Abstract
We have proposed a direct evaluation method concerning preservation of noise-free components for image noise reduction. This evaluation method is to graphically estimate how well a noise-reduction method will preserve noise-free image components by using the normal probability plot of the image pixel value difference between an original image and its noise-reduced image; this difference is equivalent to the “method noise” which was defined by Buades et al. Further, by comparing the linearity of a normal probability plot for two different noise reduction methods, one can graphically assess which method will be more able to preserve the noise-free component than the other. As an illustrative example of this evaluation method, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the spatially-adaptive BayesShrink noise-reduced method devised by Chang et al., when applied to chest phantom CT images. The evaluation results of our proposed method were consistent with the visual impressions for the CT images processed in this study. The results of this study also indicate that the spatially-adaptive BayesShrink algorithm devised by Chang et al. will work well on the chest phantom CT images, although the assumption for this method is often violated in CT images, and the assumption postulated for the spatially-adaptive BayesShrink method is expected to have sufficient robustness for CT images.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hsung TC, Lun DPK, Siu WC (1999) Denoising by singularity detection. IEEE Trans Signal Process 47(11):3139–3144
Sakellaropoulos P, Costaridou L, Panayiotakis G (2003) A wavelet-based spatially adaptive method for mammographic contrast enhancement. Phys Med Biol 48:787–803
Zhong J, Ning R, Conover D (2004) Image denoising based on multiscale singularity detection for cone beam CT breast imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23(6):696–703
Yong Y, Croitoru MM, Bidani A, Zwischenberger JB, Clark J, John W (2006) Nonlinear multiscale wavelet diffusion for speckle suppression and edge enhancement in ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25(3):297–311
Scheunders P, De Backer S (2007) Wavelet denoising of multicomponent images using Gaussian scale mixture models and a noise-free image as priors. IEEE Trans Image Process 16(7):1865–1872
Luo J, Zhu Y, Hiba B (2010) Medical image denoising using one-dimensional singularity function model. Comput Med Imaging Graph 34(2):167–176
Chang SG, Yu B, Vetterli M (2000) Spatially adaptive wavelet thresholding with context modeling for image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process 9(9):1522–1531
Chang SG, Yu B, Vetterli M (2000) Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression. IEEE Trans Image Process 9(9):1532–1546
Young KC, Oduko JM, Bosmans H, Nijs K, Martinez L (2006) Optimal beam quality selection in digital mammography. Br J Radiol 79(948):981–990
Buades A, Coll B, Morel J (2005) A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one. SIAM J Multiscale 4(2):490–530
Ikeda M, Makino R, Imai K, Matsumoto M, Hitomi R (2010) A method for estimating noise variance of CT image. Comput Med Imaging Graph 34(8):642–650
Boone JM, Geraghty EM, Seibert JA, Wootton-Gorges SL (2003) Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach. Radiology 228(2):352–360
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas 15070205 from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ikeda, M., Makino, R. & Imai, K. A new evaluation method for image noise reduction and usefulness of the spatially adaptive wavelet thresholding method for CT images. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 35, 475–483 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-012-0175-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-012-0175-8