Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Dear Editor,
Genome-scale screening is a powerful method used to explore phenotypes that are of interest, and numerous screening systems have been built for functional sites identification. Classical genetic screening in eukaryotes has been performed using chemical mutagens (Chen et al., 2000), transposon mediated gene trapping (Dupuy et al., 2005), and CRISPR-Cas9 system (Wang et al., 2014). These have helped us to decipher many biological processes. Although numerous screening methods have been developed presently (Schneeberger, 2014), most of them are time consuming and expensive for library designing, preparing, and screening. In addition, classical screening systems reveal target genes with high false positive rates because it is very difficult to ensure that only one target is disrupted in a single cell. These disadvantages, which commonly exist in typical genome-wide screening, hinder the widespread application of forward genetic screening.
In previous reports, PiggyBac (PB) transposon was performed for insertional mutagenesis in mammals (Wang et al., 2009). Recently, a report has been developed about “Slingshot” screening method, a self-inactivating PB transposon system for tamoxifen inducible insertional mutagenesis (Kong et al., 2010). While Slingshot screening system has been used for gain-of-function, loss-of-function, and genome-wide screens, it is difficult to ensure only one insertional mutagenesis in one cell because of the multi-copy Slingshot vector entry.
Here, we have developed a new screening system named “One-Shot” which is based on Slingshot method and haploid embryonic stem cells (haESCs) (Li et al., 2012). In “One-Shot” screening system, we integrated PiggyBac based gene trapping cassette into mRosa26 locus via CRISPR-Cas9 assisted homologous recombination in mouse haESCs, and we ensured no random insertion with thymidine kinase (TK) negative selection (Fig. 1A). By design, correctly integrated clones have only one copy of trapping cassette and characteristic of drugs resistance (Fig. S1A and S1B). Furthermore, without the induction of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT), “One-Shot” haESCs can be cryopreserved and expanded homogeneously. Since “One-Shot” system was generated, screening could be initiated by supplementing 4-OHT into the medium. This enabled PB transposase-oestrogen receptor ligand-binding domain complex (PBase-ERT2) transport into the nucleus and induced transposition (Fig. 1B). In addition, PB transposase (PBase) in “One-Shot” was self-inactivated after 4-OHT treatment to prevent re-transposition of trapping element (Fig. 1C). From the data, “One-Shot” in haESCs was integrated in the proper position and expressed spatiotemporally.
Because haESCs can be differentiated with haplotype (He et al., 2017), we differentiated “One-Shot” haESCs into haploid neural stem cell-like cells (haNSCLCs) to obtain “One-Shot” haNSCLCs (Figs. 1D and S1C), which broaden the scope of application of “One-Shot” system.
To evaluate the footprints of “One-Shot” in genome, we expanded “One-Shot” haESCs and “One-Shot” haNSCLCs in a population of 4 × 107 respectively, and then added 4-OHT to trigger the transposition events. After 3 days of 4-OHT induction, cells were harvested to amplify the inserted sites using splinkerette PCR (Horn et al., 2007). Next, PCR products from “One-Shot” haESCs and “One-Shot” haNSCLCs were sequenced separately by next generation sequencing. As expected, PiggyBac mediated transpositions were distributed both in forward and reverse strands of genome without phenotype screening (Fig. 1E) and footprints of trapping element in “One-Shot” system were distributed in the whole genome (Fig. 1F). From global overview of reads distribution, we found that PB transposon could insert in many genome features. Consistent with previous report, we observed the preference of integration of this system within transcription units (Fig. 1G) (Ding et al., 2005). Furthermore, we picked 15 clones from the transposed “One-Shot” haESCs library using flow cytometry, and inserted sites for each clone were isolated via barcodes encoded splinkerette PCR and high throughput sequencing. With our expectation, only one inserted site was identified from most of the clones (Fig. 1H). Although it was very difficult to completely self-inactivate PBase in “One-Shot” haESCs (Fig. 1C), most of reads were located in first inserted site in these clones (Fig. 1H). For this part, we evaluated the coverage of “One-Shot” system and found that it could be inserted in whole genome.
