Main datasets
We use two different samples drawn from the 1992–2009 waves of the Spanish Labor Force Survey “Encuesta de Población Activa” (EPA), the Spanish equivalent to the Current Population Survey in the USA. The survey is conducted by the Spanish Statistical Institute, and it is representative of the Spanish population and interviewing some 20,000 households every quarter. The EPA tracks information about each member of the household above 16 within each household for up to six quarters, providing detailed information about demographics, educational attainment and labor market status.
The EPA is released in two main forms. The first is as a series of repeated cross sections where all individual identifiers are stripped off and it is not possible to track individual respondents (even though each individual still contributes up to 6 observations). We will term this sample the cross-sectional EPA. This sample contains detailed information on the educational attainment and the labor market and demographic outcomes of individuals above 16 years of age. In the case of young adults residing with their parents, the survey allows reconstructing parental characteristics. The Spanish Statistical Institute provided us with the exact age in years. The Spanish Labor Force Survey does not contain wages in the sample period we examine. As for province, we use that of current residence. We use the cross-sectional EPA to study the evolution of schooling attainment at later ages, that we set at 25 because the distribution of schooling attainment does not change much after that age.
The second sample contains exactly the same individuals as the former one, but allows the identification of each individual across waves and thus permits longitudinal analysis. We refer to this sample as the longitudinal EPA. In this case, household identifiers are stripped off, and information about schooling or demographics is given in a coarser way: age is grouped in five year bands and educational level is given with much less detail. Still, the dataset is very useful to study the dynamics of school to work transitions. Table 1 presents the summary statistics.
Table 1 Summary statistics Information on wages
We rely on out-of-sample information to construct measures of the wages that a young adult would use to form expectations about earnings in different education paths. As stated before, actual average wages suffer from the typical endogeneity problem between developments in wages and labor supply of youth. Moreover, our prior is that it is a measure that is difficult to be observed by youth, because it would require the student to have access to specific data on wages. Therefore, we opted for another measure of wages,Footnote 7 based on collective agreements. This second measure can be directly observed with no need for accessing any data or making any calculations. Also, we will argue below that bargained wages are not affected by the endogeneity problem between wages and youth labor supply.
Measures based on bargained wages in industry-level collective agreements
Our measure of wages draws from the Registry of Collective Agreements between 1990 and 2009. In Spain, 75% of workers have working conditions and wages determined by some collective agreement. These agreements are the result of a bargaining process between unions and employer federations. Most agreements have province–industry coverage, but there are some with higher (national) or lower (firm specific) coverage. During the sample period, firm-level agreements were subordinated to industry ones, so they could only improve working conditions beyond what was stated in the industry-level agreement. Most of the industry-level agreements are negotiated by a small set of nation-wide trade unions and employer federations.
Collective contracts in Spain are automatically extended to all employers and employees under the scope of the agreement and the clauses included are legally binding. These contracts set a minimum wage for each skill level and thus generate an implicit wage structure by skill level during the life of the agreement (which typically lasts for 3 or 4 years). The definition of skill groups in the Registry of Collective Agreements is the same as in that in the Social Security records. Collective agreements get the same publicity as an Act from the Parliament would get, and it is compulsory for the unions and employer federations to register their terms and conditions at the Ministry of Labor. The registry contains information about the industrial and geographical coverage of the agreement, the wage growth for a particular period as well as the month and year of signature. We focus on agreements with coverage at the province–industry level, that cover 54% of workers in Spain.Footnote 8 Between 1993 and 2001, the registry contains information about the wage levels for each of the skill groups in Table 2, and that is the information we use to construct our preferred measure of earnings. The concept we use is the “base wage”, that excludes any premia linked to tenure on the job, age or performance and is closely linked to entry wages. We were unable to construct the wage measure for all provinces because not all provinces and industries have an agreement or some of the agreements did not register the levels of agreed wages. Hence, out of the 50 provinces, we only use 30. The 30 provinces we use account for 76% of male employment in a 4% sample of Social Security records in November 2000.Footnote 9
Table 2 Correspondence skill groups-schooling group The structure of wages by skill settled within each collective agreement has not varied much over time. Nevertheless, the fact that skilled and unskilled young males work in different industries and that wage growth has evolved differently across industries generates variation in the returns to skill. For example, workers below 40 years of age and with basic education—or less—work mainly in construction (20% in 1995), retail (14% in 1995) and agriculture (10%) (see Fig. 3). On the other hand, males with high school or more worked mainly in services (in particular, services to industry and education and health are the most typical destinations). While workers with upper secondary schooling or higher also work in construction, they do so to a lesser extent than unskilled young adults (less than 10% for all the period—see Fig. 4).
The second reason to focus on industries to construct wage levels is that wages increased differently across industries. The average wage growth in the construction collective agreements has experienced a markedly procyclical behavior (see Fig. 5). Right after the early 90s recession, unions and employer federations in the construction sector bargained yearly wage increases below the rest of the industries in 1994. Nevertheless, as the expansion evolved, the average wage in construction grew between 50 and 75 basis points more than in the rest of the industries. The previous two facts imply that, holding the share of unskilled and skilled workers constant in construction and in the rest of industries, the overall wage increase in construction relative to services is likely to mechanically increase relative low-skill wages.
Using the previous two facts, we partially adapt the strategy in Bartik (1991) or Gould et al. (2002) to construct measures of skill-specific local labor market opportunities. Bartik (1991) predicts the part of regional labor market outcomes that is due to national changes in demand by interacting initial industrial specialization in the region with the nationwide evolution of the wage in that industry. In our case, instead of using aggregate wage levels (or wage growth) to measure the opportunity cost of studying, we use province–sector–skill-specific wage floors as settled in collective contracts. As we document below, one of the advantages of using such wage floors is that the wages of unskilled young males bunch around that point. Hence, the evolution of the wage structure as derived from those wage floors can potentially be observed by the youths.Footnote 10
We construct proxies of the wages of workers with college education using the “base wages” of the first and second contribution groups (groups 1 and 2 in Table 2). We measure the wages of unskilled workers using the “base wage” of laborers (group 10 in Table 2). For the group with intermediate education, we use the collective agreement wage of group 3 (administrative workers).Footnote 11 The measure of skill-specific wages we use is the following:
$$\begin{aligned} {\overline{W}}_{s,p,t}= \sum \limits _{j=1}^{j=5}\pi _{s,j,p,1995}{\overline{w}}_{s,j,p,t} \end{aligned}$$
(1)
where j indexes industries, p indexes the province and t indexes time. \({\overline{w}}_{s,j,p,t}\) is the wage bargained in industry j for province p and period t for skill group s. For the main analysis, we use information on 5 industries. The first four are construction, retail, metal and services to the industry, which covered 73% and 50% of the employment of skilled and unskilled youth in 1992, respectively.Footnote 12 We aggregate the wages of the rest of the industries in the province into a 5th group. \(\pi _{s,j,p,1995}\) is the employment share of the industry in a province–age–education group as of 1995. The temporal variation of industry share of youth employment is likely to be determined by the relative supply and demand of unskilled workers and may thus reflect factors other than the opportunity cost of studying. Hence, we fix the province-specific weight using the averages of 1992–1995 from the Spanish Labor Force Survey (cross-sectional EPA).Footnote 13
Do collective agreement wages reflect observable economic opportunities of young adults?
We present three pieces of evidence, suggesting that the relative variation in wages bargained in collective agreements does reflect the opportunity cost of studying after the compulsory age. Firstly, we document that the wages settled for unskilled workers actually bind, as there is substantial concentration of actual wages of young workers around the levels bargained in collective agreements (at least for construction). Secondly, the variation over time of bargained wages responds more to the labor market tightness of workers older than 40 years of age, than to that of young adults. Finally, we show that changes in our measure of available opportunities by youth and actual wages are correlated.
Accumulation of wages at the level settled by collective agreements
We document the bite of collective agreements by plotting the distribution of nominal monthly wages of unskilled young construction workers in the four largest Spanish provinces in the Social Security sample: Barcelona, Madrid, Alicante and Valencia. We present histograms with distributions of nominal monthly wages in 1993 (a recession year at the beginning of the sample) and in 2000—an expansion year.Footnote 14 Visual inspection of Fig. 6a and b suggest the following conclusions.
