Abstract
The magnetocaloric properties of the as-consolidated nanocrystalline and coarse-grained gadolinium metals were studied in the present work. With the decrease of Gd grains from micrometer to nanometer range, magnetic entropy change drops surprising from 10.07 to 4.47 J kg−1 K−1 at a magnetic-field change of 5 T, and their resultant magnetic entropy change uniformly peaks at 294, 290, and 288 K, respectively, corresponding to the magnetic transition temperature of the three samples. The Curie temperature TC of the nanocrystalline Gd shifts by more than 6 K below that of coarse-grained Gd sample. However, the values of magnetic entropy change of the nanocrystalline metals exhibit a more constant tendency compared with the coarse-grained sample. The Arrott plots indicate the second-order character of magnetic phase transition still in the nanocrystalline Gd metals. The refrigerant capacity calculated is also used to evaluate material refrigeration capacity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In recent years, magnetic refrigeration technology has attracted extensive attention due to its good energy efficiency, small volume and environment amity, when compared with the conventional gas-compression cooling (Pecharsky and Gschneidner 1999; Pecharsky et al. 2005). As a result, many magnetic materials with large magnetocaloric effect (MCE) have been developed and comprehensively investigated for the moment.
Recently, the research and development efforts in the area of magnetic refrigeration have been concentrated in the nanoscale magnetic materials due to a large MCE in the nanostructured materials (McMichael et al. 1992, 1993; Bennett et al. 1994; Shao et al. 1996). Considerable investigations indicate that the nanostructured materials are very promising candidates for potential application in the magnetic refrigeration (Zhang et al. 2001; Tanaka et al. 2001; Hueso et al. 2002; Provenzanoa et al. 2003; Shir et al. 2003; Kinoshita et al. 2004; Evangelisti et al. 2005; Poddar et al. 2006; Gόmez-Polo et al. 2007; Ma et al. 2007; Baldomir et al. 2007; Franco et al. 2007; škorvánek et al. 2007; Poddar et al. 2007; Biswas et al. 2008; Franco et al. 2008; Gorsse et al. 2008; Li 2008; Gass et al. 2008; Lu et al. 2008; Santanna et al. 2008; Serantes et al. 2008; Pekała and Drozd 2008; Juan and Gui 2009; Gorria et al. 2009; Phan et al. 2009; Babita et al. 2009; Calderon-Ortiz et al. 2009; Das et al. 2009; Phan et al. 2010; Burianova et al. 2010; Nelson et al. 2002). However, up to now, not much effort has been devoted to the rare earth bulk nanocrystalline metals.
As the only simple ferromagnet among the rare earth elements at room temperature, the metal gadolinium (Gd) has been broadly investigated in past decades (Geldart et al. 1962; Legvold 1980; Gschneidner and Pecharsky 2000; Dan’kov et al. 1998) and has drawn tremendous attention, particularly with respect to the finite-temperature magnetic properties and magnetocaloric effect. It is well known that Gd crystallizes in the hexagonal close-packed structure with a lattice constant of a = 3.629 Å, c/a = 1.579. The magnetic phase transition from paramagnet to ferromagnet is second-order transformation taking place at the Curie temperature around 293 K, close to room temperature.
In our recent research, a novel technique has been developed for preparing full dense bulk size-controllable nanocrystalline pure rare earth metals (Song et al. 2006), which enabled us to study the remarkable influence of nanostructure on the all kinds of properties of the rare earth metal Gd. However, the magnetocaloric properties of bulk nanocrystalline Gd metals remain unexplored for the moment. In the present work, therefore, it is the aim of this study to investigate the effect of nanostucture, as represented in the bulk nanocrystalline Gd metals, on the magnetic entropy change of Gd.
Experimental
The experimental details on the preparation and characterization of the consolidated bulk of the pure rare earth Gd metals have been published elsewhere (Zeng et al. 2009).
The initially prepared Gd nanoparticles, prepared by the inert-gas condensation method, were consolidated using by Spark Plasma Sintering. The sintering conditions are as follows: vacuum, temperature in the range 250–700°C with a heating rate of 50°C min−1, pressure 500 MPa and without heat preservation time. After sintering, the consolidated bulk nanocrystalline metals cooled down to room temperature.
