therapy. Nucl Sci IEEE Trans 51(3):866–872
NICADD (2015) http://www.niu.edu/nicadd/research/medical/
Cormack A, Koehler A (1976) Quantitative proton tomography: preliminary experiments. Phys Med Biol 21(4):560
Hanson KM (1979) Proton computed tomography. Nucl Sci IEEE Trans 26(1):1635–1640
Hanson K, Bradbury J, Cannon T, Hutson R, Laubacher D, Macek R, Paciotti M, Taylor C (1981) Computed tomography using proton energy loss. Phys Med Biol 26(6):965
Hanson K, Bradbury J, Koeppe R, Macek R, Machen D, Morgado R, Paciotti M, Sandford S, Steward V (1982) Proton computed tomography of human specimens. Phys Med Biol 27(1):25
Zygmanski P, Gall KP, Rabin MS, Rosenthal SJ (2000) The measurement of proton stopping power using proton-cone-beam computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 45(2):511
Schneider U, Pedroni E (1994) Multiple Coulomb scattering and spatial resolution in proton radiography. Med Phys 21(11):1657–1663
Williams D (2004) The most likely path of an energetic charged particle through a uniform medium. Phys Med Biol 49(13):2899
Schulte R, Penfold S, Tafas J, Schubert K (2008) A maximum likelihood proton path formalism for application in proton computed tomography. Med Phys 35(11):4849–4856
Bethe H (1930) Zur theorie des durchgangs schneller korpuskularstrahlen durch materie. Ann Phys 397(3):325–400
Leo W (1988) Techniques for nuclear and particle physics experiments. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res 834:290
Li T, Liang Z, Singanallur JV, Satogata TJ, Williams DC, Schulte RW (2006) Reconstruction for proton computed tomography by tracing proton trajectories: a Monte Carlo study. Med Phys 33(3):699–706
Penfold S, Schulte RW, Censor Y, Rosenfeld AB (2010) Total variation superiorization schemes in proton computed tomography image reconstruction. Med Phys 37(11):5887–5895
Rit S, Dedes G, Freud N, Sarrut D, Létang JM (2013) Filtered backprojection proton CT reconstruction along most likely paths. Med Phys 40(3):031103
Poludniowski G, Allinson N, Evans P (2014) Proton computed tomography reconstruction using a backprojection-then-filtering approach. Phys Med Biol 59(24):7905
Penfold S, Censor Y (2015) Techniques in iterative proton CT image reconstruction. Sens Imaging 16(1):1–21
Schulte RW, Bashkirov V, Klock MCL, Li T, Wroe AJ, Evseev I, Williams DC, Satogata T (2005) Density resolution of proton computed tomography. Med Phys 32(4):1035–1046
ICRU (1992) Photon, electron, proton, and neutron interaction data for body tissues. International commission on radiation units and measurements report 46
ICRP (1975) Reference man: anatomical, physiological and metabolic characteristics. ICRP Publication 23
Jackson DF, Hawkes D (1981) X-ray attenuation coefficients of elements and mixtures. Phys Rep 70(3):169–233
Janni JF (1982) Proton range-energy tables, 1 keV–10 GeV, energy loss, range, path length, time-of-flight, straggling, multiple scattering, and nuclear interaction probability. Part I. For 63 compounds. At Data Nucl Data Tables 27:147
Berger M, Inokuti M, Andersen H, Bichsel H (1993) Stopping powers and ranges for protons and alpha particles. ICRU report 49
Doolan P, Testa M, Sharp G, Bentefour E, Royle G, Lu H (2015) Patient-specific stopping power calibration for proton therapy planning based on single-detector proton radiography. Phy Med Biol 60(5):1901
Bourque AE, Carrier J-F, Bouchard H (2014) A stoichiometric calibration method for dual energy computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 59(8):2059
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge J. Pollard for her constructive comments in reviewing this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, J., Penfold, S.N. Review of 3D image data calibration for heterogeneity correction in proton therapy treatment planning. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 39, 379–390 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-016-0447-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-016-0447-9