Introduction

Activated carbon powder has long been in use in the purification of water (Shannon et al. 2008), sugar (Harris 1942), and other food materials (Roy 1994). It has also been in use as air filter and in adsorbing several adverse species like, color, odor, organic dyes, pesticides, herbicides, metals ions, and microbes of varied origin to the benefit of human. However, its use in facial cream formulations is a recent development with blitz campaign that is shrouded with the lack of awareness of any ill effect (Gillbro and Olsson 2011; Khanna and Datta Gupta 2002) on its use.

In recent times, several multinational companies introduced newer products related to facial application mainly for male population. The level of advertisement to introduce such products is eye catching involving popular matinee idols and sport celebrities in the electronic media. The base slogan of such advertisement is to combat dark spot, acne, oily skin, and environmentally inflicted damages on the exposed face outdoor. The introduction of such a cream to get away with all these problems is credited with the addition of active microsized carbon with the additional advantage of getting fairer skin day by day.

On application of such face cream may result quick effect where the known adsorbing property of microcarbon acts. However, its use over a period of time could be disastrous. The common side effect of any face cream is itching, allergy, dry skin, pimples, or photosensitivity (Bhushan 2012; Ellison 2014; Palmer et al. 2000; Gamboni et al. 2013; Hamed et al. 2012; Idrus and Hymans 2014; McRill et al. 2000; Monheit and Dreher 2013; Rodgers and Chabrol 2009; Sin and Tsang 2003; Spiewak and Dutkiewicz 2002; Szayna and Kuhn 1998; Tlacuilo-Parra et al. 2001; Trattner et al. 2009; Tzanck 1952; Weldon et al. 2000). However, the use of microcarbon in facial cream poses extra problem as these contain a fair proportion of reduced graphene oxide in the nanodomain. The general protocol to synthesize microcarbon is by carbonization process of wood or dry plant waste under limited supply of air by burning or simply by pyrolyzing. The milled product formed as powder generally thought with the upper size cap as only microcarbon in size. Industries use fine carbon powder for its diverse application and they never intended to use any nano sized carbon powder. The product normally used is called active charcoal in microsize form and such carbon retains some adsorbed oxygen. Followed by the discovery of nanoforms of carbon and their identification with state-of-the-art microscopic and spectroscopic techniques, the physico-chemical properties of such forms of carbon have been shown to vary drastically under ambient conditions leading to deleterious effects to human once applied directly especially under visible light and air to induce diseases caused by the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) structure.

Experimental

Materials

We investigated the status of alleged microcarbon used in four popular brand face cream like Ponds pure white deep cleaning facial foam (P; a product of Unilever, UK), Nivea Men Oil Control Face Wash (N1); Nivea Men All-in-1 (N2) (products of Beiersdorf, Hamburg, Germany) and Garnier Men Power White Double Action(G) (a products of L’Oréal, France). The black component as carbon from each of these P, N1, N2, and G face creams is routinely separated and washed out and subjected to spectroscopic and microscopic analyses.

Isolation of carbon

Ponds pure white deep cleaning facial foam (P): 10 gm of P was taken in 100 ml beaker containing 80 ml 1:1 dichloromethane:ethanol mixture. It was sonicated for 5 min and centrifuged for 3 min at 4500 rpm. The solid residue left was washed with ethanol two times after 5 min sonication each time. The black carbon left out was dried in air. The amount of carbon isolated was 4.7 mg.

Nivea Men Oil Control Face Wash (N1), Nivea Men All-in-1 (N2) and Garnier Men Power White Double Action(G): For all these, the same technique was followed and a typical process is described below. 10 gm of a sample was taken in 40 ml petroleum ether in a 100 ml beaker. It was sonicated for 5 min, and then, the petroleum ether was decanted off. 80 ml 2:1 ethanol and water mixture was added into the left out solid. After 5 min sonication, the whole part was centrifuged for 3 min at 4500 rpm. The solid residue was washed with 1.1 ethanol and water mixture two times and then finally washed with ethanol two times. This part was further washed with acetone and air dried. Carbon around 4.5 mg was collected.

Physical measurements

Electronic spectra of the samples were measured using JASCO, V-630 spectrophotometer, while pH of the solution was monitored using Systronics Digital pH meter 335. The fluorescence spectra were recorded with Photon Technology International (PTI) Quanta Master™ 300. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), a SUPRA 40VP field-emission SEM (Carl Zeiss NTS GmbH, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) unit, in high-vacuum mode operated at 10 kV was used for the visualization of the size and morphology of isolated black stuff. The Raman data were collected on a Micro-Raman system (WITEC MODEL) with excitation energy of 2.41 eV (514 nm). FTIR were recorded using JASCO 450 model and fluorescence microscopic images were recorded using Leica DM2500. AFM images were made using Agilent 5100 AFM Molecular imaging model with AC mode imaging in the frequency range 152–172 kHz.