The microstructures of the consolidated bulk of the pure rare earth Gd metals were observed with transmission electron microscopes and select area electron diffraction. It is revealed from the TEM micrograph observation that the average grain sizes in the as-consolidated bulk at 280 and 700°C, and the coarse-grained polycrystalline Gd raw material, are 15, 100 and 1,000 nm, respectively.
The magnetic properties of the as-consolidated bulk as well as the coarse-grain specimens were measured by using a Physics Property Measurement System (PPMS, Quantum Design).
The magnetic entropy of a magnetic system can be derived from the Maxwell equation (1):
In an isothermal magnetization process, the magnetic entropy change (ΔSM) can be derived from Eq. 1 by integrating from the initial field 0 to the final field H, as following shown:
where the symbols S, M, H, and T represent the magnetic entropy, the magnetization of material, the applied magnetic field and the temperature of the system, respectively.
In the case of measurements of the magnetization made at a certain constant temperature, and at discrete intervals of H, the above Maxwell expression can be numerically approximated with the following expression (3):
where M (T1, H) and M (T2, H) represent the values of the magnetization in a magnetic field H at the temperatures T1 and T2.
Results and discussion
Figure 1 displays the ZFC magnetization curves of the bulk Gd metals at temperature range from 3 to 335 K in the applied magnetic field of 100 Oe. The values of the Curie temperatures (TC) have been obtained from the inflection point of the magnetization data at low field. Thus, the magnetic orderings, respectively, at 296.2, 289 and 294.2 K, determined from the magnetization of the samples as a function of temperature, are associated with the second-order paramagnetic to ferromagnetic transition. It can be well found that the Curie temperature of the bulk Gd metals decreases as the grain size decrease, from the 296.2 K of coarse-grained polycrystalline Gd down to 289 K of the consolidated bulk nanocrystalline Gd at 280°C. In other words, the Curie temperature TC of the nanocrystalline Gd shifts by more than 7 K below that of coarse-grained Gd sample. Such behavior has been observed for other systems, e.g. for FePt (Rellinghaus et al. 2003) nanopaticles. Meanwhile, the curves of the consolidated bulks exhibit broader shape near the Curie temperature compared with the coarse-grained Gd.
Correspondingly, the magnetizations of the samples at 3 K are 3.1, 2.7 and 2.1 emu/g, respectively, determined also from the figure. This value also decreases with the decrease in grain size.
The magnetization behaviors at 5 K of the consolidated bulk of the pure rare earth metals as well as the coarse-grained polycrystalline Gd metal measured in the magnetic field from 0 to 5.0 T are shown in Fig. 2a–c. It is well seen that, the saturation magnetization rises from 223.97 emu/g of the consolidated bulk at 280°C to 250.36 emu/g of the consolidated bulk at 700°C, and to 278.97 emu/g of the coarse-grained polycrystalline Gd metal. However, comparing it with the coarse-grained bulk Gd, the magnetizations decrease by about 20 and 10% for the as-consolidated samples, respectively, exhibiting a distinct depressed magnetization in the bulk nanocrystalline Gd metals.
In order to well understand the effect of grain sizes on magnetic entropy change (ΔSM) in the bulk Gd metals, the isothermal magnetization measurements have been carried out up to a maximum magnetic field of 5 T at different temperatures in the vicinity of TC. The magnetization behaviors of the consolidated bulk of the pure rare earth metals measured between 270 and 310 K in the magnetic field from 0 to 5.0 T are shown in Fig. 3a–c. The magnetization isotherms of both the consolidated bulk metals show the typical magnetic order transition from ferromagnetic to paramagnetic state, which is the characteristic of the second-order magnetic-crystallographic transition induced by the strong variation of temperature under magnetic field around the Curie temperature.