Firstly, minimum wages of laborers in collective agreements do vary across provinces. The minimum wage was 779 euro in Barcelona in 1993, while it was 650 in Madrid in the same year. Similarly, it was around 690 euro in Alicante, but 623 in neighboring Valencia. The distribution of actual wages reflects those gaps. There is substantial mass of wages in Madrid below the minimum in Barcelona and the same happens with the adjacent provinces of Alicante and Valencia.
Secondly, there is accumulation of wages at or close to the province-specific minimum wage level. The degree of accumulation was high in Madrid in 1993—where 8% of laborers get the collective agreement minimum wage and about 40% of laborers get a wage that is between the minimum and 10% above that minimum. However, the accumulation is also noticeable in Alicante or Valencia (between 4 and 8% of laborers get the minimum wage).
Accumulation implies that a youth considering leaving the school system is likely to observe those wages—these are prevalent among other youths working in the sector. In the absence of information on how youths form their expectations about earnings in the event of dropping out, the concentration of wages around statutory minima suggests that the fact that these wages are both compulsory and minimum serve as a basis for taking his or her schooling decisions.
Finally, the figures show some degree of noncompliance—i.e., monthly wages below the statutory minimum. For example, Table 13 shows that the fraction of wages below the wage floor was high in 1993 (14.8%) and lower in 2000 (8.9%). Some of that slippage is due to the fact that some firms may not update their wages automatically but do so over the year—as well as particular labor contracts that may qualify for wages below the agreement minimum. In general, more than one-quarter of male laborers earn wages between their corresponding wage floor and 5% above that amount. The fraction has remained stable over the sample period.
Wage growth in collective agreements:
The identification strategy in our study relies in the time-series variation in industry-specific collective bargaining wages within provinces. A key assumption is that province-specific changes in bargained wages respond little to province-specific shifts in the inflow of unskilled young adults. Models of wage bargaining typically assume that final wages depend on the outside opportunities of firms and workers, and stress the role of unemployment as an (inverse) measure of outside opportunities. Hence, to understand whose outside opportunities are taken into account in wage bargaining, we regressed wage growth on (one-year lagged) unemployment rates of unskilled workers in four age groups: 16–25, 26–35, 36–45 and 46–55. The regression also includes province and year dummies. The former control for provincial long-run specialization, and the latter for macro factors that affect wage growth (such as the inflation rate). We lag the unemployment rate to mitigate simultaneity biases.
Table 3 The determinants of wage growth in collective agreements: lagged unemployment rate Table 3 presents the results for 4 different agreements: construction, retail, metal and a composite of the rest of the agreements. All regressions are weighted by the number of workers covered by the agreement. The result is column 1 row 1 is − 239. That is, a 10 percentage points increase of the provincial unemployment rate of workers between 16 and 25 years of age reduces wage growth in construction by .239 percentage points (standard error: .18). The estimate in row 4 column 1, measuring wage responses to unemployment among the 46–55-year old is − 755. That is, increases in unemployment rate among individuals between 46 and 55 years have three times the impact on wage growth than that of 16–25 years of age. The estimates across industries generally suggest a much larger wage response to the unemployment rate of workers over 35 than to the unemployment rate of unskilled young workers. We infer from the pattern of estimates that bargained wage growth does not primarily reflect the economic condition of unskilled young workers.
Bargained and actual wages
The third piece of evidence shows the link between wages in collective agreements and the median of actual wages perceived by unskilled workers relative to the median of actual wages perceived by mid- and high-skilled workers.
Table 4 Actual wages and wages in collective agreements Table 4, row 1 shows estimates of the impact of the ratio of the wages of laborers on mid-skill groups on the wage bargained for laborers in the province for the five industries considered: construction, metal, services to industries, retail and rest. Each province–year unit provides one observation, weighted by the number of workers in the province in the Social Security database (as that was the database used to compute median wages). All specifications include year and province dummies. An increase of 10 percentage points in our measure of the ratio of collective agreement wages between low- and mid-skill workers increases the actual ratio of unskilled-to mid-skill market by 1.87 percentage points. In Column 2, we examine which component explains the ratio of low- to mid-skill wages. The results suggest that the component associated to construction has the largest coefficient in the low- to mid-skill ratio but has little explanatory power in the mid- to high-skill ratio.Footnote 15
Columns 3 and 4 show the results of a regression of the ratio of mid-to-skill wages on the same ratio based on collective agreements. Again, a 10 percentage points increase in the measure based on collective agreements increases by 1 percentage point the ratio of market wages.
