Abstract
Cadmium sulfide nanoparticles were grown in Na2O–GeO2 glass matrix by a diffusion-controlled phase decomposition of over-saturated solid solution. The structural properties of CdS nanocrystals have been studied by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), optical absorption and electrical conductivity. The existence of CdS nanocrystals was confirmed by XRD and TEM, also its crystallite sizes are obtained. The average CdS crystallite sizes calculated from XRD analysis for the different heat-treatment conditions are found in the range between 23.7 and 48.8 nm; however, the average CdS crystallite sizes obtained from TEM micrographs are found in the range between 17 and 63 nm. The band gap energy Eopt and the activation energy Eg for the electrical conductivity have been increased with decrease in the particle size; however, the Urbach energy ΔE decreases with decreasing the nanocrystal size.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cadmium sulfide, a technologically important material, has aroused some interest in recent years. In the early 1980s, it was found that semiconductor nanocrystals embedded in a wide-gap matrix of oxide glass represented three-dimensionally confined quantum wells for electronic excitations (electrons, holes, excitons) (Ekimov et al. 1980; Ekimov and Onushchenko 1981; Efros and Efros 1982). The development of the technology for growing of nanocrystals of various semiconductor compounds via the process of diffusion-controlled phase decomposition of oversaturated solid solution (Golubkov et al. 1981) has opened the door for intensive investigations of their linear, nonlinear and electro-optical properties.
The purpose of this paper is to grow and characterize the novel system of CdS nanoparticles embedded in germanate glass matrix. In this work also, it is intended to study the effect of CdS nanocrystal sizes on the optical and electrical properties of the present sodium germanate glass system. The prepared glass samples were characterized by differential thermal analysis (DTA), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
Experimental
In this work, we have prepared a novel system of CdS nanoparticles embedded in sodium germanate glass matrix. This system is 40 Na2O–60 GeO2: 3 wt% CdS. The raw materials used in preparation are Na2CO3, GeO2 and CdS reagent grades. They were weighted, mixed and stirred many times to obtain homogeneous mixture. The mixture was put in a porcelain crucible and inserted in an electric furnace held at 1,498 K for 2 h. Then, the melt has poured into two mild steel split mould in air. A DTA measurement for the as-quenched glass sample was performed by a micro differential thermal analyzer (Shemadzu-DT30). DTA allows us to identify the glass transition temperature (Tg) and the glass crystallization temperature (Tc) which are needed to select the values of annealing temperatures required to obtain different sizes of nanoparticles. In the present work, we have found the values of Tg and Tc are 831 and 935 K, respectively, accordingly the produced glass samples are heat-treated at 853, 873, 883 and 893 K for different time periods (1–9 h) to grow different sizes of nanoparticles.
The XRD analysis was performed by a Philips Pw 1373 X-ray diffractometer with Cu radiation (λ = 1.542 Å). TEM of type (JEOL-200CX) Japan was employed to examine the crystallinity and the particle size of the heat-treated glass samples. The optical absorption spectra were recorded using a Jasco V-530 UV–Vis spectrophotometer in the wavelength region 200–1,000 nm at room temperature. For the measurements of dc electrical conductivity, electrodes were formed by brush painting silver paste. The dc conductivity was measured as a function of temperature, using a spring-loaded sample holder in a wire-wound cylindrical furnace. All our dc electrical conductivity measurements were made using a Keithley electrometer model 616, with a smoothing adjustable power supply (0–1 kV). A fixed voltage of 200 V was applied. The temperature of the specimen was measured by means of a chromel–alumel thermocouple.
The dc electrical conductivity (σdc) of each glass specimen was then calculated using the formula:
where L is the thickness of the sample (cm), A is the area of the electrode (cm2) and R is the resistance (Ω).
Results and discussion
XRD and TEM analysis
Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4 show the XRD patterns for the glass samples (40 Na2O–60 GeO2: 3 wt% CdS) heat-treated at 853, 873, 883 and 893 K for different annealing times (1–9 h). The XRD patterns show diffraction lines compatible with the diffraction lines of orthorhombic bulk CdS and hexagonal GeO2 crystal at the surface of the nanoparticles according to [JCPDS 47-1179] and [JCPDS 83-0548], respectively. This result indicates that our quenching method leads to formation and crystallization of CdS nanoparticles which are covered by Ge–O bonds at the surface of the nanoparticles (Swelm et al. 2011).
We have calculated the mean sizes for the nanoparticles embedded in glass from full width at half maximum intensity of XRD peaks according to the Debye–Scherrer (Guinier 1963) equation:
where D is the crystallite size, β is the half-width of diffraction peak in radians, λ is the X-ray wavelength and θ is the angle of diffraction.
According to Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and Eq. 2, the calculated values of the average CdS particle size, D, were found to have sizes ranging from 23.7 to 48.8 nm for the studied glass samples heat-treated at 853, 873, 883 and 893 K for different annealing times ranging from 1 to 9 h (see Table 1).
