Correction to: Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology (2021) 11:569–578 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-020-01073-2

In the original publication of the article, Table 2 and some of the figures (Figs. 8, 9) were incorrectly published, this has been corrected in this paper.

Table 2 Average values of some of the petrophysical parameters estimated
Fig. 8
figure 8

a AI–Porosity plot for Well D showing lithology distribution and fluid type distribution. Red colour shade = gas sands, blue colour shade = brine sands, and grey colour shade = shale. Insert colour bar-Gamma ray. Note The gas–brine boundary is the modified upper Hashin–Shtrikman bound line. b AI–Porosity plot for Well A showing lithology distribution and fluid type distribution. Red colour shade = gas sands, blue colour shade = brine sands, and grey colour shade = shale. Insert colour bar-Gamma ray. Note The gas–brine boundary is the modified upper Hashin–Shtrikman bound line. c AI–Porosity plot for Well C showing lithology distribution and fluid type distribution. Red colour shade = gas sands, blue colour shade = brine sands, and grey colour shade = shale. Insert colour bar-Gamma ray. Note The gas–brine boundary is the Hashin-Shtrikman bound line

Fig. 9
figure 9

A conceptual rock physics template model applicable for the study area showing lithologies and fluids as well as porosity trend lines