Abstract
The coupled analysis of multi-field heat and mass transfer in geothermal reservoirs is a pivotal concern within the realm of geothermal rock exploitation. It holds significant implications for the assessment of thermal energy capacity and the formulation of reservoir optimization strategies in the context of geothermal rock resources. Parameters governing production, along with fracture network characteristics (such as injection well temperature, injection well pressure, fracture width, and fracture network density), exert an influence on enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) heat production. In this study, aiming to comprehend the dynamic heat generation of EGS during prolonged exploitation, a coupling of various fields including permeation within the rock formations of geothermal reservoirs and the deformation of these rocks was achieved. In this study, we formulated the governing equations for the temperature field, stress field, and permeability field within the geothermal reservoir rock. Subsequently, we conducted numerical simulations to investigate the heat transfer process in an enhanced geothermal system. We analyzed the effects of injection well temperature, injection well pressure, primary fracture width, and secondary fracture density on the temperature distribution within the reservoir and the thermal power output of the production well. The research findings underscore that ill-conceived exploitation schemes markedly accelerate the thermal breakthrough rate of production wells, resulting in a diminished rate of geothermal resource extraction from the geothermal reservoir rock. Variations in influent well temperature and secondary fracture density exhibit an approximately linear impact on the output from production wells. Crucially, injection well pressure and primary fracture width emerge as pivotal factors influencing reservoir output response, with excessive widening of primary fractures leading to premature thermal breakthrough in production wells.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The application of fossil fuels has brought about the Industrial Revolution and has provided humanity with tremendous developmental impetus over the past few centuries. In the current global environment, energy demand is steadily on the rise. Energy diversification not only offers a broader range of energy choices to cater to the specific needs of different regions and countries but also enhances the stability of energy supply. By reducing reliance on a single energy source, it mitigates the risk of supply disruptions. Geothermal energy, as a stable, widely distributed, and pollution-free clean energy source, has garnered attention from many nations. Hot dry rock refers to high-temperature rock formations buried deep underground with low porosity and permeability (Li et al. 2020). The heat stored within them requires artificial modification through the creation of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) for extraction (Baujard et al. 2021). The transformation of the reservoir is an irreversible process, necessitating the simulation of the overall production dynamics of the reservoir. This allows for the exploration of the impact of key production parameters on the reservoir’s dynamic behavior, thereby providing a basis for the formulation of production schemes.
EGS research has been conducted for more than 30 years, but in the past it was limited to countries such as the US, the UK, Japan, France, Germany, Switzerland, and Australia (Genter et al. 2003; Zhu et al. 2019; Leon and Kumar 2008; Karastathis et al. 2011). The abundance of dry heat rock resources has attracted the attention of many scholars. Modeling and experimental studies on EGS have developed rapidly. The issue of the EGS presents a classic example of a multi-domain, multiphysics coupling challenge. Within the framework of the EGS consisting of the injection wells, production wells, porous reservoirs, and surrounding impermeable rock formations, different domains adhere to distinct governing equations. Nonetheless, physically valid connectivity conditions must be met at the interfaces of these domains. Concurrently, in the simulation of EGS, the temperature field and permeation field necessitate coupled solutions, occasionally entailing joint solutions involving solid deformation and component transport. Gringarten et al. (1975) presented a theory for heat extraction from a fractured hot dry rock based on the assumption of the infinite and uniform apertures of parallel vertical fractures. Cold water enters through the bottom of each fracture, and the heat conductivity transfers from the hot rock to the fractured rock via the water flow. Their solution could be used in determining the water temperature and the ratio of the amount of heat extracted by means of the water flow within the fractures. Ashena et al. (2023) investigate the effect of a change in the thermal conductivity on the net heat energy, the net power, and the coefficient of performance (COP), at different circulation rates. Zhou and Hou (2013) proposed a numerical model describing hydraulic fracturing process for simulating the dynamic fracture expansion process and the fracture fluid momentum and mass exchange between the fracture fluid and t pore fluid.
In dry-thermal rock reservoirs, the interactions between temperature, pressure, and percolating bodies are very complex. Bower and Zyvoloski (1997) developed a numerical model of heat-water coupling in fractured rock. Shaik et al. (2011) determined the effective permeability tensor in geothermal reservoir simulations by investigating the fluid flow process, and they followed with a two-dimensional model to simulate the geothermal reservoirs. Nowak et al. (2011) proposed a multi-physical field porous medium THM coupled microscopic continuous medium method based on mass conservation, momentum conservation, and energy conservation equations with two field system engineering experiments and established a three-dimensional model while implementing parallel computation for the model. Jiang et al. (2013, 2014), as well as Chen and Jiang (2015), conducted numerical simulations of the permeation and heat transfer processes in EGS based on the Brinkman equation. They considered the impact of permeability and thermal imbalances between the surrounding rock and pore fluids on the lifespan of EGS. Subsequently, Cao et al. (2016) explored various geothermal well layouts and the relationship between injected water flow rate, heat extraction efficiency, EGS lifespan under the influence of structural stresses. Saeid et al. (2015) performed coupled simulations of low-temperature geothermal systems in one and two dimensions, considering different regimes of laminar and turbulent thermal conductivity. By comparing various parameters, they derived a quantitative relationship indicating that the lifespan of a geothermal field depends on porosity, flow rate, well spacing, reservoir temperature, and injected water temperature. However, the systematic study of how parameters related to injection wells and fracture width impact EGS heat production remains unexplored. Furthermore, the alterations in fluid properties occurring due to temperature changes within the geothermal rock reservoir have not been thoroughly considered. Therefore, it is imperative to comprehend the influence of parameters like injection well characteristics, fracture width, and fluid properties on the reservoir and production aspects. This understanding is crucial for optimizing the heat production capacity of EGS.
The output response of an EGS is jointly governed by the stress field, temperature field, and fracture permeation field within the matrix rock blocks. In this study, we integrated the coupling relationships between the fluid medium in the EGS, the permeability of fractures, and the reservoir rock. This integration led to the establishment of mathematical models for the stress field, temperature field, and permeation field within the EGS. Initially, we analyzed the dynamic characteristics of the temperature field during prolonged exploitation of the EGS. Subsequently, we conducted a comprehensive study and discussion on the impact of reservoir properties such as injection well temperature, injection well pressure, primary fracture width, and secondary fracture density, as well as other production parameters. The results of these efforts provide a deeper understanding of the dynamic nature of the reservoir temperature field and how the properties of the reservoir and production parameters collectively influence heat production in the EGS.
Coupled control equations for dry heat rock mining
Basic assumptions
An EGS is complex and can be simplified into a model composed of matrix rock mass and fracture system. The phase change of water caused by temperature is ignored, and the reservoir is a single-phase water-saturated reservoir. In the context of heat transfer in the model, only the heat transfer between the matrix rock and the fluid, as well as the variation in the temperature field within the matrix rock, has been considered. Temperature changes resulting from other factors have not been taken into account. In this study, the water flow in the fracture system is assumed to be laminar, in accordance with Darcy’s law, and the deformation of both the matrix rock mass and the fracture system is small (Pruess and Narasimhan 1985).
Control equations of the coupled model
For the EGS, the equations for the displacement and stress fields of the rock can be expressed as follows (Sun et al. 2016):
where u is the displacement [m]; \(\lambda\) and \(\nu \) are the Lame constants [Pa], respectively; \(\alpha_{T}\) is the thermal expansion coefficient of the bedrock [K−1]; \(\alpha_{B}\) is the Biot coupling coefficient; \(\sigma_{ij}\) is the tensor of the stress in the bedrock [Pa]; \(T_{s}\) is the temperature field of the bedrock [K]; and \(F_{i}\) is the physical force acting in the bedrock [N].
Considering the deformation of cracks, the controlling equation for the deformation generated by the interaction between the cracks and the rock mass can be expressed as follows:
where \( u_{n}\) is the normal displacement of the crack [m]; \(u_{s}\) is the tangential displacement of the crack [m]; \(K_{n}\) and \(K_{s}\) are the normal and tangential stiffness of the crack [Pa/m], respectively; and\(\sigma_{n}{\prime}\) and \(\sigma_{s}{\prime}\) are the normal and tangential effective stresses at the boundary of the crack [Pa/m].
Considering the porous seepage flow of matrix rocks with low permeability, the governing equation of seepage flow can be expressed as follows (Tenma et al. 2008):
where S is the water storage coefficient of the matrix [Pa−1]; t is time, s; \(\kappa\) is the permeability of the matrix [m2]; e is the volume strain of the matrix mass; \(\eta\) is the dynamic viscosity of the seepage medium [Pa·s]; and Q is the source-sink term of the seepage [kg/(m2·s)].
Consider the temperature field of the matrix of the EGS, the control equation can be expressed as follows:
where \(c_{s}\) is the specific heat capacity of the matrix rock mass [J/(kg·K)]; \(\rho_{s}\) is the density of the matrix rock mass [kg/m3]; W is the external heat source term [W]; and \(\lambda_{s}\) is the heat transfer coefficient of the matrix rock mass [W/(m·K)].
Considering the fluid seepage within the fracture, the controlling equation can be expressed as follows (Ma et al. 2023):
where \(\kappa_{f}\) is the permeability of the fracture in the enhanced geothermal system [m2]; \(Q_{f}\) is the flow exchange between the fracture face and the matrix rock [kg/(m2·s)]; \(d_{f}\) is the width of the fracture [m]; \(s_{f}\) is the water storage coefficient of the fracture [Pa−1]; and n is the normal direction of the fracture boundary.
Considering the heat field of the fluid itself in the fracture, the governing equation can be expressed as follows (Sun et al. 2017):
where \(c_{f}\) is the specific heat capacity of the fluid medium [J/(kg·K)]; \(u_{f}\) is the flow velocity of the fluid flowing along the fracture [m/s]; \(\rho_{f}\) is the density of the fluid flowing in the fracture [kg/m3]; \(T_{f}\) is the temperature of the fluid in the fracture [K]; \(\lambda_{f}\) is the coefficient of heat conduction of the fluid in the fracture [W/(m·K)]; and \(W_{f}\) is the heat conducted at the fracture boundary through the matrix rock boundary to the fluid flowing in the fracture [W].
For the \(W_{f}\) term on the right side of the equation, it is assumed that the heat exchange between the fluid in the fracture and the matrix rock boundary obeys Newton’s law of cooling, and the heat exchange between the fluid medium in the fracture and the matrix rock boundary can be calculated by the convective heat transfer coefficient. When the temperature of the fluid medium in the fracture differs from the temperature between the matrix rock boundary, the heat absorbed by the fluid medium in the fracture from the matrix rock on a unit area can be expressed as follows (Li et al. 2015):
where h is the heat transfer coefficient between media [W/(m2·K)].
Coupling relationship between physical fields
Coupling between seepage and stress at the boundary surface of fracture and matrix rocks
Geothermal exploitation system is an organic system, and there are joint effects of temperature field, seepage field, and stress field among rock mass and cracks and the action mechanism among temperature field, seepage field, and stress field (Zhou et al. 1998; Li et al. 2023). In an EGS, the heat exchange at the boundaries of fractures affects the temperature distribution within the reservoir rock. The coupling relationship between the temperature field and the stress field can alter the properties of the fracture network. As the primary flow pathways in the fluid medium, changes in the fracture network can impact its permeability, which is crucial for the coupled behavior between stress and flow fields in enhanced geothermal systems. To study the coupling characteristics of this system, Louis (1974) conducted experiments investigating the relationship between flow and stress in a rock mass containing a single fracture. He proposed an empirical exponential formula to explain the behavior of this coupled system:
where \(k_{0}\) is the permeability coefficient of the fracture at \(\sigma_{n}{\prime} = 0\) [m2]; \(k_{f}\) is the permeability coefficient of the fracture in the matrix rock [m2]; \(\alpha\) is the influence coefficient [1], and the magnitude of this coefficient is related to the state of existence of the fracture in the matrix rock.
Changes in fluid media properties
In EGS, the properties of the fluid also undergo changes as the fluid temperature varies within the fractures. The variation in fluid temperature has a significant impact on the viscosity of the fluid. The relationships between water viscosity, water density, specific heat capacity, and thermal conductivity of water with respect to temperature are expressed by the following formulas (Qu et al. 2017; Shen et al. 2022):
Numerical model solving and validation
Computational models
Figure 1 illustrates the EGS wellbore and fracture network model. In the diagram, "I" is the injection well, "P" is the production well, and the two horizontal fractures connected with the injection well and the production well are the main fractures of the reservoir. Secondary cracks are a group of vertical cracks that connect two horizontal main cracks. The physical parameters of the dry rock model are presented in Table 1. (Xiao et al. 2019).
