The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India

, Volume 61, Issue 6, pp 626–634 | Cite as

Contraceptive Methods: Needs, Options and Utilization

Review Article

Abstract

Objectives

Background-Contraception is the intentional prevention of conception through the use of various devices, sexual practices, chemicals, drugs or surgical procedures. An effective contraception allows a physical relationship without fear of an unwanted pregnancy and ensures freedom to have children when desired. The aim is to achieve contraception in maximum comfort and privacy, with minimum cost and side effects. Some methods, like male and female condoms, also provide twin advantage of protection from sexually transmitted diseases. The burden of unsafe abortion lies primarily in developing countries. Here, contraceptive prevalence is measured among currently married women of reproductive age, and levels have not yet reached those that exist in developed countries.

Conclusion

In countries like India, there is a dire need for contraceptive methods to be more women friendly, accessible and provide adequate privacy. Providers also need to be sensitive to special needs of adolescents as they are at a critically vulnerable segment.

Keywords

Contraception Condoms Vasectomy Tubectomy STDs 

References

  1. 1.
    The Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI). Sharing responsibility: women, society and abortion worldwide. New York: AGI; 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maternal mortality in 2005; Estimates Developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank, WHO, Geneva 2007.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lule E, Singh S, Chowdhury SA. Fertility regulation behavior and their costs: contraception and unintended pregnancies in Africa and Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Washington: World Bank; 2007.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chhabra R, Nuna C. Abortion in India: an overview. New Delhi: Veerendra printers, Ford Foundation; 1994.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Washington AE, Cates W, Wasserheit J. Preventing pelvic inflammatory disease. JAMA. 1991;266(4):2574–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blanc AK, Tsui AO, Croft TN, et al. Patterns and trends in adolescents’ contraceptive use and discontinuation in developing countries and comparisons with adult women. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009;35(2):63–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dehne KL, Riedner G. Sexually transmitted infections among adolescents: the need for adequate health services. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cowan FM, Mindel A. Sexually transmitted diseases in children: adolescents. Genitourin Med. 1993;69(2):141–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pilot P and Islam MQ. Sexually transmitted diseases in the 1990s: global epidemiology and challenges for control. Sex Transm Dis. 1994; 21(supp 2): S7–S13.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ramasubban R. Women’s vulnerability: recent evidence on sexually transmitted infections. In: Ramasubban R, Jejeebhoy SJ, editors. Women’s Reproductive Health in India. Jaipur: Rawat Publications; 2000. p. 280–330.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    IIPS & ORG Macro. National family health survey-2: India. 1998–99. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences; 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheng CY, Mruk DD. New frontiers in nonhormonal male contraception. Contraception. 2010;82(5):476–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seiber EE, Bertrand JT, Sullivan TM. Changes in contraceptive method mix in developing countries. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2007;33(3):117–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jayaraman A, Mishra V Arnold F. The relationship of family size and composition to fertility desires, contraceptive adoption and method choice in South Asia. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009;35(1):29–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Olson L, Rollins J. Psychological barriers to contraceptive use among adolescent women. In: Stuart I, Wells C, editors. Pregnancy in adolescence: needs, problems, and management. New York: Van Nostrand; 1982.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gandotra MM, Das NP. Factors influencing choice of a contraceptive and the reason for it’s discontinuation. In: Khan ME, Cernada G, editors. Spacing as an alternative strategy: India’s family welfare programme. New Delhi: B.R. Publishing Corporation; 1996. p. 94–114.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nichter M, Nichter M. Modern methods of fertility regulation: when and for whom are they appropriate? In: Nichter M, editor. Anthropology and international health: South Asian case studies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1989. p. 57–82.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kapur P. A study of changes in the sexual behaviour of call girls and their clients in India. Paper presented at the workshop on Sexual Aspects of AIDS/STD Prevention in India. Mumbai : Tata Institute of Social Sciences; 1993.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nag M. Sexual behaviour and AIDS in India. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd; 1996.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Joshi C. AIDS awareness: transmitting embarrassment. New Delhi: India Today; 1994. p. 114–5.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gopalakrishnan K. Promoting condoms. Seminar. 1992;396:34–6.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jejeebhoy SJ, Santhya KG, Verma RK, et al. Setting the stage. In: Jejeebhoy SJ, editor. Looking back looking forward: a profile of sexual and reproductive health in India. New Delhi: Population Council; 2004. p. 3–24.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Govinda P, Dahal SS, Padmadas S, et al. Fertility-limiting behaviour and contraceptive choice among men in Nepal. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2008;34(1):6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fisher HE. Lust, attraction and attachment in mammalian reproduction. Hum Nat. 1988;9:23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heise L, Ellsberg M, Gottemoeller M. Ending violence against women. Population reports series L, No. 11. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Population Information Program; 1999.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Elias CJ and Heise L. The development of microbicides: A new method of HIV prevention for women. Population council (programme division) Working Paper No. 6. New York: Population Council; 1993.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Barge S, Ramchander L. Provider and clients interactions in primary health care: a case study from Madhya Pradesh. In: Koening MA, Khan ME, editors. Improving quality of care in India’s family welfare programme: the challenge ahead. New York: Population Council; 1999. p. 92–116.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khan ME, Patel BC, Chandrasekhar R. Study of MTP acceptors and their subsequent contraceptive use. J Fam Welf. 1993;36(3):70–85.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Khan ME, Gupta RB, Bella CP. The quality of coverage of family planning services in Uttar Pradesh: Client perspectives. In: Michael AK, Khan ME, editors. Improving quality of care in India’s family welfare programme: The challenge ahead. New York: The Population Council; 1999. p. 49–69.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Lady Irwin CollegeDelhi UniversityNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Regional STD Teaching, Training & Research CentreVardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjang HospitalNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations