Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Visual Module Exploration: A Live-User Evaluation

  • Technical Contribution
  • Published:
KI - Künstliche Intelligenz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern universities present students with a wide array of course and module options, making it difficult for students to make informed decisions about the modules they take and how their choices can help them achieve their educational goals. This is exacerbated when students are uncertain about their goals or when limited information about module options is available, as is all too often the case, leaving many students to follow the choices of their peers. The main contribution of this work is to describe a module recommendation and advisory system to help undergraduate students better understand the options available to them and the implications of their decisions. We describe a system that uses text mining techniques on raw module descriptions to generate rich, interconnected module representations. We demonstrate how these representations can be used as the basis for a visual recommender system and describe the results of a recent live-user evaluation to demonstrate the practical benefits of such a system on different groups of undergraduate students. This paper is an extended version that was previously presented at AI-2021 Forty-first SGAI International Conference on Artificial Intelligence [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. UCD module catalogue, https://sisweb.ucd.ie/usis/!W_HU_MENU.P_PUBLISH?p_tag=MODSEARCHALL, last accessed 2021/09/08.

  2. CSO Homepage, https://cso.kmi.open.ac.uk/cso-classifier/, last accessed 2021/09/08.

  3. www.wikipedia.com, last accessed 2021/09/08.

References

  1. Hagemann N, O’Mahony MP, Smyth B (2021) A Live-User Evaluation of a Visual Module Recommender and Advisory System for Undergraduate Students. In: Artificial Intelligence XXXVIII: 41st SGAI International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AI 2021, Cambridge, UK, December 14–16, 2021, Proceedings 41. Springer International Publishing, pp 299–312

    Google Scholar 

  2. Romero C, Ventura S (2020) Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(3):e1355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker RS, Martin T, Rossi LM (2016) Educational data mining and learning analytics. The Wiley handbook of cognition and assessment: Frameworks, methodologies, and applications, pp 379–396

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Drachsler H, Verbert K, Santos OC, Manouselis N (2015) Panorama of recommender systems to support learning. Recommender syst handb 421–451

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang SJ (2021) Guest Editorial: Precision Education-A New Challenge for AI in Education. J Educ Technol Soc 24(1)

  6. Williamson B (2017) Big data in education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. Big Data in Educ 1–256

  7. Buckingham Shum S, Hawksey M, Baker RSJD, Jeffery N, Behrens JT, Pea R (2013) Educational data scientists: a scarce breed. In: Proceedings of the third international conference on learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 278–281

  8. Campbell JP, DeBlois PB, Oblinger DG (2007) Academic analytics: a new tool for a new era. Educ Rev 42(4):40

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fayyad UM, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Smyth P, Others (1996) Discovery knowledge, mining data towards a unifying framework. In: KDD 96:82–88

  10. Guruge DB, Kadel R, Halder SJ (2021) The state of the art in methodologies of course recommender systems-a review of recent research. Data 6(2):18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Du X, Yang J, Hung J-L, Shelton B (2020) Educational data mining: a systematic review of research and emerging trends. Inf Discov Deliv 48:225–236

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mackney S, Shields R (2019) Learning analytics for student success at university: trends and dilemmas. In: The educational intelligent economy: Big data, artificial intelligence, machine learning and the Internet of things in education, Vol. 38, Emerald Publishing Limited, pp 251–268

  13. Farmanbar R, Niknami S, Lubans DR, Hidarnia A (2013) Predicting exercise behaviour in Iranian college students: Utility of an integrated model of health behaviour based on the transtheoretical model and self-determination theory. Health Educ J 72(1):56–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elbadrawy A, Polyzou A, Ren Z, Sweeney M, Karypis G, Rangwala H (2016) Predicting student performance using personalized analytics. Computer 49(4):61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ajith P, Sai MSS, Tejaswi B (2013) Evaluation of student performance: an outlier detection perspective. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng 2(2):40–44

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yaacob WFW, Sobri NM, Nasir SAM, Norshahidi ND, Husin WZW (2020) Predicting student drop-out in higher institution using data mining techniques. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1496 . IOP Publishing

  17. Wu Z, He T, Mao C, Huang C (2020) Exam paper generation based on performance prediction of student group. Inf Sci 532:72–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma B, Lu M, Taniguchi Y, Konomi S (2021) CourseQ: the impact of visual and interactive course recommendation in university environments. Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn 16(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Iatrellis O, Kameas A, Fitsilis P (2017) Academic advising systems: a systematic literature review of empirical evidence. Educ Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7040090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Drachsler H, Verbert K, Santos OC, Manouselis N (2015) Panorama of recommender systems to support learning. Recomm Syst Handb. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Al-badarenah A, Alsakran J (2016) An automated recommender system for course selection. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 7(3):166–175. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2016.070323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bydžovská H (2016) Course enrollment recommender system. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on educational data mining (1), 312–317

  23. Jiang W, Pardos ZA, Wei Q (2019) Goal-based course recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on learning analytics & knowledge, pp. 36–45

  24. Morsy S, Karypis G (2018) Learning Course Sequencing for Course Recommendation

  25. Morsomme R, Alferez SV (2019) Content-based course recommender system for liberal arts education. International educational data mining society

  26. Hagemann N, O’Mahony MP, Smyth B (2018) Module advisor: guiding students with recommendations. Int Conf Intell Tutoring Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91464-0_34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hagemann N, O’Mahony MP, Smyth B (2019) Visualising module dependencies in academic recommendations. Proceedings of the 24th international conference on intelligent user interfaces: companion, 15–17

  28. Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 3(4–5):993–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-411519-4.00006-9

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Hagemann N, O’Mahony MP, Smyth B (2018) Module advisor: a hybrid recommender system for elective module exploration. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on recommender systems, pp. 498–499

  30. Salatino AA, Osborne F, Thanapalasingam T, Motta E (2019) The CSO classifier: Ontology-driven detection of research topics in scholarly articles. In Digital Libraries for Open Knowledge: 23rd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, TPDL 2019, Oslo, Norway, September 9-12, 2019, Proceedings 23. Springer International Publishing, pp 296–311

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hagemann N (2022) Navigating academia - recommender systems for module exploration. PhD thesis, University College Dublin

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Insight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Dublin, Ireland

    Nina Hagemann, Michael P. O’Mahony & Barry Smyth

Authors
  1. Nina Hagemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael P. O’Mahony
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Barry Smyth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Hagemann.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hagemann, N., O’Mahony, M.P. & Smyth, B. Visual Module Exploration: A Live-User Evaluation. Künstl Intell (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-023-00800-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-023-00800-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation