Skip to main content
Log in

On the accuracy of localization achievable in fiducial-based stereoscopic image registration system using an electronic portal imaging device

  • Scientific Paper
  • Published:
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Portal imaging using electronic portal imaging device (EPID) is a well-established image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) technique for external beam radiation therapy. The aims of this study are threefold; (i) to assess the accuracy of isocentre localization in the fiducial-based stereoscopic image registration, (ii) to investigate the impact of errors in the beam collimation device on stereoscopic registration, and (iii) to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer variability in stereoscopic registration. Portal images of a ball bearing phantom were acquired and stereoscopic image registrations were performed based on a point centred in the ball bearing as the surrogate for registration. Experiments were replicated by applying intentional offsets in the beam collimation device to simulate collimation errors. The accuracy of fiducial markers localization was performed by repeating the experiment using three spherical lead shots implanted in a pelvic phantom. Portal images of pelvis phantom were given to four expert users to assess the inter-observer variability in performing registration. The isocentre localization accuracy tested using ball bearing phantom was within 0.3 mm. Gravity-induced systematic errors of beam collimation device by 2 mm resulted in positioning offsets of the order of 2 mm opposing the simulated errors. Relatively large inter-portal pair projection errors ranges from 1.3 mm to 1.8 mm were observed with simulated errors in the beam collimation device. The intra-user and inter-user variabilities were observed to be 0.8 and 0.4 mm respectively. Fiducial-based stereoscopic image registration using EPID is robust for IGRT procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chung PWM, Haycocks T, Brown T, Cambridge Z, Kelly V, Alasti H, Jaffray DA, Catton CN (2004) On-line aSi portal imaging of implanted fiducial markers for the reduction of interfraction error during conformal radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60(1):329–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Keall PJ, Todor AD, Vedam SS, Bartee CL, Siebers JV, Kini VR, Mohan R (2004) On the use of EPID-based implanted marker tracking for 4D radiotherapy. Med Phys 31(12):3492–3499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schallenkamp JM, Herman MG, Kruse JJ, Pisansky TM (2005) Prostate position relative to pelvic bony anatomy based on intraprostatic gold markers and electronic portal imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63(3):800–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Greer PB, Dahl K, Ebert MA, White M, Wratten C, Ostwald P, Pichler P, Denham JW (2008) Assessment of a daily online implanted fiducial marker-guided prostate radiotherapy process. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 52(5):517–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Miranpuri AS, Tomé WA, Paliwal BR, Kesslering C, Mehta MP (2001) Assessment of patient independent intrinsic error for a noninvasive frame for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Int J Cancer 96(5):320–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bert C, Metheany KG, Doppke K, Chen GTY (2005) A phantom evaluation of a stereo-vision surface imaging system for radiotherapy patient setup. Med Phys 32(9):2753–2762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mao W, Lee L, Xing L (2008) Development of a QA phantom and automated analysis tool for geometric quality assurance of on-board MV and kV X-ray imaging systems. Med Phys 35(4):1497–1506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wiehle R, Koth HJ, Nanko N, Grosu AL, Hodapp N (2009) On the accuracy of isocenter verification with kV imaging in stereotactic radiosurgery. Strahlenther Onkol 185(5):325–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Phillips MH, Singer K, Miller E, Stelzer K (2000) Commissioning an image-guided localization system for radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48(1):267–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Du W, Yang J, Luo D, Martel M (2010) A simple method to quantify the coincidence between portal image graticules and radiation field centers or radiation isocenter. Med Phys 37(5):2256–2263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Elekta. Installation Manual for XVI R4.0

  12. Murphy MJ (2002) Fiducial-based targeting accuracy for external-beam radiotherapy. Med Phys 29(3):334–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Balter JM, Pelizzari CA, Chen GTY (1992) Correlation of projection radiographs in radiation therapy using open curve segments and points. Med Phys 19(2):329–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang HC, Chui CS, Tsai HY, Chen CH, Tsai LF (2008) Dose deviations caused by positional inaccuracy of multileaf collimator in intensity modulated radiotherapy. Radiat Measur 43(2–6):925–928

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ung NM, Harper C, Wee L (2011) Dosimetric impact of systematic MLC positional errors on step and shoot IMRT for prostate cancer: a planning study. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 34(2):291–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mu G, Ludlum E, Xia P (2008) Impact of MLC leaf position errors on simple and complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer. Phys Med Biol 53(1):77–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sastre-Padro M, Welleweerd J, Malinen E, Eilertsen K, Olsen DR, van der Heide UA (2007) Consequences of leaf calibration errors on IMRT delivery. Phys Med Biol 4:1147–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was carried out at Genesis Cancer Care WA (formerly Perth Radiation Oncology), Wembley, Western Australia. The authors thank the assistance of Sara Lyons Hackett and Simon Woodings in the preparation of this manuscript. They also acknowledge the financial support of one of the authors (N.M. Ung) by the Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education and the University of Malaya.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. M. Ung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ung, N.M., Wee, L. On the accuracy of localization achievable in fiducial-based stereoscopic image registration system using an electronic portal imaging device. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 35, 205–213 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-012-0148-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-012-0148-y

Keywords

Navigation