Advertisement

3 Biotech

, 8:150 | Cite as

Molecular cloning, characterization and expression analysis of MADS-box genes associated with reproductive development in Momordica dioica Roxb.

  • Jatindra Nath Mohanty
  • Raj Kumar Joshi
Original Article
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

The repertoire and functions of MADS-box family transcription factors (TFs) largely remains unexplored with respect to floral organogenesis of Momordica dioica Roxb. Degenerative PCR followed by rapid amplification of cDNA ends was employed in the present study to clone and characterize 17 MADS-box genes (designated as MdMADS01 to MdMADS17) from the floral buds of M. dioica. The cloned genes were clustered into three subgroups (11 MIKCC, 4 MIKC* and 2 Mα) based on phylogenetic relationships with the MADS-box genes from Cucumis sativus, Cucumis melo and Arabidopsis thaliana. Southern hybridization showed that all the isolated genes were represented by single copy locus in the M. dioica genome. Gene structure analysis revealed 1–8 exons in MdMADS-box genes with the number of exons in MIKC greatly exceeding from that in M-type genes. Motif elicitation of the MdMADS-box genes indicated the presence of additional domains with MIKC type, suggesting that they had more complex structures. Expression analysis of MdMADS genes in six M. dioica transcriptome suggested that, 11 MIKCC—type genes are associated with floral homeotic functions, 4 MIKC*-type genes (MdMADS12 to MdMADS15) controlled the growth of male gametophyte, while the two M-type genes (MdMADS16 and MdMADS17) played significant role in female gametogenesis and seed development. Overall, these are the first set of MADS-box genes from M. dioica exhibiting a differential expression pattern during floral development. The results from this study will provide valuable information for further functional studies of candidate MADS-box genes in the sexual dimorphism of this economically important dioecious cucurbit.

Keywords

Momordica dioica L. MADS-box MIKC Floral development Expression analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The study is funded by a research grant (BT/PR3919/PBD/16/959/2011) from the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India. JNM is grateful to DBT, India for financial support in the form of Senior Research Fellowship. The authors are thankful to Prof. Manoj Ranjan Nayak, President, Siksha O Anusandhan University for his guidance and support. We also thank Prof. Sumita Jha, Centre for Advanced Study, Dept. of Botany, Calcutta University and Prof. Sanghamitra Nayak, Head, Centre of Biotechnology, Siksha O Anusandhan University for their able guidance and support. We also thank DST-FIST, Govt. of India, for the research infrastructure facilities provided to Centre of Biotechnology, Siksha O Anusandhan University.

Authors’ contributions

RKJ conceived and supervised the project. JNM collected samples, isolated RNA, performed cloning, sequencing and qPCR expression analyses. JNM and RKJ interpreted the data and prepared the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Supplementary material

13205_2018_1176_MOESM1_ESM.docx (46 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 45 kb)
13205_2018_1176_MOESM2_ESM.jpg (3.1 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (JPEG 3139 kb)
13205_2018_1176_MOESM3_ESM.jpg (281 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (JPEG 280 kb)
13205_2018_1176_MOESM4_ESM.jpg (738 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (JPEG 738 kb)