To evaluate the feasibility of “One-Shot” screening system, we explored the genes that delay exit from naïve state using “One-Shot” haESCs withdrawal of 2i and LIF. To monitor the process of differentiation, destabilized GFP expressed from endogenous Rex1 (Zfp42) locus was generated in “One-Shot” haESCs (“One-Shot” Rex1-GFP haESCs, OsRG-haESCs) (Wray et al., 2011). To validate the sensitivity, we first differentiated OsRG-haESCs in N2B27 medium without 2i and LIF, and observed few OsRG-haESCs retained GFP positive within 7 days (Fig. S2A). We next prepared OsRG-haESCs for naïve pluripotency exit screening. At the beginning, OsRG-haESCs were purified by flow cytometry to confirm that more than 90% cells were haploid. Next, these cells were divided into 3 libraries, and each library contained 1.5 × 107 cells, which were cultured in N2B27 medium without 2i and LIF for random differentiation. After 32 days, GFP positive cells from 3 libraries were collected respectively (Fig. 2A). GFP-positive cells from two libraries were sequenced using high throughput sequencing to isolate the trapped genes directly (library OSD_1 and library OSD_2), and GFP positive cells from the rest of library (library OSD_B) were plated onto dish with feeders and cultured in N2B27 medium with 2i and LIF for 7 days before isolating inserted sites.
Through overlapping of trapped genes from three independent libraries, we obtained a gene list that delay the downregulation of pluripotent markers of ESCs (Fig. S2B and Table S1). Furthermore, gene ontology (GO) analysis of trapped genes appeared in 3 libraries revealed that several genes were related to development and cell differentiation (Fig. 2B).
Considering the gene lists from 3 libraries, we identified many genes that participated in the cell fate commitment (Fig. 2B). Although a few genes appeared in each library individually, many genes are shared more than two libraries (Figs. 2C and S2B). For the genes shared in three libraries, we identified Hira and Jarid2, which was previously implicated in process of ESC differentiation (Fig. 2C) (Leeb et al., 2014). In addition, sixteen of the candidate genes found in our screening have also been identified in a similar study (Leeb et al., 2014) (Table S1). Notably, mutation of Radil was recovered in three libraries and had a number of trapped sites (Fig. 2C and 2D), which implied an obstacle in differentiation of ESCs with deficient Radil. Moreover, Radil and Trps1 which came from three libraries were selected to identify their function in regulating pluripotency-related genes (Table S1). We knocked out these genes respectively in mice diploid ESCs using CRISPR-Cas9 (Fig. S2C), and then cultured them in suspension with N2B27 medium. After 72 h, embryoid bodies were harvested and pluripotent genes were quantified by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The results showed that Radil and Trps1 could prevent downregulation of pluripotent genes while in the differentiation medium (Fig. 2E).
Additionally, we set out genes that are resistant to puromycin by performing trapping screening in “One-Shot” haESCs. Compared to self-renewal screening, we obtained a more refined gene list in puromycin screening, which demonstrated that the regulation of self-renewal is more complicated (Table S2). More intriguingly, we also identified a few genes related to drug transportation in puromycin screening (Fig. 2F) (Liang et al., 2015). Moreover, GO analysis of puromycin resistant genes revealed that there was a significant enrichment in the terms of intracellular signal transduction, endocytosis, and components of the membrane (Figs. 2G and S2D). From this part, Lrp6 was chosen to evaluate its function in the resistance of puromycin. After the knockout of Lrp6, cells were cultured in the presence of puromycin for 7 days, and we found that a few colonies survived (Fig. S2E).
In conclusion, we have generated a “One-Shot” screening technique based on PB transposon system in both haESCs and haNSCLCs, and we have established that regardless of the presence or absence of transposition, only one footprint of trapping element was present in a cell. Unexpectedly, we found it was very difficult to completely self-inactivate PBase with 4-OHT treatment. This may be due to the incomplete cutting of “CAGGS” from the Slingshot. Therefore, 4-OHT induced self-inactivation should be optimized in the future. Alternatively, 4-OHT should be supplemented in the medium during the duration of the screening to improve the efficiency of the self-inactivation of PBase. With the help of this screening system, we have isolated functional genes involved in the maintenance of pluripotency-related genes and puromycin resistance in haESCs. Comparing to exist screening system, “One-Shot” haESCs (or haNSCLCs) can be expanded in any capacity homogeneously before induction, and differentiated into different types of haploid somatic cell, which tremendously simplifies the preparation of screening library. Characterized by one mutation per cell, simple library preparation, sequence independence, and lower false positive rate, our “One-Shot” screening system can be employed in numerous processes such as screening of essential genes, targets identification of related drugs, and further screenings in haploid somatic cells. Specially, trapping element in “One-Shot” system can be replaced by other cis-acting elements such as CTCF binding site, and then used for screening which cannot be done in loss of function screening methods. Additionally, although a haploid neural cell library harboring genome-wide mutations has been previously used for the screening of Mn2+-mediated toxicity (He et al., 2017), using the “One-Shot” haNSCLCs will simplify the high throughput screening of progenitor or somatic cells for the identification of drug targets or for toxicity studies in the neural system considerably.