Figure 5a–d shows the TEM micrographs for the glass samples heat-treated at 853, 873, 883 and 893 K for different times 7, 4, 2 and 3 h, respectively.
The estimated average crystallite size based on the electron microscope analysis for the different phases exists in the annealed samples at 853, 873, 883 and 893 K for different times that are tabulated in Table 1, where the average particle size varies from 17 to 63 nm depending on the annealing time.
From XRD analysis, the decrease in the broadening of the diffraction peaks with increasing the annealing time and annealing temperature is due to the increase in nanoparticle size, also from TEM micrographs it is observed that the size of the nanoparticles increases with increasing the annealing time (Fig. 6a–d) and annealing temperature.
The obtained dependence of CdS particle size (Fig. 6a–d) on the heat-treatment time cannot be described by the relationship R ~ t1/2 (a “normal growth” usually preceding the coalescence (Ekimov 1996)) or by the relationship R ~ t1/3. In the present study, the growth can be represented as RXRD ~ t0.056 for low annealing temperature (853 K) and RXRD ~ t0.88 for high annealing temperature (893 K). However, for the obtained nanoparticle size using TEM method the growth rate showed RTEM ~ t0.075 and RTEM ~ t0.18 at the same temperatures above (Fig. 6a–d). Therefore, the mechanism of the growth of CdS semiconductor nanocrystals in germanate glasses calls for further investigation.
UV–Vis absorption spectra
The change of the optical absorption of heat-treated samples is due to increasing the number of crystalline nuclei of the same size at the initial stage of growth; also changes of shapes of absorption spectra are due to changes of positions of quantum levels with growth of nanoparticles (Burda et al. 2005).
Figure 7 shows the absorption spectra for the glass samples heat-treated at 873 K for different annealing times 2, 3, 4 and 5 h, respectively. From inspection of this figure it is observed that the values of the absorption band-edge wavelength, λcut off, seem to move generally, towards the longer wavelengths as the annealing time is increased, i.e., towards the red shift.
The values of Eopt were determined for the all heat-treated (40 Na2O–60 GeO2: 3 wt% CdS) glass samples at 853, 873, 883 and 893 K for different times ranging from 1 to 9 h (using Davis–Mott relation Tauc et al. 1966; Davis and Mott 1970) by extrapolation to zero absorption in the (αħω)2 versus ħω plots in (Fig. 8 as an example).
where B is a constant, Eopt. is the optical band gap energy and n is a number which characterizes the transition process (n = 1/2 for direct allowed transition).
The obtained values of Eopt show a decrease with increasing the annealing time and annealing temperature but with a slow rate at low annealing temperatures; on the other hand at higher annealing temperature, the rate of decreasing the Eopt increases with increasing the annealing time (see Table 1). The low rate of changing the band gap at low temperatures may be due to the reduction of intrinsic defects at the nanoparticles glass interface (Mathieu et al. 1995) and can be explained as following (Swelm et al. 2011). At these short times, we have two opposite effects on the energy of the absorption edge (1) effect of growing which leads to a shift of absorption to lower energy side and (2) the reduction of intrinsic defects which cause a slight shift to higher energy side. These two effects lead to the change in the energy of the absorption edge which is small. Then, the obtained results imply that the increase in nanoparticle size with increasing annealing temperature and annealing time leads to a decrease in the band gap energy.
The width of the band tails (Urbach energy ΔE) associated with valence and conduction bands was believed to be originated from electron transition between localized states, where the density of these localized states is exponentially dependent on energy (Tauc and Zanini 1977). Values of ΔE for the heat-treated glass samples at 853, 873, 883 and 893 K for different times ranging from 1 to 9 h are determined from the inverse slopes of lnα(ω) versus ħω plots according to the following Urbach equation which are shown in Fig. 9 as an example.
where α′(ω) is constant and ΔE is the width of the band tails energy.
The Urbach energy was used to characterize the degree of disorderness (which would depend on the thermal history of the samples) in amorphous and crystalline systems, materials with larger Urbach energy would have greater tendency to convert weak bonds into defects (Pal et al. 2000; Levy et al. 1989). It is observed that the Urbach energy for all heat-treated glass samples increases as the annealing time and annealing temperature increases (see Table 1), suggesting that there is an increase in the defect concentration.
The DC electrical conductivity
The temperature dependence of the dc electrical conductivity, σdc, for the heat-treated (40 Na2O–60 GeO2: 3 wt% CdS) glass samples at constant temperature (873 K) for different duration times (2, 3, 4 and 5 h) are calculated from the measured voltage and current values.
The dependence of the measured dc electrical conductivity on the reciprocal absolute temperature (1/T) is well represented by Arrhenius relation (Shihub and Gould 1995):
where, σ is the electrical conductivity, σ0 represents the value of σ at T = 0, k Boltzmann’s constant and Eg is the activation energy.
The variation of log σdc with the reciprocal of the absolute temperature (T−1) is shown in Fig. 10 for the glass–ceramic samples annealed at 873 K for different times (2–5 h). From inspection of this figure, it is observed that log σdc versus T−1 gives good straight lines with different slopes at high temperatures for all the present annealed glass samples. The activation energies were calculated from the slopes of log σdc versus T−1.
The variation of the activation energy, Eg, for the 40 Na2O–60 GeO2: 3 wt% CdS glass–ceramic samples annealed at 873 K for different annealing times is shown in Fig. 11.
From inspection of this figure, one can observe that the activation energy decreases from 0.061 to 0.028 eV as the nanoparticle size increases.
This obtained Eg showed higher energy values than that obtained for the as-quenched glass samples which is probably expected to be almost due to the electronic transitions between discrete energy levels of the split valence and conduction bands in CdS nanocrystals and the energy gap should be increased with decreasing the CdS nanoparticle sizes (Alivisatos 1996a, b; Brus 1991; Gaponenko 1998) and the contribution of Na+ ion to the conduction is very small.
Conclusion
We have reported the growth of a novel system of CdS nanocrystals in sodium germanate (40 Na2O–60 GeO2) glass matrix. The prepared CdS nanoparticles in glass matrix are characterized by DTA, XRD and TEM. The nanoparticle sizes are calculated using XRD patterns and TEM micrographs, which are found to vary from 17 to 63 nm.
The optical energy gap Eopt of CdS nanoparticles showed a decrease in its values with increasing the nanoparticle size also, the electrical activation energy Eg for the same samples showed the same nanoparticles size dependence; this may be due to a splitting of both the valence and conduction bands into a series of subbands, i.e., the energy band in nanocrystals becomes discrete. However, the Urbach energy ΔE increases as the nanoparticle size increases, this behavior suggests that there is a tendency to form clusters with increasing the value of nanoparticle size.
References
Alivisatos AP (1996a) Perspectives on the physical chemistry of semiconductor nanocrystals. J Phys Chem 100:13226
Alivisatos AP (1996b) Semiconductor clusters, nanocrystals and quantum dots. Science 271:933
Brus LE (1991) Quantum crystallites and nonlinear optics. Appl Phys A 53:465
Burda C, Chen X, Narayanan R, El-Sayed MA (2005) Chemistry and properties of nanocrystals of different shapes. Chem Rev 105:1025
Davis EA, Mott NF (1970) Conduction in non-crystalline systems V. Conductivity, optical absorption and photoconductivity in amorphous semiconductors. Philos Mag 22:903
Efros AlL, Efros AL (1982) Interband absorption of light in a semiconductor sphere. Sov Phys Semicond 16:772
Ekimov A (1996) Growth and optical properties of semiconductor crystals in glass matrix. J Lumin 70:1
Ekimov AI, Onushchenko AA (1981) Quantum size effect in three-dimensional microscopic semiconductor crystals. Sov JETP Lett 34:345
Ekimov AI, Onushenko AA, Tzehomskii VA (1980) Exciton light absorption by CuCl microcrystals growth in a glass matrix. Sov Phys Chem Glass (Fiz. Khim. Stekla) 6:511
Gaponenko K (1998) Optical properties of semiconductor nanocrystals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Golubkov VV, Ekimov AI, Onushchenko AA, Tsehomskii VA (1981) Kinetiks of CuCl microcrystals growth in a glass matrix. Sov Phys Chem Glass 7:397
Guinier A (1963) X-ray diffraction in crystals, imperfect crystals, and amorphous bodies. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco
Levy M, Duclot JM, Rousseau F (1989) V2O5-based glasses as cathodes for lithium batteries. J Power Sources 26:381
Mathieu H, Richard T, Allegre J, Lefebvre P, Arnaud G (1995) Quantum confinement effects of Cds nanocrystals in a sodium borosilicate glass prepared by the sol gel process. J Appl Phys 77:287
Pal M, Tsujigami Y, Yoshikado A, Sakata H (2000) Electrical and optical properties of MoO3–TeO2 amorphous films prepared by PVD method. Phys Status Solidi (a) 182:727
Shihub SI, Gould RD (1995) Frequency dependence of electronic conduction parameters in evaporated thin films of cobalt phthalocyanine. J Thin Solid Films 254:187
Swelm W, Higazy A, Algradee M (2011) Growth and characterization of novel system of nanoparticles embedded in phosphate glass matrix. World J Condens Matter Phys 1:24–32
Tauc J, Zanini M (1977) Temperature dependence of the absorption edge of liquid sulfur. J Non-Cryst Solids 23:349
Tauc J, Grigorovici R, Vancu A (1966) Optical properties and electronic structure of amorphous germanium. Phys Status Solids 15:627
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
El-Rabaie, S., Taha, T.A. & Higazy, A.A. Synthesis and characterization of CdS nanocrystals embedded in germanate glasses. Appl Nanosci 4, 219–226 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-012-0192-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-012-0192-7