Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance of independent dose calculation in helical tomotherapy: implementation of the MCSIM code

  • Scientific Paper
  • Published:
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently, a software-based second check dose calculation for helical tomotherapy (HT) is not available. The goal of this study is to evaluate the dose calculation accuracy of the in-house software using EGS4/MCSIM Monte Carlo environment against the treatment planning system calculations. In-house software was used to convert HT treatment plan information into a non-helical format. The MCSIM dose calculation code was evaluated by comparing point dose calculations and dose profiles against those from the HT treatment plan. Fifteen patients, representing five treatment sites, were used in this comparison. Point dose calculations between the HT treatment planning system and the EGS4/MCSIM Monte Carlo environment had percent difference values below 5 % for the majority of this study. Vertical and horizontal planar profiles also had percent difference values below 5 % for the majority of this study. Down sampling was seen to improve speed without much loss of accuracy. EGS4/MCSIM Monte Carlo environment showed good agreement with point dose measurements, compared to the HT treatment plans. Vertical and horizontal profiles also showed good agreement. Significant time saving may be obtained by down-sampling beam projections. The dose calculation accuracy of the in-house software using the MCSIM code against the treatment planning system calculations was evaluated. By comparing point doses and dose profiles, the EGS4/MCSIM Monte Carlo environment was seen to provide an accurate independent dose calculation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fenwick JD, Tome WA, Soisson ET et al (2006) Tomotherapy and other innovative IMRT delivery systems. Semin Radiat Oncol 4:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mackie TR, Balog J, Ruchala K et al (1999) Tomotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 1:108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stathakis S, Li J, Ma CC (2007) Monte Carlo determination of radiation-induced cancer risks for prostate patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 8:2685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mackie TR (1990) Applications of the Monte Carlo method in radiotherapy. In: Kase DK, Bjarngard BE, Attix FH (eds) The dosimetry of ionizing radiation, vol III. Academic, New York, pp 541–620

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rogers DW, Faddegon BA, Ding X, Ma CM, We J, Mackie TR (1995) BEAM: a Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units. Med Phys 22:503–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang J, Li JS, Qin L, Xiong W, Ma CM (2004) Modelling of electron contamination in clinical photon beams for Monte Carlo dose calculation. Phys Med Biol 49:2657–2673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ma CM, Faddegon BA, Rogers DWO, Mackie TR (1997) Accurate characterization of the Monte Carlo calculated electron beams for radiotherapy. Med Phys 24:401–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miften M, Wiesmeyer M, Kapur A, Ma CM (2001) Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the BEAM Monte Carlo simulation system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2:21–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ma CM, Li JS, Pawlicki T, Jiang SB, Deng J (2002) MCSIM users manual, internal report no: FCCC-RADPHYS-0201, pp 1–25

  10. Ma CM, Li J, Pawlicki T et al (2004) MCSIM—a Monte Carlo dose calculation tool for radiation therapy. In: Yi BY, Ahn SD, Choi EK, Ha SW (eds) Proceedings of the XIVth international conference on the use of computers in radiation therapy (ICCR). Jeong, Seoul, pp 515–519

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fan J, Li J, Chen L, Stathakis S, Luo W, Du Plessis F, Xiong W, Yang J, Ma CM (2006) A practical Monte Carlo MU verification tool for IMRT quality assurance. Phys Med Biol 10:2503–2515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Flampouri S, Jiang SB, Sharp GC, Wolfgang J, Patel AA, Choi NC (2006) Estimation of the delivered patient dose in lung IMRT treatment based on deformable registration of 4D-CT data and Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol 51:2763–2779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kutcher GJ, Coia L, Gillin M et al (1994) Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM radiation therapy committee task group 40. Med Phys 4:581–618

    Google Scholar 

  14. Haslam JJ, Bonta DV, Lujan AE et al (2003) Comparison of dose calculated by an intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning system and an independent monitor unit verification program. J Appl Clin Med Phys 3:224–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gibbons JP, Smith K, Cheek D et al (2009) Independent calculation of dose from a helical tomotherapy unit. J Appl Clin Med Phys 1:2772

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mukumoto N, Tsujii K, Saito S et al (2009) A preliminary study of in-house Monte Carlo simulations: an integrated Monte Carlo verification system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2:571–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pisaturo O, Moeckli R, Mirimanoff RO et al (2009) A Monte Carlo-based procedure for independent monitor unit calculation in IMRT treatment plans. Phys Med Biol 13:4299–4310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsai JS, Engler MJ, Liu J (2002) Quasi-independent monitor unit calculation for intensity modulated sequential tomotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2:135–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang L, Chui CS, Lovelock M (1998) A patient-specific Monte Carlo dose-calculation method for photon beams. Med Phys 6:867–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Papanikolaou N, He W, Vazquez LA, Gutierrez A, Stathakis S, Alkhatib H, Shi C (2010) MU-Tomo: independent dose validation software for helical tomotherapy. J Cancer Sci Ther 2:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sellakumar P, Arun C, Sanjay SS, Ramesh SB (2011) Comparison of monitor units calculated by radiotherapy treatment planning system and an independent monitor unit verification software. Phys Med 27:21–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen L, Chen LX, Huang SM, Sun WZ, Sun HQ, Deng XW (2010) Independent verification of monitor unit calculation for radiation treatment planning system. Chin J Cancer 29:217–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ryczkowski A, Piotrowski T (2011) Tomotherapy archive structure and new software tool for loading and advanced analysis of data contained in it. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 16:58–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nelson WR, Hirayama H, Rogers DW (1985) Report no: SLAC-265

  25. Thomas SJ, Eyre KR, Tudor GSJ, Fairfoul J (2012) Dose calculation software for helical tomotherapy, utilizing patient CT data to calculate an independent three-dimensional dose cube. Med Phys 39:160–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA

    Eric Dzintars, Sotirios Stathakis, Panayiotis Mavroidis, Amir Sadeghi & Nikos Papanikolaou

  2. Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Karolinska Institute and Stockholm University, Box 260, 17176, Stockholm, Sweden

    Panayiotis Mavroidis

Authors
  1. Eric Dzintars
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sotirios Stathakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Panayiotis Mavroidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amir Sadeghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nikos Papanikolaou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panayiotis Mavroidis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dzintars, E., Stathakis, S., Mavroidis, P. et al. Performance of independent dose calculation in helical tomotherapy: implementation of the MCSIM code. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 35, 423–438 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-012-0165-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-012-0165-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation