Skip to main content
Log in

Induction and biological evaluations of self cross-linking chondroitin sulfate-poly(ethylene oxide) hydrogel

  • Articles
  • Published:
Macromolecular Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The biological properties of self cross-linked chondroitin sulfate (CS)-poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) hydrogel including degradation, in vitro bone cell behaviors, and cellular compatibility were evaluated after the induction of its gel formation through use of different experimental conditions such as precursor composition, reaction temperatures, and precursor solution concentrations. The compositions of the CS-acrylate and PEO-thiol precursors had ratios of 25:75, 50:50, and 75:25. Hydrogel formations were induced with a mechanism of self cross-linking at the solution temperatures of 7, 23, 37, and 50 °C through use of different precursor solutions (2%, 3%, 5%, and 10%). Higher reaction temperatures and precursor concentrations induced quicker formation of the CS-PEO gel. While the 10% precursor solution became a hydrogel within 2 min at 50 °C, the 2% solution took approximately 462 min at 7 °C. While the CS-PEO gel with higher PEO content (25:75) swelled to 330%, the hydrogel with lower PEO content (75:25) swelled to 147% at 23 °C, indicating that higher PEO content induced higher gel swelling. The CS-PEO hydrogel (50:50) gradually degraded in vitro through addition of 0.5 unit of chondroitinase ABC every 2 days, which led to approximately 7% degradation over 24 days. A CCK-8 assay performed on the hydrogel surface showed initially higher cell adhesion on the higher concentration CS gel (75:25), even though the adhered cells seemed to detach from their surfaces over time. Live and dead assays demonstrated that both cells on the surface of and inside the hydrogel were viable for 7 days. The results of in vitro bromodeoxyuridine, 3-(4,5-dimethythiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide, and neutral red assays and evaluation of the gel covering on the cells cultured on the culture flask demonstrated excellent hydrogel cell compatibility (25:75, 50:50, and 75:25) compared to that of latex, the negative control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. M. Jordan, N. K. Arden, M. Doherty, B. Bannwarth, J. W. J. Bijlsma, P. Dieppe, K. Gunther, H. Hauselmann, G. Herrero-Beaumont, P. Kaklmanis, S. Lohmander, B. Leeb, M. Lequesne, B. Mazieres, E. Martin-Mola, K. Pavelka, A. Pendleton, L. Punze, U. Serni, B. Swoboda, G. Verbruggen, I. Zimmerman-Gorska, and M. Dougados, Ann. Rheum. Dis., 62, 1145 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. M. E. Gilbert, K. R. Kirker, S. D. Gray, P. D. Ward, J. G. Szakacs, G. D. Prestwirch, and R. R. Orlandi, Laryngoscope, 114, 1406 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. O. Bruyere and J. Y. Reginster, Drugs Aging, 24, 573 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. I. Noh, G. W. Kim, Y. J. Choi, M. S. Kim, Y. Park, K. B. Lee, I. S. Kim, S. J. Hwang, and G. Tae, Biomed. Mater., 1, 116 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Jo, D. Kim, J. Woo, G. Yoon, Y. D. Park, G. Tae, and I. Noh, Macromol. Res., 19, 147 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Kim, I. S. Kim, T. H. Cho, K. B. Lee, S. J. Hwang, G. Tae, I. Noh, S. H. Lee, Y. Park, and K. Sun, Biomaterials, 28, 1830 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. H. Choi, S. H. Kim, H. K. Hong, S. J. Kim, S. K. Lee, O. Y. Kim, J. K. Park, J. H. Rhee, and G. Khang, J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 6, 83 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. J. Park, S. M. Yu, M. H. Chun, H. J. Chun, and C. H. Kim, J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 6, 438 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Na and K. H. Park, J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 5, 482 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. H. Lee, S. M. Kim, J. C. Park, M. A. Sung, S. B. Yu, J. H. Nam, Y. I. Chung, J. J. Kim, Y. D. Park, and G. Tae, J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 6, 730 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. M. Jordan, Ann. Rheum. Dis., 62, 1145 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. R. J. Linhardt and R. E. Hileman, Gen. Pharmacol., 26, 443 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Rebaudi, P. Silvestrini, and P. Trisi, Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent., 23, 371 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Rebinstein, D. Nakar, and A. Sintov, Int. J. Pharm., 84, 141 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. X. Hu, D. Li, F. Zhou, and C. Gao, Acta Biomater., 7, 1618 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. I. Strehin, Z. Nahas, K. Arora, T. Nguyen, and J. Elisseeff, Biomaterials, 31, 2788 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. F. Wang, Z. Li, M. Khan, K. Tamama, P. Kuppusamy, W. R. Wagner, C. K. Sen, and J. Guan, Acta Biomater., 6, 1978 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. H. Cao and S. Y. Xu, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 19, 567 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. C. T. Lee, C. P. Huang, and Y. D. Lee, Biomacromolecules, 7, 2200 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. B. Huang, C. Q. Li, Y. Chou, G. Luo, and C. Z. Zhang, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater., 74, 159 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Nakashima, Y. Matsuyame, K. Takahashi, T. Satoh, H. Koie, K. Kanayama, T. Tsuji, K. Marutama, S. Imagama, Y. Sakai, and N. Ishiguro, Biomed. Mater. Eng., 19, 421 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Brittberg, A. Lindahl, A. Nilsson, C. Ohlsson, O. Isaksson, and L. Peterson, N. Engl. J. Med., 331, 889 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. D. A. Grande, M. I. Pitman, L. Peterson, D. Menche, and M. Klein, J. Orthop. Res., 7, 208 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Y. Wang, L. Zhang, M. Hu, W. Wen, H. Xiao, and Y. Niu, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A, 92, 693 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Y. J. Jun, K. M. Park, Y. K. Joung, S. J. Lee, and K. D. Park, Macromol. Res., 15, 704 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. C. Hiemstra, L. L van der As, Z. Zhong, P. J. Dijkstra, and J. Feijen, Macromolecules, 40, 1165 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. H. L. Wei, K. Yao, Z. Yang, H. J. Chu, J. Zhu, C. C. Ma, and Z. X. Zhao, Macromol. Res., 19, 294 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. H. Byun and B. Hong, Macromol. Res., 16, 189 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. D. H. Kim, S. J. Heo, J. W. Shin, C. W. Mun, K. M. Park, K. D. Park, and K. S. Jae, Macromol. Res., 18, 387 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. K. T. Lim, H. W. Choung, A. L. Im, J. H. Kim, C. S. Cho, Y. H. Choung, S. H. Jeon, P. H. Choung, and J. H. Chung, J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 7, 473 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Insup Noh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jo, S., Kim, S., Hwang, Y. et al. Induction and biological evaluations of self cross-linking chondroitin sulfate-poly(ethylene oxide) hydrogel. Macromol. Res. 19, 1303–1309 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-011-1201-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-011-1201-5

Keywords

Navigation