The nature of the magnetic phase transition in the Gd metals has been examined by using Banerjee criterion (Banerjee 1964). According to which the slope of M2 versus H/M curves (Arrott plot) denotes whether the observed magnetic phase transition is of the first order (negative slope) or, second order (positive slope). The so-called Arrott plots of H/M versus M2 near the magnetic transition temperature were performed for a temperature interval between 270 and 310 K, as shown in Fig. 4a–c. All the H/M versus M2 curves exhibit the positive slope indicating that the transitions between the ferromagnetic and paramagnetic phases in all samples are of the second-order transition (SOMT). As we know that the paramagnetic-ferromagnetic phase transition in polycrystalline Gd is the second-order magnetic transition. In other words, the nanosturctures do not change the magnetic transition and still preserve the second-order ferromagnetic → paramagnetic magnetic phase transition in the bulk nanocrystalline Gd metals.
The temperature dependence of magnetic entropy change (ΔSM) value for all, upon the magnetic applied field changes of 5 T, determined numerically using Eq. 3 and the corresponding magnetization (M) curves in Fig. 3, displaying a maximum negative value around the Curie temperature, is shown in Fig. 5.
Figure 5 shows the temperature dependencies of the ΔS curves for the as-consolidated and coarse-grained bulk Gd metals measured directly from 270 to 310 K in a magnetic field from 0 to 5 T. It is well known that the MCE peaks at the appropriate magnetic phase-transition temperature of the magnetic material. The maximum of the ΔS peaks at its Curie temperature (TC). MCE shows that the ΔS peak temperatures of the as-consolidated at 280°C and at 700°C as well as coarse-grained bulk Gd samples are 288, 290, and 294 K, respectively, which are slightly smaller than the values determined from the ZFC measurement; the corresponding peak values of ΔS of the three bulk samples are 4.47 K, 7.73 K, and 10.07 J kg−1 K−1, respectively. Obviously, the ΔS values of the bulk nanocrystalline Gd metals are far lower than that of the corresponding coarse-grained bulk Gd. Remarkably, the peak value in the as-consolidated at 280°C (4.47 J kg−1 K−1) is nearly 2 times smaller than in coarse-grained bulk Gd (10.07 J kg−1 K−1). Thus, it indicates that the grain sizes can affect the magnetocaloric effect in the Gd metals.
The decreasing of the crystallite size in the nanostructural Gd samples leads to a reduction of the maximum value for the ΔS, specially the value only attaining to 4.47 J kg−1 K−1 for the SPS 280°C sample. The ΔS peak temperatures have also been found to be strongly dependent on the crystallite size of the bulk Gd materials and turned out to be reduced to 6 K compared with the coarse-grained bulk Gd. The broadening of ΔS peaks revealed in the as-consolidated samples in comparison with the coarse-grained bulk Gd metal, can be at least partially, attributed to the structural disorder due to the significantly increased total grain boundary volume. It is well seen in the TEM, especially the HRTEM (Zeng et al. 2009), that the grain boundary microstructure in the nanocrystalline Gd is like the disordered amorphous phase state, being very different from that in the crystal grain. The amount of disordered phase in the bulk nanocrystalline Gd is more than that in the coarse-grained Gd due to the significantly increased total grain boundary volume. It is well known that the ferromagnetic ordering in Gd depends on the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida interaction, which is sensitive to the atomic distances. Therefore, it is expected that the exchange interaction at the grain boundary would be different from that at the internal region of the grain. Consequently, the reduction in the magnetocaloric effect of the bulk nanocrystalline Gd metals can be partly ascribed to the existence of large amount of disordered amorphous phase (grain boundaries). On the other hand, the magnetocaloric effect is related to the magnetic moment, however, the reduction of magnetic moment due to grain size reduction, which causes the decrease in magnetocaloric effect for the bulk nanocrystalline Gd metals.
In practice, the refrigerant capacity (Q), how much heat can be transferred between the cold and hot sinks in one ideal refrigeration cycle, is also an important parameter for selecting potential substances as magnetic refrigerants. The larger the Q is, the better the magnetocaloric material is. According to the method reported in the previous literature (Pecharsky and Gschneidner 2001), the Q is defined as
where Tcold and Thot are the temperature of the cold and hot sinks, respectively.
In order to get better comparison, the related magneto-caloric parameters of the coarse-grained and consolidated bulk Gd metals at 5 T are listed in the Table 1. Table 1 shows the comparison of magnetic entropy changes (ΔS), MCE peak temperatures (TP), relative cooling power (RCP), Curie temperatures (TC) determined from the ZFC measurement and grain size (D) between coarse-grained sample and bulk nanocrystalline Gd metals.
Finally, it is worth to note that the maximum value for the magnetocaloric effect decreases around 56 and 33%, respectively, for the SPS 280°C sample and the SPS 700°C sample in comparison with the coarse-grained bulk Gd. However, the magnetic entropy change peaks of the bulk nanocrystalline Gd metals are broaden and showing more constant than the coarse-grained bulk Gd in the same temperature span, which suggested that the bulk nanocrystalline could cover a large working temperature span. This large temperature interval with almost constant value of ΔS could be interesting for magnetic refrigeration applications at room temperature.
These results reveal that grain size can remarkably affect the MCE in the Gd metals and consequently stongly influence the conversion performance in the AMR. Therefore, our present work about the grain sizes on magnetocaloric effect may open an important field for the magnetic refrigeration practice applications.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the bulk nanocrystalline Gd matels have been consolidated from Gd nanoparticles using spark plasma sintering (SPS) technique. At 280°C, the mean size of the sintered Gd sample is 15 nm, and it increases to 100 nm when the temperature rises to 700°C. However, the Curie temperatures TC of Gd metals are, respectively, at 296.2, 289 and 294.2 K, shifted by more than 7 K below that of coarse-grained polycrystalline Gd. Meanwhile, the nanosturctures do not change the magnetic transition and the second- order magnetic transitions still remain. Magnetic entropy changes (ΔS) show that with the decrease of Gd grains from micrometer to nanometer, the ΔS drops surprising from 10.07 to 4.47 J kg−1 K−1, and their resultant ΔS uniformly peaks at 294, 290, and 288 K, respectively. All results imply the remarkable influence of the nanostructure on the magnetocaloric effects of Gd due to the finite size effect and grain boundaries.
In addition, it is worth to note that the magnetic entropy change peaks of the bulk nanocrystalline Gd metals are broaden and showing more constant than the coarse-grained counterpart in the same temperature span, which suggested that the bulk nanocrystalline metals could cover a large working temperature span. This large temperature interval with almost constant value of ΔS could be interesting for magnetic refrigeration applications at room temperature.
References
Babita I, Ram S, Gopalan R, Chandrasekaran V (2009) Dynamic inverse-magnetocaloric and martensite transition in Ni49Mn38Sn13 nanocrystals in low magnetic fields. Philos Mag Lett 89:399
Baldomir D, Rivas J, Serantes D, Pereir M, Arias JE, Buján-Núňez MC, Vázquez-Vázquez C (2007) Magnetic field dependence of the magnetocaloric effect in magnetic nanoparticle systems: a Monte Carlo simulation. J Non-Cryst Solids 353:793
Banerjee BK (1964) On a generalised approach to first and second order magnetic transitions. Phys Lett 12:16
Bennett LH, McMichael RD, Tang HC (1994) Monte Carlo simulations of the magnetocaloric effect in superferromagnetic clusters having uniaxial magnetic anisotropy. J Appl Phys 75:5493
