Abstract
This paper rigorously examines a dynamic foundation of the maxmin criterion (also known as Rawlsian criterion), which selects a social outcome that maximizes the payoff of the worst-off agent. A society is populated with two types of equal and finite numbers of agents, row and column. When two agents, one from each type, are matched, a pair of non-transferable payoffs is drawn from a compact and convex set, and they simultaneously choose whether or not to agree to initiate a long term relationship. They actually form the relationship if they both agree to do so; otherwise, they obtain their respective disagreement payoffs and return to their respective pools of agents, waiting for the next period for a new match. Those who form a long term relationship can unilaterally choose to terminate their relationship in later periods, while if both agree to continue the relationship, they can do so with a high probability less than one. If their relationship is broken, they return to their respective pools as described above.
We focus on the outcomes sustained by a threshold decision rule slightly perturbed to incorporate sympathy in the spirit of Hume (A treatise of human nature. Oxford philosophical texts. Oxford University Press, London, 1978). For a general class of two person games, as the probability of continuing the long term relationship converges to 1, all agents in the economy almost always play the strongly Pareto efficient Rawlsian outcome, the most egalitarian outcome among strongly Pareto efficient outcomes. The Rawlsian criterion is generated through repeated long term interactions among agents in a decentralized fashion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bendor J, Mookherjee D, Ray D (2007) Reinforcement learning in repeated interaction games. BE J Theor Econ 1(1)
Burdett K, Wright R (1998) Two-sided search with nontransferable utility. Rev Econ Dyn 1(1):220–245
Camerer CF (2003) Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Cho I-K, Matsui A (2005) Learning aspiration in repeated games. J Econ Theory 124(2)
Cho I-K, Matsui A (2011) A search theoretic foundation of Nash bargaining solution. University of Illinois Press/University of Tokyo Press, Champaign/Tokyo
Fujiwara-Greve T, Okuno-Fujiwara M (2009) Voluntarily separable repeated prisoner’s dilemma. Rev Econ Stud 76:993–1021
Ghosh P, Ray D (1996) Cooperation in community interaction without information flows. Rev Econ Stud 63:491–519
Gul F, Pesendorfer W (2008) The case for mindless economics. In: Caplin A, Schotter A (eds) The foundations of positive and normative economics. Oxford University Press, London, pp 3–39
Hume D (1978) A treatise of human nature. Oxford philosophical texts. Oxford University Press, London
Karandikar R, Mookherjee D, Ray D, Vega-Redondo F (1998) Evolving aspirations and cooperation. J Econ Theory 80(2):292–331
Kushner HJ, Yin GG (1997) Stochastic approximation algorithms and applications. Springer, Berlin
Mortensen DT, Pissarides CA (1994) Job creation and job destruction in the theory of unemployment. Rev Econ Stud 208:397–415
Nash JF (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2):155–162
Osborne MJ, Rubinstein A (1998) Games with procedurally rational players. Am Econ Rev 88(4):834–847
Rasinski KA, Berktold J, Smith TW, Albertson BL (2002) America recovers: a follow-up to a national study of public response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. NORC
Roth AE, Prasnikar V, Okuno-Fujiwara M, Zamir S (1991) Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh and Tokyo: an experimental study. Am Econ Rev 81(5):1068–1095
Rubinstein A (1982) Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50(1):97–110
Rubinstein A, Wolinsky A (1985) Equilibrium in a market with sequential bargaining. Econometrica 53:1133–1150
Simon H (1987) Models of man. Continuity in administrative science. Ancestral books in the management of organizations. Garland, New York
Ståhl I (1972) Bargaining theory. Stockh Sch Econ
Yamamori T, Kato K, Kawagoe T, Matsui A (2008) Voice matters in a dictator game. Exp Econ 11:336–343
Young P (1993) An evolutionary model of bargaining. J Econ Theory 59:145–168
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, IK., Matsui, A. A Dynamic Foundation of the Rawlsian Maxmin Criterion. Dyn Games Appl 2, 51–70 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-011-0026-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-011-0026-3