References

  1. Adamczyk BJ, Fernandez DE (2009) MIKC* MADS domain heterodimers are required for pollen maturation and tube growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 149:1713–1723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey TL, Williams N, Misleh C, Li WW (2006) MEME: discovering and analyzing DNA and protein sequence motifs. Nucl Acids Res 34:W369–W373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baratakke RC, Patil CG (2009) Karyomorphological investigations in dioecious climber Momordica dioica Roxb. J Cytol Genet 11:91–96Google Scholar
  4. Becker A, Theissen G (2003) The major clades of MADS-box genes and their role in the development and evolution of flowering plants. Mol Phylogenet Evol 29:464–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bemer M, Wolters-Arts M, Grossniklaus U, Angenent GC (2008) The MADS domain protein DIANA acts together with AGAMOUS-LIKE80 to specify the central cell in Arabidopsis ovules. Plant Cell 20:2088–2101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bharathi LK, Munshi AD, Vinod Chandrashekaran S, Behera TK, Das AB, John KJ, Nath V (2011) Cytotaxonomical analysis of Momordica L. (Cucurbitaceae) species of Indian occurrence. J Genet 90:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhowmick BK, Jha S (2015) Dynamics of sex expression and chromosome diversity in Cucurbitaceae: a story in the making. J Genet 94:793–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhowmick BK, Yamamoto M, Jha S (2016) Chromosomal localization of 45S rDNA, sex specific C values and heterochromatin distribution in Coccinia grandis (L.) Voigt. Protoplasma 253:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charlesworth D, Mank JE (2010) The birds and the bees and the flowers and the trees: lessons from genetic mapping of sex determination in plants and animals. Genetics 186:9–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coen ES, Meyerowitz EM (1991) The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colombo M, Masiero S, Vanzulli S, Lardelli P, Kater MM, Colombo L (2008) AGL23, a type I MADS-box gene that controls female gametophyte and embryo development in Arabidopsis. Plant J 54:1037–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Lucia F, Crevillen P, Am Jones, Greb T, Dean C (2008) A PHD-polycomb repressive complex 2 triggers the epigenetic silencing of FLC during vernalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:16831–16836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diggle PK, Di Stilio VS, Gschwend AR, Golenberg EM, Moore RC, Russell JR, Sinclair JP (2011) Multiple developmental processes underlie sex differentiation in angiosperms. Trends Genet 27:368–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:1241–1251Google Scholar
  15. Gramzow L, Theißen G (2010) A hitchhiker’s guide to the MADS world of plants. Genome Biol 11:214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Han P, García-Ponce B, Fonseca-Salazar G, Alvarez-Buylla ER, Yu H (2008) AGAMOUS-LIKE 17, a novel flowering promoter, acts in a FT independent photoperiod pathway. Plant J 55:253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hao X, Fu Y, Zhao W, Liu L, Bade R, Hasi A, Hao J (2016) Genome-wide identification and analysis of the MADS-box gene family in melon. J Am Soc Hort Sci 141:507–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heijmans K, Morel P, Vandenbussche M (2012) MADS-box genes and floral development: the dark side. J Expt Bot 63:5397–5454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hossain MA, Islam M, Ali M (1996) Sexual crossing between two genetically female plants and sex genetics of kakrol (Momordica dioica Roxb.). Euphytica 90:121–125Google Scholar
  20. Hu L, Liu S (2012) Genome-wide analysis of the MADS-box gene family in cucumber. Genome 55:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kang IH, Steffen JG, Portereiko MF, Lloyd A, Drews GN (2008) The AGL62 MADS domain protein regulates cellularization during endosperm development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20:635–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee S, Woo YM, Ryu S, Shin YD, Kim WT, Park KY, Lee IJ, An G (2008) Further characterization of a rice AGL12 group MADS-box gene, OsMADS26. Plant Physiol 147:156–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Litt A, Irish V (2003) Duplication and diversification in the APETALA/FRUITFUL floral homeotic gene lineage: implications for the evolution of floral development. Genetics 165:821–833Google Scholar
  24. Liu C, Chen H, Er HL, Soo HM, Kumar PP, Han JH, Liou YC, Yu H (2008) Direct interaction of AGL24 and SOC1 integrates flowering signals in Arabidopsis. Development 135:1481–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C (T)) method. Methods 25:402–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Masiero S, Colombo L, Grini PE, Schnittger A, Kater MM (2011) The emerging importance of type I MADS box transcription factors for plant reproduction. Plant Cell 23:865–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Matias-Hernandez L, Battaglia R, Galbiati F, Rubes M, Eichenberger C, Grossniklaus U, Kater MM, Colombo L (2010) VERDANDI is a direct target of the MADS domain ovule identity complex and affects embryo sac differentiation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22:1702–1715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Melzer S, Lens F, Gennen J, Vanneste S, Rohde A, Beeckman T (2008) Flowering-time genes modulate meristem determinacy and