References
Chen Y, Yee D, Dains K, Chatterjee A, Cavalcoli J, Schneider E, Om J, Woychik RP, Magnuson T (2000) Genotype-based screen for ENU-induced mutations in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 24:314–317
Ding S, Wu X, Li G, Han M, Zhuang Y, Xu T (2005) Efficient transposition of the piggyBac (PB) transposon in mammalian cells and mice. Cell 122:473–483
Dupuy AJ, Akagi K, Largaespada DA, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA (2005) Mammalian mutagenesis using a highly mobile somatic Sleeping Beauty transposon system. Nature 436:221–226
He ZQ, Xia BL, Wang YK, Li J, Feng GH, Zhang LL, Li YH, Wan HF, Li TD, Xu K et al (2017) Generation of mouse haploid somatic cells by small molecules for genome-wide genetic screening. Cell reports 20:2227–2237
Horn C, Hansen J, Schnutgen F, Seisenberger C, Floss T, Irgang M, De-Zolt S, Wurst W, von Melchner H, Noppinger PR (2007) Splinkerette PCR for more efficient characterization of gene trap events. Nat Genet 39:933–934
Kong J, Wang F, Brenton JD, Adams DJ (2010) Slingshot: a PiggyBac based transposon system for tamoxifen-inducible ‘self-inactivating’ insertional mutagenesis. Nucleic acids Res 38:e173
Leeb M, Dietmann S, Paramor M, Niwa H, Smith A (2014) Genetic exploration of the exit from self-renewal using haploid embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 14:385–393
Li W, Shuai L, Wan H, Dong M, Wang M, Sang L, Feng C, Luo GZ, Li T, Li X et al (2012) Androgenetic haploid embryonic stem cells produce live transgenic mice. Nature 490:407–411
Liang Y, Li S, Chen L (2015) The physiological role of drug transporters. Protein Cell 6:334–350
Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdottir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, Mesirov JP (2011) Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol 29:24–26
Schneeberger K (2014) Using next-generation sequencing to isolate mutant genes from forward genetic screens. Nat Rev Genet 15:662–676
Wang W, Bradley A, Huang Y (2009) A piggyBac transposon-based genome-wide library of insertionally mutated Blm-deficient murine ES cells. Genome Res 19:667–673
Wang T, Wei JJ, Sabatini DM, Lander ES (2014) Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Science 343:80–84
Wray J, Kalkan T, Gomez-Lopez S, Eckardt D, Cook A, Kemler R, Smith A (2011) Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 alleviates Tcf3 repression of the pluripotency network and increases embryonic stem cell resistance to differentiation. Nat Cell Biol 13:838–845
FOOTNOTES
We thank Shi-Wen Li, Xi-Li Zhu, Hua Qin, and Qing Meng for their help with confocal laser-scanning microscopy and FACS. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2019YFA0110801 to W.L., 2017YFA0103803 to Q.Z.), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA16030400 to W.L.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31621004 to Q.Z. and W.L., 31701286 to G.F.), and the Key Research Projects of the Frontier Science of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDB-SSW-SMC022 to W.L.). Junjie Mao, Kai Xu, Jiabao Han, Guihai Feng, Ying Zhang and Wei Li declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mao, J., Xu, K., Han, J. et al. Rapid construction of a whole-genome mutant library by combining haploid stem cells and inducible self-inactivating PiggyBac transposon. Protein Cell 11, 452–457 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-020-00702-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-020-00702-0