Cytotoxicity study

Approximately 103 cells/well skin keratinocyte (HaCaT) cells were seeded onto 96-well plates and incubated for overnight. In a typical experiment, 5 and 20 mg/ml of isolated rGO from one of the facial creams were prepared in DMEM. Cells were incubated with rGO dilutions for 12 h under 200 W light source. A blank, an untreated control (positive control), and a maximum rGO control (only rGO dilutions) were set in the study. After incubation, wells were washed with PBS (phosphate buffer saline). MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) solution in fresh medium was added and was incubated for 4 h at 37 °C followed by solubilisation solution was added. Absorbance was measured in a UV–Vis microplate reader (SkanIt, Thermo Fischer Scientific) at 570 nm wave length; reference wave length was set at 670 nm.

Phalloidin staining

HaCaT cells were treated with 5 and 20 mg/ml rGO under light for 12 h. Graphene (rGO)-treated cells were washed with ice-cold PBS followed by fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature (RT). Therefore, cell permeabilization was done by 0.01% triton-X 100 in PBS for 7 min followed by PBS wash. Cells were incubated with 1 × Phalloidin stain for 60 min at RT followed by PBS wash. Cells were mounted and observed through red filter (ex: 512–552 nm, em: 565–615 nm) under inverted microscope (Nikon eclipse TίU, Japan) equipped with 60× (S Plan Fluor) objective.

Results and discussion

Field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) images from P or N shows the presence of spherical or sheet like carbon (Fig. 1a–c) in nanosize, respectively. The corresponding atomic force microscopic (AFM) images support the presence of spherical nano carbon in sample P and graphene like sheets in sample N and G (Fig. 1d–f), respectively.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Microscopic images of isolated black stuff: FESEM images of a P; b N1; and c G and AFM images of d P; e N1: and f G

The nature of these carbon materials have been revealed by Raman and FTIR spectroscopic analyses. Raman spectra (Fig. 2a–c) of these carbon do not relate to pristine graphitic charcoal; rather, the presence of both G and D bands with overtone around 2700 cm−1 discloses their nature similar to graphene or spherical nanocarbon (Thema et al. 2013). FTIR spectra (Fig. 2d–f) despite subtle differences between these samples show the presence of C–O, C–H, and O–H vibrational similarities. The prominent C=O stretching (1732 cm−1) remained absent but retaining C–O–C epoxide linkage (Guerrero-Contreras and Caballero-Briones 2015) in the sample, P. Recent studies show that graphene oxide (GO) can exist in normal flat sheet or even as closed spherical form (Pakhira et al. 2015). This epoxide linkage (Pakhira et al. 2015) which is responsible for spherical shape is present in P which is absent in N1 and G.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Raman spectra of a P; b N1 and c G and FTIR spectra of d P; e N1 and f G

In our recent studies, we have shown that reduced graphene oxide (rGO) generates ROS (Dutta et al. 2015) which can be utilized to kill hospital pathogens. ROS in biological context are formed as natural byproduct during the metabolism of oxygen and have important roles in cell signaling and homeostasis (Devasagayam et al. 2004; Dickinson and Chang 2011). However, under environmental stress (e.g., UV or heat exposure), ROS levels can increase dramatically (Devasagayam et al. 2004; Dutta et al. 2015). This may result in significant damage to cell structures (Dickinson and Chang 2011; Maiuri et al. 2007). Cumulatively, this process is known as oxidative stress (Dickinson and Chang 2011). ROS are also generated by exogenous sources such as ionizing radiation (Sosa Torres et al. 2015). The common effects of ROS are cause of aging (Muller et al. 2007; Van Raamsdonk and Hekimi 2009), cancer (Irani et al. 1997), and cell proliferation (Cheung et al. 2015). Thus, the unintentional use of nanocarbon present in the micro carbon is capable to provoke air under light to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) which is directly related to cause skin cancer and with the formation of skin wrinkles aggravating the process of aging.

To show the nature of species present in the black carbon residue, we followed the general process which we adopted earlier (Pakhira et al. 2015). The residual carbon we got was leached with 10% aqueous sodium hydroxide. The alkali leached part after extraction and on neutralization with dilute HCl acid was allowed to stand under warm condition to yield the precipitation of a blackish brown product. This residue is soluble in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) (0.01 M) having pH 6.8 and 7.4, respectively. Such buffered solution when subjected to electronic absorption spectrum resembled that of grapheme oxide (GO) as shown in Fig. 3. The insoluble remained after buffer solution leaching was black in color. The black product that was not soluble is similar in properties as reported earlier where the subtle difference between GO and rGO remained in such solubility.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Electronic spectra of PBS buffer solution of (i) P part, (ii) N1 and (iii) G part having different pH value a) 6.8 and b) 7.4

The PBS solution in all the cases displayed a peak at 290 nm at pH 6.8, but this absorption gets broadened on increasing the pH to 7.4. Such electronic spectral variation under pH difference is similar to point out open and clinch fist forms of GO as reported earlier (Pakhira et al. 2015).