Model solving methods
Based on the aforementioned coupled model, along with the initial and boundary conditions of the EGS rock mass, it is possible to solve for the temperature field, flow field, and stress field of the fractures and matrix rock mass. In this study, the numerical solution of the coupled model for the EGS is achieved using COMSOL Multiphysics. The governing equations of the various physical fields are combined and solved together, allowing for the computation of relevant numerical values for each field. For simulating fractures in the enhanced geothermal system, it is common to employ thin-layer elements (Leung and Zimmerman 2012), which have a certain thickness. However, in the case of EGS, the calculation domain is large and the fracture network within it is extensive and complex. Each thin-layer fracture would generate a large number of grids, leading to an excessively large grid count that hinders the computation of final results. Another approach is to transform the thin-layer fracture elements typically used in simulations into one-dimensional line elements without thickness for computation (Chen et al. 2014) The difference in results is not significant under the same parameters (Qu et al. 2019; Li et al. 2015), and the use of line elements simplifies the grid when performing finite element simulation and computation. The model shown in Fig. 1 is simplified to a two-dimensional model as depicted in Fig. 2, for simulation and analysis. For the two-dimensional model of the EGS under the condition of one-dimensional line elements, the stress field, temperature field, and flow field of the system are imported into COMSOL Multiphysics for solution.
Model coupling verification
This study employs COMSOL Multiphysics to solve the THM coupling model. In order to validate the effectiveness and computational accuracy of the model, two case studies are chosen for validation in this work.
Ghassemi and Zhang (2004) investigated the variations in temperature, pressure, and stress near a circular wellbore after a sudden temperature drop. Utilizing identical physical parameters, a comparative analysis between their findings and the results obtained from modeling and computation in COMSOL Multiphysics is presented in Fig. 3, for reference. Lauwerier (1955) gave an analytical solution for the variation of fracture water temperature with time in the study of heat transfer in oil reservoirs. After a certain time t, the temperature of the water in the fracture is distributed along the x-axis as follows:
where erfc is the residual error function; U is the unit step function; and \(u_{f}\) is the fluid flow rate in the fracture, m/s.
The THM coupling model of a single fracture was solved using COMSOL Multiphysics, and the results were compared with the analytical solution, as depicted in Fig. 4. The numerical solution closely aligns with the analytical solution. By contrasting the numerical simulation with the analytical solution, it becomes evident that the mathematical model and solution approach presented in this paper are in concordance with theoretical analytical expectations. This underscores the feasibility of the mathematical model and computational methodology proposed in this study.
Results and discussion
Evolutionary characteristics of the temperature field
Currently, the geothermal recovery rate γ of a geothermal reservoir is commonly used to evaluate the geothermal recovery performance of an enhanced geothermal system, and γ is calculated as follows:
where \(T_{{{\text{avg}}\left( {{\text{init}}} \right)}}\) is the initial average temperature of the rock [K]; \(T_{{{\text{avg}}\left( t \right)}}\) is the average temperature of the rock at moment t [K]; and \(V_{s}\) is the volume of the rock [m3].
The variation of the temperature field of dry thermal rocks under different time conditions obtained by COMSOL Multiphysics is shown in Fig. 5. From the result of Fig. 5, it can be seen that the temperature field of the rock mass near the production wells maintains a stable value for a long time during the first years of the mining process. After a long time of mining, the low-temperature region of the matrix rock expands, the temperature increase of the fluid during the flow of the fracture network slows down, and the low-temperature region gradually spreads along the fluid flow side. After about 50 years of mining, the low-temperature region spreads near the production wells, thermal breakthrough occurs in the production wells, the temperature of the production wells decreases rapidly, and the thermal power of the production wells decreases sharply.
Effect of the injection well temperature
To study the effect of the inlet temperature on the production well output, the temperature of the production well and the variation of the thermal power of the production well were obtained by taking increments of 15 °C at a time at a pressure of 20 MPa (2900 psi) and an initial inlet temperature of 20 °C, and the variation trends are shown in Figs. 6 and 7. From the results in Figs. 6 and 7, it can be seen that the variation trends at different temperatures do not vary much over the 30-year stable mining period. The effect of temperature on the variation of thermal power varies roughly linearly, which is consistent with the analysis under Eq. (17) for the variation of fracture water temperature. High-temperature fluids from producing wells can be injected directly into injection wells without cooling treatment after power generation or other reuse.
Effect of the injection well pressure
The injection well pressure significantly affects the fluid flow rate in the fracture network, and Fan et al. (2018) established an analytical model considering the heat-fluid–solid coupling dry-thermal rock reservoir based on the discrete fracture network model to analyze the effect of injection volume on the temperature of the discrete fracture network. With the increase of injection volume, the temperature at the fracture exit end changes rapidly at the early stage and slows down at the later stage. Meanwhile, the thermal breakthrough at the exit end of the production well becomes earlier and earlier with the increase of injection volume. In order to study the effect of injection well pressure on production well output, the variation of temperature and thermal power of the outlet well were obtained by increasing the inlet pressure by 4 MPa (5800 psi) for each calculation starting from 10 MPa (1450 psi) under the condition that the injection well temperature was 60 °C and the production well pressure was 6 MPa (8700 psi). The variation of temperature and thermal heat extraction rate at different pressures are shown in Figs. 8 and 9. From the results in Figs. 8 and 9, it can be seen that as the pressure increases, the temperature decreases at an accelerated rate after about 15 years of stable extraction, and the higher the pressure, the faster the rate of decrease. The effect of increasing pressure on the production heat power of the producing wells is mainly concentrated in the first 25 years of exploitation, and increasing the pressure affects the flow rate of the fluid in the fracture and the change of the heat field. Compared to the relatively stable heat power variation at 22 MPa (3191 psi), further increasing the pressure leads to an accelerated decline in heat power after 25 years of exploitation. Raising the injection well pressure results in a sharp initial increase in heat power from the production well, yet boosting the pressure at the injection well predominantly impacts the initial phase of heat production. Moreover, increasing the pressure causes the injected well fluid to permeate into more distant zones, concurrently expediting the thermal breakthrough process.
Effect of the width of the main crack
The main fracture is connected to the injection well and the outlet well. As the main circulation channel for fluid media, the width of the main fracture has a large impact on the temperature field distribution of the entire enhanced geothermal system. A smaller fracture width will cause the fluid medium percolation process in the main fracture to slow down, which will inject insufficient thermal energy extraction from the matrix rock at the end of the well. A larger fracture width will make the fluid flow faster and flow too quickly from the injection well to the end of the main fracture, the fluid medium does not fully exchange heat with the matrix rock body near the injection well area, the temperature of the matrix rock body near the production well drops faster, and the thermal breakthrough of the production well is advanced (Hu et al 2014). In order to study the effect of the width of the main fracture, the width of the secondary fracture was taken to be 0.0001 m, and the change in the width of the main fracture was calculated by taking increments of 0.0002 m each time starting from 0.0001 m, and the temperature field at each width and the change in the thermal power of the production well were obtained as shown in Figs. 10 and 11. From the results in Figs. 10 and 11, it can be seen that the variation of the width of the main fracture has a similar effect on the variation of the production thermal power as the variation of the pressure on the thermal power. As the width of the fracture increases, the flow rate of fluid medium along the main fracture becomes faster and the thermal power of the production well shows an upward trend. After the stable exploitation period of 20–25 years, the curve of the production thermal power is staggered compared to the fracture with smaller width due to thermal breakthrough, at which time the temperature of the output well of the fracture with larger width decreases faster and the production thermal power is less than that of the fracture with smaller width.
Effect of the paracrack density
In the process of dry-thermal rock extraction, two main fractures established by hand are then artificially hydraulically fractured to form a secondary fracture channel connecting the two main fractures, which together with the secondary fractures form the fracture network of the enhanced geothermal system. The degree of controlled fracturing affects the density of the secondary fractures, and the change in the density of the secondary fractures affects the connectivity between the injection wells and the output wells on the one hand, and on the other hand, the increase in the density of the secondary fractures leads to a more uniform distribution of the secondary fractures in the matrix rock, which results in a more adequate heat exchange between the fluid and the matrix rock and reduces the rate of thermal breakthrough in the production wells to a certain extent. The variation of the temperature of the water outlet well, the thermal power of the production well, and the geothermal extraction rate in the dry heat rock area obtained by varying the number of secondary fractures in the extraction area with a primary fracture width of 0.0005 m and a secondary fracture width of 0.0001 m are shown in Figs. 12 and 13. From the results in Figs. 12 and 13, it can be seen that there is not much fluctuation in the mining power when the analysis of fracture density is performed at a pressure of 14 MPa (2030 psi). The density of fractures primarily impacts the connectivity between the injection and production wells within the geothermal rock, resulting in a larger contact area between the fluid medium and the geothermal reservoir. Starting from six secondary fractures, further increasing the density of secondary fractures diminishes its effect on the reservoir’s heat power. In the context of geothermal rock reservoir, there exists a marginal impact with increasing fracture density, and a higher number of fractures lead to greater hydraulic fracturing difficulty. When devising extraction strategies, it is essential to consider the combined influence of hydraulic fracturing complexity and fracture density, aiming for an optimal balance.
Summary and conclusions
In this study, a mathematical model for the stress field, temperature field, and permeability field of an enhanced geothermal system (EGS) was established based on the coupling relationship between fluid medium, fracture permeability, and reservoir rocks. Full coupling simulations were conducted using COMSOL Multiphysics to investigate the impact of injection well temperature, injection well pressure, main fracture width, and secondary fracture density on the distribution of reservoir temperature field and the thermal–electric output of production wells. The key conclusions drawn from these studies are as follows:
-
(1)
In an enhanced geothermal system, as the production process progresses, the low-temperature area starts to expand from the injection well and causes thermal breakthrough, and the temperature of the production well drops significantly. The rate of heat breakthrough in producing well is related to the distance between injection well and producing well.
-
(2)
The impact of temperature decrease on the temperature and thermal power output of production wells generally follows a linear trend. As for the injection well pressure, its effect on the output temperature and thermal power of production wells is substantial. With an increase in injection well pressure, the overall thermal breakthrough speed of the system experiences significant changes. Around the threshold of 22 MPa, higher injection well pressures lead to a notable acceleration in the thermal breakthrough speed.
-
(3)
The influence of fracture width on this system and pressure appears to follow similar patterns. Excessive fracture width accelerates thermal breakthrough. As for the variation in output from the geothermal rock reservoir under different secondary fracture densities, increasing fracture density has a substantial impact on output wells when the fracture density itself is relatively low. However, as the number of fractures increases, the impact of increasing fracture density on the thermal power output of production wells stabilizes.
Abbreviations
- \({c}_{f}\) :
-
Specific heat capacity of the fluid medium, J/(kg·K)
- \({c}_{s}\) :
-
Specific heat capacity of the matrix rock mass, J/(kg·K)
- \({d}_{f}\) :
-
Width of the fracture, m
- e :
-
Volume strain of the matrix mass, 1
- \({F}_{i}:\) :
-
Physical force acting in the bedrock, N
- h :
-
Heat transfer coefficient between media, W/(m2·K)
- \({k}_{0}:\) :
-
Permeability coefficient of the fracture at \(\sigma_{n}{\prime} = 0\), m2
- \({k}_{f}\) :
-
Permeability coefficient of the fracture in the matrix rock, m2
- \({K}_{n}\) :
-
Normal stiffness of the crack, Pa/m
- \({K}_{s}\) :
-
Tangential stiffness of the crack, Pa/m
- Q :
-
Source-sink term of the seepage, kg/(m2 s)
- \({Q}_{f}\) :
-
Flow exchange between the fracture face and the matrix rock, kg/(m2·s)
- \({s}_{f}\) :
-
Water storage coefficient of the fracture, Pa−1
- S :
-
Water storage coefficient of the matrix, Pa−1
- t :
-
Time, s
- \({T}_{{\text{avg}}\left({\text{init}}\right)}\) :
-
Initial average temperature of the rock, K
- \({T}_{{\text{avg}}\left(t\right)}\) :
-
Average temperature of the rock at moment t, K
- \({T}_{f}\) :
-
Temperature of the fluid in the fracture, K
- \({T}_{s}\) :
-
Temperature field of the bedrock, K
- u :
-
Displacement, m
- \({u}_{f}\) :
-
Flow velocity of the fluid flowing along the fracture, m/s
- \(u_{n}\) :
-
Normal displacement of the crack, m
- \(u_{s}\) :
-
Tangential displacement of the crack, m
- \(V_{s}\) :
-
The volume of the rock, m3
- W :
-
External heat source term, W
- \(W_{f}\) :
-
Heat conducted at the fracture boundary through the matrix rock boundary to the fluid flowing in the fracture, W
- \(\alpha\) :
-
Influence coefficient, 1
- \(\alpha_{T}\) :
-
Thermal expansion coefficient of the bedrock, K−1
- \(\alpha_{B}\) :
-
Biot coupling coefficient, 1
- \(\eta\) :
-
Dynamic viscosity of the seepage medium, Pa·s
- \(\kappa\) :
-
Permeability of the matrix, m2
- \(\kappa_{f}\) :
-
Permeability of the fracture in the enhanced geothermal system, m2
- \(\lambda\) :
-
Lame constants, Pa
- \(\lambda_{s}\) :
-
Heat transfer coefficient of the matrix rock mass, W/(m·K)
- \(\lambda_{f}\) :
-
Coefficient of heat conduction of the fluid in the fracture, W/(m·K)
- \(\nu\) :
-
Lame constants, Pa
- \(\rho_{s}\) :
-
Density of the matrix rock mass, kg/m3
- \(\rho_{f}\) :
-
Density of the fluid flowing in the fracture, kg/m3
- \(\sigma_{ij}\) :
-
Tensor of the stress in the bedrock, Pa
- \(\sigma_{n}{\prime}\) :
-
Normal effective stresses at the boundary of the crack, Pa/m.
- \(\sigma_{s}{\prime}\) :
-
Tangential effective stresses at the boundary of the crack, Pa/m
References
Ashena R, Mohammad M, Siva K et al (2023) Investigating the effect of thermal conductivity on geothermal energy production at different circulation rates in an EGS abandoned case study. International Petroleum Technology Conference. https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-22762-EA
Baujard C, Rolin P, Dalmais E, Hehn R, Genter A (2021) Soultz-sous-Forets geothermal reservoir: structural model update and thermo-hydraulic numerical simulations based on three years of operation data. Geosciences 11(12):502. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11120502
Bower KM, Zyvoloski G (1997) A numerical model for thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling in fractured rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(8):1201–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0148-9062(97)00308-2
Cao W, Huang W, Jiang F (2016) A novel thermal-hydraulic-mechanical model for the enhanced geothermal system heat extraction. Int J Heat Mass Transf 100:661–671
Chen J, Jiang F (2015) Designing multi-well layout for enhanced geothermal system to better exploit hot dry rock geothermal energy. Renewable Energy 74:37–48
Chen BG, Song EX, Cheng XH (2014) Numerical calculation method for two-dimensional fractured rock mass seepage and heat transfer based on discrete fracture network model. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 33(01):43–51. https://doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.01.005
Fan DY, Sun H, Yao J et al (2018) An analytical thermo-hydraulic-mechanical coupled model for heat extraction from hot-dry rock reservoirs. J China Univ Pet (Edition of Natrual Science) 42(6):106–113. <Go to ISI>://CSCD:6402238
Genter A, Guillou-Frottier L, Feybesse JL et al (2003) Typology of potential hot fractured rock resources in Europe. Geothermics 32(4–6):701–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0375-6505(03)00065-8
Ghassemi A, Zhang Q (2004) A transient fictitious stress boundary element method for porothermoelastic media. Eng Anal Boundary Elem 28(11):1363–1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2004.05.003
Gringarten AC, Witherspoon PA, Ohnishi Y (1975) Theory of heat extraction from fractured hot dry rock. J Geophys Res 80(8):1120–1124. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB080i008p01120
Hu J, Su Z, Wu N et al (2014) Analysis of thermal flow coupled water-rock temperature field in enhanced geothermal systems. Prog Geophys 29(03):1391–1398
Jiang F, Luo L, Chen J (2013) A novel three-dimensional transientmodel for subsurface heat exchange in enhanced geothermal systems. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 41:57–62
Jiang F, Chen J, Huang W et al (2014) A three-dimensional transient model for EGS subsurface thermo-hydraulic process. Energy 72:300–310
Karastathis VK, Papoulia J, DiFiore B et al (2011) Deep structure investigations of the geothermal field of the North Euboean Gulf, Greece, using 3-D local earthquake tomography and Curie Point Depth analysis. J Volcanol Geoth Res 206(3–4):106–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2011.06.008
Lauwerier H (1955) The transport of heat in an oil layer caused by the injection of hot fluid. Appl Sci Res Sect A 5(2–3):145–150
Leon MA, Kumar S (2008) Design and performance evaluation of a solar-assisted biomass drying system with thermal storage. Drying Technol 26(7):936–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930802142812
Leung CTO, Zimmerman RW (2012) Estimating the hydraulic conductivity of two-dimensional fracture networks using network geometric properties. Transp Porous Media 93(3):777–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-012-9982-3
Li MT, Gou Y, Hou ZM, Were P (2015) Investigation of a new HDR system with horizontal wells and multiple fractures using the coupled wellbore-reservoir simulator TOUGH2MP-WELL/EOS3. Environ Earth Sci 73(10):6047–6058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4242-9
Li HY, Zhao S, Lin AD et al (2020) Analysis of global energy supply and demand in 2019: based on BP statistical review of world energy (2020). Nat Gas Oil 38(06):122–130
Li, ZY, Lei ZD, Shen WJ et al (2023) A comprehensive review of the oil flow mechanism and numerical simulations in shale oil reservoirs. Energies 16(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083516
Louis C (1974) Rock hydraulics in rack mechanics. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 287–299
Ma TR, Jiang LT, Shen WJ et al (2023) Fully coupled hydro-mechanical modeling of two-phase flow in deformable fractured porous media with discontinuous and continuous Galerkin method. Comput Geotech 164:105–123
Nowak T, Kunz H, Dixon D et al (2011) Coupled 3-D thermo-hydro-mechanical analysis of geotechnological in situ tests. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.11.002
Pruess K, Narasimhan TN (1985) A practical method for modeling fluid and heat-flow in fractured porous-media. Soc Petrol Eng J 25(1):14–26. https://doi.org/10.2118/10509-pa
Qu ZQ, Zhang W, Guo T (2017) Study on the influence of reservoir parameters and stratigraphic fractures on geothermal energy production BASED on COMSOL. Adv Geophys 32(06):2374–2382
Qu ZQ, Zhang W, Guo TK et al (2019) Simulation of heat extraction performance for fractured hot dry rock based on local thermal non-equilibrium. J China Univ Pet (edition of Natural Science) 43(01):90–98
Saeid S, Al-Khoury R, Nick H et al (2015) A prototype design model for deep low-enthalpy hydrothermal systems. Renewable Energy 77:408–422
Shaik AR, Rahman SS, Tran NH, Tran T (2011) Numerical simulation of Fluid-Rock coupling heat transfer in naturally fractured geothermal system. Appl Therm Eng 31(10):1600–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.01.038
Shen WJ, Ma TR, Li XZ et al (2022) Fully coupled modeling of two-phase fluid flow and geomechanics in ultra-deep natural gas reservoirs. Phys Fluids 34(4):043–067
Sun ZX, Xu Y, Lv SH et al (2016) Thermo-hydraulic coupling model and numerical simulation of enhanced geothermal systems. J China Univ Pet (edition of Natural Science) 40(06):109–117
Sun ZX, Zhang X, Xu Y et al (2017) Numerical simulation of the heat extraction in EGS with thermal-hydraulic-mechanical coupling method based on discrete fractures model. Energy 120:20–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.046
Tenma N, Yamaguchi T, Zyvoloski G (2008) The Hijiori Hot Dry Rock test site, Japan Evaluation and optimization of heat extraction from a two-layered reservoir. Geothermics 37(1):19–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2007.11.002
Xiao P, Yan FF, Dou B et al (2019) Numerical simulation of heat transfer process in enhanced geothermal systems with horizontal wells and parallel multiple fractures. Renewable Energy 37(07):1091–1099. https://doi.org/10.13941/j.cnki.21-1469/tk.2019.07.023
Zhou L, Hou M (2013) A new numerical 3D-model for simulation of hydraulic fracturing in consideration of hydro-mechanical coupling effects. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 60(2):370–380
Zhou Y, Rknd R, Graham J (1998) A coupled thermoporoelastic model with thermo-osmosis and thermal-filtration. Int J Solids Struct 35(34–35):4659–4683. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7683(98)00089-4
Zhu Q, Zhang J, Zhou Y (2019) Overview of development and power generation technologies for enhanced geothermal systems. Energy Sources a: Recovery Util Environ Eff 24(09):19–27
Funding
This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 12172362), the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) Innovation Found (2021DQ02-0204), and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences (NO. 2023024).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest in this work.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zeng, Z., Shen, W., Wang, M. et al. Numerical simulation of multi-field coupling in geothermal reservoir heat extraction of enhanced geothermal systems. J Petrol Explor Prod Technol 14, 1631–1642 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-024-01775-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-024-01775-x