Skip to main content
Log in

Learning Curve of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for a Resident in a High-Volume Resident Training Setup

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study Objective

To evaluate the resident learning curve, demographic and comparative analysis of total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Design

This retrospective observational study was conducted in a high-volume resident training setup.

Setting

Tertiary care center is used in the study.

Materials and Methods

Eight hundred and one total laparoscopic hysterectomy patients operated by the residents between July 2013 and June 2019 were evaluated with respect to the learning curve, duplication of the steps, the results in terms of intra- and postoperative complications and the time taken for the surgery. Surgeries were assigned as per the institutional inclusion criteria for the residents. The fellowship program enrolled six residents per year for training period of 1 year. The residents initially performed ten simple cases under the supervision of the director followed by ten cases which were performed independently, and based on their learning curve, they then performed advanced cases independently.

Results

TLH was successfully performed in all women by surgical residents in training. The surgical time was 61–120 min in majority (49.3%). 2.99% had intra-operative complications while 7.61% had postoperative complications which were identified and managed. All women recovered uneventfully.

Conclusion(s)

Dedicated teaching staff, uniform surgical protocols and high-volume centers contribute to the safety of TLH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

TLH:

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy

BMI:

Body mass index

LSCS:

Lower segment cesarean section

Fig:

Figure

LH:

Laparoscopic hysterectomy

LAVH:

Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy

CO2:

Carbon dioxide

POD:

Postoperative day

LSCH:

Laparoscopic-assisted supracervical hysterectomy

N:

Number

PID:

Pelvic inflammatory disease

References

  1. Puntambekar S, Shetty TS, Goel A, et al. Single-centre experience of doing safe total laparoscopic hysterectomy: retrospective analysis of 1200 cases. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2020;70(5):376–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kreuninger JA, Cohen SL, Meurs EAIM, Cox M, et al. Trends in readmission rate by route of hysterectomy—A single-centerexperience. Acta ObstetGynecolScand. 2018;97:285–93.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pattanaik T, Mishra SP, Das S. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy–a retrospective observational study in a teaching hospital. Ann Int Med Den Res. 2017;3(1):OG10-13.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wallenstein M, Ananth V, Kim J, et al. Effect of surgical volume on outcomes for laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:709–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. David-Montefiore E, Rouzier R, Chapron C, et al. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals. Human Reprod. 2007;22(1):260–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Puntambekar SP, Wagh GN, Puntambekar SS, et al. A novel technique of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for routine use: evaluation of 140 cases. Int J Biomed Sci. 2008;4(1):38–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sinha R, Sundaram M, Lakhotia S, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus. J Gynecol Endosc Surg. 2009;1(1):34–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vree F, Cohen S, Chavan N, et al. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative outcomes in hysterectomy. JSLS. 2014;18:174–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mikhail E, Scott L, Miladinovic B, et al. Association between fellowship training, surgical volume, and laparoscopic suturing techniques among members of the American association of gynecologic laparoscopists. Minimally Invasive Surg. 2016;2016:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nagar O, Sharma A, Shankar V, et al. A comparative study of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and non-descent vaginal hysterectomy for treatment of benign diseases of uterus. Int J Clin Obstetri Gynaecol. 2018;2(4):63–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Llarena N, Shah A, Milad M. Bowel injury in gynecologic laparoscopy: a systematic review. Obstetri Gynecol. 2015;125(6):1407–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, et al. The eVALuate study: two paralel randomized trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ. 2004;328:129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bettaiah R, Reddy C, Anantha R. Laparoscopic hysterectomies: our 10 years’ experience in a single laparoscopic center. J Obstetri Gynecol India. 2016;66(4):274–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Terzi H, Biler A, Demirtas O, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: analysis of the surgical learning curve in benign conditions. Int J Surg. 2016;35:51–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wattiez A, Soriano D, Cohen SB, et al. The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparative analysis of 1647 cases. Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9(3):339–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ascher-Walsh CJ, Capes T. An evaluation of the resident learning curve in performing laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies as compared with patient outcome: Five-year experience. J Minimally Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(6):719–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Twijnstra AJH, Blikkendaal MD, Kolkman W, Smeets MJGH, et al. Implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy: maintenance of skills after a mentorship program. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010;70:173–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith K, Caceres A. Vaginal cuff closure in minimally invasive hysterectomy: a review of training, techniques, and materials. Cureus. 2017;9(10):e1766. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1766.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theertha Shetty MS.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest and nothing to disclose.

Ethical Approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Institutional Ethical Clearance taken.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all human participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Shailesh Puntambekar, Specialist in the Department of Minimal Access Surgery; Theertha Shetty, Fellow in the Department of Minimal Access Surgery (Gynaecology); Seema Puntambekar, Specialist in the Department of Minimal Access Surgery; Arjun Goel, Fellow in the Department of Minimal Access Surgery; Mangesh Panse, Specialist in the Department of Minimal Access Surgery; Ravindra Sathe, Specialist in the Department of Minimal Access Surgery; Swapnil Shelke, Fellow in the Department of Minimal Access Surgery (Gynaecology).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Puntambekar, S., Shetty, T., Puntambekar, S. et al. Learning Curve of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for a Resident in a High-Volume Resident Training Setup. J Obstet Gynecol India 72 (Suppl 1), 267–273 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-021-01540-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-021-01540-8

Keywords

Navigation