Biswas A, Samanta T, Banerjee S, Das I (2008) Influence of charge ordering on magnetocaloric properties of nanocrystalline Pr0.65(Ca0.7Sr0.3)0.35MnO3. Appl Phys Lett 92:212502
Burianova S, Poltierova-Vejpravova J, Holec P, Plocek J (2010) Magnetocaloric phenomena in Mg-ferrite nanoparticles. J Phys Conference Ser 200:072015
Calderon-Ortiz E, Perales-Perez O, Voyles P, Gutierrez G, Tomar MS (2009) MnxZn1-xFe2-yRyO4 (R = Gd, Eu) ferrite nanocrystals for magnetocaloric applications. Microelectronics J 40:677
Dan’kov SY, Tishin AM, Pecharsky VK, Gschneidner KA Jr (1998) Magnetic phase transitions and the magnetothermal properties of gadolinium. Phys Rev B 57:3478
Das SD, Mohapatra N, Iyer KK, Bapat RD, Sampathkumaran EV (2009) Magnetic behavior of nanocrystalline ErCo2. J Phys Condens Matter 21:296004
de Santanna YVB, de Melo MAC, Santos IA, Coelho AA, Gama S, Cótica LF (2008) Structural, microstructural and magnetocaloric investigations in high-energy ball milled Ni2.18Mn0.82Ga powders. Solid State Commun 148:289
Evangelisti M, Candini A, Ghirri A, Affronte M, Brechin EK, McInnes EJL (2005) Spin-enhanced magnetocaloric effect in molecular nanomagnets. Appl Phys Lett 87:072504
Franco V, Conde CF, Conde A (2007) Enhanced magnetocaloric response in Cr/Mo containing Nanoperm-type amorphous alloys. Appl Phys Lett 90:052509
Franco V, Pirota KR, Prida VM, Neto AMJC, Conde A, Knobel M, Hernando B, Vazquez M (2008) Tailoring of magnetocaloric response in nanostructured materials: Role of anisotropy. Phys Rev B 77:104434
Gass J, Srikanth H, Kislov N, Srinivasan SS, Emirov Y (2008) Magnetization and magnetocaloric effect in ball-milled zinc ferrite powder. J Appl Phys 103:07B309
Geldart DJW, Hargraves P, Fujiki NM, Dublap RA (1962) Anisotropy of the critical magnetic susceptibility of gadolinium. Phys Rev 62:2728
Gorria P, Álvarez P, Sánchez Marcos J, Sánchez Llamazares JL, Pérez MJ, Blanco JA (2009) Crystal structure, magnetocaloric effect and magnetovolume anomalies in nanostructured Pr2Fe17. Acta Materialia 57:1724
Gorsse S, Chevalier B, Orveillon G (2008) Magnetocaloric effect and refrigeration capacity in Gd60Al10Mn30 Nanocomposite. Appl Phys Lett 92:122501
Gschneidner KA Jr, Pecharsky VK (2000) Magnetocaloric materials. Ann Rev Mater Sci 30:387
Gόmez-Polo C, Socolovsky LM, Denardin JC, Knobel M, Pérez-Landazábal JI, Recarte V (2007) Magnetocaloric effect in FeCr soft magnetic nanocrystalline alloys. J Magn Magn Mater 316:e876
Hueso LE, Sande P, Migue’ns DR, Rivas J, Rivadulla F, Lo’pez-Quintela MA (2002) Tuning of the magnetocaloric effect in La0.67Ca0.33MnO3-δ nanoparticles synthesized by sol-gel techniques. J Appl Phys 91:9943
Juan Z, Gui W (2009) Magnetocaloric effect in (La0.47Gd0.2)Sr0.33MnO3 polycrystalline nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 32:143
Kinoshita T, Seino S, Maruyama H, Otome Y, Okitsu K, Nakayama T, Niihara K, Nakagawa T, Yamamoto TA (2004) Influence of size distribution on the magnetocaloric effect of superparamagnetic gold-magnetite nanocomposite. J Alloys Compd 365:281
Legvold S (1980) In: Wohlfarth EP (ed) Ferromagnetic Materials, Vol. 3. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, p 185
Li S (2008) The magnetic entropy change in CoMnSb alloys with different crystal sizes. J Alloys Compd 448:73
Lu WJ, Luo X, Hao CY, Song WH, Sun YP (2008) Magnetocaloric effect and Griffiths-like phase in La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 nanoparticles. J Appl Phys 104:113908
Ma S, Li WF, Li D, Xiong DK, Sun NK, Geng DY, Liu W, Zhang ZD (2007) Large cryogenic magnetocaloric effect in the blocking state of GdAl2/Al2O3 nanocapsules. Phys Rev B 76:144404
