Abstract
Fungal chitosan (FCH) is superior to crustacean chitosan (CH) sources and is of immense interest to the scientific community while having a high demand at the global market. Industrial scale fermentation technologies of FCH production are associated with considerable challenges that frequently restrict their economic production and feasibility. The production of high quality FCH using an underexplored fungal strain Cunninghamella echinulata NCIM 691 that is hoped to mitigate potential future large-scale production was investigated. The one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) method was implemented to examine the effect of the medium components (i.e. carbon and nitrogen) on the FCH yield. Among these variables, the optimal condition for increased FCH yield was carbon (glucose) and nitrogen (yeast extract) source. A total of 11 factors affected FCH yield among which, the best factors were screened by Plackett–Burman design (PBD). The optimization process was carried out using the response surface methodology (RSM) via Box-Behnken design (BBD). The three-level Box– Behnken factorial design facilitated optimum values for 3 parameters—glucose (2% w/v), yeast extract (1.5% w/v) and magnesium sulphate (0.1% w/v) at 30˚C and pH of 4.5. The optimization resulted in a 2.2-fold higher FCH yield. The produced FCH was confirmed using XRD, 1H NMR, TGA and DSC techniques. The degree of deacetylation (DDA) of the extracted FCH was 88.3%. This optimization process provided a significant improvement of FCH yields and product quality for future potential scale-up processes. This research represents the first report on achieving high FCH yield using a reasonably unfamiliar fungus C. echinulata NCIM 691 through optimised submerged fermentation conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- AIM:
-
Alkali insoluble materials
- ANOVA:
-
Analysis of variance
- BBD:
-
Box-Behnken design
- CCD:
-
Central composite design
- CH:
-
Chitosan
- CHNPs:
-
Chitosan nanoparticles
- CSL:
-
Corn steep liquor
- CT:
-
Chitin
- CW:
-
Cassava waste water
- D2O:
-
Deuterium oxide
- DCl:
-
Deuterium chloride
- DCW:
-
Dry cell weight
- DDA:
-
Degree of deacetylation
- DLS:
-
Dynamic light scattering
- DoE:
-
Design of experiment
- DSC:
-
Differential scanning calorimetry
- FCH:
-
Fungal chitosan
- FT-IR:
-
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
- LMWCH:
-
Low molecular weight chitosan
- MGYP:
-
Malt extract glucose yeast extract peptone
- MW :
-
Molecular weight
- NCIM:
-
National collection of industrial microorganism
- NMR:
-
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
- OFAT:
-
One-factor-at-a-time
- PBD:
-
Plackett–Burman Design
- PBS:
-
Phosphate Buffer Saline
- PDB/PDA:
-
Potato dextrose broth/agar
- RSM:
-
Response surface methodology
- SEM:
-
Scanning electron microscopy
- SmF:
-
Submerged fermentation
- Tg:
-
Glass transition temperature
- TGA:
-
Thermogravimetric analysis
- VIF:
-
Variance Inflation Factor
- XRD:
-
X-Ray diffraction
- YPD:
-
Yeast extract peptone dextrose
- ZP:
-
Zeta potential
References
Abdel-Gawad KM, Hifney AF, Fawzy MA, Gomaa M (2017) Technology optimization of chitosan production from Aspergillus niger biomass and its functional activities. Food Hydrocoll 63:593–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.10.001
Abo Elsoud MM, Mohamed SS, Selim MS, Sidkey NM (2023) Characterization and optimization of chitosan production by Aspergillus terreus. Arab J Sci Eng 48:93–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-07163-z
Ahn JS, Choi HK, Cho CS (2001) A novel mucoadhesive polymer prepared by template polymerization of acrylic acid in the presence of chitosan. Biomaterials 22:923–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00256-8
Amorim RV, Pedrosa RP, Fukushima K, Martínez CR, Ledingham WM, Campos-Takaki D, Maria G (2006) Alternative carbon sources from sugar cane process for submerged cultivation of Cunninghamella bertholletiae to produce chitosan. Food Technol Biotechnol 44:519–523
Araki Y, Ito E (1975) A pathway of chitosan formation in Mucor rouxii. Enzymatic deacetylation of chitin. Eur J Biochem 55:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1975.tb02139.x
Azeez S, Sathiyaseelan A, Jeyaraj ER, Saravanakumar K, Wang MH, Kaviyarasan V (2023) Extraction of chitosan with different physicochemical properties from Cunninghamella echinulata (Thaxter) Thaxter for biological applications. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 195:3914–3927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-022-03982-w
Bagy MM, Nafady NA, Hassan EA, Hashem MM (2022) Simultaneous production of an exopolysaccharide and chitosan by Aspergillus quadrilineatus using response surface methodology. Assiut Univ J Multidiscip Sci Res 1:214–41. https://doi.org/10.21608/aunj.2022.138922.1012
Baijal U, Mehrotra BS (1980) The genus Cunninghamella: a reassessment. Sydowia 33:1–13
Banat IM, Carboue Q, Saucedo-Castaneda G, de Jesus C-M (2021) Biosurfactants: The green generation of speciality chemicals and potential production using Solid-State fermentation (SSF) technology. Bioresour Technol 320:124222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124222
Berger LRR, Stamford TCM, Stamford-Arnaud TM, De Alcântara SRC, Silva ACD, Silva AMD, Nascimento AED, de Campos-Takaki GM (2014a) Green conversion of agroindustrial wastes into chitin and chitosan by Rhizopus arrhizus and Cunninghamella elegans strains. Int J Mol Sci 15:9082–9102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15059082
Berger LRR, Stamford TCM, Stamford-Arnaud TM, de Oliveira FL, de Do Nascimento Campos-Takaki AEGM (2014b) Effect of corn steep liquor (CSL) and cassava wastewater (CW) on chitin and chitosan production by Cunninghamella elegans and their physicochemical characteristics and cytotoxicity. Molecules 19:2771–2792. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules19032771
Bezerra MA, Santelli RE, Oliveira EP, Villar LS, Escaleira LA (2008) Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta 76:965–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019
Box GEP, Wilson KB (1951) On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J R Stat Soc B 13:1–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00067.x
Budishevska O, Popadyuk N, Musyanovych A, Kohut A, Donchak V, Voronov A, Voronov S (2020) Formation of three-dimensional polymer structures through radical and ionic reactions of peroxychitosan. Stud Nat Prod Chem 64:365–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817903-1.00012-7
Chatterjee S, Das A, Paul D, Chakraborty S, Choudhury P (2023) Utilization of fleshing waste of leather processing for the growth of zygomycetes: a new substrate for economical production of bio-polymer chitosan. J Environ Manage 343:118141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118141
Chitosan market size, share & trends analysis report by application (2023) pharmaceutical, water treatment, cosmetics, biomedical, food & beverage. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/global-chitosan-market. Accessed 26 September 2023
Claverie E, Perini M, Onderwater RCA, Pianezze S, Larcher R, Roosa S, Yada B, Wattiez R (2023) Multiple technology approach based on stable isotope ratio analysis, fourier transform infrared spectrometry and thermogravimetric analysis to ensure the fungal origin of the chitosan. Molecules 28:4324. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28114324
Crini G (2019) Historical review on chitin and chitosan biopolymers. Environ Chem Lett 17:1623–1643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-019-00901-0
Crognale S, Russo C, Petruccioli M, D’annibale A (2022) Chitosan production by fungi: current state of knowledge, future opportunities and constraints. Fermentation 8:76. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8020076
de Souza AF, Galindo HM, de Lima MA, Ribeaux DR, Rodríguez DM, da Silva Andrade RF, Gusmão NB, de Campos-Takaki GM (2020) Biotechnological strategies for chitosan production by mucoralean strains and dimorphism using renewable substrates. Int J Mol Sci 21:4286. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124286
Demain AL (2000) Microbial biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 18:26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7799(99)01400-6