Methods
We use two measures of educational outcomes \(S_{i,p,t}\). The first one is short-run and measures transitions out from the educational system. The second is a longer-run measure of the final educational attainment at the age of 25. We estimate reduced-form versions of the following form.
$$\begin{aligned} S_{i,p,t}=\alpha _{0}+\alpha _{1}\frac{{\overline{W}\mathrm{unskilled}}}{{\overline{W}\mathrm{mid}}\_{\mathrm{skill}}}+\alpha _{2} \frac{{\overline{W}\mathrm{mid}}\_{\mathrm{skill}}}{{\overline{W}\mathrm{college}}}+\mu _{p}+\theta _{t}+\varepsilon _{i,p,t} \end{aligned}$$
(2)
\(\mu _{p}\) are local labor market fixed effects (province dummies), \(\theta _{t}\) are time fixed effects and \(\frac{{\overline{W}\mathrm{unskilled}}}{{\overline{W}\mathrm{mid}}\_{\mathrm{skill}}}\) and \(\frac{{\overline{W}\mathrm{mid}}\_{\mathrm{skill}}}{ {\overline{W}\mathrm{college}}}\) denote the wage structure that youths would observe at the age of 17 -when educational decisions are taken.Footnote 16 We define three levels of schooling attainment \(S_{i,p,t}\) by a young adult i in a province p at time t: basic schooling (or less), vocational training or a joint outcome that lumps together secondary academic track and college. The vocational track and the academic track provide a very different set of skills to youth that complete them. As we found it very hard to rank those skills, we estimate the model as a multinomial logit—see discussion in Sect. 3. In addition, in most specifications we also show the results with a binary dependent variable that takes value 1 if the youth completed any degree beyond the compulsory one. Whenever we estimate variants of equation (2) we include province fixed-effects and, as a robustness in separate specifications, province-specific trends.
The coefficients of interest are those of the two measures of the returns to skill \(\alpha _{1}\) and \(\alpha _{2}\). The identification is obtained from changes across provinces and time in the ratios of unskilled to skilled wages when a cohort reaches the age of 17.
Finally, family characteristics exhibited a steady improvement over the sample period. To control for those in some specifications, we select a sample of coresident young adults (86% of our sample lived with their parents at the age of 25). Namely, we control for dummies with the educational attainment of the mother and indicators of whether the mother and the father live in the household of the young adult.
Sources of biases
Wages settled in collective agreements respond to some workers’ economic situation -see Table 3. If these are correlated with youths’ perceived wages and schooling decisions, the estimates would be biased. To address such concerns, we include controls for the contemporaneous unemployment rate of the youth by skill level. In particular, we introduce in some specifications the provincial unemployment rate of unskilled individuals youths between 26 and 35 years of age, between 36 and 45 and between 46 and 55. Secondly, we also experiment including additional controls for province-level trends. To the extent that the influx of new entrants is partly determined by the evolution of demography (larger cohorts at the province level), provincial time trends would net out such effects.
Thus far, we are interpreting changes in collective agreement wages as reflecting an outward shift of the labor demand curve at the industry level. Nevertheless, a second source of biases would arise if increases in collective agreement wages represent a movement along the demand curve, leading to employment destruction (such as the textbook model of the labor market predicts an increase in the minimum wage would do). In such case, increases in \(\frac{{\overline{W}\mathrm{unskilled}}}{{\overline{W}\mathrm{mid}}\_{\mathrm{skill}}}\) measured by collective agreements would correlate positively with the growth in youth unemployment, possibly generating a downward bias in our estimates.Footnote 17 Two notes are in order. In our setting, the increase in collective agreement wages has a component of industry demand that is most likely lacking in minimum wage increases. To assess to what extent this is a problem, we experiment with broader measures of economic incentives where we interact \(\frac{{\overline{W}\mathrm{unskilled}}}{ {\overline{W}\mathrm{mid}}\_{\mathrm{skill}}}\) with the ratio of unemployment rates between low-skill and mid-skill workers. Secondly, we also examine school to work and non-work transitions. If increases in collective agreement wages measure movements along the demand of labor curve, we should observe the same type of responses that Neumark and Wascher (1995) document: a higher chance of transition into non-work following an increase in low-skill wages.