McMichael RD, Shull RD, Swartzendruber LJ, Bennett LH, Watson RE (1992) Magnetocaloric effect in superparamagnets. J Magn Magn Mater 111:29
McMichael RD, Ritter JJ, Shull RD (1993) Enhanced magnetocaloric effect in Gd3Ga5–xFexO12. J Appl Phys 73:6946
Misaka TY, Shiomi K, Yamamoto TA, Nakagawa T, Katsura M, Numazawa T, Nakayama T, Niihara K (2001) Magnetic nanocomposite composed of a silver matrix and grains of iron compound. Scripta Mater 44:2141
Nelson JA, Bennett LH, Wagner MJ (2002) Solution Synthesis of Gadolinium Nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 124:2979
Pecharsky VK, Gschneidner KA Jr (1999) Magnetocaloric effect and magnetic refrigeration. J Magn Magn Mater 200:44
Pecharsky VP, Gschneidner KA Jr (2001) Some common misconceptions concerning magnetic refrigerant materials. J Appl Phys 90:4614
Pecharsky VK, Gschneidner KA, Tsokol AO (2005) Recent developments in magnetocaloric materials. Rep Prog Phys 68:1479
Pekała M, Drozd V (2008) Magnetocaloric effect in nano- and polycrystalline La0.8Sr0.2MnO3 manganites. J Non Cryst Solids 354:5308
Phan MH, Morales MB, Chinnasamy CN, Latha B, Harris VG (2009) Magnetocaloric effect in bulk and nanostructured Gd3Fe5O12 materials. J Phys D Appl Phys 42:115007
Phan MH, Chandra S, Bingham NS, Srikanth H, Zhang CL, Cheong SW, Hoang TD, Chinh HD (2010) Magnetocaloric effect in bulk and nanostructured Gd3Fe5O12 materials. Appl Phys Lett 97:242506
Poddar P, Gassa J, Rebar DJ, Srinath S, Srikanth H, Morrison SA, Carpenter EE (2006) Magnetocaloric effect in ferrite nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 307:227
Poddar P, Srinath S, Gass J, Prasad BLV, Srikanth H (2007) Magnetic transition and large magnetocaloric effect associated with surface spin disorder in Co and CocoreAgshell Nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C 111:14060
Provenzanoa V, Lia J, King T, Canavan E, Shirron P, DiPirro M, Shull RD (2003) Shull Enhanced magnetocaloric effects in R3(Ga1-xFex)5O12 (R = Gd, Dy, Ho; 0 < x < 1) nanocomposites. J Magn Magn Mater 266:185
Rellinghaus B, Stappert S, Acet M, Wassermann EF (2003) Magnetic properties of FePt nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 266:142
Serantes D, Baldomir D, Pereiro M, Rivas J, Vázquez-Vázquez C, Buján-Núñez MC, Arias JE (2008) Magnetic field-dependence study of the magnetocaloric properties of a superparamagnetic nanoparticle system. Phys Stat Sol A 205:1349
Shao Y, Zhang J, Lai JKL, Shek CH (1996) Magnetic entropy in nanocomposite binary gadolinium alloys. J Appl Phys 80:76
Shir F, Yanik L, Bennett LH, Della Torre E, Shull RD (2003) Room temperature active regenerative magnetic refrigeration: magnetic nanocomposites. J Appl Phys 93:8295
Škorvánek I, Kováč J, Marcin J, švec P, Janičkovič D (2007) Magnetocaloric effect in amorphous and nanocrystalline. Mater Sci Eng A 460:449–451
Song X, Zhang J, Yue M, Li E, Zeng H, Lu N, Zhou M, Zuo T (2006) technique for preparing ultrafine nanocrystalline bulk material of pure rare-earth metals. Adv Mater 18:1210
Zeng H, Kuang C, Zhang J, Yue M (2009) Thermal properties and microstructure of bulk nanocrystalline Gd material. J Mater Sci 44:5509
Zhang XX, Wei HL, Zhang ZQ, Zhang L (2001) anisotropic magnetocaloric effect in nanostructured magnetic clusters. Phys Rev Lett 87:157203
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Zeng, H., Zhang, J., Kuang, C. et al. Magnetic entropy change in bulk nanocrystalline Gd metals. Appl Nanosci 1, 51–57 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-011-0007-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-011-0007-2