Divya K, Vijayan S, George TK, Jisha MS (2017) Antimicrobial properties of chitosan nanoparticles: mode of action and factors affecting activity. Fibers Polym 18:221–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-017-6690-1
Dong Y, Ruan Y, Wang H, Zhao Y, Bi D (2004) Studies on glass transition temperature of chitosan with four techniques. J Appl Polym Sci 93:1553–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.20630
El-Far NA, Shetaia YM, Ahmed MA, Amin RM, Abdou DAM (2021) Statistical optimization of chitosan production using marine-derived Penicillium chrysogenum MZ723110 in Egypt. Egypt J Aquat Biol Fish 25:799–819. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejabf.2021.206881
Ghormade V, Pathan EK, Deshpande MV (2017) Can fungi compete with marine sources for chitosan production? Int J Biol Macromol 104:1415–1421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.01.112
Habibi A, Karami S, Varmira K, Hadadi M (2020) Key parameters optimization of chitosan production from Aspergillus terreus using apple waste extract as sole carbon source. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 44:283–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-020-02441-2
Huq T, Khan A, Brown D, Dhayagude N, He Z, Ni Y (2022) Sources, production and commercial applications of fungal chitosan: a review. J Bioresour Bioprod 7:85–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobab.2022.01.002
Junior AF, Chagas LF, Scheidt GN, Chapla VM, Colonia BS, Souza MC, Martins AL (2022) Chitosan and chitin production and extraction in isolates of Cunninghamella sp. Acta Sci Biol Sci 44:e59982. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v44i1.59982
Karamchandani BM, Chakraborty S, Dalvi SG, Satpute SK (2022a) Chitosan and its derivatives: Promising biomaterial in averting fungal diseases of sugarcane and other crops. J Basic Microbiol 62:533–554. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.202100613
Karamchandani BM, Maurya PA, Dalvi SG, Waghmode S, Sharma D, Rahman PK, Ghormade V, Satpute SK (2022b) Synergistic activity of rhamnolipid biosurfactant and nanoparticles synthesized using fungal origin chitosan against phytopathogens. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 10:917105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.917105
Karamchandani BM, Pawar AA, Pawar SS, Syed S, Mone NS, Dalvi SG, Rahman PK, Banat IM, Satpute SK (2022c) Biosurfactants’ multifarious functional potential for sustainable agricultural practices. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 10:1047279. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1047279
Ke CL, Deng FS, Chuang CY, Lin CH (2021) Antimicrobial actions and applications of chitosan. Polymers 13:904. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13060904
Kumar S, Mukherjee A, Dutta J (2020) Chitosan based nanocomposite films and coatings: Emerging antimicrobial food packaging alternatives. Trends Food Sci Technol 97:196–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.01.002
Lavertu M, Xia Z, Serreqi AN, Berrada M, Rodrigues A, Wang D, Buschmann MD, Gupta A (2003) A validated 1H NMR method for the determination of the degree of deacetylation of chitosan. J Pharm Biomed Anal 32:1149–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(03)00155-9
Mane SR, Pathan EK, Kale D, Ghormade V, Gadre RV, Rajamohanan PR, Badiger MV, Deshpande MV (2017) Optimization for the production of mycelial biomass from Benjaminiella poitrasii to isolate highly deacetylated chitosan. J Polym Mater 34:145–156
Mane SR, Pathan EK, Tupe S, Deshmukh S, Kale D, Ghormade V, Chaudhari B, Deshpande MV (2022) Isolation and characterization of chitosans from different fungi with special emphasis on zygomycetous dimorphic fungus Benjaminiella poitrasii: evaluation of its chitosan nanoparticles for the inhibition of human pathogenic fungi. Biomacromol 23:808–815. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01248
Matruchot L (1903) Une mucorinee purement conidienne, Cunninghamella africa. Ann Mycol 1:45–60
Muzzarelli RAA, Ilari P, Tarsi R, Dubini B, Xia W (1994) Chitosan from Absidia coerulea. Carbohydr Polym 25:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8617(94)90161-9
Namboodiri MT, Paul T, Medisetti RM, Pakshirajan K, Narayanasamy S, Pugazhenthi G (2022) Solid state fermentation of rice straw using Penicillium citrinum for chitosan production and application as nanobiosorbent. Bioresour Technol 18:101005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101005
Nguyen TTT, Choi YJ, Lee HB (2017) Isolation and characterization of three unrecorded Zygomycete fungi in Korea: Cunninghamella bertholletiae, Cunninghamella echinulata, and Cunninghamella elegans. Mycobiology 45:318–326. https://doi.org/10.5941/myco.2017.45.4.318
Parekh S, Vinci VA, Strobel RJ (2000) Improvement of microbial strains and fermentation processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 54:287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530000403
Plackett RL, Burman JP (1946) The design of optimum multifactorial experiments. Biometrika 33:305–325. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/33.4.305
Pochanavanich P, Suntornsuk W (2002) Fungal chitosan production and its characterization. Lett Appl Microbiol 35:17–21. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765x.2002.01118.x
Politis SN, Colombo P, Colombo G, Rekkas DM (2017) Design of experiments (DoE) in pharmaceutical development. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 43:889–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2017.1291672
Ramasamy P, Subhapradha N, Shanmugam V, Shanmugam A (2014) Extraction, characterization and antioxidant property of chitosan from cuttlebone Sepia kobiensis (Hoyle 1885). Int J of Biol Macromol 64:202–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.12.008
Report on alternative products and technologies to plastics and their applications (2022) NITI Aayoghttps://www.niti.gov.in. Accessed 24 April 2023
Shajahan A, Shankar S, Sathiyaseelan A, Narayan KS, Narayanan V, Kaviyarasan V, Ignacimuthu S (2017) Comparative studies of chitosan and its nanoparticles for the adsorption efficiency of various dyes. Int J Biol Macromol 104:1449–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.128
Sharma D, Singh D, Sukhbir-Singh GM, Karamchandani BM, Aseri GK, Banat IM, Satpute SK (2023) Biosurfactants: Forthcomings and regulatory affairs in food-based industries. Molecules 28:2823. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062823
Shu ZY, Jiang H, Lin RF, Jiang YM, Lin L, Huang JZ (2010) Technical methods to improve yield, activity and stability in the development of microbial lipases. J Mol Catal B Enzym 62:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2009.09.003
Silva NR, Luna MA, Santiago AL, Franco LO, Silva GK, De Souza PM, Okada K, Albuquerque CD, Da Silva CA, Campos-Takaki GM (2014) Biosurfactant-and-bioemulsifier produced by a promising Cunninghamella echinulata isolated from caatinga soil in the northeast of Brazil. Int J Mol Sci 15:15377–95. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150915377
Singh V, Haque S, Niwas R, Srivastava A, Pasupuleti M, Tripathi C (2017) Strategies for fermentation medium optimization: an in-depth review. Front Microbiol 7:2087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02087
Sun W, Shahrajabian MH, Petropoulos SA, Shahrajabian N (2023) Developing sustainable agriculture systems in medicinal and aromatic plant production by using chitosan and chitin-based bio stimulants. Plants 12:2469. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12132469
Tan SC, Tan TK, Wong SM, Khor E (1996) The chitosan yield of zygomycetes at their optimum harvesting time. Carbohydr Polym 30:239–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(96)00052-5
Vaingankar PN, Juvekar AR (2014) Fermentative production of mycelial chitosan from zygomycetes: media optimization and physico-chemical characterization. Adv Biosci Biotechnol 5:940–956. https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2014.512108
Wang W, Du Y, Qiu Y, Wang X, Hu Y, Yang J, Cai J, Kennedy JF (2008) A new green technology for direct production of low molecular weight chitosan. Carbohydr Polym 74:127–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.01.025
Wang Y, Yang L, Zhou X, Wang Y, Liang Y, Luo B, Dai Y, Wei Z, Li S, He R, Ding W (2023) Molecular mechanism of plant elicitor daphnetin-carboxymethyl chitosan nanoparticles against Ralstonia solanacearum by activating plant system resistance. Int J Biol Macromol 241:124580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124580