The FTIR spectra (Fig. 4) of light treated black carbon under aerobic condition show the appearance of new peaks and the alkali leached neutralized stuff shows C–O stretching vibrations. These can be explained in the following way. The light induces electron transfer from black insoluble carbon which is in reality reduced form of graphene oxide (rGO) that produces superoxide radical ion (ROS) with aerial oxygen and itself gets partially oxidized followed by hydrolysis to form GO (Pakhira et al. 2015, 2017). It is to be noted that GO that is leachable does not fluoresce, but the insoluble rGO does (Pakhira et al. 2015).

Fig. 4
figure 4

FTIR spectra of light treated part in air a P and b N1 and c G and d, e and f are isolated part with NaOH of P, N1, and G, respectively

Fluorescence microscopic images (Fig. 5) are used to validate the role of oxygen and light in the production of fluorescent materials. Four sets of smeared glass slides contain black carbon isolated from P. In these four sets, the exposure of O2 and light were varied. After 2 h, these slides were viewed by fluorescence microscopy.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Fluorescence microscopic images of isolated carbon from P (i) under light in the presence of air, (ii) under light in argon atmosphere, (iii) in dark in the presence of air, (iv) in dark in argon atmosphere: a bright field, b 385 nm, c 488 nm, d 561 nm and e 635 nm

The black carbon isolated from Pi essentially contains rGO (reduced graphene oxide) and this remains indistinguishable under air or light or under argon under bright field. However, when viewed under different light source like 385,488 561 and 635 nm, the left column (Fig. 5) displays fluorescence. The rGO in this channel has been exposed to light in the presence of air. We have earlier shown that rGO reacts with O2 present in air to generate superoxide radical ion (O2 ) and rGO+. The cationic rGO+ reacts with the available moisture (water) to produce Graphene Oxide (GO). The GO has the property to fluoresce (Dutta et al. 2015). Similarly, Fig. 6 displays.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Fluorescence microscopic images of isolated carbon from (i) N1, (ii) N2, and (iii) G in the presence of air and light: a bright field, b 385 nm, c 488 nm, d 561 nm and e 635 nm. In case of absence of either light or air, no fluorescence observed and hence not shown

The fluorescence microscopic images caused under light and oxygen (air) exposure on the insoluble isolated black carbon from other facial cream like N1, N2, and G including their less informative bright filed images. Thus, the alleged active microcarbon present in all these facial cream generates reduced oxygen species (ROS) under exposure to visible light in the presence of air. This is because these are contaminated with rGO which has the property to get activated in air under light to produce GO (Dutta et al. 2015) with the production of toxic superoxide radical ion (O2 ).

These isolated black carbons also respond to NBT (nitro blue tetrazolium) test (Beauchamp and Fridovich 1971; Lombard et al. 2001) in the presence of air and light, which chemically confirm the production of superoxide radical, the first product amongst the reactive oxygen species (ROS).

Cytotoxicity

The standard MTT assays suggested that these isolated rGO has cytotoxic effect on HaCaT cells (Fig. 7). Viabilities of HaCaT cells were 50.53 and 36.77% for 5 and 20 mg/ml rGO treatment, respectively. The cytotoxic effect of rGO was due to its generation of superoxide radical with air under visible light. The superoxide anion radical being the first member of the ROS kills the cells. These results indicate that the alleged active microcarbon used in face cream contains enough graphene material like rGO which has high cytotoxic effect under visible light exposure and in air to the live skin cells.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Cytotoxic effect of isolated rGO: a) controlled HaCat cells; b) and c) are 5 and 20 mg/ml rGO treated HaCat Cells

Cytoskeleton study

Figure 8 shows that the isolated rGO has the property to interact with the cellular component, cytoskeleton. It has localized on F-actin filaments of HaCaT cells which leads to cell death via disruption of cytoskeleton assembly. Untreated cells showed organized cytoskeleton distribution (Fig. 8a), though cytoskeleton assembly was disrupted upon increase of rGO concentration (Fig. 8b, c).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Impairment of F-actin assembly by isolated black carbon (rGO) in skin keratinocyte (HaCaT) cells which were exposed to a control; b 5 and c 20 mg/ml isolated black carbon for 12 h and then stained with phalloidin for F-actin (red). Scale bar: 20 μm

Conclusion

We demonstrate here that the popular cream manufactured by Ponds, Nivea, or Grainer brands face wash contains nanosized reduced graphene oxide (rGO) which are inadvertently created while producing active microcarbon powder from natural sources. The rGO present in micro carbon remains dormant but gets aggravated under normal light to excite aerial oxygen to toxic superoxide anion. The superoxide anion is the first member of ROS which will have a cascading damaging effect on living cells and would mutate the normal facial cells readily. It is true that the use of these forms of nanocarbons is beneficial in other services to human, but in contact with air and ordinary light, their use must be avoided. Therefore, this is a caveat that the manufacturer of such microcarbon should ensure that the microcarbon that they use should not contain nanocarbon like reduced graphene oxide or its carcinogenic effect on skin application by human will be disastrous.

Supporting information

Supporting Information containing FTIR spectra of carbon isolated form N2 and its light treatment parts are available from Applied Nanoscience website.