growth form in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Genet 40:1489–1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ming R, Bendahmane A, Renner SS (2011) Sex chromosomes in land plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 62:485–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mohanty JN, Nayak S, Jha S, Joshi RK (2016) A sequence tagged site (STS) marker encoding Copia-like retrotransposable element is associated with male specific sex expression in Momordiac dioica Roxb. Sci Hort 201:265–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mohanty JN, Nayak S, Jha S, Joshi RK (2017) Transcriptome profiling of the floral buds and discovery of genes related to sex-differentiation in the dioecious cucurbit Coccinia grandis (L.) Voigt. Gene 626:395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nesi N, Debeaujon I, Jond C, Stewart AJ, Jenkins GI, Caboche M, Lepiniec L (2002) The TRANSPARENT TESTA16 locus encodes the ARABIDOPSIS BSISTER MADS domain protein and is required for proper development and pigmentation of the seed coat. Plant Cell 14:2463–2479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parenicová L, de Folter S, Kieffer M, Horner DS, Favalli C, Busscher J, Cook HE, Ingram RM, Kater MM, Davies B, Angenent GC, Colombo L (2003) Molecular and phylogenetic analyses of the complete MADS-box transcription factor family in Arabidopsis: new openings to the MADS world. Plant Cell 15:1538–1551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pelaz S, Ditta GS, Baumann E, Wisman E, Yanofsky MF (2000) B and C floral organ identity functions require SEPALLATA MADS-box genes. Nature 405:200–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Renner SS, Ricklefs RE (1995) Dioecy and its correlations in the flowering plants. Am J Bot 82:596–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rijpkema AS, Zethof J, Gerats T, Vandenbussche M (2009) The petunia AGL6 gene has a SEPALLATA-like function in floral patterning. Plant J 60:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schaefer H, Renner SS (2010) A three genome phylogeny of Momordica (Cucurbitaceae) suggests seven returns from dioecy to monoecy and recent long-distance dispersal to Asia. Mol Phylogenet Evol 54:553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shu Y, Yu D, Wang D, Guo D, Guo C (2013) Genome-wide survey and expression analysis of the MADS-box gene family in soybean. Mol Biol Rep 40:3901–3911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smaczniak C, Immink RGH, Angenent GC, Kaufmann K (2012) Developmental and evolutionary diversity of plant MADS-box domain factors: insights from recent studies. Development 139:3081–3098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tamura K, Stecher G, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tao Z, Shen L, Liu C, Liu L, Yan Y, Yu H (2012) Genome-wide identification of SOC1 and SVP targets during the floral transition in Arabidopsis. Plant J 70:549–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tapia-López R, García-Ponce B, Dubrovsky JG, Garay-Arroyo A, Pérez- Ruíz RV, Kim SH, Acevedo F, Pelaz S, Alvarez-Buylla ER (2008) An AGAMOUS-related MADS-box gene, XAL1 (AGL12), regulates root meristem cell proliferation and flowering transition in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 146:1182–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Theiben G, Melzer R, Rumpler F (2016) MADS-domain transcription factors and the floral quartet model of flower development: linking plant development and evolution. Development 143:3259–3271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Theißen G (2001) Development of floral organ identity: stories from the MADS house. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4:75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Theißen G, Gramzow L (2016) Structure and evolution of plant MADS domain transcription factors. In: Gonzalez DH (ed) Plant transcription factors: evolutionary, structural and functional aspects. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tian Y, Dong Q, Ji Z, Chi F, Cong P, Zhou Z (2015) Genome-wide identification and analysis of the MADS-box gene family in apple. Gene 555:277–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Verelst W, Saedler H, Münster T (2007a) MIKC* MADS-protein complexes bind motifs enriched in the proximal region of late pollen-specific Arabidopsis promoters. Plant Physiol 143:447–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Verelst W, Twell D, de Folter S, Immink R, Saedler H, Münster T (2007b) MADS-complexes regulate transcriptome dynamics during pollen maturation. Genome Biol 8:R249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Volz SM, Renner SS (2008) Hybridization, polyploidy and evolutionary transitions between monoecy and dioecy in Bryonia (Cucurbitaceae). Am J Bot 95:1297–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vyskot B, Hobza R (2004) Gender in plants: sex chromosomes are emerging from the fog. Trends Genet 20:432–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wuest SE, O’Maoileidigh DS, Rae L, Kwasniewska K, Raganelli A, Hanczaryk K, Lohan AJ, Loftus B, Graciet E, Wellmer F (2012) Molecular basis for the specification of floral organs by APETALA3 and PISTILLATA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:13452–13457CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Functional Genomics Laboratory, Centre for BiotechnologySiksha O Anusandhan UniversityBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations