Highly efficient base editing in human tripronuclear zygotes
- 1.6k Downloads
There are hundreds of disease-causing single-gene mutations, mainly caused by single-nucleotide substitutions or point mutations rather than small insertions/deletions (indels), and often there are no cures for these diseases. By introducing the CRISPR/Cas9 system into mouse zygotes, disease-causing mutations could be corrected, leading to the production of healthy adult animals (Long et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2013). Several studies have demonstrated that CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing could also introduce precise genetic modifications in early human embryos (Kang et al., 2016; Liang et al., 2015; Tang et al., 2017). However, indels rather than single-nucleotide substitutions are obtained frequently, because most DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) produced by programmable nucleases are repaired by error-prone non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) rather than homologous recombination (HR) using a template donor DNA. Recently, base editors, composed of cytidine deaminase, Cas9 nickase (nCas9), and uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor (UGI), have recently been developed to substitute a C at a target site with T without generating DSBs in plant, yeast, mouse zygotes, and human cells, and shown to be >100-fold more efficient than HR at generating point mutations (Kim et al., 2017a; Komor et al., 2016; Liang et al., 2017; Ma et al., 2016; Nishida et al., 2016; Zong et al., 2017). Moreover, the genome-targeting scope has been increased by using staphylococcus aureus CRISPR/Cas9 (SaCas9) with modified protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) recognition (Kim et al., 2017b). Yet, the efficiency and specificity of base editors has not been demonstrated in human embryos. Here, we report that both base editor 3 (BE3) using nCas9 and SaKKH-BE3 using SaKKH-nCas9 can introduce single-nucleotide substitutions efficiently in human tripronuclear (3PN) zygotes.
To broaden the genome-targeting scope of base editors, we used the recently reported SaKKH-BE3 that relaxes the variant’s PAM requirement to NNNRRT (Fig. 1A). Targeted deep sequencing on the injected embryos revealed that 17 out of 17 (100%) or 6 out of 9 (67%) embryos carried targeted point mutations at the target site in the FANCF or DNMT3B gene, respectively (Fig. 1E–K). Note that we observed very low percentage (<5%) of wild-type (Wt) allele in 5 FANCF mutant embryos (FANCF-E2, E7, E9, E11, and E17) and no Wt allele in 3 FANCF mutant embryos (FANCF-E13, E14, and E15), indicating high base-editing efficiencies in human 3PN embryos using SaKKH-BE3 (Figs. 1G, S1B, and S1C). Targeted deep sequencing showed that a C-to-T conversion was the major mutagenic pattern at all three target sites, with frequencies range from 78.8% to 98.5% (Fig. S2). C-to-A or C-to-G conversions were also observed in 1 HBB (11%), 7 FANCF (70%), and 3 DNMT3B (50%) mutant embryos (Figs. 1 and S1). We also found C–T conversion on the upstream or downstream of the sgRNA target site in 0 HBB (0%), 10 FANCF (59%), and 3 DNMT3B (50%) mutant embryos (Fig. S2), consistent with previous studies (Kim et al., 2017a; Kim et al., 2017b; Komor et al., 2016). Using engineered base editors containing mutated cytidine deaminase domains, such as YE1-BE3, may narrow the width of the editing window (Kim et al., 2017b).
To avoid the PCR bias, we further examined 4- to 8-cell embryos with FANCF or DNMT3B base editing at the single-cell level. Single blastomeres of 4- to 8-cell embryos were isolated and picked up under the microscope for PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing. We found that 10 out of 10 (100%) or 9 out of 9 (100%) embryos carried targeted point mutations at the target site in the FANCF or DNMT3B gene, respectively (Figs. 1K, S3, and S4). Based on single-cell sequencing reads, 79% or 83% alleles carried targeted point mutations in the FANCF or DNMT3B (Fig. S5). Among these mutant embryos, two FANCF base-editing embryos (FANCF-E20, E24) and two DNMT3B base-editing embryos (DNMT3B-E11, E14) contained only targeted point mutations (Figs. S3 and S4). C-to-T conversion was the major mutagenic pattern, and C-to-A or C-to-G conversions were also observed in FANCF and DNMT3B mutant embryos (Fig. S5). Furthermore, compared with CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing (Kang et al., 2016), although 7 out of 10 FANCF mutant embryos contained indels alleles (Fig. S3), the percentage of total DNA alleles with indels was very low (13% for FANCF and 0% for DNMT3B) (Fig. S5D). Further optimizing base editors with inactive Cas9 mutant or Cpf1 mutant may reduce the indels to a lower level.
Finally, to assess base editors off-target effects, we performed whole genome sequencing (WGS) to identify SaKKH-BE3 off-target mutations in the three FANCF mutant embryos (FANCF-E28, E29, and E30) (Fig. S6). Of 1,187 possible off-target sites that differ from the on-target site by up to 5 mismatches, we observed just 1 potential off-target site in 1 out of 3 FANCF mutant embryos (Fig. S6). Taken together, these results indicate that BE3 did not induce significant off-target alterations in gene-edited human embryos.
In summary, our results show that microinjection of BE3 or SaKKH-BE3 mRNA resulted in efficient and precise base editing in human 3PN zygotes. These results demonstrate that base editors can be used for correcting genetic defects in human embryos in the future.
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81671413), Shanghai Key Laboratory for Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Genetic (17DZ2271100), National Research and Development Plan (2016YFC1000604), CAS Strategic Priority Research Program (XDB02050007, XDA01010409), the MoST863 Program (2015AA020307), NSFC grants (31522037), China Youth Thousand Talents Program (to H.Y.), and Break through project of Chinese Academy of Sciences.
C.Z. designed and performed experiments. M.Z. and Y.W. designed and performed human embryo injection. H.P. performed plasmid construction. Y.S. and Y.L. performed targeted-deep-sequencing analysis and off-target analysis. Y.S., Y. G., Y.D., Q.X., N.Y., W.Z., and Y.L. collected the human embryos. H.Y. designed experiments and wrote the manuscript. Z.C., H.Y., and W.L., supervised the project.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.