Skip to main content
Log in

Trial of Labor After Cesarean Section Among Women with Unique Lower Segment Scarred Uterus and Fetal Weight >3500 g: Prognostic Factors for a Safe Vaginal Delivery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate outcome of trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) with fetal weight >3500 g.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective descriptive study was carried out between March 1, 2012, and February 28, 2015. Medical and obstetrical records of women with birth weight (BW) >3500 g admitted in the labor ward with advanced labor or admitted in early labor but with underestimated fetal weight >3500 g were analyzed. Main variables analyzed included maternal parity, vaginal delivery prior to TOLAC, the BW and the integrity of the uterine scar.

Results

Mean BW was 3789.3 g. Out of 36 women, 75 % had a successful TOLAC. Women who delivered vaginally before TOLAC had a higher success rate than women who never delivered vaginally (94.1 vs. 63.1 %, P < 0.044).

Conclusion

Successful TOLAC with birth weight >3500 g can be observed among women, especially among those admitted in advanced labor or with successful vaginal delivery prior to the current TOLAC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marshall JL, Spiby H, McCormick F. Evaluating the ‘Focus on Normal Birth and Reducing Caesarean section Rates Rapid Improvement Programme’: a mixed method study in England. Midwifery. 2015;31(2):332–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. AI Rifai R. Rising cesarean deliveries among apparently low-risk mothers at university teaching hospitals in Jordan: analysis of population survey data, 2002–2012. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014;2(2):195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nerum H, Halvorsen L, Sørlie T, et al. Maternal request for cesarean section due to fear of birth: can it be changed through crisis-oriented counseling? Birth. 2006;33(3):221–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sidebotham M. Promoting normal birth the easy way. Pract Midwife. 2012;15(10):23–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Valentin L. Prediction of scar integrity and vaginal birth after caesarean delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(2):285–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shaheen N, Khalil S, Iftikhar P. Prediction of successful trial of labour in patients with a previous caesarean section. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014;64(5):542–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bourtembourg A, Mangin M, Ramanah R, et al. Breech delivery and scarred uterus: a special obstetrical situation?] [Article in French. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013;42(4):351–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith D, Stringer E, Vladutiu CJ, et al. Risk of uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean with an unknown uterine scar. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015. pii: S0002-9378(15)00112-X.

  9. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155 (Replaces guideline Number 147), February 2005. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;89(3):319–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perrotin F, Marret H, Fignon A, et al. Scarred uterus: is routine exploration of the cesarean scar after vaginal birth always necessary? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1999;28(3):253–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kieser M, Friede T. Re-calculating the sample size in internal pilot study designs with control of the type I error rate. Stat Med. 2000;19(7):901–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Soni A, Sharma C, Verma S, et al. A prospective observational study of trial of labor after cesarean in rural India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;129(2):156–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bangal VB, Giri PA, Shinde KK, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean section. N Am J Med Sci. 2013;5(2):140–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Melamed N, Segev M, Hadar E, et al. Outcome of trial of labor after cesarean section in women with past failed operative vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(1):49.e1-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Madaan M, Agrawal S, Nigam A, et al. Trial of labour after previous caesarean section: the predictive factors affecting outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(3):224–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elie Nkwabong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have none to declare.

Ethical Standards

This study entitled “Trial of labor after cesarean section among women with unique lower segment scarred uterus and fetal weight 3500 g: prognostic factors for a safe vaginal delivery” received approval from the institutional ethics.

Additional information

Elie Nkwabong, MD, is an Obstetrician and Gynecologist in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at University Teaching Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences; Joseph Nelson Fomulu, MD, is an Obstetrician and Gynecologist in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at University Teaching Hospital, Yaoundé; Fabrice Lionel Djomkam Youmsi, MD, is a General Practitioner in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Nylon District Hospital (Cameroon).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nkwabong, E., Fomulu, J.N. & Djomkam Youmsi, F.L. Trial of Labor After Cesarean Section Among Women with Unique Lower Segment Scarred Uterus and Fetal Weight >3500 g: Prognostic Factors for a Safe Vaginal Delivery. J Obstet Gynecol India 66 (Suppl 1), 202–206 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0835-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0835-1

Keywords

Navigation