Zhang H, Yang S, Fang J, Deng Y, Wang D, Zhao Y (2014) Optimization of the fermentation conditions of Rhizopus japonicus M193 for the production of chitin deacetylase and chitosan. Carbohydr Polym 101:57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.015
Acknowledgements
BMK, PAM and SKS are grateful to Savitribai Phule Pune University for providing financial support to complete the proposed research
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BMK performed all the experiments in the laboratory and wrote the paper- preliminary draft including entire data analysis. PAM assisted BMK to conduct the experiments and write the preliminary draft. MA analysed the statistical data and was also involved in editing the manuscript. SD and SKS contributed towards conceptualization, designing the methodology and editing the manuscript. IMB and SKS contributed in designing, studying, reviewing, analysing the entire data as well as editing the complete manuscript. All authors have carefully read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical standards
This research does not involve any human participants and/or animals.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file2 (TIF 488 KB)
Fig. S1 Effect of different nitrogen sources at A: 1%, B: 1.5%, C: 2%, D: Merge plot depicting comparison between all nitrogen sources at varied concentrations (%), E: Effect of peptone (P) and yeast extract (Y) individually and in combination at varied concentrations on chitosan production (mg/l) by C. echinulata. The fungal suspension - 1.0 ×108 spores/ml was made in phosphate buffer saline (pH 7.0) and inoculated into fermentation medium supplemented with four nitrogen sources individually at three different concentrations - selected through One-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) approach. Culture was incubated at 29±1℃/100 rpm/6 days. Highest biomass and chitosan production were observed in yeast extract followed by peptone, soyameal and tryptone. Comparison between all four nitrogen sources depicted a positive effect on biomass and chitosan with gradual increase in the concentration of yeast extract
Supplementary file3 (TIF 338 KB)
Fig. S2 Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) A: Commercial-Low molecular weight commercial chitosan (LMWCH) and B: Fungal chitosan (FCH) derived from C. echinulata. TGA provides thermal analysis under the influence of altered temperature conditions. The TGA was performed at 40–600°C in an inert environment of nitrogen (20°C/min). TGA curves denoted the thermal stability along with decomposition of samples. In LMWCH, first stage loss was 2.382% at 50-180°C; whereas, for FCH the weight loss was 4.151% which remained stable up to 240°C. The second decomposition resulted in weight loss of 53.875% (for LMWCH) and 53.854% (for FCH) which can be correlated with the pyrolytic decomposition of saccharide rings of the chitosan molecule at 200 and 450°C
Supplementary file4 (TIF 297 KB)
Fig. S3 Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). A: Commercial - Low molecular weight commercial chitosan (LMWCH) and B: Fungal chitosan (FCH) derived from C. echinulata. DSC measures the difference in the amount of heat needed to raise the temperature of a sample. Both samples were upheld at 30-200°C in an inert nitrogen environment (10°C/min). The DSC curves of both samples displayed a typical polysaccharide with degradation profiles. The first endothermic peak for LMWCH at 28.19°C (348.9J/g) and for FCH at 40.59°C (450.5 J/g). The second endothermic peak initiated at 77.81°C (for LMWCH) and 87.94°C (for FCH) till 126.30°C. The elevation in the baseline corresponds to the degradation of chitosan samples due to its combustion
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Karamchandani, B.M., Maurya, P.A., Awale, M. et al. Optimization of fungal chitosan production from Cunninghamella echinulata using statistical designs. 3 Biotech 14, 82 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-024-03919-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-024-03919-6